A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance

Social responsibilities of businesses and their managers have been discussed since the 1950s. Yet no consensus about progress has been achieved in the corporate social responsibility/corporate social performance literature. In this article, we seek to analyze three views on this literature. One view...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business & society 2005-09, Vol.44 (3), p.283-317
Hauptverfasser: De Bakker, Frank G. A., Groenewegen, Peter, Den Hond, Frank
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 317
container_issue 3
container_start_page 283
container_title Business & society
container_volume 44
creator De Bakker, Frank G. A.
Groenewegen, Peter
Den Hond, Frank
description Social responsibilities of businesses and their managers have been discussed since the 1950s. Yet no consensus about progress has been achieved in the corporate social responsibility/corporate social performance literature. In this article, we seek to analyze three views on this literature. One view is that development occurred from conceptual vagueness, through clarification of central constructs and their relationships, to the testing of theory—a process supported by increased sophistication in research methods. In contrast, other authors claim that hardly any progress is to be expected because of the inherently normative character of the literature. A final view is that progress in the literature on the social responsibilities of business is obscured or even hampered by the continuing introduction of newconstructs. This article explores which of these three views better describes the evolution of the literature during a period of 30 years and suggests implications for further research.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0007650305278086
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59983623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0007650305278086</sage_id><sourcerecordid>888880081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-2f3ec1543d6e03e2e3f17ac497721b858388c3ee2bc2bc9437a3319d06e29d0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHhdBb9H9SHaTYy1-QUHRevAUNpuJ3ZJk6256yMXf7qYtKIowzAzMM-8wMwidUnJJqZRXhBApEsJJwmRKUrGHRjRJWBQzkuyj0VCOhvohOvJ-SQhlTMgR-pzga1PUxjbQOaPxpFV1743HtsKc4DdQbpM_gw-pXmDVlni-AOt6bFs8tW5lneoAv1htVD1wK9t6U5jadP2G_sM8gausa1Sr4RgdVKr2cLKLY_R6ezOf3kezx7uH6WQWac6EiFjFQdMk5qUAwoEBr6hUOs6kZLRIk5SnqeYArNDBsphLxTnNSiKABV_yMbrY6q6c_ViD7_LGeA11rVqwa58nWZZywXgAz36BS7t24Sg-p1kWxlAqAkS2kHbWewdVvnKmUa7PKcmHb-S_vxFazne6ymtVVy5sb_x3nySC0TgNXLTlvHqHH7P_0_0C5dKVxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199388116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>De Bakker, Frank G. A. ; Groenewegen, Peter ; Den Hond, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>De Bakker, Frank G. A. ; Groenewegen, Peter ; Den Hond, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>Social responsibilities of businesses and their managers have been discussed since the 1950s. Yet no consensus about progress has been achieved in the corporate social responsibility/corporate social performance literature. In this article, we seek to analyze three views on this literature. One view is that development occurred from conceptual vagueness, through clarification of central constructs and their relationships, to the testing of theory—a process supported by increased sophistication in research methods. In contrast, other authors claim that hardly any progress is to be expected because of the inherently normative character of the literature. A final view is that progress in the literature on the social responsibilities of business is obscured or even hampered by the continuing introduction of newconstructs. This article explores which of these three views better describes the evolution of the literature during a period of 30 years and suggests implications for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6503</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0007650305278086</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BUSOBE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Corporations ; Economic sociology ; General studies. Economic systems ; Literature Reviews ; Progress ; Research Methodology ; Social Responsibility ; Social Theories ; Society ; Sociology ; Sociology of economy and development ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Business &amp; society, 2005-09, Vol.44 (3), p.283-317</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Sep 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-2f3ec1543d6e03e2e3f17ac497721b858388c3ee2bc2bc9437a3319d06e29d0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-2f3ec1543d6e03e2e3f17ac497721b858388c3ee2bc2bc9437a3319d06e29d0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0007650305278086$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0007650305278086$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27323,27903,27904,33753,33754,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17062148$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Bakker, Frank G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenewegen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Den Hond, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance</title><title>Business &amp; society</title><description>Social responsibilities of businesses and their managers have been discussed since the 1950s. Yet no consensus about progress has been achieved in the corporate social responsibility/corporate social performance literature. In this article, we seek to analyze three views on this literature. One view is that development occurred from conceptual vagueness, through clarification of central constructs and their relationships, to the testing of theory—a process supported by increased sophistication in research methods. In contrast, other authors claim that hardly any progress is to be expected because of the inherently normative character of the literature. A final view is that progress in the literature on the social responsibilities of business is obscured or even hampered by the continuing introduction of newconstructs. This article explores which of these three views better describes the evolution of the literature during a period of 30 years and suggests implications for further research.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Economic sociology</subject><subject>General studies. Economic systems</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Progress</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>Social Theories</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of economy and development</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0007-6503</issn><issn>1552-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHhdBb9H9SHaTYy1-QUHRevAUNpuJ3ZJk6256yMXf7qYtKIowzAzMM-8wMwidUnJJqZRXhBApEsJJwmRKUrGHRjRJWBQzkuyj0VCOhvohOvJ-SQhlTMgR-pzga1PUxjbQOaPxpFV1743HtsKc4DdQbpM_gw-pXmDVlni-AOt6bFs8tW5lneoAv1htVD1wK9t6U5jadP2G_sM8gausa1Sr4RgdVKr2cLKLY_R6ezOf3kezx7uH6WQWac6EiFjFQdMk5qUAwoEBr6hUOs6kZLRIk5SnqeYArNDBsphLxTnNSiKABV_yMbrY6q6c_ViD7_LGeA11rVqwa58nWZZywXgAz36BS7t24Sg-p1kWxlAqAkS2kHbWewdVvnKmUa7PKcmHb-S_vxFazne6ymtVVy5sb_x3nySC0TgNXLTlvHqHH7P_0_0C5dKVxQ</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>De Bakker, Frank G. A.</creator><creator>Groenewegen, Peter</creator><creator>Den Hond, Frank</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance</title><author>De Bakker, Frank G. A. ; Groenewegen, Peter ; Den Hond, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-2f3ec1543d6e03e2e3f17ac497721b858388c3ee2bc2bc9437a3319d06e29d0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Economic sociology</topic><topic>General studies. Economic systems</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Progress</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>Social Theories</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of economy and development</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Bakker, Frank G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenewegen, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Den Hond, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Business &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Bakker, Frank G. A.</au><au>Groenewegen, Peter</au><au>Den Hond, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance</atitle><jtitle>Business &amp; society</jtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>283-317</pages><issn>0007-6503</issn><eissn>1552-4205</eissn><coden>BUSOBE</coden><abstract>Social responsibilities of businesses and their managers have been discussed since the 1950s. Yet no consensus about progress has been achieved in the corporate social responsibility/corporate social performance literature. In this article, we seek to analyze three views on this literature. One view is that development occurred from conceptual vagueness, through clarification of central constructs and their relationships, to the testing of theory—a process supported by increased sophistication in research methods. In contrast, other authors claim that hardly any progress is to be expected because of the inherently normative character of the literature. A final view is that progress in the literature on the social responsibilities of business is obscured or even hampered by the continuing introduction of newconstructs. This article explores which of these three views better describes the evolution of the literature during a period of 30 years and suggests implications for further research.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0007650305278086</doi><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-6503
ispartof Business & society, 2005-09, Vol.44 (3), p.283-317
issn 0007-6503
1552-4205
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59983623
source SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Bibliometrics
Corporations
Economic sociology
General studies. Economic systems
Literature Reviews
Progress
Research Methodology
Social Responsibility
Social Theories
Society
Sociology
Sociology of economy and development
Studies
title A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A40%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Bibliometric%20Analysis%20of%2030%20Years%20of%20Research%20and%20Theory%20on%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility%20and%20Corporate%20Social%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Business%20&%20society&rft.au=De%20Bakker,%20Frank%20G.%20A.&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=283-317&rft.issn=0007-6503&rft.eissn=1552-4205&rft.coden=BUSOBE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0007650305278086&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E888880081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199388116&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0007650305278086&rfr_iscdi=true