Reformers v. Abolitionists: Some Notes for Further Research on Plea Bargaining
Recent work on plea bargaining reveals a normative shift by many academics to a more favorable position regarding this practice. The reasons for this shift are discussed, as are future directions for research. Factors which may have resulted in the favorable shift include: indications that the pract...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Law & society review 1979-01, Vol.13 (2), p.567-572 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recent work on plea bargaining reveals a normative shift by many academics to a more favorable position regarding this practice. The reasons for this shift are discussed, as are future directions for research. Factors which may have resulted in the favorable shift include: indications that the practice is widespread, indications that it has been practiced for a long time & is not merely the result of an overloaded trial system, the variations of plea bargaining reported, endorsement by the Supreme Court, & resulting formalization & openness of the procedure. Emphasized are two general directions for future research: an examination of the processes & outcomes of the criminal trial, of which little is now known, & a classification of cases into 'hard' & 'easy' & the distribution of each type. M. Migalski. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0023-9216 1540-5893 |
DOI: | 10.2307/3053270 |