HAVA and the States
Two major events—the 2000 vote counting crisis in Florida and passage of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) in October 2002—spawned a wave of federal, state, and local policy innovation and policy implementation. The major effect of the Florida crisis was a nationwide effort to analyze information on...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Publius 2005-10, Vol.35 (4), p.497-514 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 514 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 497 |
| container_title | Publius |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Liebschutz, Sarah F. Palazzolo, Daniel J. |
| description | Two major events—the 2000 vote counting crisis in Florida and passage of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) in October 2002—spawned a wave of federal, state, and local policy innovation and policy implementation. The major effect of the Florida crisis was a nationwide effort to analyze information on elections and to debate policy solutions. Subsequently, HAVA, the first major election law in U.S. history that includes federal funds for election equipment and operations, had a more substantial effect on policy innovation and implementation. Both before and after HAVA, election law changes have been affected by partisan considerations, policy analyses, and entrepreneurial leadership. Thus far, HAVA has positively affected election administration, though administrative practices and their effectiveness vary across and within the states. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/publius/pji037 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59934488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A138861240</galeid><jstor_id>4624728</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A138861240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-413ec2a703371e7a7ba4140cd6b76172dce0b2500b065e99733d5ad836ddd1f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s9rFDEUB_AgCq61J8GTh8VDwcO0Lz9fclyX2q2s7aFVxEvIzLxZZ52dWZMZ0P_eKVtaWhYsOQSSzzcvIY-xtxyOOTh5sh3yph7SyXZdg8RnbMJRYYYc8DmbACibaafhJXuV0hoApLM4YW8Ws2-zaWjLaf-Tpld96Cm9Zi-q0CQ6vJ0P2NdPp9fzRba8PDufz5ZZYYD3meKSChEQpEROGDAPiisoSpOj4SjKgiAXGiAHo8k5lLLUobTSlGXJKyUP2NHu3G3sfg-Uer-pU0FNE1rqhuS1c1Ipa58AUUij_3-iNMqiAzPC94_guhtiO77WC44a0eENynZoFRrydVt1fQzFilqKoelaqupxecaltYYLBaM_3uPHUdKmLvYGPjwIjKanP_0qDCn586uLJ1t7tnxos3226JqGVuTHT5xf7r14EbuUIlV-G-tNiH89B3_TW_62t_yut8bAu11gnfou3mllhEJh7-vXaax7tx3iL29QovaL7z_8F-X0R_v5wgv5D6XE1Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217577976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HAVA and the States</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Liebschutz, Sarah F. ; Palazzolo, Daniel J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liebschutz, Sarah F. ; Palazzolo, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><description>Two major events—the 2000 vote counting crisis in Florida and passage of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) in October 2002—spawned a wave of federal, state, and local policy innovation and policy implementation. The major effect of the Florida crisis was a nationwide effort to analyze information on elections and to debate policy solutions. Subsequently, HAVA, the first major election law in U.S. history that includes federal funds for election equipment and operations, had a more substantial effect on policy innovation and implementation. Both before and after HAVA, election law changes have been affected by partisan considerations, policy analyses, and entrepreneurial leadership. Thus far, HAVA has positively affected election administration, though administrative practices and their effectiveness vary across and within the states.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/publius/pji037</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBLSAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Congressional elections ; Crises ; Election law ; Election laws ; Elections ; Electoral law ; Electoral reform ; Federal government ; Federalism ; Florida ; Innovations ; Interpretation and construction ; Leadership ; Legislation ; Local elections ; Management ; Policy Analysis ; Policy making ; Political aspects ; Political parties ; Political reform ; Provisional ballots ; State elections ; Subnational government ; U.S.A ; United States ; United States of America ; Voter fraud ; Voter registration ; Voting ; Voting Behavior ; Voting rights ; Voting turnout</subject><ispartof>Publius, 2005-10, Vol.35 (4), p.497-514</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 CSF Associates: Publius, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Center for the Study of Federalism Fall 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-413ec2a703371e7a7ba4140cd6b76172dce0b2500b065e99733d5ad836ddd1f43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4624728$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4624728$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27844,27845,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liebschutz, Sarah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palazzolo, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><title>HAVA and the States</title><title>Publius</title><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><description>Two major events—the 2000 vote counting crisis in Florida and passage of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) in October 2002—spawned a wave of federal, state, and local policy innovation and policy implementation. The major effect of the Florida crisis was a nationwide effort to analyze information on elections and to debate policy solutions. Subsequently, HAVA, the first major election law in U.S. history that includes federal funds for election equipment and operations, had a more substantial effect on policy innovation and implementation. Both before and after HAVA, election law changes have been affected by partisan considerations, policy analyses, and entrepreneurial leadership. Thus far, HAVA has positively affected election administration, though administrative practices and their effectiveness vary across and within the states.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Congressional elections</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Election law</subject><subject>Election laws</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral law</subject><subject>Electoral reform</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Local elections</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Policy Analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political reform</subject><subject>Provisional ballots</subject><subject>State elections</subject><subject>Subnational government</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Voter fraud</subject><subject>Voter registration</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><subject>Voting turnout</subject><issn>0048-5950</issn><issn>1747-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0s9rFDEUB_AgCq61J8GTh8VDwcO0Lz9fclyX2q2s7aFVxEvIzLxZZ52dWZMZ0P_eKVtaWhYsOQSSzzcvIY-xtxyOOTh5sh3yph7SyXZdg8RnbMJRYYYc8DmbACibaafhJXuV0hoApLM4YW8Ws2-zaWjLaf-Tpld96Cm9Zi-q0CQ6vJ0P2NdPp9fzRba8PDufz5ZZYYD3meKSChEQpEROGDAPiisoSpOj4SjKgiAXGiAHo8k5lLLUobTSlGXJKyUP2NHu3G3sfg-Uer-pU0FNE1rqhuS1c1Ipa58AUUij_3-iNMqiAzPC94_guhtiO77WC44a0eENynZoFRrydVt1fQzFilqKoelaqupxecaltYYLBaM_3uPHUdKmLvYGPjwIjKanP_0qDCn586uLJ1t7tnxos3226JqGVuTHT5xf7r14EbuUIlV-G-tNiH89B3_TW_62t_yut8bAu11gnfou3mllhEJh7-vXaax7tx3iL29QovaL7z_8F-X0R_v5wgv5D6XE1Lg</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Liebschutz, Sarah F.</creator><creator>Palazzolo, Daniel J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Robert B. and Helen S. Meyner Center for the Study of State and Local Government and the Center for the Study of Federalism</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>HAVA and the States</title><author>Liebschutz, Sarah F. ; Palazzolo, Daniel J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-413ec2a703371e7a7ba4140cd6b76172dce0b2500b065e99733d5ad836ddd1f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Congressional elections</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Election law</topic><topic>Election laws</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral law</topic><topic>Electoral reform</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Local elections</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Policy Analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political reform</topic><topic>Provisional ballots</topic><topic>State elections</topic><topic>Subnational government</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Voter fraud</topic><topic>Voter registration</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><topic>Voting turnout</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liebschutz, Sarah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palazzolo, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Publius</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liebschutz, Sarah F.</au><au>Palazzolo, Daniel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HAVA and the States</atitle><jtitle>Publius</jtitle><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>497-514</pages><issn>0048-5950</issn><eissn>1747-7107</eissn><coden>PBLSAB</coden><abstract>Two major events—the 2000 vote counting crisis in Florida and passage of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) in October 2002—spawned a wave of federal, state, and local policy innovation and policy implementation. The major effect of the Florida crisis was a nationwide effort to analyze information on elections and to debate policy solutions. Subsequently, HAVA, the first major election law in U.S. history that includes federal funds for election equipment and operations, had a more substantial effect on policy innovation and implementation. Both before and after HAVA, election law changes have been affected by partisan considerations, policy analyses, and entrepreneurial leadership. Thus far, HAVA has positively affected election administration, though administrative practices and their effectiveness vary across and within the states.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/publius/pji037</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0048-5950 |
| ispartof | Publius, 2005-10, Vol.35 (4), p.497-514 |
| issn | 0048-5950 1747-7107 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59934488 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Analysis Congressional elections Crises Election law Election laws Elections Electoral law Electoral reform Federal government Federalism Florida Innovations Interpretation and construction Leadership Legislation Local elections Management Policy Analysis Policy making Political aspects Political parties Political reform Provisional ballots State elections Subnational government U.S.A United States United States of America Voter fraud Voter registration Voting Voting Behavior Voting rights Voting turnout |
| title | HAVA and the States |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A20%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HAVA%20and%20the%20States&rft.jtitle=Publius&rft.au=Liebschutz,%20Sarah%20F.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=497-514&rft.issn=0048-5950&rft.eissn=1747-7107&rft.coden=PBLSAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/publius/pji037&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA138861240%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217577976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A138861240&rft_jstor_id=4624728&rfr_iscdi=true |