The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations

The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American sociological review 2006-04, Vol.71 (2), p.167-190
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Nancy J., Robinson, Robert V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 2
container_start_page 167
container_title American sociological review
container_volume 71
creator Davis, Nancy J.
Robinson, Robert V.
description The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically communitarian in viewing individuals as subsumed by a larger community of believers subject to timeless laws and God's greater plan, they are disposed toward economic communitarianism, whereby the state should provide for the poor, reduce inequality, and meet community needs via economic intervention. Modernists are theologically individualistic in seeing individuals as having to make moral decisions in a temporal context and as responsible for their own destinies. As such, modernists are inclined to economic individualism, whereby the poor are responsible for their fates, wider income differences promote individual initiative, and government should not interfere in the economy. An alternate hypothesis, based on Islamic scripture's discussion of economic matters, limits the effect of orthodoxy versus modernism to the one clear economic directive of Islam: the state's responsibility to care for the poor. The authors find that Islamic orthodoxy-measured as the desire to implement Islamic law (the shari'a)-is associated with the broad economic communitarianism expected by Moral Cosmology theory.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/000312240607100201
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60001735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30038984</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_000312240607100201</sage_id><sourcerecordid>30038984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e8f6726e00f2a8399d7d0ebac21b6262653e3a53b8aecdf6ba70ce2f2971678c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0l1rFDEUBuAgCq6tf0AQgqJ3054kM_nwrpRtrWztRev1cDaTabPMTtZkRrv_vhm2VFHakouQ5DlvPggh7xgcMKbUIQAIxnkJEhQD4MBekBkzwhSaK_aSzCZQTOI1eZPSKg-hMmZGbq9uHJ1fY-cHjB57eoLW0dDSs9Th2lt6EYeb0ITb7Rd6OW42IQ60DfFheYG_KfYNndvQh2ni25gGnyN8Ty_dL9fT8zF1fl2c4ypEP2zpdxx86NM-edVil9zb-36P_DiZXx1_LRYXp2fHR4vClkwNhdOtVFw6gJajFsY0qgG3RMvZUvLcKuEEVmKp0dmmlUtUYB1vuVFMKm3FHvm8y93E8HN0aajXPlnXddi7MKZa5pdgSlTPwkoxZYA9D4VSpQRpMvzwD1yFMfb5tjVnWguQqszo42NoMkZwLSErvlM2hpSia-tN9GuM25pBPf2A-v8fkIs-3Udjsti1EXvr059KpWRlqukIhzuX8Nr9tf1Tye93Fas0hPiQKLLURpfiDilfxQ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883932860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Davis, Nancy J. ; Robinson, Robert V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Nancy J. ; Robinson, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically communitarian in viewing individuals as subsumed by a larger community of believers subject to timeless laws and God's greater plan, they are disposed toward economic communitarianism, whereby the state should provide for the poor, reduce inequality, and meet community needs via economic intervention. Modernists are theologically individualistic in seeing individuals as having to make moral decisions in a temporal context and as responsible for their own destinies. As such, modernists are inclined to economic individualism, whereby the poor are responsible for their fates, wider income differences promote individual initiative, and government should not interfere in the economy. An alternate hypothesis, based on Islamic scripture's discussion of economic matters, limits the effect of orthodoxy versus modernism to the one clear economic directive of Islam: the state's responsibility to care for the poor. The authors find that Islamic orthodoxy-measured as the desire to implement Islamic law (the shari'a)-is associated with the broad economic communitarianism expected by Moral Cosmology theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000312240607100201</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ASREAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: American Sociological Association</publisher><subject>Algeria ; Anniversaries ; Bangladesh ; Beliefs ; Church &amp; state ; Communitarianism ; Community ; Community Needs ; Community Relations ; Cosmology ; Countries ; Crosscultural Analysis ; Crossnational studies ; Distributive justice ; Economic conditions ; Economic growth ; Economic policy ; Economic reform ; Economic systems ; Economic theory ; Egalitarianism ; Egypt ; Empirical research ; Enrollment ; Ethics ; GDP ; General studies. Ideologies ; God ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Gross Domestic Product ; Income inequalities ; Income Inequality ; Individualism ; Indonesia ; Inequality ; Intervention ; Islam ; Islamic countries ; Islamic Culture ; Islamic law ; Jordan ; Judaism ; Justice ; Koran ; Law ; Life expectancy ; Low income groups ; Modernism ; Modernist art ; Mosques ; Muslims ; National Surveys ; Orthodoxy ; Pakistan ; Political sociology ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Protestantism ; Public opinion ; Public