From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability
Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-ben...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business ethics 2006-05, Vol.65 (3), p.251-267 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 267 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Journal of business ethics |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Rasche, Andreas Esser, Daniel E. |
description | Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59949673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25123787</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25123787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c87f4d4b61cc2aba0889e34a57aeb2e1550972ef51fd489f884de4294e5bc09b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAehJ2_R2exOdvdYivWDigf1HDbbiU2bNDG7FfLvXakInjrwzgszDw9jlxxuOIC69RwQeQKACQrEZDhiI45KJJAZdcxGwDOVSJTylJ15v4Y4yOWImXnfNpPXYDe0ausl9ZNnu7Uf1NA2TEL77zN1rt1tgy2qugrDOTspbe3p4rfH7H1-9zZ7SBYv94-z6SJxAiAkTqtSLmWRcedSW1jQ2pCQFpWlIiWOCEalVCIvl1KbUmu5JJkaSVg4MIUYs-u9t-vbzx35kDeVd1TXdkvtzudojDSZEgdBkaHUIj0MciOV0AYi-LQHe-rI5V1fNbYf8o3t1sXOU8i_cmEzjGuISQGyWFWMiOl-TsjzNFP5KjRRdrWXrX1o-z9ZRFKhtBLfx6SIwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19473890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Rasche, Andreas ; Esser, Daniel E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rasche, Andreas ; Esser, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><description>Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><subject>Accountability ; accountability standards ; Accounting ; Accounting standards ; Argumentation ; Auditing standards ; Business ; Business audits ; Business ethics ; Business planning ; Business studies ; Corporate culture ; Corporate governance ; Decision-making ; Decisions ; Dialogue ; Discourse ethics ; Ethical accountability ; Habermas ; Leadership ; Management ; Management audits ; Morality ; organizational accountability ; Responsibility ; Social accounting ; Stakeholder ; stakeholder dialogue ; stakeholder management ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2006-05, Vol.65 (3), p.251-267</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c87f4d4b61cc2aba0889e34a57aeb2e1550972ef51fd489f884de4294e5bc09b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25123787$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25123787$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4008,27865,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapjbuset/v_3a65_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a251-267.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rasche, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><title>From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><description>Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>accountability standards</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounting standards</subject><subject>Argumentation</subject><subject>Auditing standards</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business audits</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Business planning</subject><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Decision-making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Dialogue</subject><subject>Discourse ethics</subject><subject>Ethical accountability</subject><subject>Habermas</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management audits</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>organizational accountability</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>Social accounting</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>stakeholder dialogue</subject><subject>stakeholder management</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAehJ2_R2exOdvdYivWDigf1HDbbiU2bNDG7FfLvXakInjrwzgszDw9jlxxuOIC69RwQeQKACQrEZDhiI45KJJAZdcxGwDOVSJTylJ15v4Y4yOWImXnfNpPXYDe0ausl9ZNnu7Uf1NA2TEL77zN1rt1tgy2qugrDOTspbe3p4rfH7H1-9zZ7SBYv94-z6SJxAiAkTqtSLmWRcedSW1jQ2pCQFpWlIiWOCEalVCIvl1KbUmu5JJkaSVg4MIUYs-u9t-vbzx35kDeVd1TXdkvtzudojDSZEgdBkaHUIj0MciOV0AYi-LQHe-rI5V1fNbYf8o3t1sXOU8i_cmEzjGuISQGyWFWMiOl-TsjzNFP5KjRRdrWXrX1o-z9ZRFKhtBLfx6SIwA</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Rasche, Andreas</creator><creator>Esser, Daniel E.</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability</title><author>Rasche, Andreas ; Esser, Daniel E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c87f4d4b61cc2aba0889e34a57aeb2e1550972ef51fd489f884de4294e5bc09b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>accountability standards</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounting standards</topic><topic>Argumentation</topic><topic>Auditing standards</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business audits</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Business planning</topic><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Decision-making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Dialogue</topic><topic>Discourse ethics</topic><topic>Ethical accountability</topic><topic>Habermas</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management audits</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>organizational accountability</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>Social accounting</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>stakeholder dialogue</topic><topic>stakeholder management</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rasche, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rasche, Andreas</au><au>Esser, Daniel E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>251-267</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><abstract>Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 2006-05, Vol.65 (3), p.251-267 |
issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59949673 |
source | RePEc; PAIS Index; SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Education Source |
subjects | Accountability accountability standards Accounting Accounting standards Argumentation Auditing standards Business Business audits Business ethics Business planning Business studies Corporate culture Corporate governance Decision-making Decisions Dialogue Discourse ethics Ethical accountability Habermas Leadership Management Management audits Morality organizational accountability Responsibility Social accounting Stakeholder stakeholder dialogue stakeholder management Transparency |
title | From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A36%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Stakeholder%20Management%20to%20Stakeholder%20Accountability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Rasche,%20Andreas&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=251-267&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25123787%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19473890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25123787&rfr_iscdi=true |