Courting LULUs: Characteristics of Suitor and Objector Communities

This research examines nonmetropolitan places most likely to support or oppose proposals for locally undesirable land uses (LULUs) involving waste management facilities. Two hypotheses are tested: (1) that relatively remote communities of lower socioeconomic status will be less likely to oppose such...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rural sociology 2000-09, Vol.65 (3), p.376-395
Hauptverfasser: Bohon, Stephanie A., Humphrey, Craig R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 395
container_issue 3
container_start_page 376
container_title Rural sociology
container_volume 65
creator Bohon, Stephanie A.
Humphrey, Craig R.
description This research examines nonmetropolitan places most likely to support or oppose proposals for locally undesirable land uses (LULUs) involving waste management facilities. Two hypotheses are tested: (1) that relatively remote communities of lower socioeconomic status will be less likely to oppose such proposals; and (2) that support for such proposals is widespread among nonmetropolitan communities because of growth machine activities. Using key informants and secondary data for 166 non‐metropolitan Pennsylvania places, we find that local growth promotion, especially efforts to promote business and industry, is related positively to community experience with plant closings and to proposals for these LULUs. Where these proposals are made, community opposition tends to be present as well, particularly in larger communities and, surprisingly, in those of lower socioeconomic status. The significance of these findings is discussed in terms of the growth machine and the opposition they can provoke to protect the use value of land in a single nonmetropolitan region.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00035.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60080099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57356610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-85887075a1d4636ac469d9bcdf5ae9dd8565a678394e1407d03637724ec8ea693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVklGL1DAQx4MouK5-h3KKb-1Nmk7S3IPgFd1TFlc8F30L2TTV1G57Ji3ufXtTdjlBkMM8JCT5zX9m8g8hZxQyGsd5m1EsZAolo1kOANm4izPD7PCALO6uHpJFPOQpUJo_Jk9CaCMEiHxBLqth8qPrvyXr7XobLpLqu_bajNa7MDoTkqFJric3Dj7RfZ1sdq0186Ya9vupd6Oz4Sl51Ogu2GendUm2b998rq7S9Wb1rnq9Tg0yimmJZSlAoKZ1wRnXpuCyljtTN6itrOsSOWouSiYLSwsQdayYCZEX1pRWc8mW5OVR98YPPycbRrV3wdiu070dpqA4QAkg7wdRMOScwr0gK2WBEKtdkrO_wDY-Wx-7VTQmjJ3lNELP_wnlEmSOFESkLo6U8UMI3jbqxru99reKgpo9Va2ajVOzcWr2VJ08VYcY_OKUQgeju8br3rjwR4FyysXc16sj9st19vY_EqhP2-sNwyiQHgXiJ7CHOwHtfygumED15cNKfXyfU46rrwrZb_BHwQ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290925107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Courting LULUs: Characteristics of Suitor and Objector Communities</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Bohon, Stephanie A. ; Humphrey, Craig R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bohon, Stephanie A. ; Humphrey, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><description>This research examines nonmetropolitan places most likely to support or oppose proposals for locally undesirable land uses (LULUs) involving waste management facilities. Two hypotheses are tested: (1) that relatively remote communities of lower socioeconomic status will be less likely to oppose such proposals; and (2) that support for such proposals is widespread among nonmetropolitan communities because of growth machine activities. Using key informants and secondary data for 166 non‐metropolitan Pennsylvania places, we find that local growth promotion, especially efforts to promote business and industry, is related positively to community experience with plant closings and to proposals for these LULUs. Where these proposals are made, community opposition tends to be present as well, particularly in larger communities and, surprisingly, in those of lower socioeconomic status. The significance of these findings is discussed in terms of the growth machine and the opposition they can provoke to protect the use value of land in a single nonmetropolitan region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-0112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-0831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00035.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RUSOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Communities ; Community ; Community Development ; Community Relations ; Developed Nations ; Economic Conditions ; Employment Opportunities ; Experiential Learning ; Facilities ; Facility Siting Disputes ; Hazardous Materials ; Industrial development ; Industrialization ; Inhalants ; Land Use ; Literature Reviews ; Local communities ; Nonmetropolitan Areas ; Nuclear Energy ; Opinions ; Pennsylvania ; Plant Closure ; Politics ; Proposals ; Public opinion ; Public Support ; Rural and urban sociology ; Rural areas ; Rural Development ; Rural sociology ; Social Stratification ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic status ; Socioeconomics ; Sociology ; U.S.A ; USA ; Waste disposal ; Waste management ; Waste management industry ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Rural sociology, 2000-09, Vol.65 (3), p.376-395</ispartof><rights>2000 Rural Sociological Society</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Rural Sociological Society Sep 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-85887075a1d4636ac469d9bcdf5ae9dd8565a678394e1407d03637724ec8ea693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-85887075a1d4636ac469d9bcdf5ae9dd8565a678394e1407d03637724ec8ea693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1549-0831.2000.tb00035.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1549-0831.2000.tb00035.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27323,27848,27903,27904,30979,33753,33754,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1161670$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bohon, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><title>Courting LULUs: Characteristics of Suitor and Objector Communities</title><title>Rural sociology</title><description>This research examines nonmetropolitan places most likely to support or oppose proposals for locally undesirable land uses (LULUs) involving waste management facilities. Two hypotheses are tested: (1) that relatively remote communities of lower socioeconomic status will be less likely to oppose such proposals; and (2) that support for such proposals is widespread among nonmetropolitan communities because of growth machine activities. Using key informants and secondary data for 166 non‐metropolitan Pennsylvania places, we find that local growth promotion, especially efforts to promote business and industry, is related positively to community experience with plant closings and to proposals for these LULUs. Where these proposals are made, community opposition tends to be present as well, particularly in larger communities and, surprisingly, in those of lower socioeconomic status. The significance of these findings is discussed in terms of the growth machine and the opposition they can provoke to protect the use value of land in a single nonmetropolitan region.