Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded
This study used attribution theory to explain respondents' levels of support for the death penalty for juveniles, the mentally ill, and the mentally retarded via the administration of a quasi-experimental factorial survey to 697 subjects who were called for jury service. The results indicate th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Justice quarterly 2003-03, Vol.20 (1), p.65-93 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 93 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 65 |
| container_title | Justice quarterly |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Cochran, John K. Boots, Denise Paquette Heide, Kathleen M. |
| description | This study used attribution theory to explain respondents' levels of support for the death penalty for juveniles, the mentally ill, and the mentally retarded via the administration of a quasi-experimental factorial survey to 697 subjects who were called for jury service. The results indicate that the respondents with dispositional attribution styles were significantly more likely to recommend a death sentence than were those with situational attirbution styles. Moreover, the study found that the effects of a large number of the "known correlates" of support for the death penalty were fully or substantially mediated by attribution theory measures. The substantive, theoretical, methodological, and legal/policy implications of the study are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/07418820300095461 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60103447</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>332666461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e825bdb23cf7ed0a915ee8e87b3d2de90fe27c7f15f643b7ee2cd9ea8ac7f2413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFDEQgIMoOK7-AG_Bg6dtzasn3eBlWXzBghc9h3RSzWZIJ21S7ToH_7sZx4su6Kmoqu8riipCnnP2irOBvWZa8WEQTDLGxl7t-QOy41r13cjZ-JDsTv2uAf1j8qTWQ6M4F-OO_LhCLGHaMOREKx4jVGqTpxYx4OZbhvnOFk-dXQPaSNcthXq7QEI650IP2zdIoVmXFG-Bnuo2xiMNyeVlBWz55a-Bf3QLYJsJ_il5NNtY4dnveEG-vHv7-fpDd_Pp_cfrq5vOqf2AHbS9Jz8J6WYNntmR9wADDHqSXngY2QxCOz3zft4rOWkA4fwIdrCtKBSXF-Tlee5a8tcNKpolVAcx2gR5q2bPOJNK6Qa--As85K2ktpsRop1XS6kaxM-QK7nWArNZS1hsORrOzOkb5t43mvPm7ITUzrbYu1yiN2iPMZe52ORCNfJfuv6vfs8y-B3lT5unpZI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228207334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cochran, John K. ; Boots, Denise Paquette ; Heide, Kathleen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cochran, John K. ; Boots, Denise Paquette ; Heide, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study used attribution theory to explain respondents' levels of support for the death penalty for juveniles, the mentally ill, and the mentally retarded via the administration of a quasi-experimental factorial survey to 697 subjects who were called for jury service. The results indicate that the respondents with dispositional attribution styles were significantly more likely to recommend a death sentence than were those with situational attirbution styles. Moreover, the study found that the effects of a large number of the "known correlates" of support for the death penalty were fully or substantially mediated by attribution theory measures. The substantive, theoretical, methodological, and legal/policy implications of the study are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-8825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-9109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07418820300095461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Attribution ; Capital Punishment ; Criminal justice ; Juries ; Juvenile justice ; Juvenile Offenders ; Mental Illness ; Mental Patients ; Mentally Retarded ; Public Support</subject><ispartof>Justice quarterly, 2003-03, Vol.20 (1), p.65-93</ispartof><rights>Copyright Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences 2003</rights><rights>Copyright Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences Mar 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e825bdb23cf7ed0a915ee8e87b3d2de90fe27c7f15f643b7ee2cd9ea8ac7f2413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e825bdb23cf7ed0a915ee8e87b3d2de90fe27c7f15f643b7ee2cd9ea8ac7f2413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cochran, John K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boots, Denise Paquette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heide, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><title>Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded</title><title>Justice quarterly</title><description>This study used attribution theory to explain respondents' levels of support for the death penalty for juveniles, the mentally ill, and the mentally retarded via the administration of a quasi-experimental factorial survey to 697 subjects who were called for jury service. The results indicate that the respondents with dispositional attribution styles were significantly more likely to recommend a death sentence than were those with situational attirbution styles. Moreover, the study found that the effects of a large number of the "known correlates" of support for the death penalty were fully or substantially mediated by attribution theory measures. The substantive, theoretical, methodological, and legal/policy implications of the study are discussed.</description><subject>Attribution</subject><subject>Capital Punishment</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Juries</subject><subject>Juvenile justice</subject><subject>Juvenile Offenders</subject><subject>Mental Illness</subject><subject>Mental Patients</subject><subject>Mentally Retarded</subject><subject>Public Support</subject><issn>0741-8825</issn><issn>1745-9109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuLFDEQgIMoOK7-AG_Bg6dtzasn3eBlWXzBghc9h3RSzWZIJ21S7ToH_7sZx4su6Kmoqu8riipCnnP2irOBvWZa8WEQTDLGxl7t-QOy41r13cjZ-JDsTv2uAf1j8qTWQ6M4F-OO_LhCLGHaMOREKx4jVGqTpxYx4OZbhvnOFk-dXQPaSNcthXq7QEI650IP2zdIoVmXFG-Bnuo2xiMNyeVlBWz55a-Bf3QLYJsJ_il5NNtY4dnveEG-vHv7-fpDd_Pp_cfrq5vOqf2AHbS9Jz8J6WYNntmR9wADDHqSXngY2QxCOz3zft4rOWkA4fwIdrCtKBSXF-Tlee5a8tcNKpolVAcx2gR5q2bPOJNK6Qa--As85K2ktpsRop1XS6kaxM-QK7nWArNZS1hsORrOzOkb5t43mvPm7ITUzrbYu1yiN2iPMZe52ORCNfJfuv6vfs8y-B3lT5unpZI</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Cochran, John K.</creator><creator>Boots, Denise Paquette</creator><creator>Heide, Kathleen M.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded</title><author>Cochran, John K. ; Boots, Denise Paquette ; Heide, Kathleen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e825bdb23cf7ed0a915ee8e87b3d2de90fe27c7f15f643b7ee2cd9ea8ac7f2413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Attribution</topic><topic>Capital Punishment</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Juries</topic><topic>Juvenile justice</topic><topic>Juvenile Offenders</topic><topic>Mental Illness</topic><topic>Mental Patients</topic><topic>Mentally Retarded</topic><topic>Public Support</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cochran, John K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boots, Denise Paquette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heide, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Justice quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cochran, John K.</au><au>Boots, Denise Paquette</au><au>Heide, Kathleen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded</atitle><jtitle>Justice quarterly</jtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>65-93</pages><issn>0741-8825</issn><eissn>1745-9109</eissn><abstract>This study used attribution theory to explain respondents' levels of support for the death penalty for juveniles, the mentally ill, and the mentally retarded via the administration of a quasi-experimental factorial survey to 697 subjects who were called for jury service. The results indicate that the respondents with dispositional attribution styles were significantly more likely to recommend a death sentence than were those with situational attirbution styles. Moreover, the study found that the effects of a large number of the "known correlates" of support for the death penalty were fully or substantially mediated by attribution theory measures. The substantive, theoretical, methodological, and legal/policy implications of the study are discussed.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/07418820300095461</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0741-8825 |
| ispartof | Justice quarterly, 2003-03, Vol.20 (1), p.65-93 |
| issn | 0741-8825 1745-9109 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60103447 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Attribution Capital Punishment Criminal justice Juries Juvenile justice Juvenile Offenders Mental Illness Mental Patients Mentally Retarded Public Support |
| title | Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A11%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attribution%20styles%20and%20attitudes%20toward%20capital%20punishment%20for%20juveniles,%20the%20mentally%20incompetent,%20and%20the%20mentally%20retarded&rft.jtitle=Justice%20quarterly&rft.au=Cochran,%20John%20K.&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=65-93&rft.issn=0741-8825&rft.eissn=1745-9109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07418820300095461&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E332666461%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228207334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |