Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections
Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American political science review 2009-08, Vol.103 (3), p.343-366 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 366 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 343 |
container_title | The American political science review |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | DRUCKMAN, JAMES N. KIFER, MARTIN J. PARKIN, MICHAEL |
description | Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the resulting predictions with a novel dataset based on candidate Web sites over three election cycles. Unlike television advertisements or newspaper coverage, Web sites provide an unmediated, holistic, and representative portrait of campaigns. We find that incumbents and challengers differ across a broad range of behavior that reflects varying attitudes toward risk, that incumbents’ strategies depend on the competitiveness of the race, and that candidates link negative campaigning to other aspects of their rhetorical strategies. Our efforts provide researchers with a basis for moving toward a more complete understanding of congressional campaigns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0003055409990037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60035450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0003055409990037</cupid><jstor_id>27798510</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27798510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-542c8e503d630f167adf39dec6e93b23fca700c7ead3fcd67da096240a4f698b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wINQPHjbOtl8bY5SapW2qNRevIQ0my1b96MmW9B_b9aWCop4ymTeZybvZBA6x9DHgMX1DAAIMEZBShlCcYA6mBERMUnJIeq0ctTqx-jE-1W4Aoakg8RAl2udL6veoC7LTZUb3eR15Xt51Zv3Z_2QrpbOeh-SuugNC2u-9FN0lOnC27Pd2UXz2-Hz4C6aPIzuBzeTyHBMm4jR2CSWAUk5gQxzodOMyNQabiVZxCQzWgAYYXUa4pSLVIPkMQVNMy6TBemiq23ftavfNtY3qsy9sUWhK1tvvOJhLkbDA_-BRMRx6Cv_BWNMKCRAAnj5A1zVGxd-oWUopTElNEB4CxlXe-9sptYuL7X7UBhUuxn1azOh5mJbs_JN7fYFsRAyYbgdJdrquW_s-17X7lVxQQRTfPSkpsnLdMwmj2oceLLzoMuFy9Ol_Xb6t4tPTn6mQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214442434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N. ; KIFER, MARTIN J. ; PARKIN, MICHAEL</creator><creatorcontrib>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N. ; KIFER, MARTIN J. ; PARKIN, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><description>Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the resulting predictions with a novel dataset based on candidate Web sites over three election cycles. Unlike television advertisements or newspaper coverage, Web sites provide an unmediated, holistic, and representative portrait of campaigns. We find that incumbents and challengers differ across a broad range of behavior that reflects varying attitudes toward risk, that incumbents’ strategies depend on the competitiveness of the race, and that candidates link negative campaigning to other aspects of their rhetorical strategies. Our efforts provide researchers with a basis for moving toward a more complete understanding of congressional campaigns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0003055409990037</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APORBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Advertising campaigns ; Behavior ; Candidates ; Communication ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Congressional elections ; Elections ; Electoral campaigning ; Endorsements ; Familiarity ; Governance ; Incumbency ; Incumbents ; Information seeking behavior ; Internet ; Legislators ; Negative campaigning ; Partisanship ; Political advertising ; Political Campaigns ; Political candidates ; Political Communication ; Political parties ; Political partisanship ; Political rhetoric ; Political science ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Rhetoric ; Studies ; Television commercials ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; United States Senate ; Voters ; Websites</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 2009-08, Vol.103 (3), p.343-366</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009 American Political Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Political Science Association Aug 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-542c8e503d630f167adf39dec6e93b23fca700c7ead3fcd67da096240a4f698b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-542c8e503d630f167adf39dec6e93b23fca700c7ead3fcd67da096240a4f698b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27798510$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055409990037/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12844,27923,27924,55627,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIFER, MARTIN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARKIN, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><title>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the resulting predictions with a novel dataset based on candidate Web sites over three election cycles. Unlike television advertisements or newspaper coverage, Web sites provide an unmediated, holistic, and representative portrait of campaigns. We find that incumbents and challengers differ across a broad range of behavior that reflects varying attitudes toward risk, that incumbents’ strategies depend on the competitiveness of the race, and that candidates link negative campaigning to other aspects of their rhetorical strategies. Our efforts provide researchers with a basis for moving toward a more complete understanding of congressional campaigns.</description><subject>Advertising campaigns</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Congressional elections</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral campaigning</subject><subject>Endorsements</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Incumbency</subject><subject>Incumbents</subject><subject>Information seeking behavior</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Negative campaigning</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Political advertising</subject><subject>Political Campaigns</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Political Communication</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Political rhetoric</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Television commercials</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>United States Senate</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wINQPHjbOtl8bY5SapW2qNRevIQ0my1b96MmW9B_b9aWCop4ymTeZybvZBA6x9DHgMX1DAAIMEZBShlCcYA6mBERMUnJIeq0ctTqx-jE-1W4Aoakg8RAl2udL6veoC7LTZUb3eR15Xt51Zv3Z_2QrpbOeh-SuugNC2u-9FN0lOnC27Pd2UXz2-Hz4C6aPIzuBzeTyHBMm4jR2CSWAUk5gQxzodOMyNQabiVZxCQzWgAYYXUa4pSLVIPkMQVNMy6TBemiq23ftavfNtY3qsy9sUWhK1tvvOJhLkbDA_-BRMRx6Cv_BWNMKCRAAnj5A1zVGxd-oWUopTElNEB4CxlXe-9sptYuL7X7UBhUuxn1azOh5mJbs_JN7fYFsRAyYbgdJdrquW_s-17X7lVxQQRTfPSkpsnLdMwmj2oceLLzoMuFy9Ol_Xb6t4tPTn6mQA</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N.</creator><creator>KIFER, MARTIN J.</creator><creator>PARKIN, MICHAEL</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections</title><author>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N. ; KIFER, MARTIN J. ; PARKIN, MICHAEL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-542c8e503d630f167adf39dec6e93b23fca700c7ead3fcd67da096240a4f698b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Advertising campaigns</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Congressional elections</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral campaigning</topic><topic>Endorsements</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Incumbency</topic><topic>Incumbents</topic><topic>Information seeking behavior</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Negative campaigning</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Political advertising</topic><topic>Political Campaigns</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Political Communication</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Political rhetoric</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Television commercials</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>United States Senate</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIFER, MARTIN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARKIN, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N.</au><au>KIFER, MARTIN J.</au><au>PARKIN, MICHAEL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>343-366</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><coden>APORBP</coden><abstract>Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the resulting predictions with a novel dataset based on candidate Web sites over three election cycles. Unlike television advertisements or newspaper coverage, Web sites provide an unmediated, holistic, and representative portrait of campaigns. We find that incumbents and challengers differ across a broad range of behavior that reflects varying attitudes toward risk, that incumbents’ strategies depend on the competitiveness of the race, and that candidates link negative campaigning to other aspects of their rhetorical strategies. Our efforts provide researchers with a basis for moving toward a more complete understanding of congressional campaigns.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0003055409990037</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0554 |
ispartof | The American political science review, 2009-08, Vol.103 (3), p.343-366 |
issn | 0003-0554 1537-5943 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60035450 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Advertising campaigns Behavior Candidates Communication Communication (Thought Transfer) Congressional elections Elections Electoral campaigning Endorsements Familiarity Governance Incumbency Incumbents Information seeking behavior Internet Legislators Negative campaigning Partisanship Political advertising Political Campaigns Political candidates Political Communication Political parties Political partisanship Political rhetoric Political science Resistance (Psychology) Rhetoric Studies Television commercials U.S.A United States of America United States Senate Voters Websites |
title | Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A16%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Campaign%20Communications%20in%20U.S.%20Congressional%20Elections&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=DRUCKMAN,%20JAMES%20N.&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=343-366&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft.coden=APORBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0003055409990037&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27798510%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214442434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0003055409990037&rft_jstor_id=27798510&rfr_iscdi=true |