Defining Political Community and Rights to Natural Resources in Botswana
ABSTRACT Community‐Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM), once presented as the best way to protect common pool natural resources, now attracts a growing chorus of critiques that either question its underlying assumptions or emphasize problems related to institutional design. These critiques ove...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Development and change 2009-03, Vol.40 (2), p.281-305 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 305 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 281 |
| container_title | Development and change |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Poteete, Amy R. |
| description | ABSTRACT
Community‐Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM), once presented as the best way to protect common pool natural resources, now attracts a growing chorus of critiques that either question its underlying assumptions or emphasize problems related to institutional design. These critiques overlook connections between the definition of rights to natural resources and membership in political communities. The potential for competing definitions of political identity and rights across natural resources arises when property rights regimes differ across natural resources and these different systems of rights appeal to alternative definitions of community. In Botswana, the entangling of natural resource policy with identity politics contributed to a partial recentralization of CBNRM in 2007. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01515.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59905382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>58831525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5385-72a7f827bd1cee48e69ba5227c31526017812aab59a9e830f6f109037b9e9baf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q668az1Jlia5EXQ6K-iUqSjehLSmM7NrZ9Pi9u9trex25iaB87zvITwIYQIhac_pPCTDSAQiiiCkACoEwgkPVztosBnsogEAoQHh_HUfHXg_BwAKkg1QfGkzV7hihh_K3NUuNTkelYtFU7h6jU3xjqdu9lF7XJd4YuqmaudT68umSq3HrsAXZe2_TWGO0F5mcm-P_-5D9Dy-ehrFwe399c3o_DZIOZM8ENSITFKRvJPU2qG0kUoMp1SkjHAaARGSUGMSroyykkEWZQQUMJEo25IZO0Qnfe-yKr8a62u9cD61eW4KWzZec6Wg3US3g1J2K_lWkAnCFSdiK0ghku1XZAvKHkyr0vvKZnpZuYWp1pqA7qzpue7k6E6O7qzpX2t61UbP-ui3y-363zl9eTWKu2dbEPQFztd2tSkw1aeOBBNcv0yu9ePD8O4tnlA9Zj_KTKvm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20685228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining Political Community and Rights to Natural Resources in Botswana</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Poteete, Amy R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poteete, Amy R.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Community‐Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM), once presented as the best way to protect common pool natural resources, now attracts a growing chorus of critiques that either question its underlying assumptions or emphasize problems related to institutional design. These critiques overlook connections between the definition of rights to natural resources and membership in political communities. The potential for competing definitions of political identity and rights across natural resources arises when property rights regimes differ across natural resources and these different systems of rights appeal to alternative definitions of community. In Botswana, the entangling of natural resource policy with identity politics contributed to a partial recentralization of CBNRM in 2007.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-155X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01515.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DECHEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Botswana ; Communities ; Community ; Development studies ; Identity Politics ; Land rights ; Natural Resources ; Political institutions ; Politics ; Property ; Property Rights ; Resource management ; Right of property</subject><ispartof>Development and change, 2009-03, Vol.40 (2), p.281-305</ispartof><rights>Institute of Social Studies 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5385-72a7f827bd1cee48e69ba5227c31526017812aab59a9e830f6f109037b9e9baf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5385-72a7f827bd1cee48e69ba5227c31526017812aab59a9e830f6f109037b9e9baf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7660.2009.01515.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7660.2009.01515.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27844,27903,27904,45552,45553</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poteete, Amy R.</creatorcontrib><title>Defining Political Community and Rights to Natural Resources in Botswana</title><title>Development and change</title><description>ABSTRACT
Community‐Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM), once presented as the best way to protect common pool natural resources, now attracts a growing chorus of critiques that either question its underlying assumptions or emphasize problems related to institutional design. These critiques overlook connections between the definition of rights to natural resources and membership in political communities. The potential for competing definitions of political identity and rights across natural resources arises when property rights regimes differ across natural resources and these different systems of rights appeal to alternative definitions of community. In Botswana, the entangling of natural resource policy with identity politics contributed to a partial recentralization of CBNRM in 2007.</description><subject>Botswana</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Development studies</subject><subject>Identity Politics</subject><subject>Land rights</subject><subject>Natural Resources</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Property Rights</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Right of property</subject><issn>0012-155X</issn><issn>1467-7660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q668az1Jlia5EXQ6K-iUqSjehLSmM7NrZ9Pi9u9trex25iaB87zvITwIYQIhac_pPCTDSAQiiiCkACoEwgkPVztosBnsogEAoQHh_HUfHXg_BwAKkg1QfGkzV7hihh_K3NUuNTkelYtFU7h6jU3xjqdu9lF7XJd4YuqmaudT68umSq3HrsAXZe2_TWGO0F5mcm-P_-5D9Dy-ehrFwe399c3o_DZIOZM8ENSITFKRvJPU2qG0kUoMp1SkjHAaARGSUGMSroyykkEWZQQUMJEo25IZO0Qnfe-yKr8a62u9cD61eW4KWzZec6Wg3US3g1J2K_lWkAnCFSdiK0ghku1XZAvKHkyr0vvKZnpZuYWp1pqA7qzpue7k6E6O7qzpX2t61UbP-ui3y-363zl9eTWKu2dbEPQFztd2tSkw1aeOBBNcv0yu9ePD8O4tnlA9Zj_KTKvm</recordid><startdate>200903</startdate><enddate>200903</enddate><creator>Poteete, Amy R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200903</creationdate><title>Defining Political Community and Rights to Natural Resources in Botswana</title><author>Poteete, Amy R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5385-72a7f827bd1cee48e69ba5227c31526017812aab59a9e830f6f109037b9e9baf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Botswana</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Development studies</topic><topic>Identity Politics</topic><topic>Land rights</topic><topic>Natural Resources</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Property Rights</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Right of property</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poteete, Amy R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poteete, Amy R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining Political Community and Rights to Natural Resources in Botswana</atitle><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle><date>2009-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>281-305</pages><issn>0012-155X</issn><eissn>1467-7660</eissn><coden>DECHEU</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Community‐Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM), once presented as the best way to protect common pool natural resources, now attracts a growing chorus of critiques that either question its underlying assumptions or emphasize problems related to institutional design. These critiques overlook connections between the definition of rights to natural resources and membership in political communities. The potential for competing definitions of political identity and rights across natural resources arises when property rights regimes differ across natural resources and these different systems of rights appeal to alternative definitions of community. In Botswana, the entangling of natural resource policy with identity politics contributed to a partial recentralization of CBNRM in 2007.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01515.x</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0012-155X |
| ispartof | Development and change, 2009-03, Vol.40 (2), p.281-305 |
| issn | 0012-155X 1467-7660 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59905382 |
| source | Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Botswana Communities Community Development studies Identity Politics Land rights Natural Resources Political institutions Politics Property Property Rights Resource management Right of property |
| title | Defining Political Community and Rights to Natural Resources in Botswana |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A17%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20Political%20Community%20and%20Rights%20to%20Natural%20Resources%20in%20Botswana&rft.jtitle=Development%20and%20change&rft.au=Poteete,%20Amy%20R.&rft.date=2009-03&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=281-305&rft.issn=0012-155X&rft.eissn=1467-7660&rft.coden=DECHEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01515.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58831525%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20685228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |