The Changing Social Stratification of the South

The analysis is subdivided into 3 periods of time: (1) the yrs of recovery from the Civil War & of southern backwardness, (2) the depression of 1929 & the New Deal, & (3) the period of rapid industrialization & prosperity which began in 1940. Discussion centers mainly on quantitative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social forces 1959-10, Vol.38 (1), p.42-50
1. Verfasser: Heberle, Rudolf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 42
container_title Social forces
container_volume 38
creator Heberle, Rudolf
description The analysis is subdivided into 3 periods of time: (1) the yrs of recovery from the Civil War & of southern backwardness, (2) the depression of 1929 & the New Deal, & (3) the period of rapid industrialization & prosperity which began in 1940. Discussion centers mainly on quantitative changes within a given kind of stratification system. 3 types of social strata are distinguished: castes, estates, & SC's. Southern plantations were from the beginning capitalistic enterprises. Whether in America or elsewhere in the world, wherever this kind of large-scale agri'al enterprise developed, a class of landless agric'al workers will be found. Thus, in contrast to other regions of the US, southern society has been from the beginning definitely & conspicuously stratified. Planters held highest prestige. Southern society at this time would have been a typical capitalistic class society had there not been the large pop of Negroes & mixed breeds who had a diff legal status. Southern planters began as entrepreneurs but under the force of circumstances developed traits of an aristocratic way of life & mentality. Emancipation transformed most Negroes into a class of wage earners, the peers & competitors of the white wage laborers. After a brief period of pol'al equality, Negroes were reduced again to a subordinate soc position, but not within a true caste system. Regarding changes in the stratification of the white pop after the Civil War: (1) the planter class, which reconsolidated itself, seems to have been remarkably stable with but little circulation among the postwar elite: (2) Out of the poorer yeoman farmer class developed a white tenant & share-cropper class; (3) In cities & towns there arose a new & growing class of supply merchants & bankers with considerable econ power;(4) In the major cities & in favorably located communities there came into existence a broader class of industrial entrepreneurs; & (5) workers in the skilled jobs were predominantly white, whereas Negroes were employed mainly in unskilled, dirty jobs. Changes in the soc stratification of the South during the past 25 yrs are a continuation of previous trends: (a) The quantitative significance of the planter class has declined; (b) Share-tenants are being replaced by wage laborers, & the once rigid class distinction between planter & poor white is being levelled off; (d) a new econ SC of top executives & managers is growing; (e) white collar workers are increasing considerably; & (6) the new type of
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2574015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60096441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2574015</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2574015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b8abaf955503794ca2b121a82d4ab6c7487b36b2fbdc24e4932d80784df7acb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oUFRU9r87nZHKXY1lLw0CriJSRptt263dQkC_rv3bLFgwedw8zlYYZ5AbhE8A4TyAeYcQoROwI9xAhNeQbZMehBSHjKOcGn4CyEDYQQUZr3wGCxtslwrepVWa-SuTOlqpJ59CqWRWna7urEFUls1dw1cX0OTgpVBXtxmH3wPHpYDCfp7Gn8OLyfpYaSLKY6V1oVgjHW3hXUKKwRRirHS6p0ZjjNuSaZxoVeGkwtFQQvc8hzuiy4MpqTPrjp9u68-2hsiHJbBmOrStXWNUFmEIqMUvQvZALmiELWwqtfcOMaX7dPSIQFFG3h_brbThnvQvC2kDtfbpX_kgjKfb7ykG8rrzu5CdH5P1jasTJE-_nDlH-XGSecycnrmxwjMZ3mo7F8Id_DN4Qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290999921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Changing Social Stratification of the South</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Heberle, Rudolf</creator><creatorcontrib>Heberle, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The analysis is subdivided into 3 periods of time: (1) the yrs of recovery from the Civil War & of southern backwardness, (2) the depression of 1929 & the New Deal, & (3) the period of rapid industrialization & prosperity which began in 1940. Discussion centers mainly on quantitative changes within a given kind of stratification system. 3 types of social strata are distinguished: castes, estates, & SC's. Southern plantations were from the beginning capitalistic enterprises. Whether in America or elsewhere in the world, wherever this kind of large-scale agri'al enterprise developed, a class of landless agric'al workers will be found. Thus, in contrast to other regions of the US, southern society has been from the beginning definitely & conspicuously stratified. Planters held highest prestige. Southern society at this time would have been a typical capitalistic class society had there not been the large pop of Negroes & mixed breeds who had a diff legal status. Southern planters began as entrepreneurs but under the force of circumstances developed traits of an aristocratic way of life & mentality. Emancipation transformed most Negroes into a class of wage earners, the peers & competitors of the white wage laborers. After a brief period of pol'al equality, Negroes were reduced again to a subordinate soc position, but not within a true caste system. Regarding changes in the stratification of the white pop after the Civil War: (1) the planter class, which reconsolidated itself, seems to have been remarkably stable with but little circulation among the postwar elite: (2) Out of the poorer yeoman farmer class developed a white tenant & share-cropper class; (3) In cities & towns there arose a new & growing class of supply merchants & bankers with considerable econ power;(4) In the major cities & in favorably located communities there came into existence a broader class of industrial entrepreneurs; & (5) workers in the skilled jobs were predominantly white, whereas Negroes were employed mainly in unskilled, dirty jobs. Changes in the soc stratification of the South during the past 25 yrs are a continuation of previous trends: (a) The quantitative significance of the planter class has declined; (b) Share-tenants are being replaced by wage laborers, & the once rigid class distinction between planter & poor white is being levelled off; (d) a new econ SC of top executives & managers is growing; (e) white collar workers are increasing considerably; & (6) the new type of industrial worker is in many respects diff from the textile-mill hand & sawmill worker who once were typical of southern labor. The class structure of the South has become more similar to that of the remainder of the US. The relatively simple stratification of an agrarian society has been replaced by the more complex stratification of an urbanized industrial society. Diff in SM between North & South have been levelled off. For the Negroes, the chances of upward SM are still limited, but they have developed a class system of their own which, except for diff in relative proportions in various strata, is a replica of the white class system. Possibly the very changes discussed have had the effect of toning down what consciousness of class existed in the past. Indications are that pol'al decisions are determined by class interests. Consciousness of class seems to be competing with the will to maintain white solidarity which formed the basis of the power-monopoly of the Democratic Party. H. K. Schwarzweller.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-7732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2574015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chapel Hill, N.C: The University of North Carolina Press</publisher><subject>Aristocracy ; Black White Relations ; Class Consciousness ; Corporations ; Crop economics ; Crops ; Entrepreneurs ; Industrialization ; Plantations ; Prestige ; Slaves ; Social conditions ; Social Development ; Social status ; Social Stratification ; Social Structure ; Southern States ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Social forces, 1959-10, Vol.38 (1), p.42-50</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1959 The Williams and Wilkins Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b8abaf955503794ca2b121a82d4ab6c7487b36b2fbdc24e4932d80784df7acb73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2574015$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2574015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27869,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heberle, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><title>The Changing Social Stratification of the South</title><title>Social forces</title><addtitle>Social Forces</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The analysis is subdivided into 3 periods of time: (1) the yrs of recovery from the Civil War & of southern backwardness, (2) the depression of 1929 & the New Deal, & (3) the period of rapid industrialization & prosperity which began in 1940. Discussion centers mainly on quantitative changes within a given kind of stratification system. 3 types of social strata are distinguished: castes, estates, & SC's. Southern plantations were from the beginning capitalistic enterprises. Whether in America or elsewhere in the world, wherever this kind of large-scale agri'al enterprise developed, a class of landless agric'al workers will be found. Thus, in contrast to other regions of the US, southern society has been from the beginning definitely & conspicuously stratified. Planters held highest prestige. Southern society at this time would have been a typical capitalistic class society had there not been the large pop of Negroes & mixed breeds who had a diff legal status. Southern planters began as entrepreneurs but under the force of circumstances developed traits of an aristocratic way of life & mentality. Emancipation transformed most Negroes into a class of wage earners, the peers & competitors of the white wage laborers. After a brief period of pol'al equality, Negroes were reduced again to a subordinate soc position, but not within a true caste system. Regarding changes in the stratification of the white pop after the Civil War: (1) the planter class, which reconsolidated itself, seems to have been remarkably stable with but little circulation among the postwar elite: (2) Out of the poorer yeoman farmer class developed a white tenant & share-cropper class; (3) In cities & towns there arose a new & growing class of supply merchants & bankers with considerable econ power;(4) In the major cities & in favorably located communities there came into existence a broader class of industrial entrepreneurs; & (5) workers in the skilled jobs were predominantly white, whereas Negroes were employed mainly in unskilled, dirty jobs. Changes in the soc stratification of the South during the past 25 yrs are a continuation of previous trends: (a) The quantitative significance of the planter class has declined; (b) Share-tenants are being replaced by wage laborers, & the once rigid class distinction between planter & poor white is being levelled off; (d) a new econ SC of top executives & managers is growing; (e) white collar workers are increasing considerably; & (6) the new type of industrial worker is in many respects diff from the textile-mill hand & sawmill worker who once were typical of southern labor. The class structure of the South has become more similar to that of the remainder of the US. The relatively simple stratification of an agrarian society has been replaced by the more complex stratification of an urbanized industrial society. Diff in SM between North & South have been levelled off. For the Negroes, the chances of upward SM are still limited, but they have developed a class system of their own which, except for diff in relative proportions in various strata, is a replica of the white class system. Possibly the very changes discussed have had the effect of toning down what consciousness of class existed in the past. Indications are that pol'al decisions are determined by class interests. Consciousness of class seems to be competing with the will to maintain white solidarity which formed the basis of the power-monopoly of the Democratic Party. H. K. Schwarzweller.]]></description><subject>Aristocracy</subject><subject>Black White Relations</subject><subject>Class Consciousness</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Crop economics</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Industrialization</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><subject>Slaves</subject><subject>Social conditions</subject><subject>Social Development</subject><subject>Social status</subject><subject>Social Stratification</subject><subject>Social Structure</subject><subject>Southern States</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0037-7732</issn><issn>1534-7605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1959</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OU</sourceid><sourceid>~OW</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oUFRU9r87nZHKXY1lLw0CriJSRptt263dQkC_rv3bLFgwedw8zlYYZ5AbhE8A4TyAeYcQoROwI9xAhNeQbZMehBSHjKOcGn4CyEDYQQUZr3wGCxtslwrepVWa-SuTOlqpJ59CqWRWna7urEFUls1dw1cX0OTgpVBXtxmH3wPHpYDCfp7Gn8OLyfpYaSLKY6V1oVgjHW3hXUKKwRRirHS6p0ZjjNuSaZxoVeGkwtFQQvc8hzuiy4MpqTPrjp9u68-2hsiHJbBmOrStXWNUFmEIqMUvQvZALmiELWwqtfcOMaX7dPSIQFFG3h_brbThnvQvC2kDtfbpX_kgjKfb7ykG8rrzu5CdH5P1jasTJE-_nDlH-XGSecycnrmxwjMZ3mo7F8Id_DN4Qg</recordid><startdate>19591001</startdate><enddate>19591001</enddate><creator>Heberle, Rudolf</creator><general>The University of North Carolina Press</general><general>The Williams and Wilkins Press</general><general>University of North Carolina Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OT</scope><scope>~OU</scope><scope>~OV</scope><scope>~OW</scope><scope>7TP</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHW</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19591001</creationdate><title>The Changing Social Stratification of the South</title><author>Heberle, Rudolf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b8abaf955503794ca2b121a82d4ab6c7487b36b2fbdc24e4932d80784df7acb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1959</creationdate><topic>Aristocracy</topic><topic>Black White Relations</topic><topic>Class Consciousness</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Crop economics</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Industrialization</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><topic>Slaves</topic><topic>Social conditions</topic><topic>Social Development</topic><topic>Social status</topic><topic>Social Stratification</topic><topic>Social Structure</topic><topic>Southern States</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heberle, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2 (purchase pre Oct/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2.2</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social forces</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heberle, Rudolf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Changing Social Stratification of the South</atitle><jtitle>Social forces</jtitle><addtitle>Social Forces</addtitle><date>1959-10-01</date><risdate>1959</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>42-50</pages><issn>0037-7732</issn><eissn>1534-7605</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The analysis is subdivided into 3 periods of time: (1) the yrs of recovery from the Civil War & of southern backwardness, (2) the depression of 1929 & the New Deal, & (3) the period of rapid industrialization & prosperity which began in 1940. Discussion centers mainly on quantitative changes within a given kind of stratification system. 3 types of social strata are distinguished: castes, estates, & SC's. Southern plantations were from the beginning capitalistic enterprises. Whether in America or elsewhere in the world, wherever this kind of large-scale agri'al enterprise developed, a class of landless agric'al workers will be found. Thus, in contrast to other regions of the US, southern society has been from the beginning definitely & conspicuously stratified. Planters held highest prestige. Southern society at this time would have been a typical capitalistic class society had there not been the large pop of Negroes & mixed breeds who had a diff legal status. Southern planters began as entrepreneurs but under the force of circumstances developed traits of an aristocratic way of life & mentality. Emancipation transformed most Negroes into a class of wage earners, the peers & competitors of the white wage laborers. After a brief period of pol'al equality, Negroes were reduced again to a subordinate soc position, but not within a true caste system. Regarding changes in the stratification of the white pop after the Civil War: (1) the planter class, which reconsolidated itself, seems to have been remarkably stable with but little circulation among the postwar elite: (2) Out of the poorer yeoman farmer class developed a white tenant & share-cropper class; (3) In cities & towns there arose a new & growing class of supply merchants & bankers with considerable econ power;(4) In the major cities & in favorably located communities there came into existence a broader class of industrial entrepreneurs; & (5) workers in the skilled jobs were predominantly white, whereas Negroes were employed mainly in unskilled, dirty jobs. Changes in the soc stratification of the South during the past 25 yrs are a continuation of previous trends: (a) The quantitative significance of the planter class has declined; (b) Share-tenants are being replaced by wage laborers, & the once rigid class distinction between planter & poor white is being levelled off; (d) a new econ SC of top executives & managers is growing; (e) white collar workers are increasing considerably; & (6) the new type of industrial worker is in many respects diff from the textile-mill hand & sawmill worker who once were typical of southern labor. The class structure of the South has become more similar to that of the remainder of the US. The relatively simple stratification of an agrarian society has been replaced by the more complex stratification of an urbanized industrial society. Diff in SM between North & South have been levelled off. For the Negroes, the chances of upward SM are still limited, but they have developed a class system of their own which, except for diff in relative proportions in various strata, is a replica of the white class system. Possibly the very changes discussed have had the effect of toning down what consciousness of class existed in the past. Indications are that pol'al decisions are determined by class interests. Consciousness of class seems to be competing with the will to maintain white solidarity which formed the basis of the power-monopoly of the Democratic Party. H. K. Schwarzweller.]]></abstract><cop>Chapel Hill, N.C</cop><pub>The University of North Carolina Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2574015</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-7732
ispartof Social forces, 1959-10, Vol.38 (1), p.42-50
issn 0037-7732
1534-7605
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60096441
source PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aristocracy
Black White Relations
Class Consciousness
Corporations
Crop economics
Crops
Entrepreneurs
Industrialization
Plantations
Prestige
Slaves
Social conditions
Social Development
Social status
Social Stratification
Social Structure
Southern States
Workforce
title The Changing Social Stratification of the South
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A19%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Changing%20Social%20Stratification%20of%20the%20South&rft.jtitle=Social%20forces&rft.au=Heberle,%20Rudolf&rft.date=1959-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=42-50&rft.issn=0037-7732&rft.eissn=1534-7605&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2574015&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2574015%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290999921&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2574015&rfr_iscdi=true