An Investigation into the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index
The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) is being developed for the cross-cultural measurement of subjective wellbeing (SWB). This paper reports the findings of its utility with the Hong Kong Chinese and Australian populations. An item on affect, 'satisfaction with own happiness' was also invest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social indicators research 2005-07, Vol.72 (3), p.403-430 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 430 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 403 |
container_title | Social indicators research |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Lau, Anna L. D. Cummins, Robert A. McPherson, Wenda |
description | The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) is being developed for the cross-cultural measurement of subjective wellbeing (SWB). This paper reports the findings of its utility with the Hong Kong Chinese and Australian populations. An item on affect, 'satisfaction with own happiness' was also investigated to determine whether it should be added to the index. Three-hundred and sixty participants (180 per country), with equal representation from groups aged 18—35, 35—64 and 65 years and above, were recruited from each country. The PWI demonstrated good psychometric performance in terms of its reliability, validity and sensitivity, which are comparable in both countries. The item 'satisfaction with own happiness' was found to contribute significantly to the scale's psychometric performance in Australia but not in Hong Kong. Cultural differences in the perception of the concepts 'satisfaction' and 'happiness' were suggested as an explanation for this finding. The PWI data are also consistent with homeostasis theory, which proposes that each person's SWB level is maintained within a limited positive range. For the Australian population, their mean SWB level fell within the established Western range of 70—80, on a scale from 0 to 100. The Hong Kong population, however, fell below this range. Cultural response bias was identified as a plausible explanation for the differences between the Hong Kong and Australian samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60055969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ725633</ericid><jstor_id>27522208</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27522208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ce2eedc9309d4b219f7c1ff3b861ae1f813650647daa69d0febeebce846c8e6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxQdR8Fn9AILCINhd9Ob_zLI8nlop6KLiMmQyNzWPadImM6X205vXKRXcuLqL87uHe-5pmtcUPlAA_bFQykASAEFAKkrunjQbKjUn0DP6tNkAB046DvC8eVHKHgCkkGLTnJ_E9jTeYJnDhZ1Dim2Ic2rnX9hucyqFbJdpXrKd2t31Em7shNFhm_w98R1zSbFqP3GaBgzxonqNePuyeebtVPDVwzxqfnzanW-_kLNvn0-3J2fECdAzccgQR9dz6EcxMNp77aj3fOgUtUh9R7mSoIQerVX9CB4HxMFhJ5TrUHl-1Byvvlc5XS81g7kMxdVbbMS0FKNqStmr_r-g1BQEZ7qC7_4B92nJNWIxtNdKMQ0HN7pC7vChjN5c5XBp829DwRzaMGsbprZhDm2Yu7rz_sHYFmcnn210ofxd1NBRRUXl3qwc5uAe5d1XzaTivMpvV3lf5pQfdaYlYww6_gcWyJ1f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197662709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Investigation into the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lau, Anna L. D. ; Cummins, Robert A. ; McPherson, Wenda</creator><creatorcontrib>Lau, Anna L. D. ; Cummins, Robert A. ; McPherson, Wenda</creatorcontrib><description>The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) is being developed for the cross-cultural measurement of subjective wellbeing (SWB). This paper reports the findings of its utility with the Hong Kong Chinese and Australian populations. An item on affect, 'satisfaction with own happiness' was also investigated to determine whether it should be added to the index. Three-hundred and sixty participants (180 per country), with equal representation from groups aged 18—35, 35—64 and 65 years and above, were recruited from each country. The PWI demonstrated good psychometric performance in terms of its reliability, validity and sensitivity, which are comparable in both countries. The item 'satisfaction with own happiness' was found to contribute significantly to the scale's psychometric performance in Australia but not in Hong Kong. Cultural differences in the perception of the concepts 'satisfaction' and 'happiness' were suggested as an explanation for this finding. The PWI data are also consistent with homeostasis theory, which proposes that each person's SWB level is maintained within a limited positive range. For the Australian population, their mean SWB level fell within the established Western range of 70—80, on a scale from 0 to 100. The Hong Kong population, however, fell below this range. Cultural response bias was identified as a plausible explanation for the differences between the Hong Kong and Australian samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SINRDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Australia ; Community relations ; Correlations ; Cross Cultural Studies ; Crosscultural Differences ; Crosscultural research ; Cultural Differences ; Foreign Countries ; Happiness ; History, theory and methodology ; Homeostasis ; Hong Kong ; Indexes ; Indexes (Measures) ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Life Satisfaction ; Methodology ; Perceptions ; Personal health ; Personal safety ; Population ; Predominantly White Institutions ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Quantitative psychology ; Research methodology ; Satisfaction ; Social Indicators ; Social research ; Sociology ; Standard of living ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical Data ; Statistical variance ; Subjective wellbeing ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Validity ; Well Being ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2005-07, Vol.72 (3), p.403-430</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Springer</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ce2eedc9309d4b219f7c1ff3b861ae1f813650647daa69d0febeebce846c8e6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ce2eedc9309d4b219f7c1ff3b861ae1f813650647daa69d0febeebce846c8e6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27522208$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27522208$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27342,27922,27923,30998,33772,33773,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ725633$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17081614$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lau, Anna L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummins, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Wenda</creatorcontrib><title>An Investigation into the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index</title><title>Social indicators research</title><description>The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) is being developed for the cross-cultural measurement of subjective wellbeing (SWB). This paper reports the findings of its utility with the Hong Kong Chinese and Australian populations. An item on affect, 'satisfaction with own happiness' was also investigated to determine whether it should be added to the index. Three-hundred and sixty participants (180 per country), with equal representation from groups aged 18—35, 35—64 and 65 years and above, were recruited from each country. The PWI demonstrated good psychometric performance in terms of its reliability, validity and sensitivity, which are comparable in both countries. The item 'satisfaction with own happiness' was found to contribute significantly to the scale's psychometric performance in Australia but not in Hong Kong. Cultural differences in the perception of the concepts 'satisfaction' and 'happiness' were suggested as an explanation for this finding. The PWI data are also consistent with homeostasis theory, which proposes that each person's SWB level is maintained within a limited positive range. For the Australian population, their mean SWB level fell within the established Western range of 70—80, on a scale from 0 to 100. The Hong Kong population, however, fell below this range. Cultural response bias was identified as a plausible explanation for the differences between the Hong Kong and Australian samples.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Community relations</subject><subject>Correlations</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Studies</subject><subject>Crosscultural Differences</subject><subject>Crosscultural research</subject><subject>Cultural Differences</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>History, theory and methodology</subject><subject>Homeostasis</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Indexes (Measures)</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Life Satisfaction</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Personal health</subject><subject>Personal safety</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Predominantly White Institutions</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Social Indicators</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Standard of living</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical Data</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Subjective wellbeing</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Well Being</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rFTEUxQdR8Fn9AILCINhd9Ob_zLI8nlop6KLiMmQyNzWPadImM6X205vXKRXcuLqL87uHe-5pmtcUPlAA_bFQykASAEFAKkrunjQbKjUn0DP6tNkAB046DvC8eVHKHgCkkGLTnJ_E9jTeYJnDhZ1Dim2Ic2rnX9hucyqFbJdpXrKd2t31Em7shNFhm_w98R1zSbFqP3GaBgzxonqNePuyeebtVPDVwzxqfnzanW-_kLNvn0-3J2fECdAzccgQR9dz6EcxMNp77aj3fOgUtUh9R7mSoIQerVX9CB4HxMFhJ5TrUHl-1Byvvlc5XS81g7kMxdVbbMS0FKNqStmr_r-g1BQEZ7qC7_4B92nJNWIxtNdKMQ0HN7pC7vChjN5c5XBp829DwRzaMGsbprZhDm2Yu7rz_sHYFmcnn210ofxd1NBRRUXl3qwc5uAe5d1XzaTivMpvV3lf5pQfdaYlYww6_gcWyJ1f</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Lau, Anna L. D.</creator><creator>Cummins, Robert A.</creator><creator>McPherson, Wenda</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag New York, LLC</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>An Investigation into the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index</title><author>Lau, Anna L. D. ; Cummins, Robert A. ; McPherson, Wenda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ce2eedc9309d4b219f7c1ff3b861ae1f813650647daa69d0febeebce846c8e6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Community relations</topic><topic>Correlations</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Studies</topic><topic>Crosscultural Differences</topic><topic>Crosscultural research</topic><topic>Cultural Differences</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>History, theory and methodology</topic><topic>Homeostasis</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Indexes (Measures)</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Life Satisfaction</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Personal health</topic><topic>Personal safety</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Predominantly White Institutions</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Social Indicators</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Standard of living</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical Data</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Subjective wellbeing</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Well Being</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lau, Anna L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummins, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Wenda</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lau, Anna L. D.</au><au>Cummins, Robert A.</au><au>McPherson, Wenda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ725633</ericid><atitle>An Investigation into the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>403-430</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><coden>SINRDZ</coden><abstract>The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) is being developed for the cross-cultural measurement of subjective wellbeing (SWB). This paper reports the findings of its utility with the Hong Kong Chinese and Australian populations. An item on affect, 'satisfaction with own happiness' was also investigated to determine whether it should be added to the index. Three-hundred and sixty participants (180 per country), with equal representation from groups aged 18—35, 35—64 and 65 years and above, were recruited from each country. The PWI demonstrated good psychometric performance in terms of its reliability, validity and sensitivity, which are comparable in both countries. The item 'satisfaction with own happiness' was found to contribute significantly to the scale's psychometric performance in Australia but not in Hong Kong. Cultural differences in the perception of the concepts 'satisfaction' and 'happiness' were suggested as an explanation for this finding. The PWI data are also consistent with homeostasis theory, which proposes that each person's SWB level is maintained within a limited positive range. For the Australian population, their mean SWB level fell within the established Western range of 70—80, on a scale from 0 to 100. The Hong Kong population, however, fell below this range. Cultural response bias was identified as a plausible explanation for the differences between the Hong Kong and Australian samples.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0303-8300 |
ispartof | Social indicators research, 2005-07, Vol.72 (3), p.403-430 |
issn | 0303-8300 1573-0921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60055969 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Australia Community relations Correlations Cross Cultural Studies Crosscultural Differences Crosscultural research Cultural Differences Foreign Countries Happiness History, theory and methodology Homeostasis Hong Kong Indexes Indexes (Measures) Interpersonal Relationship Life Satisfaction Methodology Perceptions Personal health Personal safety Population Predominantly White Institutions Psychometrics Quality of Life Quantitative psychology Research methodology Satisfaction Social Indicators Social research Sociology Standard of living Statistical analysis Statistical Data Statistical variance Subjective wellbeing Test Reliability Test Validity Validity Well Being Wellbeing |
title | An Investigation into the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T12%3A06%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Investigation%20into%20the%20Cross-Cultural%20Equivalence%20of%20the%20Personal%20Wellbeing%20Index&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Lau,%20Anna%20L.%20D.&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=403-430&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft.coden=SINRDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27522208%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197662709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ725633&rft_jstor_id=27522208&rfr_iscdi=true |