policy ; Religion ; Religion &amp; politics ; Religious Orthodoxy ; Saudi Arabia ; Social Inequality ; Social Services ; Sociology ; State Surveys ; Theology ; Theory ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>American sociological review, 2006-04, Vol.71 (2), p.167-190</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>2006 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Sociological Association Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e8f6726e00f2a8399d7d0ebac21b6262653e3a53b8aecdf6ba70ce2f2971678c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e8f6726e00f2a8399d7d0ebac21b6262653e3a53b8aecdf6ba70ce2f2971678c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30038984$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30038984$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12824,21798,27321,27901,27902,30977,33751,33752,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17765954$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Nancy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><title>The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations</title><title>American sociological review</title><addtitle>Am Sociol Rev</addtitle><description>The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically communitarian in viewing individuals as subsumed by a larger community of believers subject to timeless laws and God's greater plan, they are disposed toward economic communitarianism, whereby the state should provide for the poor, reduce inequality, and meet community needs via economic intervention. Modernists are theologically individualistic in seeing individuals as having to make moral decisions in a temporal context and as responsible for their own destinies. As such, modernists are inclined to economic individualism, whereby the poor are responsible for their fates, wider income differences promote individual initiative, and government should not interfere in the economy. An alternate hypothesis, based on Islamic scripture's discussion of economic matters, limits the effect of orthodoxy versus modernism to the one clear economic directive of Islam: the state's responsibility to care for the poor. The authors find that Islamic orthodoxy-measured as the desire to implement Islamic law (the shari'a)-is associated with the broad economic communitarianism expected by Moral Cosmology theory.</description><subject>Algeria</subject><subject>Anniversaries</subject><subject>Bangladesh</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Church &amp; state</subject><subject>Communitarianism</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community Needs</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Crosscultural Analysis</subject><subject>Crossnational studies</subject><subject>Distributive justice</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Economic systems</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Enrollment</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>General studies. Ideologies</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Income inequalities</subject><subject>Income Inequality</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Islamic countries</subject><subject>Islamic Culture</subject><subject>Islamic law</subject><subject>Jordan</subject><subject>Judaism</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Koran</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Modernism</subject><subject>Modernist art</subject><subject>Mosques</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Orthodoxy</subject><subject>Pakistan</subject><subject>Political sociology</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Protestantism</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion &amp; politics</subject><subject>Religious Orthodoxy</subject><subject>Saudi Arabia</subject><subject>Social Inequality</subject><subject>Social Services</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>State Surveys</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>0003-1224</issn><issn>1939-8271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0l1rFDEUBuAgCq6tf0AQgqJ3054kM_nwrpRtrWztRev1cDaTabPMTtZkRrv_vhm2VFHakouQ5DlvPggh7xgcMKbUIQAIxnkJEhQD4MBekBkzwhSaK_aSzCZQTOI1eZPSKg-hMmZGbq9uHJ1fY-cHjB57eoLW0dDSs9Th2lt6EYeb0ITb7Rd6OW42IQ60DfFheYG_KfYNndvQh2ni25gGnyN8Ty_dL9fT8zF1fl2c4ypEP2zpdxx86NM-edVil9zb-36P_DiZXx1_LRYXp2fHR4vClkwNhdOtVFw6gJajFsY0qgG3RMvZUvLcKuEEVmKp0dmmlUtUYB1vuVFMKm3FHvm8y93E8HN0aajXPlnXddi7MKZa5pdgSlTPwkoxZYA9D4VSpQRpMvzwD1yFMfb5tjVnWguQqszo42NoMkZwLSErvlM2hpSia-tN9GuM25pBPf2A-v8fkIs-3Udjsti1EXvr059KpWRlqukIhzuX8Nr9tf1Tye93Fas0hPiQKLLURpfiDilfxQ4</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Davis, Nancy J.</creator><creator>Robinson, Robert V.