A ‘Hard-Boiled Order’: The Reeducation of Disabled WWI Veterans in New York City

As a group, the disabled veterans of the First World War made unique demands upon the United States government. Veterans and policymakers alike believed that wounded soldiers were especially entitled to public assistance and, for the first time in United States history, expected those disabled by th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of social history 2005-09, Vol.39 (1), p.161-180
1. Verfasser: Gelber, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 180
container_issue 1
container_start_page 161
container_title Journal of social history
container_volume 39
creator Gelber, Scott
description As a group, the disabled veterans of the First World War made unique demands upon the United States government. Veterans and policymakers alike believed that wounded soldiers were especially entitled to public assistance and, for the first time in United States history, expected those disabled by the war to contribute their labor power to the postwar economy. While veterans and public officials agreed that disabled soldiers could become economically self-sufficient after completing courses in vocational reeducation, federal policy was vague about whether veterans would be allowed to select their path of vocational rehabilitation. Using the New York City district of the Federal Board for Vocational Education (FBVE) as a case study, this article analyzes discrepancies between veteran and official visions of educational entitlement. In the process, the article illuminates the nation's conflicting commitments to democracy and social efficiency in the Progressive era. While the disabled veterans of WWI were often disappointed by the manner in which the U.S. government responded to their demands, their postwar activism foreshadowed the platform of the modern disability rights movement and contributed to the development of the GI Bill.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/jsh.2005.0101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60097532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A137553939</galeid><jstor_id>3790534</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1353/jsh.2005.0101</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A137553939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c782t-c97ee22f00ec38bcfb3cc251660177f5c72fae7f1f948603d93ef34c44aa47613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN001v0zAYB_AIgUQpHLlxiDigcUjxSxzH3LoCTaWyiq2swMVy3SddujQudiLYbR8Dvt4-CQ5FhaFKq3zwIb_H8WP7HwRPMephyuirlbvoEYRYD2GE7wUdzAiPcCr4_aCDECFRzIh4GDxyboUQwjwRnWDaD2-uf2TKLqJjU5SwCCd2Afbm-ufrcHoB4SnAotGqLkwVmjx8Uzg1b9VsNgrPoQarKhcWVXgC38LPxl6Gg6K-ehw8yFXp4MmfuRt8fPd2Osii8WQ4GvTHkeYpqSMtOAAhOUKgaTrX-ZxqTRhOEr85njPNSa6A5zgXcZoguhAUchrrOFYq5gmm3eDFdt2NNV8bcLVcF05DWaoKTONkgpDgjJI7IU0JStjvFZ__B1emsZVvQmKRCsoYSj2KtmipSpBFlZvaKr2Eyp9GaSrI_TnKPqacMSr86Aa9Pd6PBawLvbfg5a0Cb2r4Xi9V45wcnZ0cbifnh9v3s8NtNjrcHg8PtulwfNtG-6w2ZQlLkP4tDSZ7vbbGOQu53NhireyVxEi2EZE-IrKNiGwj4n28u-0V6HrdOPjnwlPOEi7P2hi1KULM1yQ48WVH2zLTbO78w7MtXbna2B2mXCBG478bLpxvbPdZ2UuZcN-WzD59kdngw_A0E5kU9BfnYTDb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198935508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A ‘Hard-Boiled Order’: The Reeducation of Disabled WWI Veterans in New York City</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Gelber, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Gelber, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>As a group, the disabled veterans of the First World War made unique demands upon the United States government. Veterans and policymakers alike believed that wounded soldiers were especially entitled to public assistance and, for the first time in United States history, expected those disabled by the war to contribute their labor power to the postwar economy. While veterans and public officials agreed that disabled soldiers could become economically self-sufficient after completing courses in vocational reeducation, federal policy was vague about whether veterans would be allowed to select their path of vocational rehabilitation. Using the New York City district of the Federal Board for Vocational Education (FBVE) as a case study, this article analyzes discrepancies between veteran and official visions of educational entitlement. In the process, the article illuminates the nation's conflicting commitments to democracy and social efficiency in the Progressive era. While the disabled veterans of WWI were often disappointed by the manner in which the U.S. government responded to their demands, their postwar activism foreshadowed the platform of the modern disability rights movement and contributed to the development of the GI Bill.