State Opposition to REAL ID
The REAL ID Act requires states to adopt standardized procedures and formats for state driver's licenses and IDs. Twenty-one states have passed a law or resolution in formal challenge to REAL ID; only seven states have not initiated a formal challenge. Using qualitative and quantitative analyse...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Publius 2009-07, Vol.39 (3), p.476-505 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 505 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 476 |
| container_title | Publius |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Regan, Priscilla M. Deering, Christopher J. |
| description | The REAL ID Act requires states to adopt standardized procedures and formats for state driver's licenses and IDs. Twenty-one states have passed a law or resolution in formal challenge to REAL ID; only seven states have not initiated a formal challenge. Using qualitative and quantitative analyses, we find that relatively less populous and less wealthy states, which are likely to be more impacted by unfunded mandates and more conservative states, which are more likely to be concerned about retaining state control, were more likely to oppose REAL ID. States with stronger privacy orientations also were more likely to pass statutes or resolutions in opposition. Our qualitative analysis also implies that social advocacy coalitions and state associations played important roles in facilitating and leading state resistance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/publius/pjp004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60029094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A205638113</galeid><jstor_id>40272220</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/publius/pjp004</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A205638113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-5f55061839f8a4f449fc2a8e774e2bf1732e554388e0e3182a8e39fc61c346693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuLFDEQxoMoOK5evYgweBA89G7lnRyHcZ8MjPhA8RKyIb322NOJSVrc_940vYzgZQ6VFFW_7wuVQuglhlMMmp7F8bbvxnwWdxGAPUILLJlsJAb5GC1qRTVcc3iKnuW8AwCqlVygV5-KLX65jTHkrnRhWJaw_Hi-2iyv3z9HT1rbZ__i4T5BXy7OP6-vms328nq92jSOc1Ua3nIOAiuqW2VZy5huHbHKS8k8uW2xpMRzzqhSHjzFaupV1gnsKBNC0xP0dvaNKfwafS5m32Xn-94OPozZCACiQbOjIFeKSMHkUZBKoiVVuIJv_gN3YUxDndYQLLkEjUmFmhm6s7033eDCUPyf4kLf-ztv6l-st2ZFgItqiWnlT2fepZBz8q2JqdvbdG8wmGlV5mFVZl5VFdzMguSjdwc6jHECK_fbUEt1Pe5rEIAp7aZajViDSWE4cPOj7KvZu9msyo8__Hpmd7mEdKAZEEkIgX-Td7lOfOjb9NMISSU3V9--m4uvlwJ_2KzNDf0LcsrEdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217570912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State Opposition to REAL ID</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Regan, Priscilla M. ; Deering, Christopher J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Regan, Priscilla M. ; Deering, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><description>The REAL ID Act requires states to adopt standardized procedures and formats for state driver's licenses and IDs. Twenty-one states have passed a law or resolution in formal challenge to REAL ID; only seven states have not initiated a formal challenge. Using qualitative and quantitative analyses, we find that relatively less populous and less wealthy states, which are likely to be more impacted by unfunded mandates and more conservative states, which are more likely to be concerned about retaining state control, were more likely to oppose REAL ID. States with stronger privacy orientations also were more likely to pass statutes or resolutions in opposition. Our qualitative analysis also implies that social advocacy coalitions and state associations played important roles in facilitating and leading state resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjp004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBLSAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Affluence ; Central-local government relations ; Control ; Cost estimates ; Counterterrorism ; Documents ; Drivers licenses ; Energy conservation ; Federal government ; Federal regulation ; Federalism ; Fraud ; Government ; Government regulation ; Governors ; Identification cards, certificates, etc ; Identity ; Identity cards ; Interest groups ; Intergovernmental relations ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legal reform ; Legal status, laws, etc ; Legislation ; Legislatures ; Licenses ; Motor vehicle drivers ; National security ; No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US ; Political activism ; Politics ; Privacy ; Privacy issue ; Qualitative analysis ; REAL ID Act 2005-US ; Resistance ; Right of privacy ; Social activism ; Sovereign states ; Standardization ; State budgets ; State government ; States (Political Subdivisions) ; Terrorism ; U.S.A ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Publius, 2009-07, Vol.39 (3), p.476-505</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 CSF Associates: Publius, Inc</rights><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CSF Associates: Publius, Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org. 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Summer 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-5f55061839f8a4f449fc2a8e774e2bf1732e554388e0e3182a8e39fc61c346693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-5f55061839f8a4f449fc2a8e774e2bf1732e554388e0e3182a8e39fc61c346693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40272220$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40272220$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,1581,3996,27852,27853,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/ouppublus/v_3a39_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a476-505.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Regan, Priscilla M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deering, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><title>State Opposition to REAL ID</title><title>Publius</title><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><description>The REAL ID Act requires states to adopt standardized procedures and formats for state driver's licenses and IDs. Twenty-one states have passed a law or resolution in formal challenge to REAL ID; only seven states have not initiated a formal challenge. Using qualitative and quantitative analyses, we find that relatively less populous and less wealthy states, which are likely to be more impacted by unfunded mandates and more conservative states, which are more likely to be concerned about retaining state control, were more likely to oppose REAL ID. States with stronger privacy orientations also were more likely to pass statutes or resolutions in opposition. Our qualitative analysis also implies that social advocacy coalitions and state associations played important roles in facilitating and leading state resistance.</description><subject>Affluence</subject><subject>Central-local government relations</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Counterterrorism</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Drivers licenses</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Identification cards, certificates, etc</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Identity cards</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Intergovernmental relations</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Legal status, laws, etc</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Motor vehicle drivers</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Privacy issue</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>REAL ID Act 2005-US</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Right of privacy</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Sovereign states</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>State budgets</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>States (Political Subdivisions)</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0048-5950</issn><issn>1747-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuLFDEQxoMoOK5evYgweBA89G7lnRyHcZ8MjPhA8RKyIb322NOJSVrc_940vYzgZQ6VFFW_7wuVQuglhlMMmp7F8bbvxnwWdxGAPUILLJlsJAb5GC1qRTVcc3iKnuW8AwCqlVygV5-KLX65jTHkrnRhWJaw_Hi-2iyv3z9HT1rbZ__i4T5BXy7OP6-vms328nq92jSOc1Ua3nIOAiuqW2VZy5huHbHKS8k8uW2xpMRzzqhSHjzFaupV1gnsKBNC0xP0dvaNKfwafS5m32Xn-94OPozZCACiQbOjIFeKSMHkUZBKoiVVuIJv_gN3YUxDndYQLLkEjUmFmhm6s7033eDCUPyf4kLf-ztv6l-st2ZFgItqiWnlT2fepZBz8q2JqdvbdG8wmGlV5mFVZl5VFdzMguSjdwc6jHECK_fbUEt1Pe5rEIAp7aZajViDSWE4cPOj7KvZu9msyo8__Hpmd7mEdKAZEEkIgX-Td7lOfOjb9NMISSU3V9--m4uvlwJ_2KzNDf0LcsrEdw</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Regan, Priscilla M.</creator><creator>Deering, Christopher J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>State Opposition to REAL ID</title><author>Regan, Priscilla M. ; Deering, Christopher J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-5f55061839f8a4f449fc2a8e774e2bf1732e554388e0e3182a8e39fc61c346693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Affluence</topic><topic>Central-local government relations</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Counterterrorism</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Drivers licenses</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Identification cards, certificates, etc</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Identity cards</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Intergovernmental relations</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Legal status, laws, etc</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Motor vehicle drivers</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Privacy issue</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>REAL ID Act 2005-US</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Right of privacy</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Sovereign states</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>State budgets</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>States (Political Subdivisions)</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Regan, Priscilla M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deering, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Publius</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Regan, Priscilla M.</au><au>Deering, Christopher J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State Opposition to REAL ID</atitle><jtitle>Publius</jtitle><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>476</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>476-505</pages><issn>0048-5950</issn><eissn>1747-7107</eissn><coden>PBLSAB</coden><abstract>The REAL ID Act requires states to adopt standardized procedures and formats for state driver's licenses and IDs. Twenty-one states have passed a law or resolution in formal challenge to REAL ID; only seven states have not initiated a formal challenge. Using qualitative and quantitative analyses, we find that relatively less populous and less wealthy states, which are likely to be more impacted by unfunded mandates and more conservative states, which are more likely to be concerned about retaining state control, were more likely to oppose REAL ID. States with stronger privacy orientations also were more likely to pass statutes or resolutions in opposition. Our qualitative analysis also implies that social advocacy coalitions and state associations played important roles in facilitating and leading state resistance.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/publius/pjp004</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0048-5950 |
| ispartof | Publius, 2009-07, Vol.39 (3), p.476-505 |
| issn | 0048-5950 1747-7107 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60029094 |
| source | RePEc; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Affluence Central-local government relations Control Cost estimates Counterterrorism Documents Drivers licenses Energy conservation Federal government Federal regulation Federalism Fraud Government Government regulation Governors Identification cards, certificates, etc Identity Identity cards Interest groups Intergovernmental relations Laws, regulations and rules Legal reform Legal status, laws, etc Legislation Legislatures Licenses Motor vehicle drivers National security No Child Left Behind Act 2001-US Political activism Politics Privacy Privacy issue Qualitative analysis REAL ID Act 2005-US Resistance Right of privacy Social activism Sovereign states Standardization State budgets State government States (Political Subdivisions) Terrorism U.S.A United States of America |
| title | State Opposition to REAL ID |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A53%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20Opposition%20to%20REAL%20ID&rft.jtitle=Publius&rft.au=Regan,%20Priscilla%20M.&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=476&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=476-505&rft.issn=0048-5950&rft.eissn=1747-7107&rft.coden=PBLSAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/publius/pjp004&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA205638113%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217570912&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A205638113&rft_jstor_id=40272220&rft_oup_id=10.1093/publius/pjp004&rfr_iscdi=true |