Occupational Stereotypes and Prestige
This paper examines occupational evaluation as a behavioral process. First, alternative methods of investigating occupational stratification are distinguished: the socioeconomic or “objective” approach, the prestige assessment or “subjective” approach, and a “linkage model” that attempts to identify...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social forces 1969-09, Vol.48 (1), p.64-72 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 72 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 64 |
| container_title | Social forces |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Thielbar, Gerald Feldman, Saul D. |
| description | This paper examines occupational evaluation as a behavioral process. First, alternative methods of investigating occupational stratification are distinguished: the socioeconomic or “objective” approach, the prestige assessment or “subjective” approach, and a “linkage model” that attempts to identify objective characteristics that enter as status-conferring criteria into prestige assessment. The third approach assumes a weighting and combining process according to which prestige assessments are concluded de novo by each person who reviews the occupational structure. Taking account of occupational characteristics may, however, involve response to stereotyped imagery as to what occupations and their incumbents are like, as well as the processing of objective data. Popular stereotypes of occupations are explored through the use of the semantic differential. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/sf/48.1.64 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60089317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2575470</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2575470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-6437f6438fdead9912618ee41e2f90ab5c57e931d138d0c97d5ce96a67fe373c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M1LwzAUAPAgCs7pxb9g4MdB6PbSJE1ylOGcMJigguwSYvoind1akxbcf29HRcTLe5ff-yTknMKYgmaT6Cdcjek44wdkQAXjicxAHJIBAJOJlCw9JicxrgGAcq4G5GrpXFvbpqi2thw9NRiwanY1xpHd5qPHgLEp3vGUHHlbRjz7yUPyMrt7ns6TxfL-YXq7SFwq0ybJOJO-C8rnaHOtaZpRhcgppl6DfRNOSNSM5pSpHJyWuXCoM5tJj0wyx4bkuu9bh-qz7WabTREdlqXdYtVGkwGorl528OIfXFdt6E6IhqaaAteCQ6dueuVCFWNAb-pQbGzYGQpm_y8TveHKUNMtPSSXPV7Hpgp_ZcpAmlRIweW-Z9KzIjb49cts-DCZZFKY-evKwFwtVtOZMgv2DYmgdj0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291049540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Occupational Stereotypes and Prestige</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thielbar, Gerald ; Feldman, Saul D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thielbar, Gerald ; Feldman, Saul D.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines occupational evaluation as a behavioral process. First, alternative methods of investigating occupational stratification are distinguished: the socioeconomic or “objective” approach, the prestige assessment or “subjective” approach, and a “linkage model” that attempts to identify objective characteristics that enter as status-conferring criteria into prestige assessment. The third approach assumes a weighting and combining process according to which prestige assessments are concluded de novo by each person who reviews the occupational structure. Taking account of occupational characteristics may, however, involve response to stereotyped imagery as to what occupations and their incumbents are like, as well as the processing of objective data. Popular stereotypes of occupations are explored through the use of the semantic differential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-7732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/sf/48.1.64</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOFOAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chapel Hill, N.C: The University of North Carolina Press</publisher><subject>Business orders ; Businesspeople ; Incumbents ; Occupation/Occupations/Occupational ; Occupational classification ; Occupational stereotypes ; Occupations ; Physicians ; Prestige ; Soldiers ; Stereotype/Stereotypes/ Stereotyped/ Stereotyping ; Stereotypes</subject><ispartof>Social forces, 1969-09, Vol.48 (1), p.64-72</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1969 University of North Carolina Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-6437f6438fdead9912618ee41e2f90ab5c57e931d138d0c97d5ce96a67fe373c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2575470$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2575470$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27852,27907,27908,33758,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thielbar, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Saul D.</creatorcontrib><title>Occupational Stereotypes and Prestige</title><title>Social forces</title><addtitle>Social Forces</addtitle><description>This paper examines occupational evaluation as a behavioral process. First, alternative methods of investigating occupational stratification are distinguished: the socioeconomic or “objective” approach, the prestige assessment or “subjective” approach, and a “linkage model” that attempts to identify objective characteristics that enter as status-conferring criteria into prestige assessment. The third approach assumes a weighting and combining process according to which prestige assessments are concluded de novo by each person who reviews the occupational structure. Taking account of occupational characteristics may, however, involve response to stereotyped imagery as to what occupations and their incumbents are like, as well as the processing of objective data. Popular stereotypes of occupations are explored through the use of the semantic differential.</description><subject>Business orders</subject><subject>Businesspeople</subject><subject>Incumbents</subject><subject>Occupation/Occupations/Occupational</subject><subject>Occupational classification</subject><subject>Occupational stereotypes</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><subject>Soldiers</subject><subject>Stereotype/Stereotypes/ Stereotyped/ Stereotyping</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><issn>0037-7732</issn><issn>1534-7605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1969</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OU</sourceid><sourceid>~OW</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M1LwzAUAPAgCs7pxb9g4MdB6PbSJE1ylOGcMJigguwSYvoind1akxbcf29HRcTLe5ff-yTknMKYgmaT6Cdcjek44wdkQAXjicxAHJIBAJOJlCw9JicxrgGAcq4G5GrpXFvbpqi2thw9NRiwanY1xpHd5qPHgLEp3vGUHHlbRjz7yUPyMrt7ns6TxfL-YXq7SFwq0ybJOJO-C8rnaHOtaZpRhcgppl6DfRNOSNSM5pSpHJyWuXCoM5tJj0wyx4bkuu9bh-qz7WabTREdlqXdYtVGkwGorl528OIfXFdt6E6IhqaaAteCQ6dueuVCFWNAb-pQbGzYGQpm_y8TveHKUNMtPSSXPV7Hpgp_ZcpAmlRIweW-Z9KzIjb49cts-DCZZFKY-evKwFwtVtOZMgv2DYmgdj0</recordid><startdate>196909</startdate><enddate>196909</enddate><creator>Thielbar, Gerald</creator><creator>Feldman, Saul D.</creator><general>The University of North Carolina Press</general><general>University of North Carolina Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OT</scope><scope>~OU</scope><scope>~OV</scope><scope>~OW</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196909</creationdate><title>Occupational Stereotypes and Prestige</title><author>Thielbar, Gerald ; Feldman, Saul D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-6437f6438fdead9912618ee41e2f90ab5c57e931d138d0c97d5ce96a67fe373c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1969</creationdate><topic>Business orders</topic><topic>Businesspeople</topic><topic>Incumbents</topic><topic>Occupation/Occupations/Occupational</topic><topic>Occupational classification</topic><topic>Occupational stereotypes</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><topic>Soldiers</topic><topic>Stereotype/Stereotypes/ Stereotyped/ Stereotyping</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thielbar, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Saul D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2 (purchase pre Oct/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2.2</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social forces</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thielbar, Gerald</au><au>Feldman, Saul D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Occupational Stereotypes and Prestige</atitle><jtitle>Social forces</jtitle><addtitle>Social Forces</addtitle><date>1969-09</date><risdate>1969</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>64-72</pages><issn>0037-7732</issn><eissn>1534-7605</eissn><coden>SOFOAP</coden><abstract>This paper examines occupational evaluation as a behavioral process. First, alternative methods of investigating occupational stratification are distinguished: the socioeconomic or “objective” approach, the prestige assessment or “subjective” approach, and a “linkage model” that attempts to identify objective characteristics that enter as status-conferring criteria into prestige assessment. The third approach assumes a weighting and combining process according to which prestige assessments are concluded de novo by each person who reviews the occupational structure. Taking account of occupational characteristics may, however, involve response to stereotyped imagery as to what occupations and their incumbents are like, as well as the processing of objective data. Popular stereotypes of occupations are explored through the use of the semantic differential.</abstract><cop>Chapel Hill, N.C</cop><pub>The University of North Carolina Press</pub><doi>10.1093/sf/48.1.64</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0037-7732 |
| ispartof | Social forces, 1969-09, Vol.48 (1), p.64-72 |
| issn | 0037-7732 1534-7605 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60089317 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Business orders Businesspeople Incumbents Occupation/Occupations/Occupational Occupational classification Occupational stereotypes Occupations Physicians Prestige Soldiers Stereotype/Stereotypes/ Stereotyped/ Stereotyping Stereotypes |
| title | Occupational Stereotypes and Prestige |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A22%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Occupational%20Stereotypes%20and%20Prestige&rft.jtitle=Social%20forces&rft.au=Thielbar,%20Gerald&rft.date=1969-09&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=64-72&rft.issn=0037-7732&rft.eissn=1534-7605&rft.coden=SOFOAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/sf/48.1.64&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2575470%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291049540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2575470&rfr_iscdi=true |