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1897</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/jsh.2005.0101</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSHTAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Activism ; Analysis ; Armed forces ; Case studies ; Citizenship ; Democracy ; Disabilities ; Disability ; Education ; Government ; Government programmes ; Government regulation ; Handicapped ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Military personnel ; Military training ; New York City, New York ; Patriotism ; People with disabilities ; Political activity ; Public assistance programs ; Public officials ; Rehabilitation ; Retraining ; Social aspects ; Social history ; Social welfare ; Soldiers ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; Veterans ; Vocational Education ; Vocational Rehabilitation ; War ; War wounded ; World War I ; World War One ; World wars</subject><ispartof>Journal of social history, 2005-09, Vol.39 (1), p.161-180</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Peter N. Stearns</rights><rights>2005 by Peter N. Stearns 2005</rights><rights>Copyright © 2005 Peter N. Stearns.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Peter N. Stearns Fall 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c782t-c97ee22f00ec38bcfb3cc251660177f5c72fae7f1f948603d93ef34c44aa47613</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3790534$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3790534$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27342,27922,27923,33772,33773,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gelber, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>A ‘Hard-Boiled Order’: The Reeducation of Disabled WWI Veterans in New York City</title><title>Journal of social history</title><addtitle>Journal of Social History</addtitle><addtitle>Journal of Social History</addtitle><description>As a group, the disabled veterans of the First World War made unique demands upon the United States government. Veterans and policymakers alike believed that wounded soldiers were especially entitled to public assistance and, for the first time in United States history, expected those disabled by the war to contribute their labor power to the postwar economy. While veterans and public officials agreed that disabled soldiers could become economically self-sufficient after completing courses in vocational reeducation, federal policy was vague about whether veterans would be allowed to select their path of vocational rehabilitation. Using the New York City district of the Federal Board for Vocational Education (FBVE) as a case study, this article analyzes discrepancies between veteran and official visions of educational entitlement. In the process, the article illuminates the nation's conflicting commitments to democracy and social efficiency in the Progressive era. While the disabled veterans of WWI were often disappointed by the manner in which the U.S. government responded to their demands, their postwar activism foreshadowed the platform of the modern disability rights movement and contributed to the development of the GI Bill.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government programmes</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Handicapped</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Military personnel</subject><subject>Military training</subject><subject>New York City, New York</subject><subject>Patriotism</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Political activity</subject><subject>Public assistance programs</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Retraining</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social history</subject><subject>Social welfare</subject><subject>Soldiers</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><subject>Vocational Education</subject><subject>Vocational Rehabilitation</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>War wounded</subject><subject>World War I</subject><subject>World War One</subject><subject>World wars</subject><issn>0022-4529</issn><issn>1527-1897</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNqN001v0zAYB_AIgUQpHLlxiDigcUjxSxzH3LoCTaWyiq2swMVy3SddujQudiLYbR8Dvt4-CQ5FhaFKq3zwIb_H8WP7HwRPMephyuirlbvoEYRYD2GE7wUdzAiPcCr4_aCDECFRzIh4GDxyboUQwjwRnWDaD2-uf2TKLqJjU5SwCCd2Afbm-ufrcHoB4SnAotGqLkwVmjx8Uzg1b9VsNgrPoQarKhcWVXgC38LPxl6Gg6K-ehw8yFXp4MmfuRt8fPd2Osii8WQ4GvTHkeYpqSMtOAAhOUKgaTrX-ZxqTRhOEr85njPNSa6A5zgXcZoguhAUchrrOFYq5gmm3eDFdt2NNV8bcLVcF05DWaoKTONkgpDgjJI7IU0JStjvFZ__B1emsZVvQmKRCsoYSj2KtmipSpBFlZvaKr2Eyp9GaSrI_TnKPqacMSr86Aa9Pd6PBawLvbfg5a0Cb2r4Xi9V45wcnZ0cbifnh9v3s8NtNjrcHg8PtulwfNtG-6w2ZQlLkP4tDSZ7vbbGOQu53NhireyVxEi2EZE-IrKNiGwj4n28u-0V6HrdOPjnwlPOEi7P2hi1KULM1yQ48WVH2zLTbO78w7MtXbna2B2mXCBG478bLpxvbPdZ2UuZcN-WzD59kdngw_A0E5kU9BfnYTDb</recordid><startdate>20050922</startdate><enddate>20050922</enddate><creator>Gelber, Scott</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>George Mason University</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>IMW</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050922</creationdate><title>A ‘Hard-Boiled Order’: The Reeducation of Disabled WWI Veterans in New York City</title><author>Gelber, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c782t-c97ee22f00ec38bcfb3cc251660177f5c72fae7f1f948603d93ef34c44aa47613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government programmes</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Handicapped</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Military personnel</topic><topic>Military training</topic><topic>New York City, New York</topic><topic>Patriotism</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Political activity</topic><topic>Public assistance programs</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Retraining</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social history</topic><topic>Social welfare</topic><topic>Soldiers</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><topic>Vocational Education</topic><topic>Vocational Rehabilitation</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>War wounded</topic><topic>World War I</topic><topic>World War One</topic><topic>World wars</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gelber, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: World History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of social history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gelber, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A ‘Hard-Boiled Order’: The Reeducation of Disabled WWI Veterans in New York City</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social history</jtitle><stitle>Journal of Social History</stitle><addtitle>Journal of Social History</addtitle><date>2005-09-22</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>161-180</pages><issn>0022-4529</issn><eissn>1527-1897</eissn><coden>JSHTAD</coden><abstract>As a group, the disabled veterans of the First World War made unique demands upon the United States government. Veterans and policymakers alike believed that wounded soldiers were especially entitled to public assistance and, for the first time in United States history, expected those disabled by the war to contribute their labor power to the postwar economy. While veterans and public officials agreed that disabled soldiers could become economically self-sufficient after completing courses in vocational reeducation, federal policy was vague about whether veterans would be allowed to select their path of vocational rehabilitation. Using the New York City district of the Federal Board for Vocational Education (FBVE) as a case study, this article analyzes discrepancies between veteran and official visions of educational entitlement. In the process, the article illuminates the nation's conflicting commitments to democracy and social efficiency in the Progressive era. While the disabled veterans of WWI were often disappointed by the manner in which the U.S. government responded to their demands, their postwar activism foreshadowed the platform of the modern disability rights movement and contributed to the development of the GI Bill.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/jsh.2005.0101</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4529
ispartof Journal of social history, 2005-09, Vol.39 (1), p.161-180
issn 0022-4529
1527-1897
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60097532
source Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Activism
Analysis
Armed forces
Case studies
Citizenship
Democracy
Disabilities
Disability
Education
Government
Government programmes
Government regulation
Handicapped
Laws, regulations and rules
Military personnel
Military training
New York City, New York
Patriotism
People with disabilities
Political activity
Public assistance programs
Public officials
Rehabilitation
Retraining
Social aspects
Social history
Social welfare
Soldiers
U.S.A
United States of America
Veterans
Vocational Education
Vocational Rehabilitation
War
War wounded
World War I
World War One
World wars
title A ‘Hard-Boiled Order’: The Reeducation of Disabled WWI Veterans in New York City
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A10%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20%E2%80%98Hard-Boiled%20Order%E2%80%99:%20The%20Reeducation%20of%20Disabled%20WWI%20Veterans%20in%20New%20York%20City&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20history&rft.au=Gelber,%20Scott&rft.date=2005-09-22&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=161-180&rft.issn=0022-4529&rft.eissn=1527-1897&rft.coden=JSHTAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/jsh.2005.0101&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA137553939%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198935508&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A137553939&rft_jstor_id=3790534&rft_oup_id=10.1353/jsh.2005.0101&rfr_iscdi=true