Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections

Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American political science review 2009-08, Vol.103 (3), p.343-366
Hauptverfasser: DRUCKMAN, JAMES N., KIFER, MARTIN J., PARKIN, MICHAEL
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 366
container_issue 3
container_start_page 343
container_title The American political science review
container_volume 103
creator DRUCKMAN, JAMES N.
KIFER, MARTIN J.
PARKIN, MICHAEL
description Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the resulting predictions with a novel dataset based on candidate Web sites over three election cycles. Unlike television advertisements or newspaper coverage, Web sites provide an unmediated, holistic, and representative portrait of campaigns. We find that incumbents and challengers differ across a broad range of behavior that reflects varying attitudes toward risk, that incumbents’ strategies depend on the competitiveness of the race, and that candidates link negative campaigning to other aspects of their rhetorical strategies. Our efforts provide researchers with a basis for moving toward a more complete understanding of congressional campaigns.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0003055409990037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60035450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0003055409990037</cupid><jstor_id>27798510</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27798510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-542c8e503d630f167adf39dec6e93b23fca700c7ead3fcd67da096240a4f698b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wINQPHjbOtl8bY5SapW2qNRevIQ0my1b96MmW9B_b9aWCop4ymTeZybvZBA6x9DHgMX1DAAIMEZBShlCcYA6mBERMUnJIeq0ctTqx-jE-1W4Aoakg8RAl2udL6veoC7LTZUb3eR15Xt51Zv3Z_2QrpbOeh-SuugNC2u-9FN0lOnC27Pd2UXz2-Hz4C6aPIzuBzeTyHBMm4jR2CSWAUk5gQxzodOMyNQabiVZxCQzWgAYYXUa4pSLVIPkMQVNMy6TBemiq23ftavfNtY3qsy9sUWhK1tvvOJhLkbDA_-BRMRx6Cv_BWNMKCRAAnj5A1zVGxd-oWUopTElNEB4CxlXe-9sptYuL7X7UBhUuxn1azOh5mJbs_JN7fYFsRAyYbgdJdrquW_s-17X7lVxQQRTfPSkpsnLdMwmj2oceLLzoMuFy9Ol_Xb6t4tPTn6mQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214442434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N. ; KIFER, MARTIN J. ; PARKIN, MICHAEL</creator><creatorcontrib>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N. ; KIFER, MARTIN J. ; PARKIN, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><description>Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the resulting predictions with a novel dataset based on candidate Web sites over three election cycles. Unlike television advertisements or newspaper coverage, Web sites provide an unmediated, holistic, and representative portrait of campaigns. We find that incumbents and challengers differ across a broad range of behavior that reflects varying attitudes toward risk, that incumbents’ strategies depend on the competitiveness of the race, and that candidates link negative campaigning to other aspects of their rhetorical strategies. Our efforts provide researchers with a basis for moving toward a more complete understanding of congressional campaigns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0003055409990037</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APORBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Advertising campaigns ; Behavior ; Candidates ; Communication ; Communication (Thought Transfer) ; Congressional elections ; Elections ; Electoral campaigning ; Endorsements ; Familiarity ; Governance ; Incumbency ; Incumbents ; Information seeking behavior ; Internet ; Legislators ; Negative campaigning ; Partisanship ; Political advertising ; Political Campaigns ; Political candidates ; Political Communication ; Political parties ; Political partisanship ; Political rhetoric ; Political science ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Rhetoric ; Studies ; Television commercials ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; United States Senate ; Voters ; Websites</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 2009-08, Vol.103 (3), p.343-366</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009 American Political Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Political Science Association Aug 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-542c8e503d630f167adf39dec6e93b23fca700c7ead3fcd67da096240a4f698b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-542c8e503d630f167adf39dec6e93b23fca700c7ead3fcd67da096240a4f698b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27798510$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055409990037/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12844,27923,27924,55627,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIFER, MARTIN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARKIN, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><title>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the resulting predictions with a novel dataset based on candidate Web sites over three election cycles. Unlike television advertisements or newspaper coverage, Web sites provide an unmediated, holistic, and representative portrait of campaigns. We find that incumbents and challengers differ across a broad range of behavior that reflects varying attitudes toward risk, that incumbents’ strategies depend on the competitiveness of the race, and that candidates link negative campaigning to other aspects of their rhetorical strategies. Our efforts provide researchers with a basis for moving toward a more complete understanding of congressional campaigns.</description><subject>Advertising campaigns</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</subject><subject>Congressional elections</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral campaigning</subject><subject>Endorsements</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Incumbency</subject><subject>Incumbents</subject><subject>Information seeking behavior</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Negative campaigning</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Political advertising</subject><subject>Political Campaigns</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Political Communication</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Political rhetoric</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Television commercials</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>United States Senate</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wINQPHjbOtl8bY5SapW2qNRevIQ0my1b96MmW9B_b9aWCop4ymTeZybvZBA6x9DHgMX1DAAIMEZBShlCcYA6mBERMUnJIeq0ctTqx-jE-1W4Aoakg8RAl2udL6veoC7LTZUb3eR15Xt51Zv3Z_2QrpbOeh-SuugNC2u-9FN0lOnC27Pd2UXz2-Hz4C6aPIzuBzeTyHBMm4jR2CSWAUk5gQxzodOMyNQabiVZxCQzWgAYYXUa4pSLVIPkMQVNMy6TBemiq23ftavfNtY3qsy9sUWhK1tvvOJhLkbDA_-BRMRx6Cv_BWNMKCRAAnj5A1zVGxd-oWUopTElNEB4CxlXe-9sptYuL7X7UBhUuxn1azOh5mJbs_JN7fYFsRAyYbgdJdrquW_s-17X7lVxQQRTfPSkpsnLdMwmj2oceLLzoMuFy9Ol_Xb6t4tPTn6mQA</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N.</creator><creator>KIFER, MARTIN J.</creator><creator>PARKIN, MICHAEL</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections</title><author>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N. ; KIFER, MARTIN J. ; PARKIN, MICHAEL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-542c8e503d630f167adf39dec6e93b23fca700c7ead3fcd67da096240a4f698b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Advertising campaigns</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication (Thought Transfer)</topic><topic>Congressional elections</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral campaigning</topic><topic>Endorsements</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Incumbency</topic><topic>Incumbents</topic><topic>Information seeking behavior</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Negative campaigning</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Political advertising</topic><topic>Political Campaigns</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Political Communication</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Political rhetoric</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Television commercials</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>United States Senate</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIFER, MARTIN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARKIN, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DRUCKMAN, JAMES N.</au><au>KIFER, MARTIN J.</au><au>PARKIN, MICHAEL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>343-366</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><coden>APORBP</coden><abstract>Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the resulting predictions with a novel dataset based on candidate Web sites over three election cycles. Unlike television advertisements or newspaper coverage, Web sites provide an unmediated, holistic, and representative portrait of campaigns. We find that incumbents and challengers differ across a broad range of behavior that reflects varying attitudes toward risk, that incumbents’ strategies depend on the competitiveness of the race, and that candidates link negative campaigning to other aspects of their rhetorical strategies. Our efforts provide researchers with a basis for moving toward a more complete understanding of congressional campaigns.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0003055409990037</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0554
ispartof The American political science review, 2009-08, Vol.103 (3), p.343-366
issn 0003-0554
1537-5943
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60035450
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Advertising campaigns
Behavior
Candidates
Communication
Communication (Thought Transfer)
Congressional elections
Elections
Electoral campaigning
Endorsements
Familiarity
Governance
Incumbency
Incumbents
Information seeking behavior
Internet
Legislators
Negative campaigning
Partisanship
Political advertising
Political Campaigns
Political candidates
Political Communication
Political parties
Political partisanship
Political rhetoric
Political science
Resistance (Psychology)
Rhetoric
Studies
Television commercials
U.S.A
United States of America
United States Senate
Voters
Websites
title Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A16%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Campaign%20Communications%20in%20U.S.%20Congressional%20Elections&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=DRUCKMAN,%20JAMES%20N.&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=343-366&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft.coden=APORBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0003055409990037&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27798510%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214442434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0003055409990037&rft_jstor_id=27798510&rfr_iscdi=true