A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Spirituality and Quality of Life
The relationship between spirituality and various dimensions of health and quality of life has been extensively examined during the past decade. Though several literature reviews have been conducted in an attempt to synthesize research findings pertaining to the relationship between spirituality and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social indicators research 2005-06, Vol.72 (2), p.153-188 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 188 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 153 |
| container_title | Social indicators research |
| container_volume | 72 |
| creator | Sawatzky, Rick Ratner, Pamela A. Chiu, Lyren |
| description | The relationship between spirituality and various dimensions of health and quality of life has been extensively examined during the past decade. Though several literature reviews have been conducted in an attempt to synthesize research findings pertaining to the relationship between spirituality and health, a meta-analysis of studies examining spirituality in relation to quality of life has not been identified. The present study was designed to: (a) determine whether there is empirical support for a relationship between spirituality and quality of life, (b) provide an estimate of the strength of this relationship, and (c) examine potential moderating variables affecting this relationship. The research design followed accepted methods for quantitative meta-synthesis. Potential moderating effects of several methodological differences and sample characteristics were examined using meta-analytic approaches with multivariate linear regression and analysis of variance. An extensive multidisciplinary literature search resulted in 3,040 published reports that were manually screened according to pre-established selection criteria. Subsequent to the selection process, 62 primary effect sizes from 51 studies were included in the final analysis. A random effects model of the bivariate correlation between spirituality and quality of life resulted in a moderate effect size (r = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28—0.40), thereby providing support for the theoretical framework underlying the study wherein spirituality was depicted as a unique concept that stands in relationship to quality of life. Subsequent regression analyses indicated that differences among operational definitions of spirituality and quality of life were associated with the variability in estimates of the magnitude of the relationship (R2 = 0.27). Other potential moderators, such as age, gender, ethnicity, religious affiliation and sampling method were examined but the findings pertaining to these variables were inconclusive because of limitations associated with the sample of primary studies. The implications of this study are mostly theoretical in nature and raise questions about the commonly assumed multidimensional conceptualization of quality of life. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11205-004-5577-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60057540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ749055</ericid><jstor_id>27522199</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27522199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c4738d04a30635ff24e67b01880f5af80f704c5ec823b7d87c75020d7232a4733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9LXDEQxYO04Nb2AxQULkJ9S538nXsfF1HbsqVY7XPIZhPMcr13m2Sp--2N3MWCL77MDJzfGZg5hHxm8JUB4HlmjIOiAJIqhUgfD8iMKRQUOs7ekRkIELQVAIfkQ85rAFBSyRlZzJufvlg6H2y_yzE3Y2jKvW9--96WOA75Pm6apS__vB-a201MsWxtH8uuscOqudnP1bSIwX8k74Pts_-070fkz9Xl3cU3uvh1_f1ivqBOSSzUSRTtCqQVoIUKgUuvcQmsbSEoG2pFkE5513KxxFWLDhVwWCEX3FavOCJn095NGv9ufS7mIWbn-94Oftxmo-t1qCS8CSpkTAsu3wQF6k4q1BU8fQWux22qz8uGdag1bzlWiE2QS2POyQezSfHBpp1hYJ7jMlNcpsZlnuMyj9XzZb_YZmf7kOzgYv5vRMBWi65yxxPnU3Qv8uUPlB0oVeWTSV7nMqYXnaPinHWdeAJCUqVK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197662827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Spirituality and Quality of Life</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Sawatzky, Rick ; Ratner, Pamela A. ; Chiu, Lyren</creator><creatorcontrib>Sawatzky, Rick ; Ratner, Pamela A. ; Chiu, Lyren</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between spirituality and various dimensions of health and quality of life has been extensively examined during the past decade. Though several literature reviews have been conducted in an attempt to synthesize research findings pertaining to the relationship between spirituality and health, a meta-analysis of studies examining spirituality in relation to quality of life has not been identified. The present study was designed to: (a) determine whether there is empirical support for a relationship between spirituality and quality of life, (b) provide an estimate of the strength of this relationship, and (c) examine potential moderating variables affecting this relationship. The research design followed accepted methods for quantitative meta-synthesis. Potential moderating effects of several methodological differences and sample characteristics were examined using meta-analytic approaches with multivariate linear regression and analysis of variance. An extensive multidisciplinary literature search resulted in 3,040 published reports that were manually screened according to pre-established selection criteria. Subsequent to the selection process, 62 primary effect sizes from 51 studies were included in the final analysis. A random effects model of the bivariate correlation between spirituality and quality of life resulted in a moderate effect size (r = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28—0.40), thereby providing support for the theoretical framework underlying the study wherein spirituality was depicted as a unique concept that stands in relationship to quality of life. Subsequent regression analyses indicated that differences among operational definitions of spirituality and quality of life were associated with the variability in estimates of the magnitude of the relationship (R2 = 0.27). Other potential moderators, such as age, gender, ethnicity, religious affiliation and sampling method were examined but the findings pertaining to these variables were inconclusive because of limitations associated with the sample of primary studies. The implications of this study are mostly theoretical in nature and raise questions about the commonly assumed multidimensional conceptualization of quality of life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-004-5577-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SINRDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Beliefs ; Conceptualization ; Correlation analysis ; Definitions ; Demography ; Effect Size ; Functional Behavioral Assessment ; Health ; History, theory and methodology ; Life Satisfaction ; Literature Reviews ; Measurement ; Meta Analysis ; Methodology ; Modeling ; Nature ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Regression (Statistics) ; Regression analysis ; Religion ; Religiosity ; Religious Factors ; Research Design ; Research methods ; Selection Criteria ; Social Indicators ; Social research ; Sociology ; Spiritual belief systems ; Spirituality ; Statistical Analysis ; Statistical discrepancies ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Variables ; Variance analysis ; Welfare economics ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2005-06, Vol.72 (2), p.153-188</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Springer</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c4738d04a30635ff24e67b01880f5af80f704c5ec823b7d87c75020d7232a4733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c4738d04a30635ff24e67b01880f5af80f704c5ec823b7d87c75020d7232a4733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27522199$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27522199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27323,27903,27904,30979,33753,33754,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ749055$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17078639$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sawatzky, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratner, Pamela A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Lyren</creatorcontrib><title>A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Spirituality and Quality of Life</title><title>Social indicators research</title><description>The relationship between spirituality and various dimensions of health and quality of life has been extensively examined during the past decade. Though several literature reviews have been conducted in an attempt to synthesize research findings pertaining to the relationship between spirituality and health, a meta-analysis of studies examining spirituality in relation to quality of life has not been identified. The present study was designed to: (a) determine whether there is empirical support for a relationship between spirituality and quality of life, (b) provide an estimate of the strength of this relationship, and (c) examine potential moderating variables affecting this relationship. The research design followed accepted methods for quantitative meta-synthesis. Potential moderating effects of several methodological differences and sample characteristics were examined using meta-analytic approaches with multivariate linear regression and analysis of variance. An extensive multidisciplinary literature search resulted in 3,040 published reports that were manually screened according to pre-established selection criteria. Subsequent to the selection process, 62 primary effect sizes from 51 studies were included in the final analysis. A random effects model of the bivariate correlation between spirituality and quality of life resulted in a moderate effect size (r = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28—0.40), thereby providing support for the theoretical framework underlying the study wherein spirituality was depicted as a unique concept that stands in relationship to quality of life. Subsequent regression analyses indicated that differences among operational definitions of spirituality and quality of life were associated with the variability in estimates of the magnitude of the relationship (R2 = 0.27). Other potential moderators, such as age, gender, ethnicity, religious affiliation and sampling method were examined but the findings pertaining to these variables were inconclusive because of limitations associated with the sample of primary studies. The implications of this study are mostly theoretical in nature and raise questions about the commonly assumed multidimensional conceptualization of quality of life.</description><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Functional Behavioral Assessment</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>History, theory and methodology</subject><subject>Life Satisfaction</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religiosity</subject><subject>Religious Factors</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Selection Criteria</subject><subject>Social Indicators</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Spiritual belief systems</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Statistical discrepancies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Welfare economics</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9LXDEQxYO04Nb2AxQULkJ9S538nXsfF1HbsqVY7XPIZhPMcr13m2Sp--2N3MWCL77MDJzfGZg5hHxm8JUB4HlmjIOiAJIqhUgfD8iMKRQUOs7ekRkIELQVAIfkQ85rAFBSyRlZzJufvlg6H2y_yzE3Y2jKvW9--96WOA75Pm6apS__vB-a201MsWxtH8uuscOqudnP1bSIwX8k74Pts_-070fkz9Xl3cU3uvh1_f1ivqBOSSzUSRTtCqQVoIUKgUuvcQmsbSEoG2pFkE5513KxxFWLDhVwWCEX3FavOCJn095NGv9ufS7mIWbn-94Oftxmo-t1qCS8CSpkTAsu3wQF6k4q1BU8fQWux22qz8uGdag1bzlWiE2QS2POyQezSfHBpp1hYJ7jMlNcpsZlnuMyj9XzZb_YZmf7kOzgYv5vRMBWi65yxxPnU3Qv8uUPlB0oVeWTSV7nMqYXnaPinHWdeAJCUqVK</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>Sawatzky, Rick</creator><creator>Ratner, Pamela A.</creator><creator>Chiu, Lyren</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Spirituality and Quality of Life</title><author>Sawatzky, Rick ; Ratner, Pamela A. ; Chiu, Lyren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-c4738d04a30635ff24e67b01880f5af80f704c5ec823b7d87c75020d7232a4733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Functional Behavioral Assessment</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>History, theory and methodology</topic><topic>Life Satisfaction</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religiosity</topic><topic>Religious Factors</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Selection Criteria</topic><topic>Social Indicators</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Spiritual belief systems</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Statistical discrepancies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Welfare economics</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sawatzky, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratner, Pamela A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Lyren</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest sociology</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sawatzky, Rick</au><au>Ratner, Pamela A.</au><au>Chiu, Lyren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ749055</ericid><atitle>A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Spirituality and Quality of Life</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>153-188</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><coden>SINRDZ</coden><abstract>The relationship between spirituality and various dimensions of health and quality of life has been extensively examined during the past decade. Though several literature reviews have been conducted in an attempt to synthesize research findings pertaining to the relationship between spirituality and health, a meta-analysis of studies examining spirituality in relation to quality of life has not been identified. The present study was designed to: (a) determine whether there is empirical support for a relationship between spirituality and quality of life, (b) provide an estimate of the strength of this relationship, and (c) examine potential moderating variables affecting this relationship. The research design followed accepted methods for quantitative meta-synthesis. Potential moderating effects of several methodological differences and sample characteristics were examined using meta-analytic approaches with multivariate linear regression and analysis of variance. An extensive multidisciplinary literature search resulted in 3,040 published reports that were manually screened according to pre-established selection criteria. Subsequent to the selection process, 62 primary effect sizes from 51 studies were included in the final analysis. A random effects model of the bivariate correlation between spirituality and quality of life resulted in a moderate effect size (r = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28—0.40), thereby providing support for the theoretical framework underlying the study wherein spirituality was depicted as a unique concept that stands in relationship to quality of life. Subsequent regression analyses indicated that differences among operational definitions of spirituality and quality of life were associated with the variability in estimates of the magnitude of the relationship (R2 = 0.27). Other potential moderators, such as age, gender, ethnicity, religious affiliation and sampling method were examined but the findings pertaining to these variables were inconclusive because of limitations associated with the sample of primary studies. The implications of this study are mostly theoretical in nature and raise questions about the commonly assumed multidimensional conceptualization of quality of life.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-004-5577-x</doi><tpages>36</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0303-8300 |
| ispartof | Social indicators research, 2005-06, Vol.72 (2), p.153-188 |
| issn | 0303-8300 1573-0921 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60057540 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Beliefs Conceptualization Correlation analysis Definitions Demography Effect Size Functional Behavioral Assessment Health History, theory and methodology Life Satisfaction Literature Reviews Measurement Meta Analysis Methodology Modeling Nature Psychometrics Quality of Life Regression (Statistics) Regression analysis Religion Religiosity Religious Factors Research Design Research methods Selection Criteria Social Indicators Social research Sociology Spiritual belief systems Spirituality Statistical Analysis Statistical discrepancies Studies Systematic review Variables Variance analysis Welfare economics Wellbeing |
| title | A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Spirituality and Quality of Life |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A07%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20the%20Relationship%20between%20Spirituality%20and%20Quality%20of%20Life&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Sawatzky,%20Rick&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=153-188&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft.coden=SINRDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-004-5577-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27522199%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197662827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ749055&rft_jstor_id=27522199&rfr_iscdi=true |