Students' Knowledge and Faculty Members' Expectations: The Case for Classroom Assessment

Faculty members' expectations of students' knowledge and the reality of what students know are often dramatically different. Faculty members usually teach courses, especially upper-division ones, under the assumption that students have learned certain material either in high school or in l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Teaching sociology 1997-04, Vol.25 (2), p.150-159
Hauptverfasser: Eckert, Craig M., Bower, Douglas J., Hinkle, Abby J., Stiff, Krista S., Davis, Andrew R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 159
container_issue 2
container_start_page 150
container_title Teaching sociology
container_volume 25
creator Eckert, Craig M.
Bower, Douglas J.
Hinkle, Abby J.
Stiff, Krista S.
Davis, Andrew R.
description Faculty members' expectations of students' knowledge and the reality of what students know are often dramatically different. Faculty members usually teach courses, especially upper-division ones, under the assumption that students have learned certain material either in high school or in lower-division classes. Far too often this assumption is not warranted. Many students who enter upper-division classes become lost quickly and either drop or fail the course unless the faculty member recognizes the problem. It is the authors' intention to demonstrate the usefulness of classroom assessment in reducing the problem of underprepared students. The authors recommend that faculty members use classroom assessment techniques very early in the semester to determine the stock of knowledge students bring with them into the course. With that information, the faculty member can make the determination on what, if any, material to reteach, whom to work with individually, and whom to recommend to drop the course to avoid a low or failing grade. Moreover, efforts can then be made within departments to bring expectations in alignment with reality with respect to students' knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1318660
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60063126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ554706</ericid><jstor_id>1318660</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1318660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-7ee92d67170e6d5f72d85be50b2fd664b99ae3bff2cd98d1e5afe7047fd357103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALUYmlIP4ABwshegod27GdcKtWWz7aigNF2lvk2GPIKokXTyLovyfVrlqJCycf3kfveDSMvRLwXiqw50KJyhh4wlaiVnVRGbl9ylYAtSxA6-0z9pxoBwAl1HrFtt-mOeA40Rm_GtPvHsMP5G4M_NL5uZ_u-A0OLeYl3vzZo5_c1KWRPvDbn8jXjpDHlPm6d0Q5pYFfECHRsBS-YCfR9YQvj-8p-365uV1_Kq6_fvy8vrguvKrUVFjEWgZjhQU0QUcrQ6Vb1NDKGIwp27p2qNoYpQ91FQRqF9FCaWNQ2gpQp-zdoXef068ZaWqGjjz2vRsxzdQYAKOENP-F2pbCVKVc4Jt_4C7NeVyWaKRUWkgtygWdHZDPadkdY7PP3eDyXSOgub9Dc7zDIt8e6xx518fsRt_RA5eVXX54z14fGObOP6SbL1qXFsxjvKMp5cdhxyF_AQGlmDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223512514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Students' Knowledge and Faculty Members' Expectations: The Case for Classroom Assessment</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Eckert, Craig M. ; Bower, Douglas J. ; Hinkle, Abby J. ; Stiff, Krista S. ; Davis, Andrew R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eckert, Craig M. ; Bower, Douglas J. ; Hinkle, Abby J. ; Stiff, Krista S. ; Davis, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><description>Faculty members' expectations of students' knowledge and the reality of what students know are often dramatically different. Faculty members usually teach courses, especially upper-division ones, under the assumption that students have learned certain material either in high school or in lower-division classes. Far too often this assumption is not warranted. Many students who enter upper-division classes become lost quickly and either drop or fail the course unless the faculty member recognizes the problem. It is the authors' intention to demonstrate the usefulness of classroom assessment in reducing the problem of underprepared students. The authors recommend that faculty members use classroom assessment techniques very early in the semester to determine the stock of knowledge students bring with them into the course. With that information, the faculty member can make the determination on what, if any, material to reteach, whom to work with individually, and whom to recommend to drop the course to avoid a low or failing grade. Moreover, efforts can then be made within departments to bring expectations in alignment with reality with respect to students' knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-055X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-862X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1318660</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TCSCAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Sociological Association</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Academic Failure ; Assessment ; Authors ; Classrooms ; College faculty ; College instruction ; College professors ; College Students ; Colleges ; Core curriculum ; Course Content ; Critical Thinking ; Cultural Literacy ; Education ; Educational Background ; Educational Environment ; Educational Experience ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Excellence in Education ; Formative Evaluation ; Geography ; High school students ; Higher Education ; History and organization of sociology ; History instruction ; History, theory and methodology ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Juvenile delinquency ; Knowledge ; Knowledge Level ; Learning ; Literacy ; Literary history ; Multiple Choice Tests ; Objective Tests ; Organization of profession, research and teaching. Deontology. Sociology of sociology. Epistemology ; Prior Learning ; Questionnaires ; Reagan, Ronald Wilson ; Sociology ; Sociology Education ; Student Evaluation ; Students ; System theory ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Expectations of Students ; Teaching ; Thinking Skills ; United States History ; United States of America ; Universities ; USA ; War ; World War II</subject><ispartof>Teaching sociology, 1997-04, Vol.25 (2), p.150-159</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Sociological Association Apr 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-7ee92d67170e6d5f72d85be50b2fd664b99ae3bff2cd98d1e5afe7047fd357103</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1318660$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1318660$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,31000,33774,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ554706$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2870060$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eckert, Craig M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bower, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkle, Abby J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiff, Krista S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><title>Students' Knowledge and Faculty Members' Expectations: The Case for Classroom Assessment</title><title>Teaching sociology</title><description>Faculty members' expectations of students' knowledge and the reality of what students know are often dramatically different. Faculty members usually teach courses, especially upper-division ones, under the assumption that students have learned certain material either in high school or in lower-division classes. Far too often this assumption is not warranted. Many students who enter upper-division classes become lost quickly and either drop or fail the course unless the faculty member recognizes the problem. It is the authors' intention to demonstrate the usefulness of classroom assessment in reducing the problem of underprepared students. The authors recommend that faculty members use classroom assessment techniques very early in the semester to determine the stock of knowledge students bring with them into the course. With that information, the faculty member can make the determination on what, if any, material to reteach, whom to work with individually, and whom to recommend to drop the course to avoid a low or failing grade. Moreover, efforts can then be made within departments to bring expectations in alignment with reality with respect to students' knowledge.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Academic Failure</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>College faculty</subject><subject>College instruction</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Cultural Literacy</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Background</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Experience</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Excellence in Education</subject><subject>Formative Evaluation</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>History and organization of sociology</subject><subject>History instruction</subject><subject>History, theory and methodology</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Juvenile delinquency</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literary history</subject><subject>Multiple Choice Tests</subject><subject>Objective Tests</subject><subject>Organization of profession, research and teaching. Deontology. Sociology of sociology. Epistemology</subject><subject>Prior Learning</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reagan, Ronald Wilson</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology Education</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Expectations of Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>United States History</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>World War II</subject><issn>0092-055X</issn><issn>1939-862X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALUYmlIP4ABwshegod27GdcKtWWz7aigNF2lvk2GPIKokXTyLovyfVrlqJCycf3kfveDSMvRLwXiqw50KJyhh4wlaiVnVRGbl9ylYAtSxA6-0z9pxoBwAl1HrFtt-mOeA40Rm_GtPvHsMP5G4M_NL5uZ_u-A0OLeYl3vzZo5_c1KWRPvDbn8jXjpDHlPm6d0Q5pYFfECHRsBS-YCfR9YQvj-8p-365uV1_Kq6_fvy8vrguvKrUVFjEWgZjhQU0QUcrQ6Vb1NDKGIwp27p2qNoYpQ91FQRqF9FCaWNQ2gpQp-zdoXef068ZaWqGjjz2vRsxzdQYAKOENP-F2pbCVKVc4Jt_4C7NeVyWaKRUWkgtygWdHZDPadkdY7PP3eDyXSOgub9Dc7zDIt8e6xx518fsRt_RA5eVXX54z14fGObOP6SbL1qXFsxjvKMp5cdhxyF_AQGlmDw</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>Eckert, Craig M.</creator><creator>Bower, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Hinkle, Abby J.</creator><creator>Stiff, Krista S.</creator><creator>Davis, Andrew R.</creator><general>American Sociological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>Students' Knowledge and Faculty Members' Expectations: The Case for Classroom Assessment</title><author>Eckert, Craig M. ; Bower, Douglas J. ; Hinkle, Abby J. ; Stiff, Krista S. ; Davis, Andrew R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-7ee92d67170e6d5f72d85be50b2fd664b99ae3bff2cd98d1e5afe7047fd357103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Academic Failure</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>College faculty</topic><topic>College instruction</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Cultural Literacy</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Background</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Experience</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Excellence in Education</topic><topic>Formative Evaluation</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>History and organization of sociology</topic><topic>History instruction</topic><topic>History, theory and methodology</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Juvenile delinquency</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literary history</topic><topic>Multiple Choice Tests</topic><topic>Objective Tests</topic><topic>Organization of profession, research and teaching. Deontology. Sociology of sociology. Epistemology</topic><topic>Prior Learning</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reagan, Ronald Wilson</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology Education</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Expectations of Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>United States History</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>World War II</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eckert, Craig M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bower, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinkle, Abby J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiff, Krista S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Teaching sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eckert, Craig M.</au><au>Bower, Douglas J.</au><au>Hinkle, Abby J.</au><au>Stiff, Krista S.</au><au>Davis, Andrew R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ554706</ericid><atitle>Students' Knowledge and Faculty Members' Expectations: The Case for Classroom Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Teaching sociology</jtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>150-159</pages><issn>0092-055X</issn><eissn>1939-862X</eissn><coden>TCSCAF</coden><abstract>Faculty members' expectations of students' knowledge and the reality of what students know are often dramatically different. Faculty members usually teach courses, especially upper-division ones, under the assumption that students have learned certain material either in high school or in lower-division classes. Far too often this assumption is not warranted. Many students who enter upper-division classes become lost quickly and either drop or fail the course unless the faculty member recognizes the problem. It is the authors' intention to demonstrate the usefulness of classroom assessment in reducing the problem of underprepared students. The authors recommend that faculty members use classroom assessment techniques very early in the semester to determine the stock of knowledge students bring with them into the course. With that information, the faculty member can make the determination on what, if any, material to reteach, whom to work with individually, and whom to recommend to drop the course to avoid a low or failing grade. Moreover, efforts can then be made within departments to bring expectations in alignment with reality with respect to students' knowledge.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Sociological Association</pub><doi>10.2307/1318660</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0092-055X
ispartof Teaching sociology, 1997-04, Vol.25 (2), p.150-159
issn 0092-055X
1939-862X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60063126
source Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Academic Achievement
Academic Failure
Assessment
Authors
Classrooms
College faculty
College instruction
College professors
College Students
Colleges
Core curriculum
Course Content
Critical Thinking
Cultural Literacy
Education
Educational Background
Educational Environment
Educational Experience
Educational Facilities Improvement
Excellence in Education
Formative Evaluation
Geography
High school students
Higher Education
History and organization of sociology
History instruction
History, theory and methodology
Instructional Effectiveness
Juvenile delinquency
Knowledge
Knowledge Level
Learning
Literacy
Literary history
Multiple Choice Tests
Objective Tests
Organization of profession, research and teaching. Deontology. Sociology of sociology. Epistemology
Prior Learning
Questionnaires
Reagan, Ronald Wilson
Sociology
Sociology Education
Student Evaluation
Students
System theory
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Expectations of Students
Teaching
Thinking Skills
United States History
United States of America
Universities
USA
War
World War II
title Students' Knowledge and Faculty Members' Expectations: The Case for Classroom Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Students'%20Knowledge%20and%20Faculty%20Members'%20Expectations:%20The%20Case%20for%20Classroom%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Teaching%20sociology&rft.au=Eckert,%20Craig%20M.&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=150-159&rft.issn=0092-055X&rft.eissn=1939-862X&rft.coden=TCSCAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1318660&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1318660%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223512514&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ554706&rft_jstor_id=1318660&rfr_iscdi=true