Why do family doctors (not) signal? Opportunities and limitations of the collaboration between family doctors and social service providers
Public health and social welfare subsystems are principally linked together by mutual interest in the basic care of elderly people. Family doctor services are parts of the social signalizing system that promotes revealing unprovided needs. On the other hand, taking indigents into social care would m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association 2005-01, Vol.4 (4), p.36-55 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | hun |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 55 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Kovacs, Benedek Galig, Zoltan Valyi, Reka |
description | Public health and social welfare subsystems are principally linked together by mutual interest in the basic care of elderly people. Family doctor services are parts of the social signalizing system that promotes revealing unprovided needs. On the other hand, taking indigents into social care would make considerably easier the work of family doctors. As a consequence of this family doctors' signalizing should be a general practice everywhere. But social specialists experience the contrary. In order to explain the difference between the unity of interest in principle, and the weak collaboration in reality, a theoretical model was elaborated and tested empirically. We have found that social service providers' preferences are not evident for family doctors, therefore, their willingness to signalize depends on their opportunity of obtaining information. Reprinted by permission of Szociológiai Szemle |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60020671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36526157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p621-36759122ace290a44d8daa6985f14afb9a358181ad8e113f0c2baa6304db71d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQzAEkqtJ_8AnBIZLXTpzkhFDFS6rUSyWO1cbeUCPXDrFTxC_w1aSUExdOs9rZmVnNWTYDASoXvISLbBHjG-ccVC0EV7Ps62X3yUxgHe6tO046hSGyax_SDYv21aO7Zeu-D0MavU2WIkNvmLN7mzDZ4CMLHUs7Yjo4h20YfraspfRB5P_6HrUxaIuORRoOVhPrh3CwhoZ4mZ136CItfnGebR7uN8unfLV-fF7erfJeCcilqsoGhEBNouFYFKY2iKqpyw4K7NoGZVlDDWhqApAd16KdeMkL01ZgCjnPrk62U_D7SDFt9zZqmp73FMa4VZxPzVTw76FUpVBQVvIbahxvew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36526157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why do family doctors (not) signal? Opportunities and limitations of the collaboration between family doctors and social service providers</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kovacs, Benedek ; Galig, Zoltan ; Valyi, Reka</creator><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Benedek ; Galig, Zoltan ; Valyi, Reka</creatorcontrib><description>Public health and social welfare subsystems are principally linked together by mutual interest in the basic care of elderly people. Family doctor services are parts of the social signalizing system that promotes revealing unprovided needs. On the other hand, taking indigents into social care would make considerably easier the work of family doctors. As a consequence of this family doctors' signalizing should be a general practice everywhere. But social specialists experience the contrary. In order to explain the difference between the unity of interest in principle, and the weak collaboration in reality, a theoretical model was elaborated and tested empirically. We have found that social service providers' preferences are not evident for family doctors, therefore, their willingness to signalize depends on their opportunity of obtaining information. Reprinted by permission of Szociológiai Szemle</description><identifier>ISSN: 1216-2051</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SZSZEY</identifier><language>hun</language><subject>Adult Care Services ; Delivery Systems ; Elderly ; Family policy ; Health care ; Health policy ; Information society ; Medical sociology ; Physicians ; Public Health ; Regression analysis ; Social Services ; Social Welfare ; Well-being</subject><ispartof>Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association, 2005-01, Vol.4 (4), p.36-55</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Benedek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galig, Zoltan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valyi, Reka</creatorcontrib><title>Why do family doctors (not) signal? Opportunities and limitations of the collaboration between family doctors and social service providers</title><title>Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association</title><description>Public health and social welfare subsystems are principally linked together by mutual interest in the basic care of elderly people. Family doctor services are parts of the social signalizing system that promotes revealing unprovided needs. On the other hand, taking indigents into social care would make considerably easier the work of family doctors. As a consequence of this family doctors' signalizing should be a general practice everywhere. But social