</description><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community Development</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Developed Nations</subject><subject>Economic Conditions</subject><subject>Employment Opportunities</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Facilities</subject><subject>Facility Siting Disputes</subject><subject>Hazardous Materials</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Industrialization</subject><subject>Inhalants</subject><subject>Land Use</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Nonmetropolitan Areas</subject><subject>Nuclear Energy</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Plant Closure</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public Support</subject><subject>Rural and urban sociology</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural Development</subject><subject>Rural sociology</subject><subject>Social Stratification</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Waste management industry</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0036-0112</issn><issn>1549-0831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVklGL1DAQx4MouK5-h3KKb-1Nmk7S3IPgFd1TFlc8F30L2TTV1G57Ji3ufXtTdjlBkMM8JCT5zX9m8g8hZxQyGsd5m1EsZAolo1kOANm4izPD7PCALO6uHpJFPOQpUJo_Jk9CaCMEiHxBLqth8qPrvyXr7XobLpLqu_bajNa7MDoTkqFJric3Dj7RfZ1sdq0186Ya9vupd6Oz4Sl51Ogu2GendUm2b998rq7S9Wb1rnq9Tg0yimmJZSlAoKZ1wRnXpuCyljtTN6itrOsSOWouSiYLSwsQdayYCZEX1pRWc8mW5OVR98YPPycbRrV3wdiu070dpqA4QAkg7wdRMOScwr0gK2WBEKtdkrO_wDY-Wx-7VTQmjJ3lNELP_wnlEmSOFESkLo6U8UMI3jbqxru99reKgpo9Va2ajVOzcWr2VJ08VYcY_OKUQgeju8br3rjwR4FyysXc16sj9st19vY_EqhP2-sNwyiQHgXiJ7CHOwHtfygumED15cNKfXyfU46rrwrZb_BHwQ4</recordid><startdate>200009</startdate><enddate>200009</enddate><creator>Bohon, Stephanie A.</creator><creator>Humphrey, Craig R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Rural Sociological Society</general><general>Rural Sociological Society, etc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AGQHT</scope><scope>APEJR</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JHMDA</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P7</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200009</creationdate><title>Courting LULUs: Characteristics of Suitor and Objector Communities</title><author>Bohon, Stephanie A. ; Humphrey, Craig R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5315-85887075a1d4636ac469d9bcdf5ae9dd8565a678394e1407d03637724ec8ea693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community Development</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Developed Nations</topic><topic>Economic Conditions</topic><topic>Employment Opportunities</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Facilities</topic><topic>Facility Siting Disputes</topic><topic>Hazardous Materials</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Industrialization</topic><topic>Inhalants</topic><topic>Land Use</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Nonmetropolitan Areas</topic><topic>Nuclear Energy</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Plant Closure</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public Support</topic><topic>Rural and urban sociology</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural Development</topic><topic>Rural sociology</topic><topic>Social Stratification</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Waste management industry</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bohon, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Craig R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 2 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 31</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 7</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bohon, Stephanie A.</au><au>Humphrey, Craig R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Courting LULUs: Characteristics of Suitor and Objector Communities</atitle><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle><date>2000-09</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>376-395</pages><issn>0036-0112</issn><eissn>1549-0831</eissn><coden>RUSOAJ</coden><abstract>This research examines nonmetropolitan places most likely to support or oppose proposals for locally undesirable land uses (LULUs) involving waste management facilities. Two hypotheses are tested: (1) that relatively remote communities of lower socioeconomic status will be less likely to oppose such proposals; and (2) that support for such proposals is widespread among nonmetropolitan communities because of growth machine activities. Using key informants and secondary data for 166 non‐metropolitan Pennsylvania places, we find that local growth promotion, especially efforts to promote business and industry, is related positively to community experience with plant closings and to proposals for these LULUs. Where these proposals are made, community opposition tends to be present as well, particularly in larger communities and, surprisingly, in those of lower socioeconomic status. The significance of these findings is discussed in terms of the growth machine and the opposition they can provoke to protect the use value of land in a single nonmetropolitan region.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00035.x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-0112
ispartof Rural sociology, 2000-09, Vol.65 (3), p.376-395
issn 0036-0112
1549-0831
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60080099
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Communities
Community
Community Development
Community Relations
Developed Nations
Economic Conditions
Employment Opportunities
Experiential Learning
Facilities
Facility Siting Disputes
Hazardous Materials
Industrial development
Industrialization
Inhalants
Land Use
Literature Reviews
Local communities
Nonmetropolitan Areas
Nuclear Energy
Opinions
Pennsylvania
Plant Closure
Politics
Proposals
Public opinion
Public Support
Rural and urban sociology
Rural areas
Rural Development
Rural sociology
Social Stratification
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomic status
Socioeconomics
Sociology
U.S.A
USA
Waste disposal
Waste management
Waste management industry
Wastes
title Courting LULUs: Characteristics of Suitor and Objector Communities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A49%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Courting%20LULUs:%20Characteristics%20of%20Suitor%20and%20Objector%20Communities&rft.jtitle=Rural%20sociology&rft.au=Bohon,%20Stephanie%20A.&rft.date=2000-09&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=376-395&rft.issn=0036-0112&rft.eissn=1549-0831&rft.coden=RUSOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00035.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57356610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290925107&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true