Socioeconomic rights: Do they deliver the goods?
The South African Constitution contains a series of social and economic rights that impose obligations upon the state to deliver basic goods and services to its citizens. The inclusion of these rights was the subject of intense debate during the negotiations leading to the introduction of the Consti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of constitutional law 2008-07, Vol.6 (3-4), p.687-711 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 711 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 687 |
container_title | International journal of constitutional law |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Davis, Dennis M |
description | The South African Constitution contains a series of social and economic rights that impose obligations upon the state to deliver basic goods and services to its citizens. The inclusion of these rights was the subject of intense debate during the negotiations leading to the introduction of the Constitution. The debate concerned the respective roles to be played by a democratically elected government and the judiciary. Analysis of key cases over the past fourteen years reveals that the judiciary has sought to strike a balance between holding the exercise of public power accountable to the Constitution and deferring to the policy choices of the government. This approach has resulted in very modest gains for the poor. Thus, socioeconomic rights may well promise more than they can deliver, but the modest consequence of compelling government to justify its policy choices when they affect the poorest of the poor should not be discounted. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/icon/mon014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59904823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37180686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-5a2819310e56495e25f074a62e10e07a6bfba60e823e73a34c653e9948eb5b003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8QcysaDQc_wRmwWhli-pEgMwW457aY2SuNgpUv89qYJYme7u1fPe8BBySeGGgmYz70I3a0MHlB-RCeUlzwsp9PHfzuGUnKX0CUC1EGpC4C04H3Dohda7LPr1pk-32SJk_Qb32Qob_43xcGTrEFbp7pyc1LZJePE7p-Tj8eF9_pwvX59e5vfL3LEC-lzYQlHNKKCQXAssRA0lt7LAIYLSyqqurARUBcOSWcadFAy15gorUQGwKbka_25j-Nph6k3rk8OmsR2GXTJCa-BD-1-QlVSBVHIAr0fQxZBSxNpso29t3BsK5qDPHPSZUR_7AeLnYmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37180686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socioeconomic rights: Do they deliver the goods?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Davis, Dennis M</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Dennis M</creatorcontrib><description>The South African Constitution contains a series of social and economic rights that impose obligations upon the state to deliver basic goods and services to its citizens. The inclusion of these rights was the subject of intense debate during the negotiations leading to the introduction of the Constitution. The debate concerned the respective roles to be played by a democratically elected government and the judiciary. Analysis of key cases over the past fourteen years reveals that the judiciary has sought to strike a balance between holding the exercise of public power accountable to the Constitution and deferring to the policy choices of the government. This approach has resulted in very modest gains for the poor. Thus, socioeconomic rights may well promise more than they can deliver, but the modest consequence of compelling government to justify its policy choices when they affect the poorest of the poor should not be discounted. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-2640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-2659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icon/mon014</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Constitution ; Constitutional law ; Constitutions ; Decision Making ; Law ; Policy ; Political philosophy ; Rights ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Socioeconomic status ; South Africa</subject><ispartof>International journal of constitutional law, 2008-07, Vol.6 (3-4), p.687-711</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-5a2819310e56495e25f074a62e10e07a6bfba60e823e73a34c653e9948eb5b003</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Dennis M</creatorcontrib><title>Socioeconomic rights: Do they deliver the goods?</title><title>International journal of constitutional law</title><description>The South African Constitution contains a series of social and economic rights that impose obligations upon the state to deliver basic goods and services to its citizens. The inclusion of these rights was the subject of intense debate during the negotiations leading to the introduction of the Constitution. The debate concerned the respective roles to be played by a democratically elected government and the judiciary. Analysis of key cases over the past fourteen years reveals that the judiciary has sought to strike a balance between holding the exercise of public power accountable to the Constitution and deferring to the policy choices of the government. This approach has resulted in very modest gains for the poor. Thus, socioeconomic rights may well promise more than they can deliver, but the modest consequence of compelling government to justify its policy choices when they affect the poorest of the poor should not be discounted. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press</description><subject>Constitution</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><issn>1474-2640</issn><issn>1474-2659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8QcysaDQc_wRmwWhli-pEgMwW457aY2SuNgpUv89qYJYme7u1fPe8BBySeGGgmYz70I3a0MHlB-RCeUlzwsp9PHfzuGUnKX0CUC1EGpC4C04H3Dohda7LPr1pk-32SJk_Qb32Qob_43xcGTrEFbp7pyc1LZJePE7p-Tj8eF9_pwvX59e5vfL3LEC-lzYQlHNKKCQXAssRA0lt7LAIYLSyqqurARUBcOSWcadFAy15gorUQGwKbka_25j-Nph6k3rk8OmsR2GXTJCa-BD-1-QlVSBVHIAr0fQxZBSxNpso29t3BsK5qDPHPSZUR_7AeLnYmQ</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Davis, Dennis M</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Socioeconomic rights: Do they deliver the goods?</title><author>Davis, Dennis M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-5a2819310e56495e25f074a62e10e07a6bfba60e823e73a34c653e9948eb5b003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Constitution</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Dennis M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of constitutional law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Dennis M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socioeconomic rights: Do they deliver the goods?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of constitutional law</jtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>687</spage><epage>711</epage><pages>687-711</pages><issn>1474-2640</issn><eissn>1474-2659</eissn><abstract>The South African Constitution contains a series of social and economic rights that impose obligations upon the state to deliver basic goods and services to its citizens. The inclusion of these rights was the subject of intense debate during the negotiations leading to the introduction of the Constitution. The debate concerned the respective roles to be played by a democratically elected government and the judiciary. Analysis of key cases over the past fourteen years reveals that the judiciary has sought to strike a balance between holding the exercise of public power accountable to the Constitution and deferring to the policy choices of the government. This approach has resulted in very modest gains for the poor. Thus, socioeconomic rights may well promise more than they can deliver, but the modest consequence of compelling government to justify its policy choices when they affect the poorest of the poor should not be discounted. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press</abstract><doi>10.1093/icon/mon014</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1474-2640 |
ispartof | International journal of constitutional law, 2008-07, Vol.6 (3-4), p.687-711 |
issn | 1474-2640 1474-2659 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59904823 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Political Science Complete |
subjects | Constitution Constitutional law Constitutions Decision Making Law Policy Political philosophy Rights Socioeconomic Factors Socioeconomic status South Africa |
title | Socioeconomic rights: Do they deliver the goods? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T02%3A58%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socioeconomic%20rights:%20Do%20they%20deliver%20the%20goods?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20constitutional%20law&rft.au=Davis,%20Dennis%20M&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=687&rft.epage=711&rft.pages=687-711&rft.issn=1474-2640&rft.eissn=1474-2659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icon/mon014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37180686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37180686&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |