From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability

Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-ben...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business ethics 2006-05, Vol.65 (3), p.251-267
Hauptverfasser: Rasche, Andreas, Esser, Daniel E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 267
container_issue 3
container_start_page 251
container_title Journal of business ethics
container_volume 65
creator Rasche, Andreas
Esser, Daniel E.
description Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59949673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25123787</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25123787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c87f4d4b61cc2aba0889e34a57aeb2e1550972ef51fd489f884de4294e5bc09b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAehJ2_R2exOdvdYivWDigf1HDbbiU2bNDG7FfLvXakInjrwzgszDw9jlxxuOIC69RwQeQKACQrEZDhiI45KJJAZdcxGwDOVSJTylJ15v4Y4yOWImXnfNpPXYDe0ausl9ZNnu7Uf1NA2TEL77zN1rt1tgy2qugrDOTspbe3p4rfH7H1-9zZ7SBYv94-z6SJxAiAkTqtSLmWRcedSW1jQ2pCQFpWlIiWOCEalVCIvl1KbUmu5JJkaSVg4MIUYs-u9t-vbzx35kDeVd1TXdkvtzudojDSZEgdBkaHUIj0MciOV0AYi-LQHe-rI5V1fNbYf8o3t1sXOU8i_cmEzjGuISQGyWFWMiOl-TsjzNFP5KjRRdrWXrX1o-z9ZRFKhtBLfx6SIwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19473890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Rasche, Andreas ; Esser, Daniel E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rasche, Andreas ; Esser, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><description>Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><subject>Accountability ; accountability standards ; Accounting ; Accounting standards ; Argumentation ; Auditing standards ; Business ; Business audits ; Business ethics ; Business planning ; Business studies ; Corporate culture ; Corporate governance ; Decision-making ; Decisions ; Dialogue ; Discourse ethics ; Ethical accountability ; Habermas ; Leadership ; Management ; Management audits ; Morality ; organizational accountability ; Responsibility ; Social accounting ; Stakeholder ; stakeholder dialogue ; stakeholder management ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2006-05, Vol.65 (3), p.251-267</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c87f4d4b61cc2aba0889e34a57aeb2e1550972ef51fd489f884de4294e5bc09b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25123787$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25123787$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4008,27865,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapjbuset/v_3a65_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a251-267.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rasche, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><title>From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><description>Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>accountability standards</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounting standards</subject><subject>Argumentation</subject><subject>Auditing standards</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business audits</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Business planning</subject><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Decision-making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Dialogue</subject><subject>Discourse ethics</subject><subject>Ethical accountability</subject><subject>Habermas</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management audits</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>organizational accountability</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>Social accounting</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>stakeholder dialogue</subject><subject>stakeholder management</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAehJ2_R2exOdvdYivWDigf1HDbbiU2bNDG7FfLvXakInjrwzgszDw9jlxxuOIC69RwQeQKACQrEZDhiI45KJJAZdcxGwDOVSJTylJ15v4Y4yOWImXnfNpPXYDe0ausl9ZNnu7Uf1NA2TEL77zN1rt1tgy2qugrDOTspbe3p4rfH7H1-9zZ7SBYv94-z6SJxAiAkTqtSLmWRcedSW1jQ2pCQFpWlIiWOCEalVCIvl1KbUmu5JJkaSVg4MIUYs-u9t-vbzx35kDeVd1TXdkvtzudojDSZEgdBkaHUIj0MciOV0AYi-LQHe-rI5V1fNbYf8o3t1sXOU8i_cmEzjGuISQGyWFWMiOl-TsjzNFP5KjRRdrWXrX1o-z9ZRFKhtBLfx6SIwA</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Rasche, Andreas</creator><creator>Esser, Daniel E.</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability</title><author>Rasche, Andreas ; Esser, Daniel E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c87f4d4b61cc2aba0889e34a57aeb2e1550972ef51fd489f884de4294e5bc09b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>accountability standards</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounting standards</topic><topic>Argumentation</topic><topic>Auditing standards</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business audits</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Business planning</topic><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Decision-making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Dialogue</topic><topic>Discourse ethics</topic><topic>Ethical accountability</topic><topic>Habermas</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management audits</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>organizational accountability</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>Social accounting</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>stakeholder dialogue</topic><topic>stakeholder management</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rasche, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rasche, Andreas</au><au>Esser, Daniel E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>251-267</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><abstract>Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4544
ispartof Journal of business ethics, 2006-05, Vol.65 (3), p.251-267
issn 0167-4544
1573-0697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59949673
source RePEc; PAIS Index; SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Education Source
subjects Accountability
accountability standards
Accounting
Accounting standards
Argumentation
Auditing standards
Business
Business audits
Business ethics
Business planning
Business studies
Corporate culture
Corporate governance
Decision-making
Decisions
Dialogue
Discourse ethics
Ethical accountability
Habermas
Leadership
Management
Management audits
Morality
organizational accountability
Responsibility
Social accounting
Stakeholder
stakeholder dialogue
stakeholder management
Transparency
title From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A36%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Stakeholder%20Management%20to%20Stakeholder%20Accountability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Rasche,%20Andreas&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=251-267&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25123787%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19473890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25123787&rfr_iscdi=true