The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations
The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American sociological review 2006-04, Vol.71 (2), p.167-190 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 190 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | American sociological review |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Davis, Nancy J. Robinson, Robert V. |
description | The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically communitarian in viewing individuals as subsumed by a larger community of believers subject to timeless laws and God's greater plan, they are disposed toward economic communitarianism, whereby the state should provide for the poor, reduce inequality, and meet community needs via economic intervention. Modernists are theologically individualistic in seeing individuals as having to make moral decisions in a temporal context and as responsible for their own destinies. As such, modernists are inclined to economic individualism, whereby the poor are responsible for their fates, wider income differences promote individual initiative, and government should not interfere in the economy. An alternate hypothesis, based on Islamic scripture's discussion of economic matters, limits the effect of orthodoxy versus modernism to the one clear economic directive of Islam: the state's responsibility to care for the poor. The authors find that Islamic orthodoxy-measured as the desire to implement Islamic law (the shari'a)-is associated with the broad economic communitarianism expected by Moral Cosmology theory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000312240607100201 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60001735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30038984</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_000312240607100201</sage_id><sourcerecordid>30038984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e8f6726e00f2a8399d7d0ebac21b6262653e3a53b8aecdf6ba70ce2f2971678c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0l1rFDEUBuAgCq6tf0AQgqJ3054kM_nwrpRtrWztRev1cDaTabPMTtZkRrv_vhm2VFHakouQ5DlvPggh7xgcMKbUIQAIxnkJEhQD4MBekBkzwhSaK_aSzCZQTOI1eZPSKg-hMmZGbq9uHJ1fY-cHjB57eoLW0dDSs9Th2lt6EYeb0ITb7Rd6OW42IQ60DfFheYG_KfYNndvQh2ni25gGnyN8Ty_dL9fT8zF1fl2c4ypEP2zpdxx86NM-edVil9zb-36P_DiZXx1_LRYXp2fHR4vClkwNhdOtVFw6gJajFsY0qgG3RMvZUvLcKuEEVmKp0dmmlUtUYB1vuVFMKm3FHvm8y93E8HN0aajXPlnXddi7MKZa5pdgSlTPwkoxZYA9D4VSpQRpMvzwD1yFMfb5tjVnWguQqszo42NoMkZwLSErvlM2hpSia-tN9GuM25pBPf2A-v8fkIs-3Udjsti1EXvr059KpWRlqukIhzuX8Nr9tf1Tye93Fas0hPiQKLLURpfiDilfxQ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883932860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Davis, Nancy J. ; Robinson, Robert V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Nancy J. ; Robinson, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically communitarian in viewing individuals as subsumed by a larger community of believers subject to timeless laws and God's greater plan, they are disposed toward economic communitarianism, whereby the state should provide for the poor, reduce inequality, and meet community needs via economic intervention. Modernists are theologically individualistic in seeing individuals as having to make moral decisions in a temporal context and as responsible for their own destinies. As such, modernists are inclined to economic individualism, whereby the poor are responsible for their fates, wider income differences promote individual initiative, and government should not interfere in the economy. An alternate hypothesis, based on Islamic scripture's discussion of economic matters, limits the effect of orthodoxy versus modernism to the one clear economic directive of Islam: the state's responsibility to care for the poor. The authors find that Islamic orthodoxy-measured as the desire to implement Islamic law (the shari'a)-is associated with the broad economic communitarianism expected by Moral Cosmology theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000312240607100201</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ASREAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: American Sociological Association</publisher><subject>Algeria ; Anniversaries ; Bangladesh ; Beliefs ; Church & state ; Communitarianism ; Community ; Community Needs ; Community Relations ; Cosmology ; Countries ; Crosscultural Analysis ; Crossnational studies ; Distributive justice ; Economic conditions ; Economic growth ; Economic policy ; Economic reform ; Economic systems ; Economic theory ; Egalitarianism ; Egypt ; Empirical research ; Enrollment ; Ethics ; GDP ; General studies. Ideologies ; God ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Gross Domestic Product ; Income inequalities ; Income Inequality ; Individualism ; Indonesia ; Inequality ; Intervention ; Islam ; Islamic countries ; Islamic Culture ; Islamic law ; Jordan ; Judaism ; Justice ; Koran ; Law ; Life expectancy ; Low income groups ; Modernism ; Modernist art ; Mosques ; Muslims ; National Surveys ; Orthodoxy ; Pakistan ; Political sociology ; Polls & surveys ; Protestantism ; Public opinion ; Public policy ; Religion ; Religion & politics ; Religious Orthodoxy ; Saudi Arabia ; Social Inequality ; Social Services ; Sociology ; State Surveys ; Theology ; Theory ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>American sociological review, 2006-04, Vol.71 (2), p.167-190</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>2006 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Sociological Association Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e8f6726e00f2a8399d7d0ebac21b6262653e3a53b8aecdf6ba70ce2f2971678c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e8f6726e00f2a8399d7d0ebac21b6262653e3a53b8aecdf6ba70ce2f2971678c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30038984$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30038984$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12824,21798,27321,27901,27902,30977,33751,33752,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17765954$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Nancy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><title>The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations</title><title>American sociological review</title><addtitle>Am Sociol Rev</addtitle><description>The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically communitarian in viewing individuals as subsumed by a larger community of believers subject to timeless laws and God's greater plan, they are disposed toward economic communitarianism, whereby the state should provide for the poor, reduce inequality, and meet community needs via economic intervention. Modernists are theologically individualistic in seeing individuals as having to make moral decisions in a temporal context and as responsible for their own destinies. As such, modernists are inclined to economic individualism, whereby the poor are responsible for their fates, wider income differences promote individual initiative, and government should not interfere in the economy. An alternate hypothesis, based on Islamic scripture's discussion of economic matters, limits the effect of orthodoxy versus modernism to the one clear economic directive of Islam: the state's responsibility to care for the poor. The authors find that Islamic orthodoxy-measured as the desire to implement Islamic law (the shari'a)-is associated with the broad economic communitarianism expected by Moral Cosmology theory.</description><subject>Algeria</subject><subject>Anniversaries</subject><subject>Bangladesh</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Church & state</subject><subject>Communitarianism</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community Needs</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Crosscultural Analysis</subject><subject>Crossnational studies</subject><subject>Distributive justice</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Economic systems</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Enrollment</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>General studies. Ideologies</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Income inequalities</subject><subject>Income Inequality</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Islamic countries</subject><subject>Islamic Culture</subject><subject>Islamic law</subject><subject>Jordan</subject><subject>Judaism</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Koran</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Modernism</subject><subject>Modernist art</subject><subject>Mosques</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Orthodoxy</subject><subject>Pakistan</subject><subject>Political sociology</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Protestantism</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion & politics</subject><subject>Religious Orthodoxy</subject><subject>Saudi Arabia</subject><subject>Social Inequality</subject><subject>Social Services</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>State Surveys</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>0003-1224</issn><issn>1939-8271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0l1rFDEUBuAgCq6tf0AQgqJ3054kM_nwrpRtrWztRev1cDaTabPMTtZkRrv_vhm2VFHakouQ5DlvPggh7xgcMKbUIQAIxnkJEhQD4MBekBkzwhSaK_aSzCZQTOI1eZPSKg-hMmZGbq9uHJ1fY-cHjB57eoLW0dDSs9Th2lt6EYeb0ITb7Rd6OW42IQ60DfFheYG_KfYNndvQh2ni25gGnyN8Ty_dL9fT8zF1fl2c4ypEP2zpdxx86NM-edVil9zb-36P_DiZXx1_LRYXp2fHR4vClkwNhdOtVFw6gJajFsY0qgG3RMvZUvLcKuEEVmKp0dmmlUtUYB1vuVFMKm3FHvm8y93E8HN0aajXPlnXddi7MKZa5pdgSlTPwkoxZYA9D4VSpQRpMvzwD1yFMfb5tjVnWguQqszo42NoMkZwLSErvlM2hpSia-tN9GuM25pBPf2A-v8fkIs-3Udjsti1EXvr059KpWRlqukIhzuX8Nr9tf1Tye93Fas0hPiQKLLURpfiDilfxQ4</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Davis, Nancy J.</creator><creator>Robinson, Robert V.</creator><general>American Sociological Association</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations</title><author>Davis, Nancy J. ; Robinson, Robert V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e8f6726e00f2a8399d7d0ebac21b6262653e3a53b8aecdf6ba70ce2f2971678c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Algeria</topic><topic>Anniversaries</topic><topic>Bangladesh</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Church & state</topic><topic>Communitarianism</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community Needs</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Crosscultural Analysis</topic><topic>Crossnational studies</topic><topic>Distributive justice</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Economic systems</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Enrollment</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>General studies. Ideologies</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Income inequalities</topic><topic>Income Inequality</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Islamic countries</topic><topic>Islamic Culture</topic><topic>Islamic law</topic><topic>Jordan</topic><topic>Judaism</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Koran</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Modernism</topic><topic>Modernist art</topic><topic>Mosques</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Orthodoxy</topic><topic>Pakistan</topic><topic>Political sociology</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Protestantism</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion & politics</topic><topic>Religious Orthodoxy</topic><topic>Saudi Arabia</topic><topic>Social Inequality</topic><topic>Social Services</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>State Surveys</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Nancy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>American sociological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Nancy J.</au><au>Robinson, Robert V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations</atitle><jtitle>American sociological review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Sociol Rev</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>167-190</pages><issn>0003-1224</issn><eissn>1939-8271</eissn><coden>ASREAL</coden><abstract>The authors test two theories linking religion and economic beliefs in predominantly Muslim nations using data from national surveys of Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Moral Cosmology theory posits that because the religiously orthodox are theologically communitarian in viewing individuals as subsumed by a larger community of believers subject to timeless laws and God's greater plan, they are disposed toward economic communitarianism, whereby the state should provide for the poor, reduce inequality, and meet community needs via economic intervention. Modernists are theologically individualistic in seeing individuals as having to make moral decisions in a temporal context and as responsible for their own destinies. As such, modernists are inclined to economic individualism, whereby the poor are responsible for their fates, wider income differences promote individual initiative, and government should not interfere in the economy. An alternate hypothesis, based on Islamic scripture's discussion of economic matters, limits the effect of orthodoxy versus modernism to the one clear economic directive of Islam: the state's responsibility to care for the poor. The authors find that Islamic orthodoxy-measured as the desire to implement Islamic law (the shari'a)-is associated with the broad economic communitarianism expected by Moral Cosmology theory.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>American Sociological Association</pub><doi>10.1177/000312240607100201</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1224 |
ispartof | American sociological review, 2006-04, Vol.71 (2), p.167-190 |
issn | 0003-1224 1939-8271 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60001735 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Algeria Anniversaries Bangladesh Beliefs Church & state Communitarianism Community Community Needs Community Relations Cosmology Countries Crosscultural Analysis Crossnational studies Distributive justice Economic conditions Economic growth Economic policy Economic reform Economic systems Economic theory Egalitarianism Egypt Empirical research Enrollment Ethics GDP General studies. Ideologies God Government (Administrative Body) Gross Domestic Product Income inequalities Income Inequality Individualism Indonesia Inequality Intervention Islam Islamic countries Islamic Culture Islamic law Jordan Judaism Justice Koran Law Life expectancy Low income groups Modernism Modernist art Mosques Muslims National Surveys Orthodoxy Pakistan Political sociology Polls & surveys Protestantism Public opinion Public policy Religion Religion & politics Religious Orthodoxy Saudi Arabia Social Inequality Social Services Sociology State Surveys Theology Theory Traditions |
title | The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A12%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Egalitarian%20Face%20of%20Islamic%20Orthodoxy:%20Support%20for%20Islamic%20Law%20and%20Economic%20Justice%20in%20Seven%20Muslim-Majority%20Nations&rft.jtitle=American%20sociological%20review&rft.au=Davis,%20Nancy%20J.&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=167-190&rft.issn=0003-1224&rft.eissn=1939-8271&rft.coden=ASREAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000312240607100201&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30038984%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883932860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=30038984&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000312240607100201&rfr_iscdi=true |