specialists experience the contrary. In order to explain the difference between the unity of interest in principle, and the weak collaboration in reality, a theoretical model was elaborated and tested empirically. We have found that social service providers' preferences are not evident for family doctors, therefore, their willingness to signalize depends on their opportunity of obtaining information. Reprinted by permission of Szociológiai Szemle</description><subject>Adult Care Services</subject><subject>Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Family policy</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Information society</subject><subject>Medical sociology</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Social Services</subject><subject>Social Welfare</subject><subject>Well-being</subject><issn>1216-2051</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQzAEkqtJ_8AnBIZLXTpzkhFDFS6rUSyWO1cbeUCPXDrFTxC_w1aSUExdOs9rZmVnNWTYDASoXvISLbBHjG-ccVC0EV7Ps62X3yUxgHe6tO046hSGyax_SDYv21aO7Zeu-D0MavU2WIkNvmLN7mzDZ4CMLHUs7Yjo4h20YfraspfRB5P_6HrUxaIuORRoOVhPrh3CwhoZ4mZ136CItfnGebR7uN8unfLV-fF7erfJeCcilqsoGhEBNouFYFKY2iKqpyw4K7NoGZVlDDWhqApAd16KdeMkL01ZgCjnPrk62U_D7SDFt9zZqmp73FMa4VZxPzVTw76FUpVBQVvIbahxvew</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Kovacs, Benedek</creator><creator>Galig, Zoltan</creator><creator>Valyi, Reka</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Why do family doctors (not) signal? Opportunities and limitations of the collaboration between family doctors and social service providers</title><author>Kovacs, Benedek ; Galig, Zoltan ; Valyi, Reka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p621-36759122ace290a44d8daa6985f14afb9a358181ad8e113f0c2baa6304db71d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>hun</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult Care Services</topic><topic>Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Family policy</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Information society</topic><topic>Medical sociology</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Social Services</topic><topic>Social Welfare</topic><topic>Well-being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Benedek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galig, Zoltan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valyi, Reka</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kovacs, Benedek</au><au>Galig, Zoltan</au><au>Valyi, Reka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why do family doctors (not) signal? Opportunities and limitations of the collaboration between family doctors and social service providers</atitle><jtitle>Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>36-55</pages><issn>1216-2051</issn><coden>SZSZEY</coden><abstract>Public health and social welfare subsystems are principally linked together by mutual interest in the basic care of elderly people. Family doctor services are parts of the social signalizing system that promotes revealing unprovided needs. On the other hand, taking indigents into social care would make considerably easier the work of family doctors. As a consequence of this family doctors' signalizing should be a general practice everywhere. But social specialists experience the contrary. In order to explain the difference between the unity of interest in principle, and the weak collaboration in reality, a theoretical model was elaborated and tested empirically. We have found that social service providers' preferences are not evident for family doctors, therefore, their willingness to signalize depends on their opportunity of obtaining information. Reprinted by permission of Szociológiai Szemle</abstract><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1216-2051 |
ispartof | Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association, 2005-01, Vol.4 (4), p.36-55 |
issn | 1216-2051 |
language | hun |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60020671 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Care Services Delivery Systems Elderly Family policy Health care Health policy Information society Medical sociology Physicians Public Health Regression analysis Social Services Social Welfare Well-being |
title | Why do family doctors (not) signal? Opportunities and limitations of the collaboration between family doctors and social service providers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A33%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20do%20family%20doctors%20(not)%20signal?%20Opportunities%20and%20limitations%20of%20the%20collaboration%20between%20family%20doctors%20and%20social%20service%20providers&rft.jtitle=Szociol%C3%B3giai%20szemle%20:%20review%20of%20sociology%20of%20the%20Hungarian%20Sociological%20Association&rft.au=Kovacs,%20Benedek&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=36-55&rft.issn=1216-2051&rft.coden=SZSZEY&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E36526157%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36526157&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |