Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory
Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of social psychology 2006-01, Vol.36 (1), p.73-90 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 90 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 73 |
container_title | European journal of social psychology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Voci, Alberto |
description | Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the first study participants were football fans, and in the second they were employees in an organization. In each study, two experimental conditions were created, whereby the accessibility and salience of the ingroup‐outgroup categorization were varied. New measures of comparative fit and depersonalization were developed, based on meta‐contrast ratios. Outcome variables were ingroup bias (Studies 1 and 2), ingroup entitativity, organizational citizenship behaviours, job satisfaction and turnover intentions (Study 2). Consistent with self‐categorization theory, results showed (a) that comparative fit determined ingroup bias and other criterion variables through the mediating process of depersonalization, and (b) that this process was active only when the category was highly accessible. The moderational role of accessibility concerned the relationship between depersonalization and outcome variables, not the link between fit and depersonalization. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ejsp.259 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60002542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38216450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4879-c39352dd42ba7e4e09b3f857aed0004f2b97af9f6d60b40f2d5a93560ca52c863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhgdRcK2CPyEIihedmmTyMfFOSq2WootfvQzZzEnNmk7WnNnW9debdlcFQXpxODfPeXg5b9M8ZvSAUcpfwBJXB1yaO82MUWPaOvxuM6NUqJZrze83DxCXlFKjVDdrpg-Q4NKNHkgOBLOPLhHvJjjPJQLukwFWUDCPLsWfbop5JG4cyHnJ6xVZlewBEfAlma4yCRHSQCbACW9kkEL7W7W7nb5CLpuHzb3gEsKj3d5rPr8--nT4pj19f_z28NVp60WvTes700k-DIIvnAYB1Cy60EvtYKj5ReALo10wQQ2KLgQNfJCuXijqneS-V91e82zrrUG_r2suexHRQ0puhLxGq6qGS8FvBaWmnVFG3wp2PWdKSFrBJ_-Ay7wu9YtoORO9ZIL1FXq-hXzJiAWCXZV44crGMmqv27TXbdraZkWf7nwOvUuh1Moi_uW1EJTdBGy33FVMsPmvzx6dfJxvvTs-4gQ__vCufLNKd1ras3fHds5O2PxMaPul-wUm5L5y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214851418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Voci, Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Voci, Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the first study participants were football fans, and in the second they were employees in an organization. In each study, two experimental conditions were created, whereby the accessibility and salience of the ingroup‐outgroup categorization were varied. New measures of comparative fit and depersonalization were developed, based on meta‐contrast ratios. Outcome variables were ingroup bias (Studies 1 and 2), ingroup entitativity, organizational citizenship behaviours, job satisfaction and turnover intentions (Study 2). Consistent with self‐categorization theory, results showed (a) that comparative fit determined ingroup bias and other criterion variables through the mediating process of depersonalization, and (b) that this process was active only when the category was highly accessible. The moderational role of accessibility concerned the relationship between depersonalization and outcome variables, not the link between fit and depersonalization. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.259</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classification ; Depersonalization ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Group dynamics ; Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation ; Job satisfaction ; Perceptions ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reference Groups ; Self ; Self Concept ; Self image ; Self-evaluation ; Selfcategorization theory ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social Comparison ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; Social Theories</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 2006-01, Vol.36 (1), p.73-90</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jan/Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4879-c39352dd42ba7e4e09b3f857aed0004f2b97af9f6d60b40f2d5a93560ca52c863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4879-c39352dd42ba7e4e09b3f857aed0004f2b97af9f6d60b40f2d5a93560ca52c863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fejsp.259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fejsp.259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,4022,27922,27923,27924,30998,30999,33773,33774,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17440197$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voci, Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the first study participants were football fans, and in the second they were employees in an organization. In each study, two experimental conditions were created, whereby the accessibility and salience of the ingroup‐outgroup categorization were varied. New measures of comparative fit and depersonalization were developed, based on meta‐contrast ratios. Outcome variables were ingroup bias (Studies 1 and 2), ingroup entitativity, organizational citizenship behaviours, job satisfaction and turnover intentions (Study 2). Consistent with self‐categorization theory, results showed (a) that comparative fit determined ingroup bias and other criterion variables through the mediating process of depersonalization, and (b) that this process was active only when the category was highly accessible. The moderational role of accessibility concerned the relationship between depersonalization and outcome variables, not the link between fit and depersonalization. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Depersonalization</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reference Groups</subject><subject>Self</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Self-evaluation</subject><subject>Selfcategorization theory</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social Comparison</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Theories</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhgdRcK2CPyEIihedmmTyMfFOSq2WootfvQzZzEnNmk7WnNnW9debdlcFQXpxODfPeXg5b9M8ZvSAUcpfwBJXB1yaO82MUWPaOvxuM6NUqJZrze83DxCXlFKjVDdrpg-Q4NKNHkgOBLOPLhHvJjjPJQLukwFWUDCPLsWfbop5JG4cyHnJ6xVZlewBEfAlma4yCRHSQCbACW9kkEL7W7W7nb5CLpuHzb3gEsKj3d5rPr8--nT4pj19f_z28NVp60WvTes700k-DIIvnAYB1Cy60EvtYKj5ReALo10wQQ2KLgQNfJCuXijqneS-V91e82zrrUG_r2suexHRQ0puhLxGq6qGS8FvBaWmnVFG3wp2PWdKSFrBJ_-Ay7wu9YtoORO9ZIL1FXq-hXzJiAWCXZV44crGMmqv27TXbdraZkWf7nwOvUuh1Moi_uW1EJTdBGy33FVMsPmvzx6dfJxvvTs-4gQ__vCufLNKd1ras3fHds5O2PxMaPul-wUm5L5y</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Voci, Alberto</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory</title><author>Voci, Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4879-c39352dd42ba7e4e09b3f857aed0004f2b97af9f6d60b40f2d5a93560ca52c863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Depersonalization</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reference Groups</topic><topic>Self</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Self-evaluation</topic><topic>Selfcategorization theory</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social Comparison</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voci, Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voci, Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>73-90</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>Two field studies investigated whether, as predicted by self‐categorization theory (Turner, 1987), the relationship between comparative fit of an ingroup‐outgroup categorization and group phenomena is mediated by depersonalization of self‐perception, and moderated by category accessibility. In the first study participants were football fans, and in the second they were employees in an organization. In each study, two experimental conditions were created, whereby the accessibility and salience of the ingroup‐outgroup categorization were varied. New measures of comparative fit and depersonalization were developed, based on meta‐contrast ratios. Outcome variables were ingroup bias (Studies 1 and 2), ingroup entitativity, organizational citizenship behaviours, job satisfaction and turnover intentions (Study 2). Consistent with self‐categorization theory, results showed (a) that comparative fit determined ingroup bias and other criterion variables through the mediating process of depersonalization, and (b) that this process was active only when the category was highly accessible. The moderational role of accessibility concerned the relationship between depersonalization and outcome variables, not the link between fit and depersonalization. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ejsp.259</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-2772 |
ispartof | European journal of social psychology, 2006-01, Vol.36 (1), p.73-90 |
issn | 0046-2772 1099-0992 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60002542 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Behavior Bias Biological and medical sciences Classification Depersonalization Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Group dynamics Ingroup-Outgroup differentiation Job satisfaction Perceptions Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reference Groups Self Self Concept Self image Self-evaluation Selfcategorization theory Social attribution, perception and cognition Social Comparison Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology Social Theories |
title | Relevance of social categories, depersonalization and group processes: two field tests of self-categorization theory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A55%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relevance%20of%20social%20categories,%20depersonalization%20and%20group%20processes:%20two%20field%20tests%20of%20self-categorization%20theory&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Voci,%20Alberto&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=73-90&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ejsp.259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38216450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214851418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |