Performance-Comparison Projects in Local Government: Participants' Perspectives
How do officials of participating local governments assess the value of their involvement in performance-comparison projects, including related costs and benefits? In this article, three prominent projects involving city and county governments are examined from the perspective of the participants th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration review 2001-01, Vol.61 (1), p.100-110 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 110 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 100 |
| container_title | Public administration review |
| container_volume | 61 |
| creator | Ammons, David N. Coe, Charles Lombardo, Michael |
| description | How do officials of participating local governments assess the value of their involvement in performance-comparison projects, including related costs and benefits? In this article, three prominent projects involving city and county governments are examined from the perspective of the participants themselves, revealing gaps between high expectations and subsequent results, but nevertheless suggesting an array of benefits for participants. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/0033-3352.00009 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60134821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A75251358</galeid><jstor_id>977540</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A75251358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5069-b664b9f7c7f6665494d2e986cc651fbc66d3971c5a7ed6d36baec5662f66b33f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFv0zAUxi0EEmVw5sAl4gAXstlx_JJwqyrWTSqsYpvgZjnu8-SS2JmdDvbf4y6oSGgSzwdbfr_v85M-E_Ka0WOW6oRSznPORXFMUzVPyIyJkuZQMPqUzA7d5-RFjFtKWcHKekYu1hiMD71yGvOF7wcVbPQuWwe_RT3GzLps5bXqsqW_w-B6dOPHbK3CaLUdlBvj-yxZxCHB9g7jS_LMqC7iqz_7Ebk-_XS1OMtXF8vzxXyVa0GhyVuAsm1MpSsDAKJsyk2BTQ1ag2Cm1QAb3lRMC1XhJp2hVagFQJHwlnPDj8i7yXcI_naHcZS9jRq7Tjn0uyiBMl7WBUvg23_Ard8Fl2aTLL0ANRSQoA8TdKM6lNYZPwalb9BhUJ13aGy6nleiEIyLOuH5I3haG-ytfow_mXgdfIwBjRyC7VW4l4zKfXhyH4_cxyMfwkuKclL8TE73_8Pl-nr-dZK9mWTbOPpwkDVVlb7C37FtHPHXoavCDwkVr4T89mUpv8PlaV2eLeRn_huQMrKX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197168626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance-Comparison Projects in Local Government: Participants' Perspectives</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCO_Political Science Complete</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Ammons, David N. ; Coe, Charles ; Lombardo, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Ammons, David N. ; Coe, Charles ; Lombardo, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>How do officials of participating local governments assess the value of their involvement in performance-comparison projects, including related costs and benefits? In this article, three prominent projects involving city and county governments are examined from the perspective of the participants themselves, revealing gaps between high expectations and subsequent results, but nevertheless suggesting an array of benefits for participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBARBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Advantages ; Benchmarking ; Benchmarks ; Cities ; Community Relations ; Comparative Analysis ; Cost accounting ; Cost savings ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Effectiveness ; Evaluation ; Expectations ; Expenditures ; Government performance ; Innovation ; Jurisdiction ; Local Government ; Participation ; Performance appraisals ; Performance Measurement ; Performance metrics ; Police ; Pregnancy ; Projects ; Public administration ; Public sector ; Studies ; Unit costs ; United States</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 2001-01, Vol.61 (1), p.100-110</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 The American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>2001 by the American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2001 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Public Administration Jan/Feb 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5069-b664b9f7c7f6665494d2e986cc651fbc66d3971c5a7ed6d36baec5662f66b33f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/977540$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/977540$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,12845,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ammons, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coe, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardo, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Performance-Comparison Projects in Local Government: Participants' Perspectives</title><title>Public administration review</title><description>How do officials of participating local governments assess the value of their involvement in performance-comparison projects, including related costs and benefits? In this article, three prominent projects involving city and county governments are examined from the perspective of the participants themselves, revealing gaps between high expectations and subsequent results, but nevertheless suggesting an array of benefits for participants.</description><subject>Advantages</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Cost accounting</subject><subject>Cost savings</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Government performance</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Local Government</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Performance appraisals</subject><subject>Performance Measurement</subject><subject>Performance metrics</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Projects</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Unit costs</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksFv0zAUxi0EEmVw5sAl4gAXstlx_JJwqyrWTSqsYpvgZjnu8-SS2JmdDvbf4y6oSGgSzwdbfr_v85M-E_Ka0WOW6oRSznPORXFMUzVPyIyJkuZQMPqUzA7d5-RFjFtKWcHKekYu1hiMD71yGvOF7wcVbPQuWwe_RT3GzLps5bXqsqW_w-B6dOPHbK3CaLUdlBvj-yxZxCHB9g7jS_LMqC7iqz_7Ebk-_XS1OMtXF8vzxXyVa0GhyVuAsm1MpSsDAKJsyk2BTQ1ag2Cm1QAb3lRMC1XhJp2hVagFQJHwlnPDj8i7yXcI_naHcZS9jRq7Tjn0uyiBMl7WBUvg23_Ard8Fl2aTLL0ANRSQoA8TdKM6lNYZPwalb9BhUJ13aGy6nleiEIyLOuH5I3haG-ytfow_mXgdfIwBjRyC7VW4l4zKfXhyH4_cxyMfwkuKclL8TE73_8Pl-nr-dZK9mWTbOPpwkDVVlb7C37FtHPHXoavCDwkVr4T89mUpv8PlaV2eLeRn_huQMrKX</recordid><startdate>200101</startdate><enddate>200101</enddate><creator>Ammons, David N.</creator><creator>Coe, Charles</creator><creator>Lombardo, Michael</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200101</creationdate><title>Performance-Comparison Projects in Local Government: Participants' Perspectives</title><author>Ammons, David N. ; Coe, Charles ; Lombardo, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5069-b664b9f7c7f6665494d2e986cc651fbc66d3971c5a7ed6d36baec5662f66b33f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Advantages</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Cost accounting</topic><topic>Cost savings</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Government performance</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Local Government</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Performance appraisals</topic><topic>Performance Measurement</topic><topic>Performance metrics</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Projects</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Unit costs</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ammons, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coe, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardo, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ammons, David N.</au><au>Coe, Charles</au><au>Lombardo, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance-Comparison Projects in Local Government: Participants' Perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><date>2001-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>100-110</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><coden>PBARBM</coden><abstract>How do officials of participating local governments assess the value of their involvement in performance-comparison projects, including related costs and benefits? In this article, three prominent projects involving city and county governments are examined from the perspective of the participants themselves, revealing gaps between high expectations and subsequent results, but nevertheless suggesting an array of benefits for participants.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/0033-3352.00009</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-3352 |
| ispartof | Public administration review, 2001-01, Vol.61 (1), p.100-110 |
| issn | 0033-3352 1540-6210 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60134821 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Education Source (EBSCOhost); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; EBSCO_Political Science Complete; JSTOR |
| subjects | Advantages Benchmarking Benchmarks Cities Community Relations Comparative Analysis Cost accounting Cost savings Cost-Benefit Analysis Effectiveness Evaluation Expectations Expenditures Government performance Innovation Jurisdiction Local Government Participation Performance appraisals Performance Measurement Performance metrics Police Pregnancy Projects Public administration Public sector Studies Unit costs United States |
| title | Performance-Comparison Projects in Local Government: Participants' Perspectives |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance-Comparison%20Projects%20in%20Local%20Government:%20Participants'%20Perspectives&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Ammons,%20David%20N.&rft.date=2001-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=100-110&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft.coden=PBARBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0033-3352.00009&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA75251358%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197168626&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A75251358&rft_jstor_id=977540&rfr_iscdi=true |