Reformers v. Abolitionists: Some Notes for Further Research on Plea Bargaining
Recent work on plea bargaining reveals a normative shift by many academics to a more favorable position regarding this practice. The reasons for this shift are discussed, as are future directions for research. Factors which may have resulted in the favorable shift include: indications that the pract...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Law & society review 1979-01, Vol.13 (2), p.567-572 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 572 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 567 |
| container_title | Law & society review |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Casper, Jonathan D. |
| description | Recent work on plea bargaining reveals a normative shift by many academics to a more favorable position regarding this practice. The reasons for this shift are discussed, as are future directions for research. Factors which may have resulted in the favorable shift include: indications that the practice is widespread, indications that it has been practiced for a long time & is not merely the result of an overloaded trial system, the variations of plea bargaining reported, endorsement by the Supreme Court, & resulting formalization & openness of the procedure. Emphasized are two general directions for future research: an examination of the processes & outcomes of the criminal trial, of which little is now known, & a classification of cases into 'hard' & 'easy' & the distribution of each type. M. Migalski. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3053270 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60071635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3053270</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3053270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-5f31d4e0a01f02be2d4b99ad3dfd3e578a070d89ac8973ac64ba852cb057eab83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FFLwzAUBeAgCs4p_oWAok-dN0nTNL7N4VQYU6Y-l7S93TraZiat4L-3o3sSfLpc-DgcDiGXDCZcgLoTIAVXcERGTIYQyFiLYzIC4CLQnEWn5Mz7LfS_FHJElissrKvRefo9odPUVmVb2qb0rb-n77ZGurQtetojOu9cu0FHV-jRuGxDbUPfKjT0wbi1KZuyWZ-Tk8JUHi8Od0w-548fs-dg8fr0MpsugoyHog1kIVgeIhhgBfAUeR6mWptc5EUuUKrYgII81iaLtRImi8LUxJJnKUiFJo3FmNwMuTtnvzr0bVKXPsOqMg3azicRgGKRkD28-gO3tnNN3y1hXCsNSvN93O2gMme9d1gkO1fWxv0kDJL9qslh1V5eD3LrW-v-Zb8JGHNW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297907928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reformers v. Abolitionists: Some Notes for Further Research on Plea Bargaining</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Casper, Jonathan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Casper, Jonathan D.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Recent work on plea bargaining reveals a normative shift by many academics to a more favorable position regarding this practice. The reasons for this shift are discussed, as are future directions for research. Factors which may have resulted in the favorable shift include: indications that the practice is widespread, indications that it has been practiced for a long time & is not merely the result of an overloaded trial system, the variations of plea bargaining reported, endorsement by the Supreme Court, & resulting formalization & openness of the procedure. Emphasized are two general directions for future research: an examination of the processes & outcomes of the criminal trial, of which little is now known, & a classification of cases into 'hard' & 'easy' & the distribution of each type. M. Migalski.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-9216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3053270</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LWSRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beverly Hills, Calif: Law and Society Association</publisher><subject>Abolitionism ; Academic/Academics/Academy/Academia ; Bargain/Bargains/Bargaining ; Court/Courts/Courtly ; Criminal justice ; Criminal sentencing ; Criminals ; Defendants ; Guilt ; Guilty verdicts ; Legal innocence ; Opinion/Opinions ; Philosophical Implications ; Plea bargains ; Police ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Law & society review, 1979-01, Vol.13 (2), p.567-572</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1979 The Law and Society Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-5f31d4e0a01f02be2d4b99ad3dfd3e578a070d89ac8973ac64ba852cb057eab83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3053270$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3053270$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,4025,27874,27928,27929,27930,33780,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casper, Jonathan D.</creatorcontrib><title>Reformers v. Abolitionists: Some Notes for Further Research on Plea Bargaining</title><title>Law & society review</title><description><![CDATA[Recent work on plea bargaining reveals a normative shift by many academics to a more favorable position regarding this practice. The reasons for this shift are discussed, as are future directions for research. Factors which may have resulted in the favorable shift include: indications that the practice is widespread, indications that it has been practiced for a long time & is not merely the result of an overloaded trial system, the variations of plea bargaining reported, endorsement by the Supreme Court, & resulting formalization & openness of the procedure. Emphasized are two general directions for future research: an examination of the processes & outcomes of the criminal trial, of which little is now known, & a classification of cases into 'hard' & 'easy' & the distribution of each type. M. Migalski.]]></description><subject>Abolitionism</subject><subject>Academic/Academics/Academy/Academia</subject><subject>Bargain/Bargains/Bargaining</subject><subject>Court/Courts/Courtly</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal sentencing</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Guilty verdicts</subject><subject>Legal innocence</subject><subject>Opinion/Opinions</subject><subject>Philosophical Implications</subject><subject>Plea bargains</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0023-9216</issn><issn>1540-5893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OU</sourceid><sourceid>~OW</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp10FFLwzAUBeAgCs4p_oWAok-dN0nTNL7N4VQYU6Y-l7S93TraZiat4L-3o3sSfLpc-DgcDiGXDCZcgLoTIAVXcERGTIYQyFiLYzIC4CLQnEWn5Mz7LfS_FHJElissrKvRefo9odPUVmVb2qb0rb-n77ZGurQtetojOu9cu0FHV-jRuGxDbUPfKjT0wbi1KZuyWZ-Tk8JUHi8Od0w-548fs-dg8fr0MpsugoyHog1kIVgeIhhgBfAUeR6mWptc5EUuUKrYgII81iaLtRImi8LUxJJnKUiFJo3FmNwMuTtnvzr0bVKXPsOqMg3azicRgGKRkD28-gO3tnNN3y1hXCsNSvN93O2gMme9d1gkO1fWxv0kDJL9qslh1V5eD3LrW-v-Zb8JGHNW</recordid><startdate>19790101</startdate><enddate>19790101</enddate><creator>Casper, Jonathan D.</creator><general>Law and Society Association</general><general>Sage Publications for the Law and Society Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>HNUUZ</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>~OT</scope><scope>~OU</scope><scope>~OV</scope><scope>~OW</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19790101</creationdate><title>Reformers v. Abolitionists: Some Notes for Further Research on Plea Bargaining</title><author>Casper, Jonathan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-5f31d4e0a01f02be2d4b99ad3dfd3e578a070d89ac8973ac64ba852cb057eab83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Abolitionism</topic><topic>Academic/Academics/Academy/Academia</topic><topic>Bargain/Bargains/Bargaining</topic><topic>Court/Courts/Courtly</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal sentencing</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Guilty verdicts</topic><topic>Legal innocence</topic><topic>Opinion/Opinions</topic><topic>Philosophical Implications</topic><topic>Plea bargains</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casper, Jonathan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 21</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2 (purchase pre Oct/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2.2</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Law & society review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casper, Jonathan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reformers v. Abolitionists: Some Notes for Further Research on Plea Bargaining</atitle><jtitle>Law & society review</jtitle><date>1979-01-01</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>572</epage><pages>567-572</pages><issn>0023-9216</issn><eissn>1540-5893</eissn><coden>LWSRAA</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Recent work on plea bargaining reveals a normative shift by many academics to a more favorable position regarding this practice. The reasons for this shift are discussed, as are future directions for research. Factors which may have resulted in the favorable shift include: indications that the practice is widespread, indications that it has been practiced for a long time & is not merely the result of an overloaded trial system, the variations of plea bargaining reported, endorsement by the Supreme Court, & resulting formalization & openness of the procedure. Emphasized are two general directions for future research: an examination of the processes & outcomes of the criminal trial, of which little is now known, & a classification of cases into 'hard' & 'easy' & the distribution of each type. M. Migalski.]]></abstract><cop>Beverly Hills, Calif</cop><pub>Law and Society Association</pub><doi>10.2307/3053270</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-9216 |
| ispartof | Law & society review, 1979-01, Vol.13 (2), p.567-572 |
| issn | 0023-9216 1540-5893 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60071635 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Abolitionism Academic/Academics/Academy/Academia Bargain/Bargains/Bargaining Court/Courts/Courtly Criminal justice Criminal sentencing Criminals Defendants Guilt Guilty verdicts Legal innocence Opinion/Opinions Philosophical Implications Plea bargains Police Trials |
| title | Reformers v. Abolitionists: Some Notes for Further Research on Plea Bargaining |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T04%3A35%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reformers%20v.%20Abolitionists:%20Some%20Notes%20for%20Further%20Research%20on%20Plea%20Bargaining&rft.jtitle=Law%20&%20society%20review&rft.au=Casper,%20Jonathan%20D.&rft.date=1979-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=572&rft.pages=567-572&rft.issn=0023-9216&rft.eissn=1540-5893&rft.coden=LWSRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3053270&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3053270%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297907928&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3053270&rfr_iscdi=true |