Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory

Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of social psychology 2006-01, Vol.36 (1), p.73-90
1. Verfasser: Voci, Alberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 90
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
container_title European journal of social psychology
container_volume 36
creator Voci, Alberto
description Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the first study participants were football fans, and in the second they were employees in an organization. In each study, two experimental conditions were created, whereby the accessibility and salience of the ingroup‐outgroup categorization were varied. New measures of comparative fit and depersonalization were developed, based on meta‐contrast ratios. Outcome variables were ingroup bias (Studies 1 and 2), ingroup entitativity, organizational citizenship behaviours, job satisfaction and turnover intentions (Study 2). Consistent with self‐categorization theory, results showed (a) that comparative fit determined ingroup bias and other criterion variables through the mediating process of depersonalization, and (b) that this process was active only when the category was highly accessible. The moderational role of accessibility concerned the relationship between depersonalization and outcome variables, not the link between fit and depersonalization. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ejsp.259
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60002542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38216450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4879-c39352dd42ba7e4e09b3f857aed0004f2b97af9f6d60b40f2d5a93560ca52c863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhgdRcK2CPyEIihedmmTyMfFOSq2WootfvQzZzEnNmk7WnNnW9debdlcFQXpxODfPeXg5b9M8ZvSAUcpfwBJXB1yaO82MUWPaOvxuM6NUqJZrze83DxCXlFKjVDdrpg-Q4NKNHkgOBLOPLhHvJjjPJQLukwFWUDCPLsWfbop5JG4cyHnJ6xVZlewBEfAlma4yCRHSQCbACW9kkEL7W7W7nb5CLpuHzb3gEsKj3d5rPr8--nT4pj19f_z28NVp60WvTes700k-DIIvnAYB1Cy60EvtYKj5ReALo10wQQ2KLgQNfJCuXijqneS-V91e82zrrUG_r2suexHRQ0puhLxGq6qGS8FvBaWmnVFG3wp2PWdKSFrBJ_-Ay7wu9YtoORO9ZIL1FXq-hXzJiAWCXZV44crGMmqv27TXbdraZkWf7nwOvUuh1Moi_uW1EJTdBGy33FVMsPmvzx6dfJxvvTs-4gQ__vCufLNKd1ras3fHds5O2PxMaPul-wUm5L5y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214851418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Voci, Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Voci, Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the first study participants were football fans, and in the second they were employees in an organization. In each study, two experimental conditions were created, whereby the accessibility and salience of the ingroup‐outgroup categorization were varied. New measures of comparative fit and depersonalization were developed, based on meta‐contrast ratios. Outcome variables were ingroup bias (Studies 1 and 2), ingroup entitativity, organizational citizenship behaviours, job satisfaction and turnover intentions (Study 2). Consistent with self‐categorization theory, results showed (a) that comparative fit determined ingroup bias and other criterion variables through the mediating process of depersonalization, and (b) that this process was active only when the category was highly accessible. The moderational role of accessibility concerned the relationship between depersonalization and outcome variables, not the link between fit and depersonalization. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.259</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classification ; Depersonalization ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Group dynamics ; Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation ; Job satisfaction ; Perceptions ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reference Groups ; Self ; Self Concept ; Self image ; Self-evaluation ; Selfcategorization theory ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social Comparison ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; Social Theories</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 2006-01, Vol.36 (1), p.73-90</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jan/Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4879-c39352dd42ba7e4e09b3f857aed0004f2b97af9f6d60b40f2d5a93560ca52c863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4879-c39352dd42ba7e4e09b3f857aed0004f2b97af9f6d60b40f2d5a93560ca52c863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fejsp.259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fejsp.259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,4022,27922,27923,27924,30998,30999,33773,33774,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17440197$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voci, Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the first study participants were football fans, and in the second they were employees in an organization. In each study, two experimental conditions were created, whereby the accessibility and salience of the ingroup‐outgroup categorization were varied. New measures of comparative fit and depersonalization were developed, based on meta‐contrast ratios. Outcome variables were ingroup bias (Studies 1 and 2), ingroup entitativity, organizational citizenship behaviours, job satisfaction and turnover intentions (Study 2). Consistent with self‐categorization theory, results showed (a) that comparative fit determined ingroup bias and other criterion variables through the mediating process of depersonalization, and (b) that this process was active only when the category was highly accessible. The moderational role of accessibility concerned the relationship between depersonalization and outcome variables, not the link between fit and depersonalization. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Depersonalization</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reference Groups</subject><subject>Self</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Self-evaluation</subject><subject>Selfcategorization theory</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social Comparison</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Theories</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhgdRcK2CPyEIihedmmTyMfFOSq2WootfvQzZzEnNmk7WnNnW9debdlcFQXpxODfPeXg5b9M8ZvSAUcpfwBJXB1yaO82MUWPaOvxuM6NUqJZrze83DxCXlFKjVDdrpg-Q4NKNHkgOBLOPLhHvJjjPJQLukwFWUDCPLsWfbop5JG4cyHnJ6xVZlewBEfAlma4yCRHSQCbACW9kkEL7W7W7nb5CLpuHzb3gEsKj3d5rPr8--nT4pj19f_z28NVp60WvTes700k-DIIvnAYB1Cy60EvtYKj5ReALo10wQQ2KLgQNfJCuXijqneS-V91e82zrrUG_r2suexHRQ0puhLxGq6qGS8FvBaWmnVFG3wp2PWdKSFrBJ_-Ay7wu9YtoORO9ZIL1FXq-hXzJiAWCXZV44crGMmqv27TXbdraZkWf7nwOvUuh1Moi_uW1EJTdBGy33FVMsPmvzx6dfJxvvTs-4gQ__vCufLNKd1ras3fHds5O2PxMaPul-wUm5L5y</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Voci, Alberto</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory</title><author>Voci, Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4879-c39352dd42ba7e4e09b3f857aed0004f2b97af9f6d60b40f2d5a93560ca52c863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Depersonalization</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reference Groups</topic><topic>Self</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Self-evaluation</topic><topic>Selfcategorization theory</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social Comparison</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voci, Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voci, Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>73-90</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the first study participants were football fans, and in the second they were employees in an organization. In each study, two experimental conditions were created, whereby the accessibility and salience of the ingroup‐outgroup categorization were varied. New measures of comparative fit and depersonalization were developed, based on meta‐contrast ratios. Outcome variables were ingroup bias (Studies 1 and 2), ingroup entitativity, organizational citizenship behaviours, job satisfaction and turnover intentions (Study 2). Consistent with self‐categorization theory, results showed (a) that comparative fit determined ingroup bias and other criterion variables through the mediating process of depersonalization, and (b) that this process was active only when the category was highly accessible. The moderational role of accessibility concerned the relationship between depersonalization and outcome variables, not the link between fit and depersonalization. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ejsp.259</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-2772
ispartof European journal of social psychology, 2006-01, Vol.36 (1), p.73-90
issn 0046-2772
1099-0992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60002542
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Behavior
Bias
Biological and medical sciences
Classification
Depersonalization
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Group dynamics
Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation
Job satisfaction
Perceptions
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reference Groups
Self
Self Concept
Self image
Self-evaluation
Selfcategorization theory
Social attribution, perception and cognition
Social Comparison
Social interactions. Communication. Group processes
Social psychology
Social Theories
title Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A55%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relevance%20of%20social%20categories,%20depersonalization%20and%20group%20processes:%20two%20field%20tests%20of%20self-categorization%20theory&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Voci,%20Alberto&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=73-90&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ejsp.259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38216450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214851418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true