Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors

This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the sur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Field methods 2006-05, Vol.18 (2), p.172-188
Hauptverfasser: McCarty, Christopher, House, Mark, Harman, Jeffrey, Richards, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 188
container_issue 2
container_start_page 172
container_title Field methods
container_volume 18
creator McCarty, Christopher
House, Mark
Harman, Jeffrey
Richards, Scott
description This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the survey vendor's control. Significant factors that affected response rates included the salience of the survey to the population, the survey length, the type of sample (listed vs random-digit dialing), minutes per piece of sample (effort), and the amount of time the survey was in the field. A ten-minute increase in survey length results in a 7% decrease in the response rate. An increase of one day in the field per one hundred cases (fielding time) results in a 7% increase in the response rate. An increase of one interviewer minute devoted to each piece of sample released results in a 2.2% increase in overall response rates and a 3.4% increase in random-digit dialing response rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1525822X05282259
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60005699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1525822X05282259</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1982581104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-948e0065594d8e3a3ffadb94e14c7c6fa52beec973f81f28d5ad57b34e8fc3f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LAzEQxRdRsFbvHgOCt9V8bDYbb7K0KhSUWkW8LGl2Yrdsk5pkhf73bqkHKYinGZjfe_DmJck5wVeECHFNOOUFpW-Y035weZAMCOc0ZTKXh9ud8nR7P05OQlhijAuRZ4PkfWSM8xE1Fj0tnAX03Pkv2KAphLWzAdBURQg3aLYA1KOgY0DOoFewtfNI2RqVbQM2pqWz0bu2hRqNlY7Oh9PkyKg2wNnPHCYv49GsvE8nj3cP5e0k1UyQmMqsAIxzzmVWF8AUM0bVc5kBybTQuVGczgG0FMwUxNCi5qrmYs4yKIxmRrJhcrnzXXv32UGI1aoJGtpWWXBdqPI-LM_l_yDLsxwzwXvwYg9cus7bPkRFZNH_mRCc9RTeUdq7EDyYau2blfKbiuBq20m130kvSXeSoD7gl-lf_DeSI4sr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1982581104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McCarty, Christopher ; House, Mark ; Harman, Jeffrey ; Richards, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>McCarty, Christopher ; House, Mark ; Harman, Jeffrey ; Richards, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the survey vendor's control. Significant factors that affected response rates included the salience of the survey to the population, the survey length, the type of sample (listed vs random-digit dialing), minutes per piece of sample (effort), and the amount of time the survey was in the field. A ten-minute increase in survey length results in a 7% decrease in the response rate. An increase of one day in the field per one hundred cases (fielding time) results in a 7% increase in the response rate. An increase of one interviewer minute devoted to each piece of sample released results in a 2.2% increase in overall response rates and a 3.4% increase in random-digit dialing response rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05282259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Anthropological research ; Data collection ; Interviews ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Research methods ; Research Responses ; Researcher Subject Relations ; Response rates ; Responses ; Surveys ; Telephone ; Telephone Surveys ; Time</subject><ispartof>Field methods, 2006-05, Vol.18 (2), p.172-188</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. May 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-948e0065594d8e3a3ffadb94e14c7c6fa52beec973f81f28d5ad57b34e8fc3f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-948e0065594d8e3a3ffadb94e14c7c6fa52beec973f81f28d5ad57b34e8fc3f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1525822X05282259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X05282259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21808,27913,27914,33763,33764,43610,43611</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCarty, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harman, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors</title><title>Field methods</title><description>This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the survey vendor's control. Significant factors that affected response rates included the salience of the survey to the population, the survey length, the type of sample (listed vs random-digit dialing), minutes per piece of sample (effort), and the amount of time the survey was in the field. A ten-minute increase in survey length results in a 7% decrease in the response rate. An increase of one day in the field per one hundred cases (fielding time) results in a 7% increase in the response rate. An increase of one interviewer minute devoted to each piece of sample released results in a 2.2% increase in overall response rates and a 3.4% increase in random-digit dialing response rates.</description><subject>Anthropological research</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Research Responses</subject><subject>Researcher Subject Relations</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Telephone Surveys</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>1525-822X</issn><issn>1552-3969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1LAzEQxRdRsFbvHgOCt9V8bDYbb7K0KhSUWkW8LGl2Yrdsk5pkhf73bqkHKYinGZjfe_DmJck5wVeECHFNOOUFpW-Y035weZAMCOc0ZTKXh9ud8nR7P05OQlhijAuRZ4PkfWSM8xE1Fj0tnAX03Pkv2KAphLWzAdBURQg3aLYA1KOgY0DOoFewtfNI2RqVbQM2pqWz0bu2hRqNlY7Oh9PkyKg2wNnPHCYv49GsvE8nj3cP5e0k1UyQmMqsAIxzzmVWF8AUM0bVc5kBybTQuVGczgG0FMwUxNCi5qrmYs4yKIxmRrJhcrnzXXv32UGI1aoJGtpWWXBdqPI-LM_l_yDLsxwzwXvwYg9cus7bPkRFZNH_mRCc9RTeUdq7EDyYau2blfKbiuBq20m130kvSXeSoD7gl-lf_DeSI4sr</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>McCarty, Christopher</creator><creator>House, Mark</creator><creator>Harman, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Richards, Scott</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors</title><author>McCarty, Christopher ; House, Mark ; Harman, Jeffrey ; Richards, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-948e0065594d8e3a3ffadb94e14c7c6fa52beec973f81f28d5ad57b34e8fc3f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anthropological research</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Research Responses</topic><topic>Researcher Subject Relations</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Telephone Surveys</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCarty, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harman, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCarty, Christopher</au><au>House, Mark</au><au>Harman, Jeffrey</au><au>Richards, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors</atitle><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>172-188</pages><issn>1525-822X</issn><eissn>1552-3969</eissn><abstract>This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the survey vendor's control. Significant factors that affected response rates included the salience of the survey to the population, the survey length, the type of sample (listed vs random-digit dialing), minutes per piece of sample (effort), and the amount of time the survey was in the field. A ten-minute increase in survey length results in a 7% decrease in the response rate. An increase of one day in the field per one hundred cases (fielding time) results in a 7% increase in the response rate. An increase of one interviewer minute devoted to each piece of sample released results in a 2.2% increase in overall response rates and a 3.4% increase in random-digit dialing response rates.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1525822X05282259</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-822X
ispartof Field methods, 2006-05, Vol.18 (2), p.172-188
issn 1525-822X
1552-3969
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60005699
source Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anthropological research
Data collection
Interviews
Polls & surveys
Research methods
Research Responses
Researcher Subject Relations
Response rates
Responses
Surveys
Telephone
Telephone Surveys
Time
title Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A14%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effort%20in%20Phone%20Survey%20Response%20Rates:%20The%20Effects%20of%20Vendor%20and%20Client-Controlled%20Factors&rft.jtitle=Field%20methods&rft.au=McCarty,%20Christopher&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=172-188&rft.issn=1525-822X&rft.eissn=1552-3969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1525822X05282259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1982581104%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1982581104&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1525822X05282259&rfr_iscdi=true