Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors
This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the sur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Field methods 2006-05, Vol.18 (2), p.172-188 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 188 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 172 |
container_title | Field methods |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | McCarty, Christopher House, Mark Harman, Jeffrey Richards, Scott |
description | This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the survey vendor's control. Significant factors that affected response rates included the salience of the survey to the population, the survey length, the type of sample (listed vs random-digit dialing), minutes per piece of sample (effort), and the amount of time the survey was in the field. A ten-minute increase in survey length results in a 7% decrease in the response rate. An increase of one day in the field per one hundred cases (fielding time) results in a 7% increase in the response rate. An increase of one interviewer minute devoted to each piece of sample released results in a 2.2% increase in overall response rates and a 3.4% increase in random-digit dialing response rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1525822X05282259 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60005699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1525822X05282259</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1982581104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-948e0065594d8e3a3ffadb94e14c7c6fa52beec973f81f28d5ad57b34e8fc3f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LAzEQxRdRsFbvHgOCt9V8bDYbb7K0KhSUWkW8LGl2Yrdsk5pkhf73bqkHKYinGZjfe_DmJck5wVeECHFNOOUFpW-Y035weZAMCOc0ZTKXh9ud8nR7P05OQlhijAuRZ4PkfWSM8xE1Fj0tnAX03Pkv2KAphLWzAdBURQg3aLYA1KOgY0DOoFewtfNI2RqVbQM2pqWz0bu2hRqNlY7Oh9PkyKg2wNnPHCYv49GsvE8nj3cP5e0k1UyQmMqsAIxzzmVWF8AUM0bVc5kBybTQuVGczgG0FMwUxNCi5qrmYs4yKIxmRrJhcrnzXXv32UGI1aoJGtpWWXBdqPI-LM_l_yDLsxwzwXvwYg9cus7bPkRFZNH_mRCc9RTeUdq7EDyYau2blfKbiuBq20m130kvSXeSoD7gl-lf_DeSI4sr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1982581104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McCarty, Christopher ; House, Mark ; Harman, Jeffrey ; Richards, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>McCarty, Christopher ; House, Mark ; Harman, Jeffrey ; Richards, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the survey vendor's control. Significant factors that affected response rates included the salience of the survey to the population, the survey length, the type of sample (listed vs random-digit dialing), minutes per piece of sample (effort), and the amount of time the survey was in the field. A ten-minute increase in survey length results in a 7% decrease in the response rate. An increase of one day in the field per one hundred cases (fielding time) results in a 7% increase in the response rate. An increase of one interviewer minute devoted to each piece of sample released results in a 2.2% increase in overall response rates and a 3.4% increase in random-digit dialing response rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05282259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Anthropological research ; Data collection ; Interviews ; Polls & surveys ; Research methods ; Research Responses ; Researcher Subject Relations ; Response rates ; Responses ; Surveys ; Telephone ; Telephone Surveys ; Time</subject><ispartof>Field methods, 2006-05, Vol.18 (2), p.172-188</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. May 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-948e0065594d8e3a3ffadb94e14c7c6fa52beec973f81f28d5ad57b34e8fc3f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-948e0065594d8e3a3ffadb94e14c7c6fa52beec973f81f28d5ad57b34e8fc3f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1525822X05282259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X05282259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21808,27913,27914,33763,33764,43610,43611</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCarty, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harman, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors</title><title>Field methods</title><description>This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the survey vendor's control. Significant factors that affected response rates included the salience of the survey to the population, the survey length, the type of sample (listed vs random-digit dialing), minutes per piece of sample (effort), and the amount of time the survey was in the field. A ten-minute increase in survey length results in a 7% decrease in the response rate. An increase of one day in the field per one hundred cases (fielding time) results in a 7% increase in the response rate. An increase of one interviewer minute devoted to each piece of sample released results in a 2.2% increase in overall response rates and a 3.4% increase in random-digit dialing response rates.</description><subject>Anthropological research</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Research Responses</subject><subject>Researcher Subject Relations</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Telephone Surveys</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>1525-822X</issn><issn>1552-3969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1LAzEQxRdRsFbvHgOCt9V8bDYbb7K0KhSUWkW8LGl2Yrdsk5pkhf73bqkHKYinGZjfe_DmJck5wVeECHFNOOUFpW-Y035weZAMCOc0ZTKXh9ud8nR7P05OQlhijAuRZ4PkfWSM8xE1Fj0tnAX03Pkv2KAphLWzAdBURQg3aLYA1KOgY0DOoFewtfNI2RqVbQM2pqWz0bu2hRqNlY7Oh9PkyKg2wNnPHCYv49GsvE8nj3cP5e0k1UyQmMqsAIxzzmVWF8AUM0bVc5kBybTQuVGczgG0FMwUxNCi5qrmYs4yKIxmRrJhcrnzXXv32UGI1aoJGtpWWXBdqPI-LM_l_yDLsxwzwXvwYg9cus7bPkRFZNH_mRCc9RTeUdq7EDyYau2blfKbiuBq20m130kvSXeSoD7gl-lf_DeSI4sr</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>McCarty, Christopher</creator><creator>House, Mark</creator><creator>Harman, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Richards, Scott</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors</title><author>McCarty, Christopher ; House, Mark ; Harman, Jeffrey ; Richards, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-948e0065594d8e3a3ffadb94e14c7c6fa52beec973f81f28d5ad57b34e8fc3f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anthropological research</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Research Responses</topic><topic>Researcher Subject Relations</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Telephone Surveys</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCarty, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harman, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCarty, Christopher</au><au>House, Mark</au><au>Harman, Jeffrey</au><au>Richards, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors</atitle><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>172-188</pages><issn>1525-822X</issn><eissn>1552-3969</eissn><abstract>This article presents a model using data from 205 telephone surveys conducted in the same survey lab over a three-year period. The model demonstrates that while response rates are partly a function of variables reflecting effort, they are also affected by contextual variables often not under the survey vendor's control. Significant factors that affected response rates included the salience of the survey to the population, the survey length, the type of sample (listed vs random-digit dialing), minutes per piece of sample (effort), and the amount of time the survey was in the field. A ten-minute increase in survey length results in a 7% decrease in the response rate. An increase of one day in the field per one hundred cases (fielding time) results in a 7% increase in the response rate. An increase of one interviewer minute devoted to each piece of sample released results in a 2.2% increase in overall response rates and a 3.4% increase in random-digit dialing response rates.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1525822X05282259</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-822X |
ispartof | Field methods, 2006-05, Vol.18 (2), p.172-188 |
issn | 1525-822X 1552-3969 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60005699 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anthropological research Data collection Interviews Polls & surveys Research methods Research Responses Researcher Subject Relations Response rates Responses Surveys Telephone Telephone Surveys Time |
title | Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-Controlled Factors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A14%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effort%20in%20Phone%20Survey%20Response%20Rates:%20The%20Effects%20of%20Vendor%20and%20Client-Controlled%20Factors&rft.jtitle=Field%20methods&rft.au=McCarty,%20Christopher&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=172-188&rft.issn=1525-822X&rft.eissn=1552-3969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1525822X05282259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1982581104%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1982581104&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1525822X05282259&rfr_iscdi=true |