Farm work satisfaction and acceptance of sustainability goals by Australian organic and conventional farmers
Farmer dependence on large-scale organizations for inputs to production is an attribute of Australian agriculture and has changed the character of farm work and how farmers see the future of agriculture. We discuss how these changes are related to farmer satisfaction with their work and their commit...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Rural sociology 1999-06, Vol.64 (2), p.266-283 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 283 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 266 |
| container_title | Rural sociology |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Rickson, R.E Saffigna, P Sanders, R |
| description | Farmer dependence on large-scale organizations for inputs to production is an attribute of Australian agriculture and has changed the character of farm work and how farmers see the future of agriculture. We discuss how these changes are related to farmer satisfaction with their work and their commitment to an alternative of conventional agricultural paradigm. Organic and conventional farmers are compared and findings show that organic farmers experience higher levels of work satisfaction and endorse the alternative agricultural paradigm more strongly than conventional growers. Personal success in using organic methods explains differences between organic farmers in their work satisfaction and commitments to the alternative paradigm. Similarly, conventional farmers confident about the future of their farms are satisfied with their work and express some commitment to the sustainability paradigm. Organic and conventional farmers share concerns about environmental sustainability but are thinking differently about what sustainable farming is and how it will affect the future of Australian agriculture. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00018.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60077006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1290923843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f363t-2245eb102aa35cd52ea6ba7c718ee51f199aab320eddd49734931866b791aefa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E-PEyEUAHBiNLFWP4NkTbzN-IABhuNus-2abNRENx7JG4Zp6E6HClPdfnvRGg8mZjlA8vi9P0DIBYOalfVuVzPZmApawWpmjKnnDgBYWz88IYu_V0_JAkCoChjjz8mLnHcFgZRqQcY1pj39EdM9zTiHPKCbQ5woTj1F5_xhxsl5Ggeaj3nGMGEXxjCf6DbimGl3opclnnAMONGYtjgF9zvZxem7n37VwpEOpYlP-SV5NpQs_-rPuSR36-svq5vq9uPm_erythqEEnPFeSN9x4AjCul6yT2qDrXTrPVesqE8FLETHHzf943RojGCtUp12jD0A4oleXuue0jx29Hn2e5Ddn4ccfLxmK0C0BpAPQql1swI2TwKRatFC2Vbkot_4C4eU_mDbMvYDagyakFv_ou4AcNF24iiqrMKefYP9pDCHtPJYrq3Sgst7dcPG3t19elmtRYbuyr-9dkPGC1uU8j27jMHJoCXptCA-AneFarT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290923843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farm work satisfaction and acceptance of sustainability goals by Australian organic and conventional farmers</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Rickson, R.E ; Saffigna, P ; Sanders, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Rickson, R.E ; Saffigna, P ; Sanders, R</creatorcontrib><description>Farmer dependence on large-scale organizations for inputs to production is an attribute of Australian agriculture and has changed the character of farm work and how farmers see the future of agriculture. We discuss how these changes are related to farmer satisfaction with their work and their commitment to an alternative of conventional agricultural paradigm. Organic and conventional farmers are compared and findings show that organic farmers experience higher levels of work satisfaction and endorse the alternative agricultural paradigm more strongly than conventional growers. Personal success in using organic methods explains differences between organic farmers in their work satisfaction and commitments to the alternative paradigm. Similarly, conventional farmers confident about the future of their farms are satisfied with their work and express some commitment to the sustainability paradigm. Organic and conventional farmers share concerns about environmental sustainability but are thinking differently about what sustainable farming is and how it will affect the future of Australian agriculture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-0112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-0831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00018.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RUSOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptance ; Agrarian Structures ; Agricultural Occupations ; Agricultural policy ; Agricultural Production ; Agricultural Technology ; Agricultural workers ; Agriculture ; Australia ; Beliefs ; Comparative studies ; Dependence ; Environmental protection ; farm comparisons ; farm management ; Farmers ; farmers' attitudes ; Farming ; Farming methods ; Farms ; Goals ; Job Satisfaction ; Labor ; Land Use ; Organic farming ; Organic produce ; organic production ; Organizational Change ; quality of life ; Relationship ; Satisfaction ; Social Networks ; Sociology ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable Development ; traditional farming ; work satisfaction</subject><ispartof>Rural sociology, 1999-06, Vol.64 (2), p.266-283</ispartof><rights>Copyright Rural Sociological Society Jun 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27846,27901,27902,30977,33751,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rickson, R.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saffigna, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, R</creatorcontrib><title>Farm work satisfaction and acceptance of sustainability goals by Australian organic and conventional farmers</title><title>Rural sociology</title><description>Farmer dependence on large-scale organizations for inputs to production is an attribute of Australian agriculture and has changed the character of farm work and how farmers see the future of agriculture. We discuss how these changes are related to farmer satisfaction with their work and their commitment to an alternative of conventional agricultural paradigm. Organic and conventional farmers are compared and findings show that organic farmers experience higher levels of work satisfaction and endorse the alternative agricultural paradigm more strongly than conventional growers. Personal success in using organic methods explains differences between organic farmers in their work satisfaction and commitments to the alternative paradigm. Similarly, conventional farmers confident about the future of their farms are satisfied with their work and express some commitment to the sustainability paradigm. Organic and conventional farmers share concerns about environmental sustainability but are thinking differently about what sustainable farming is and how it will affect the future of Australian agriculture.</description><subject>Acceptance</subject><subject>Agrarian Structures</subject><subject>Agricultural Occupations</subject><subject>Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Agricultural Production</subject><subject>Agricultural Technology</subject><subject>Agricultural workers</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>farm comparisons</subject><subject>farm management</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>farmers' attitudes</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farming methods</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Land Use</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Organic produce</subject><subject>organic production</subject><subject>Organizational Change</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>Relationship</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>traditional farming</subject><subject>work satisfaction</subject><issn>0036-0112</issn><issn>1549-0831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E-PEyEUAHBiNLFWP4NkTbzN-IABhuNus-2abNRENx7JG4Zp6E6HClPdfnvRGg8mZjlA8vi9P0DIBYOalfVuVzPZmApawWpmjKnnDgBYWz88IYu_V0_JAkCoChjjz8mLnHcFgZRqQcY1pj39EdM9zTiHPKCbQ5woTj1F5_xhxsl5Ggeaj3nGMGEXxjCf6DbimGl3opclnnAMONGYtjgF9zvZxem7n37VwpEOpYlP-SV5NpQs_-rPuSR36-svq5vq9uPm_erythqEEnPFeSN9x4AjCul6yT2qDrXTrPVesqE8FLETHHzf943RojGCtUp12jD0A4oleXuue0jx29Hn2e5Ddn4ccfLxmK0C0BpAPQql1swI2TwKRatFC2Vbkot_4C4eU_mDbMvYDagyakFv_ou4AcNF24iiqrMKefYP9pDCHtPJYrq3Sgst7dcPG3t19elmtRYbuyr-9dkPGC1uU8j27jMHJoCXptCA-AneFarT</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Rickson, R.E</creator><creator>Saffigna, P</creator><creator>Sanders, R</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Rural Sociological Society, etc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AGQHT</scope><scope>APEJR</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JHMDA</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P7</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Farm work satisfaction and acceptance of sustainability goals by Australian organic and conventional farmers</title><author>Rickson, R.E ; Saffigna, P ; Sanders, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f363t-2245eb102aa35cd52ea6ba7c718ee51f199aab320eddd49734931866b791aefa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Acceptance</topic><topic>Agrarian Structures</topic><topic>Agricultural Occupations</topic><topic>Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Agricultural Production</topic><topic>Agricultural Technology</topic><topic>Agricultural workers</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>farm comparisons</topic><topic>farm management</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>farmers' attitudes</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farming methods</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Land Use</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Organic produce</topic><topic>organic production</topic><topic>Organizational Change</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>Relationship</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>traditional farming</topic><topic>work satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rickson, R.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saffigna, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 2 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 31</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 7</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rickson, R.E</au><au>Saffigna, P</au><au>Sanders, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farm work satisfaction and acceptance of sustainability goals by Australian organic and conventional farmers</atitle><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>266-283</pages><issn>0036-0112</issn><eissn>1549-0831</eissn><coden>RUSOAJ</coden><abstract>Farmer dependence on large-scale organizations for inputs to production is an attribute of Australian agriculture and has changed the character of farm work and how farmers see the future of agriculture. We discuss how these changes are related to farmer satisfaction with their work and their commitment to an alternative of conventional agricultural paradigm. Organic and conventional farmers are compared and findings show that organic farmers experience higher levels of work satisfaction and endorse the alternative agricultural paradigm more strongly than conventional growers. Personal success in using organic methods explains differences between organic farmers in their work satisfaction and commitments to the alternative paradigm. Similarly, conventional farmers confident about the future of their farms are satisfied with their work and express some commitment to the sustainability paradigm. Organic and conventional farmers share concerns about environmental sustainability but are thinking differently about what sustainable farming is and how it will affect the future of Australian agriculture.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00018.x</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0036-0112 |
| ispartof | Rural sociology, 1999-06, Vol.64 (2), p.266-283 |
| issn | 0036-0112 1549-0831 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60077006 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Acceptance Agrarian Structures Agricultural Occupations Agricultural policy Agricultural Production Agricultural Technology Agricultural workers Agriculture Australia Beliefs Comparative studies Dependence Environmental protection farm comparisons farm management Farmers farmers' attitudes Farming Farming methods Farms Goals Job Satisfaction Labor Land Use Organic farming Organic produce organic production Organizational Change quality of life Relationship Satisfaction Social Networks Sociology Sustainability Sustainable agriculture Sustainable Development traditional farming work satisfaction |
| title | Farm work satisfaction and acceptance of sustainability goals by Australian organic and conventional farmers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farm%20work%20satisfaction%20and%20acceptance%20of%20sustainability%20goals%20by%20Australian%20organic%20and%20conventional%20farmers&rft.jtitle=Rural%20sociology&rft.au=Rickson,%20R.E&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=266-283&rft.issn=0036-0112&rft.eissn=1549-0831&rft.coden=RUSOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00018.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E1290923843%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290923843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |