Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor
Time-diary data from representative samples of American adults show that the number of overall hours of domestic labor (excluding child care and shopping) has continued to decline steadily and predictably since 1965. This finding is mainly due to dramatic declines among women (both in and out of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social forces 2000-09, Vol.79 (1), p.191-228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 228 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Social forces |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Bianchi, Suzanne M. Milkie, Melissa A. Sayer, Liana C. Robinson, John P. |
description | Time-diary data from representative samples of American adults show that the number of overall hours of domestic labor (excluding child care and shopping) has continued to decline steadily and predictably since 1965. This finding is mainly due to dramatic declines among women (both in and out of the paid labor market), who have cut their housework hours almost in half since the 1960s: about half of women's 12-hour-per-week decline can be accounted for by compositional shifts-such as increased labor force participation, later marriage, and fewer children. In contrast, men's housework time has almost doubled during this period (to the point where men were responsible for a third of housework in the 1990s), and only about 15% of their five-hour-per-week increase can be attributed to compositional factors. Parallel results on gender differences in housework were obtained from the National Survey of Families and Households estimate data, even though these produce figures 50% higher than diary data. Regression results examining factors related to wives' and husbands' housework hours show more support for the time-availability and relative-resource models of household production than for the gender perspective, although there is some support for the latter perspective as well. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/sf/79.1.191 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60098180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A66274516</galeid><jstor_id>2675569</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/sf/79.1.191</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A66274516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7061-4b1290f80aa7e728f7fb95bbd546bfa374ad42639539d8b392605a85b4fb06fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0k2LEzEYB_BBFKyrJ7_AoCKCO928v5yW0mpbLPawq8heQmYm6aY7ndRkqu63N7XiWql0ySEk-RH-T_Jk2XMI-hBIfBbtGZd92IcSPsh6kGJScAbow6wHAOYF5xg9zp7EuAQAQEJEL5tPYz5ob31r8pF37SLvrk0-8Ztovvtwc55fBtPWMXftr4NxWpiQj9w3F51vc2939to3dT7TpQ9Ps0dWN9E8-z2fZJ_ev7scTorZfDwdDmZFxQGDBSkhksAKoDU3HAnLbSlpWdaUsNJqzImuCWJYUixrUWKJUhla0JLYEjBb4pPs9e7edfBfNyZ2auViZZpGtyYlUgwAKaAARyHlmCHM2FGIhYQIEZLgi3_g0m9Cm6pVCEnBBJE4oZf_Q9vKpcQpW1KnO7XQjVGutb4LulqY1gTdpD-xLm0PGEOcULiNWBzgadRm5apD_s2eT6QzP7qF3sSophcf703nn-9LxXi2R08P0co3jVkYlTpiON_jb3e8Cj7GYKxaB7fS4VZBoLYNrqJVXCqoUoPffZjfrI_AVzu4jJ0Pf1OEAVeIcUqZvHtdF1PIP0yHG8U45lRNvlypD3woRlcXMwXwT2aVDSk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229868493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Bianchi, Suzanne M. ; Milkie, Melissa A. ; Sayer, Liana C. ; Robinson, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Suzanne M. ; Milkie, Melissa A. ; Sayer, Liana C. ; Robinson, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>Time-diary data from representative samples of American adults show that the number of overall hours of domestic labor (excluding child care and shopping) has continued to decline steadily and predictably since 1965. This finding is mainly due to dramatic declines among women (both in and out of the paid labor market), who have cut their housework hours almost in half since the 1960s: about half of women's 12-hour-per-week decline can be accounted for by compositional shifts-such as increased labor force participation, later marriage, and fewer children. In contrast, men's housework time has almost doubled during this period (to the point where men were responsible for a third of housework in the 1990s), and only about 15% of their five-hour-per-week increase can be attributed to compositional factors. Parallel results on gender differences in housework were obtained from the National Survey of Families and Households estimate data, even though these produce figures 50% higher than diary data. Regression results examining factors related to wives' and husbands' housework hours show more support for the time-availability and relative-resource models of household production than for the gender perspective, although there is some support for the latter perspective as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-7732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/sf/79.1.191</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOFOAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chapel Hill, N.C: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Adults ; Bachelors degrees ; Child care ; Child care services ; Children ; Cleaning ; Correlation analysis ; Division of labour ; Domestic service ; Employment ; Females ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; Gender differentiation ; Gender roles ; Home economics ; Households ; Housekeeping ; Housework ; Husbands ; Labor force participation ; Labor market ; Labour ; Labour market ; Males ; Marriage ; Men ; Sex Differences ; Sexual Division of Labor ; Social aspects ; Social conditions & trends ; Temporal dimension ; Time Utilization ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; USA ; Wives ; Working hours ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Social forces, 2000-09, Vol.79 (1), p.191-228</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 The University of North Carolina Press</rights><rights>Copyright © 2000 The University of North Carolina Press 2000</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright University of North Carolina Press Sep 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7061-4b1290f80aa7e728f7fb95bbd546bfa374ad42639539d8b392605a85b4fb06fb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2675569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2675569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1583,12843,27342,27867,27922,27923,30998,33772,33773,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milkie, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayer, Liana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor</title><title>Social forces</title><addtitle>Social Forces</addtitle><addtitle>Social Forces</addtitle><description>Time-diary data from representative samples of American adults show that the number of overall hours of domestic labor (excluding child care and shopping) has continued to decline steadily and predictably since 1965. This finding is mainly due to dramatic declines among women (both in and out of the paid labor market), who have cut their housework hours almost in half since the 1960s: about half of women's 12-hour-per-week decline can be accounted for by compositional shifts-such as increased labor force participation, later marriage, and fewer children. In contrast, men's housework time has almost doubled during this period (to the point where men were responsible for a third of housework in the 1990s), and only about 15% of their five-hour-per-week increase can be attributed to compositional factors. Parallel results on gender differences in housework were obtained from the National Survey of Families and Households estimate data, even though these produce figures 50% higher than diary data. Regression results examining factors related to wives' and husbands' housework hours show more support for the time-availability and relative-resource models of household production than for the gender perspective, although there is some support for the latter perspective as well.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Bachelors degrees</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child care services</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Division of labour</subject><subject>Domestic service</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differentiation</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Home economics</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housekeeping</subject><subject>Housework</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Labor force participation</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labour</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Sexual Division of Labor</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social conditions & trends</subject><subject>Temporal dimension</subject><subject>Time Utilization</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Wives</subject><subject>Working hours</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>0037-7732</issn><issn>1534-7605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0k2LEzEYB_BBFKyrJ7_AoCKCO928v5yW0mpbLPawq8heQmYm6aY7ndRkqu63N7XiWql0ySEk-RH-T_Jk2XMI-hBIfBbtGZd92IcSPsh6kGJScAbow6wHAOYF5xg9zp7EuAQAQEJEL5tPYz5ob31r8pF37SLvrk0-8Ztovvtwc55fBtPWMXftr4NxWpiQj9w3F51vc2939to3dT7TpQ9Ps0dWN9E8-z2fZJ_ev7scTorZfDwdDmZFxQGDBSkhksAKoDU3HAnLbSlpWdaUsNJqzImuCWJYUixrUWKJUhla0JLYEjBb4pPs9e7edfBfNyZ2auViZZpGtyYlUgwAKaAARyHlmCHM2FGIhYQIEZLgi3_g0m9Cm6pVCEnBBJE4oZf_Q9vKpcQpW1KnO7XQjVGutb4LulqY1gTdpD-xLm0PGEOcULiNWBzgadRm5apD_s2eT6QzP7qF3sSophcf703nn-9LxXi2R08P0co3jVkYlTpiON_jb3e8Cj7GYKxaB7fS4VZBoLYNrqJVXCqoUoPffZjfrI_AVzu4jJ0Pf1OEAVeIcUqZvHtdF1PIP0yHG8U45lRNvlypD3woRlcXMwXwT2aVDSk</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Bianchi, Suzanne M.</creator><creator>Milkie, Melissa A.</creator><creator>Sayer, Liana C.</creator><creator>Robinson, John P.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of North Carolina Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor</title><author>Bianchi, Suzanne M. ; Milkie, Melissa A. ; Sayer, Liana C. ; Robinson, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c7061-4b1290f80aa7e728f7fb95bbd546bfa374ad42639539d8b392605a85b4fb06fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Bachelors degrees</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child care services</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Division of labour</topic><topic>Domestic service</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differentiation</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Home economics</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housekeeping</topic><topic>Housework</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Labor force participation</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labour</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Sexual Division of Labor</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social conditions & trends</topic><topic>Temporal dimension</topic><topic>Time Utilization</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Wives</topic><topic>Working hours</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milkie, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayer, Liana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Social forces</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bianchi, Suzanne M.</au><au>Milkie, Melissa A.</au><au>Sayer, Liana C.</au><au>Robinson, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor</atitle><jtitle>Social forces</jtitle><stitle>Social Forces</stitle><addtitle>Social Forces</addtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>191-228</pages><issn>0037-7732</issn><eissn>1534-7605</eissn><coden>SOFOAP</coden><abstract>Time-diary data from representative samples of American adults show that the number of overall hours of domestic labor (excluding child care and shopping) has continued to decline steadily and predictably since 1965. This finding is mainly due to dramatic declines among women (both in and out of the paid labor market), who have cut their housework hours almost in half since the 1960s: about half of women's 12-hour-per-week decline can be accounted for by compositional shifts-such as increased labor force participation, later marriage, and fewer children. In contrast, men's housework time has almost doubled during this period (to the point where men were responsible for a third of housework in the 1990s), and only about 15% of their five-hour-per-week increase can be attributed to compositional factors. Parallel results on gender differences in housework were obtained from the National Survey of Families and Households estimate data, even though these produce figures 50% higher than diary data. Regression results examining factors related to wives' and husbands' housework hours show more support for the time-availability and relative-resource models of household production than for the gender perspective, although there is some support for the latter perspective as well.</abstract><cop>Chapel Hill, N.C</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1093/sf/79.1.191</doi><tpages>38</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0037-7732 |
ispartof | Social forces, 2000-09, Vol.79 (1), p.191-228 |
issn | 0037-7732 1534-7605 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60098180 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Adults Bachelors degrees Child care Child care services Children Cleaning Correlation analysis Division of labour Domestic service Employment Females Gender Gender aspects Gender differentiation Gender roles Home economics Households Housekeeping Housework Husbands Labor force participation Labor market Labour Labour market Males Marriage Men Sex Differences Sexual Division of Labor Social aspects Social conditions & trends Temporal dimension Time Utilization U.S.A United States of America USA Wives Working hours Working women |
title | Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A00%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Anyone%20Doing%20the%20Housework?%20Trends%20in%20the%20Gender%20Division%20of%20Household%20Labor&rft.jtitle=Social%20forces&rft.au=Bianchi,%20Suzanne%20M.&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=191-228&rft.issn=0037-7732&rft.eissn=1534-7605&rft.coden=SOFOAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/sf/79.1.191&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA66274516%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229868493&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A66274516&rft_jstor_id=2675569&rft_oup_id=10.1093/sf/79.1.191&rfr_iscdi=true |