</creator><general>American Sociological Association</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations</title><author>Davis, Nancy J. ; Robinson, Robert V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e8f6726e00f2a8399d7d0ebac21b6262653e3a53b8aecdf6ba70ce2f2971678c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Algeria</topic><topic>Anniversaries</topic><topic>Bangladesh</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Church &amp; state</topic><topic>Communitarianism</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community Needs</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Crosscultural Analysis</topic><topic>Crossnational studies</topic><topic>Distributive justice</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Economic systems</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Enrollment</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>General studies. Ideologies</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Income inequalities</topic><topic>Income Inequality</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Islamic countries</topic><topic>Islamic Culture</topic><topic>Islamic law</topic><topic>Jordan</topic><topic>Judaism</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Koran</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Modernism</topic><topic>Modernist art</topic><topic>Mosques</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Orthodoxy</topic><topic>Pakistan</topic><topic>Political sociology</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Protestantism</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion &amp; politics</topic><topic>Religious Orthodoxy</topic><topic>Saudi Arabia</topic><topic>Social Inequality</topic><topic>Social Services</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>State Surveys</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Nancy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>American sociological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Nancy J.</au><au>Robinson, Robert V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations</atitle><jtitle>American sociological review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Sociol Rev</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>167-190</pages><issn>0003-1224</issn><eissn>1939-8271</eissn><coden>ASREAL</coden><abstract>The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically communitarian in viewing individuals as subsumed by a larger community of believers subject to timeless laws and God's greater plan, they are disposed toward economic communitarianism, whereby the state should provide for the poor, reduce inequality, and meet community needs via economic intervention. Modernists are theologically individualistic in seeing individuals as having to make moral decisions in a temporal context and as responsible for their own destinies. As such, modernists are inclined to economic individualism, whereby the poor are responsible for their fates, wider income differences promote individual initiative, and government should not interfere in the economy. An alternate hypothesis, based on Islamic scripture's discussion of economic matters, limits the effect of orthodoxy versus modernism to the one clear economic directive of Islam: the state's responsibility to care for the poor. The authors find that Islamic orthodoxy-measured as the desire to implement Islamic law (the shari'a)-is associated with the broad economic communitarianism expected by Moral Cosmology theory.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>American Sociological Association</pub><doi>10.1177/000312240607100201</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1224
ispartof American sociological review, 2006-04, Vol.71 (2), p.167-190
issn 0003-1224
1939-8271
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60001735
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Algeria
Anniversaries
Bangladesh
Beliefs
Church & state
Communitarianism
Community
Community Needs
Community Relations
Cosmology
Countries
Crosscultural Analysis
Crossnational studies
Distributive justice
Economic conditions
Economic growth
Economic policy
Economic reform
Economic systems
Economic theory
Egalitarianism
Egypt
Empirical research
Enrollment
Ethics
GDP
General studies. Ideologies
God
Government (Administrative Body)
Gross Domestic Product
Income inequalities
Income Inequality
Individualism
Indonesia
Inequality
Intervention
Islam
Islamic countries
Islamic Culture
Islamic law
Jordan
Judaism
Justice
Koran
Law
Life expectancy
Low income groups
Modernism
Modernist art
Mosques
Muslims
National Surveys
Orthodoxy
Pakistan
Political sociology
Polls & surveys
Protestantism
Public opinion
Public policy
Religion
Religion & politics
Religious Orthodoxy
Saudi Arabia
Social Inequality
Social Services
Sociology
State Surveys
Theology
Theory
Traditions
title The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A12%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Egalitarian%20Face%20of%20Islamic%20Orthodoxy:%20Support%20for%20Islamic%20Law%20and%20Economic%20Justice%20in%20Seven%20Muslim-Majority%20Nations&rft.jtitle=American%20sociological%20review&rft.au=Davis,%20Nancy%20J.&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=167-190&rft.issn=0003-1224&rft.eissn=1939-8271&rft.coden=ASREAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000312240607100201&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30038984%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883932860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=30038984&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000312240607100201&rfr_iscdi=true