The Music Industry and the Legislative Development of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Online Service Provider Provision
The online service provider provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act-Section 512 of the Copyright Act-limits the liability of online or Internet service providers whose users infringe the copyrights of others. While the provision limits liability, it also offers significant powers to a copy...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Communication law and policy 2005-07, Vol.10 (3), p.291-312 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 312 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 291 |
| container_title | Communication law and policy |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Imfeld, Cassandra Ekstrand, Victoria Smith |
| description | The online service provider provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act-Section 512 of the Copyright Act-limits the liability of online or Internet service providers whose users infringe the copyrights of others. While the provision limits liability, it also offers significant powers to a copyright holder seeking to prosecute online copyright infringers. This article traces the legislative development of the provision, examining initial opposition by copyright holders in the music industry. That opposition changed to support after considerable expansion of the original proposal. The article concludes that the music industry successfully lobbied within a three-month window before the first version of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act was presented to Congress in May 1998. The expanded version of the provision included substantial new subpoena powers and takedown requirements. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1207/s15326926clp1003_2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59934561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1079987261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa55330bcb9d32a247275418126f77d465c4cbab79bd9260cafbc265948f7e4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1v2zAQhoWgAZI6_QOdiAztpIQfomQNGQy7TQw4SIGmM0FRR4cBRaok5cJLfnvpOlMDZLrDe897uI-i-EzwFaG4uY6EM1q3tFZ2JBgzQU-K84NWHsQPOcdzUpJ6js-KjzE-48wwws6Ll8cnQPdTNAqtXT_FFPZIuh6lLG9ga6KVyewArWAH1o8DuIS8_ldema1J0qJ7Yy04Z6YBLf24D2b7lNBCpa8RPThrHKCfEHZGAfoR_M70EI5JNN5dFKda2gifXuOs-PX92-Pyrtw83K6Xi02pGG9TqSXnjOFOdW3PqKRVQxtekTmhtW6avqq5qlQnu6bt-rwvVlJ3ita8rea6gUqyWfHl2HcM_vcEMYnBRAXWSgd-ioK3Lat4TTJ4-R_47Kfg8mwi3zkPk8-cIXqEVPAxBtBiDGaQYS8IFod_iLf_yKabo8k47cMg__hge5Hk3vqgg3TKRMHe8f8F3wSUSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207359326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Music Industry and the Legislative Development of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Online Service Provider Provision</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Imfeld, Cassandra ; Ekstrand, Victoria Smith</creator><creatorcontrib>Imfeld, Cassandra ; Ekstrand, Victoria Smith</creatorcontrib><description>The online service provider provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act-Section 512 of the Copyright Act-limits the liability of online or Internet service providers whose users infringe the copyrights of others. While the provision limits liability, it also offers significant powers to a copyright holder seeking to prosecute online copyright infringers. This article traces the legislative development of the provision, examining initial opposition by copyright holders in the music industry. That opposition changed to support after considerable expansion of the original proposal. The article concludes that the music industry successfully lobbied within a three-month window before the first version of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act was presented to Congress in May 1998. The expanded version of the provision included substantial new subpoena powers and takedown requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-1680</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15326926clp1003_2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</publisher><subject>Copyright ; Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US ; Internet service providers ; Legislation ; Music industry ; Politics ; Property, Intellectual ; Service introduction ; Technology policy ; United States</subject><ispartof>Communication law and policy, 2005-07, Vol.10 (3), p.291-312</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa55330bcb9d32a247275418126f77d465c4cbab79bd9260cafbc265948f7e4a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27842,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imfeld, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekstrand, Victoria Smith</creatorcontrib><title>The Music Industry and the Legislative Development of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Online Service Provider Provision</title><title>Communication law and policy</title><description>The online service provider provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act-Section 512 of the Copyright Act-limits the liability of online or Internet service providers whose users infringe the copyrights of others. While the provision limits liability, it also offers significant powers to a copyright holder seeking to prosecute online copyright infringers. This article traces the legislative development of the provision, examining initial opposition by copyright holders in the music industry. That opposition changed to support after considerable expansion of the original proposal. The article concludes that the music industry successfully lobbied within a three-month window before the first version of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act was presented to Congress in May 1998. The expanded version of the provision included substantial new subpoena powers and takedown requirements.</description><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US</subject><subject>Internet service providers</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Music industry</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Property, Intellectual</subject><subject>Service introduction</subject><subject>Technology policy</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1081-1680</issn><issn>1532-6926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT1v2zAQhoWgAZI6_QOdiAztpIQfomQNGQy7TQw4SIGmM0FRR4cBRaok5cJLfnvpOlMDZLrDe897uI-i-EzwFaG4uY6EM1q3tFZ2JBgzQU-K84NWHsQPOcdzUpJ6js-KjzE-48wwws6Ll8cnQPdTNAqtXT_FFPZIuh6lLG9ga6KVyewArWAH1o8DuIS8_ldema1J0qJ7Yy04Z6YBLf24D2b7lNBCpa8RPThrHKCfEHZGAfoR_M70EI5JNN5dFKda2gifXuOs-PX92-Pyrtw83K6Xi02pGG9TqSXnjOFOdW3PqKRVQxtekTmhtW6avqq5qlQnu6bt-rwvVlJ3ita8rea6gUqyWfHl2HcM_vcEMYnBRAXWSgd-ioK3Lat4TTJ4-R_47Kfg8mwi3zkPk8-cIXqEVPAxBtBiDGaQYS8IFod_iLf_yKabo8k47cMg__hge5Hk3vqgg3TKRMHe8f8F3wSUSw</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Imfeld, Cassandra</creator><creator>Ekstrand, Victoria Smith</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>The Music Industry and the Legislative Development of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Online Service Provider Provision</title><author>Imfeld, Cassandra ; Ekstrand, Victoria Smith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa55330bcb9d32a247275418126f77d465c4cbab79bd9260cafbc265948f7e4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US</topic><topic>Internet service providers</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Music industry</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Property, Intellectual</topic><topic>Service introduction</topic><topic>Technology policy</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imfeld, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekstrand, Victoria Smith</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Communication law and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imfeld, Cassandra</au><au>Ekstrand, Victoria Smith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Music Industry and the Legislative Development of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Online Service Provider Provision</atitle><jtitle>Communication law and policy</jtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>291-312</pages><issn>1081-1680</issn><eissn>1532-6926</eissn><abstract>The online service provider provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act-Section 512 of the Copyright Act-limits the liability of online or Internet service providers whose users infringe the copyrights of others. While the provision limits liability, it also offers significant powers to a copyright holder seeking to prosecute online copyright infringers. This article traces the legislative development of the provision, examining initial opposition by copyright holders in the music industry. That opposition changed to support after considerable expansion of the original proposal. The article concludes that the music industry successfully lobbied within a three-month window before the first version of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act was presented to Congress in May 1998. The expanded version of the provision included substantial new subpoena powers and takedown requirements.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</pub><doi>10.1207/s15326926clp1003_2</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1081-1680 |
| ispartof | Communication law and policy, 2005-07, Vol.10 (3), p.291-312 |
| issn | 1081-1680 1532-6926 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59934561 |
| source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Copyright Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US Internet service providers Legislation Music industry Politics Property, Intellectual Service introduction Technology policy United States |
| title | The Music Industry and the Legislative Development of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Online Service Provider Provision |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A31%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Music%20Industry%20and%20the%20Legislative%20Development%20of%20the%20Digital%20Millennium%20Copyright%20Act's%20Online%20Service%20Provider%20Provision&rft.jtitle=Communication%20law%20and%20policy&rft.au=Imfeld,%20Cassandra&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=291-312&rft.issn=1081-1680&rft.eissn=1532-6926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15326926clp1003_2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1079987261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207359326&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |