Industrial Relations Systems and US Foreign Direct Investment Abroad
Five readily distinguishable industrial relations systems are identified based on differences in education levels, hourly compensation costs and various government and collective bargaining constraints placed on management’s freedom to set the terms and conditions of employment. A model of foreign d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of industrial relations 1998-12, Vol.36 (4), p.581-609 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 609 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 581 |
container_title | British journal of industrial relations |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Cooke, William N. Noble, Deborah S. |
description | Five readily distinguishable industrial relations systems are identified based on differences in education levels, hourly compensation costs and various government and collective bargaining constraints placed on management’s freedom to set the terms and conditions of employment. A model of foreign direct investment (FDI) that incorporates these key industrial relations variables is then specified and tested against US FDI across a sample of nine industries and 33 industrialized and developing countries. The industrial relations system variables significantly influence US FDI abroad. In particular, education is negatively related to FDI across low skill–low wage countries but is positively related to FDI across high skill–high wage countries. Higher hourly compensation costs (apparently capturing higher productivity) are associated with greater FDI. Whereas government restrictions on layoffs, union penetration and centralized negotiation structures are negatively related to US FDI, the ratification of ILO standards and works council policies are positively related to US FDI. Based on these findings, the FDI attractiveness of industrial relations systems are compared and policy implications discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-8543.00109 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59895810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38654518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5609-150ddd9c22bbdfacbde9309cc5d746f9b855be2b334e00b96d4b2b1fcadbe79d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAURiNEJYbCmm0ECLFJex37OvGyD1qmqkBqqZBmY_kV5JJxWjsDzL_HIdUskKDeWLbOd66tryheETggeR0SxpuqRUYPAAiIJ8Vid_O0WABAUxFo4VnxPKXbfERsxaI4XQa7SWP0qi-vXK9GP4RUXm_T6NapVMGWN9fl2RCd_xbKUx-dGctl-OHSuHZhLI90HJR9Uex1qk_u5cO-X9ycffhy8rG6_Hy-PDm6rAxyEBVBsNYKU9da204ZbZ2gIIxB2zDeCd0ialdrSpkD0IJbpmtNOqOsdo2wdL94N3vv4nC_yW-Qa5-M63sV3LBJEkUrsCXwKEhbjgxJm8H3_wWziyNiwyfn67_Q22ETQ_6vJAIpsJqJDL35JzTN40A4y9ThTJk4pBRdJ--iX6u4zfPkVKacqpNTdfJPmTnx9sGrklF9F1UwPu1iNZAaGM0Ym7Gfvnfbx6zy-GJ5NdurOeZz7b92MRW_S97QBuXXT-fyGFermjUryehvnIe6bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1518360164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Industrial Relations Systems and US Foreign Direct Investment Abroad</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Cooke, William N. ; Noble, Deborah S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooke, William N. ; Noble, Deborah S.</creatorcontrib><description>Five readily distinguishable industrial relations systems are identified based on differences in education levels, hourly compensation costs and various government and collective bargaining constraints placed on management’s freedom to set the terms and conditions of employment. A model of foreign direct investment (FDI) that incorporates these key industrial relations variables is then specified and tested against US FDI across a sample of nine industries and 33 industrialized and developing countries. The industrial relations system variables significantly influence US FDI abroad. In particular, education is negatively related to FDI across low skill–low wage countries but is positively related to FDI across high skill–high wage countries. Higher hourly compensation costs (apparently capturing higher productivity) are associated with greater FDI. Whereas government restrictions on layoffs, union penetration and centralized negotiation structures are negatively related to US FDI, the ratification of ILO standards and works council policies are positively related to US FDI. Based on these findings, the FDI attractiveness of industrial relations systems are compared and policy implications discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8543.00109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJIRAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><subject>American ; Collective bargaining ; Education ; Foreign direct investment ; Foreign investment ; Foreign investments ; Industrial relations ; International business enterprises ; Investments ; Labor ; Labor aspects ; Labor economics ; Labor relations ; Labour relations ; Management decisions ; Policy analysis ; Professional relations. Trade unions ; Sociology ; Sociology of work ; Sociology of work and sociology of organizations ; Studies ; Trade unions ; Wage rates</subject><ispartof>British journal of industrial relations, 1998-12, Vol.36 (4), p.581-609</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Publishers Ltd/London School of Economics 1998</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Dec 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5609-150ddd9c22bbdfacbde9309cc5d746f9b855be2b334e00b96d4b2b1fcadbe79d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-8543.00109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-8543.00109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27842,27843,27846,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2012043$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooke, William N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Deborah S.</creatorcontrib><title>Industrial Relations Systems and US Foreign Direct Investment Abroad</title><title>British journal of industrial relations</title><description>Five readily distinguishable industrial relations systems are identified based on differences in education levels, hourly compensation costs and various government and collective bargaining constraints placed on management’s freedom to set the terms and conditions of employment. A model of foreign direct investment (FDI) that incorporates these key industrial relations variables is then specified and tested against US FDI across a sample of nine industries and 33 industrialized and developing countries. The industrial relations system variables significantly influence US FDI abroad. In particular, education is negatively related to FDI across low skill–low wage countries but is positively related to FDI across high skill–high wage countries. Higher hourly compensation costs (apparently capturing higher productivity) are associated with greater FDI. Whereas government restrictions on layoffs, union penetration and centralized negotiation structures are negatively related to US FDI, the ratification of ILO standards and works council policies are positively related to US FDI. Based on these findings, the FDI attractiveness of industrial relations systems are compared and policy implications discussed.</description><subject>American</subject><subject>Collective bargaining</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Foreign direct investment</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>Foreign investments</subject><subject>Industrial relations</subject><subject>International business enterprises</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labor aspects</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>Labour relations</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Professional relations. Trade unions</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of work</subject><subject>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trade unions</subject><subject>Wage rates</subject><issn>0007-1080</issn><issn>1467-8543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAURiNEJYbCmm0ECLFJex37OvGyD1qmqkBqqZBmY_kV5JJxWjsDzL_HIdUskKDeWLbOd66tryheETggeR0SxpuqRUYPAAiIJ8Vid_O0WABAUxFo4VnxPKXbfERsxaI4XQa7SWP0qi-vXK9GP4RUXm_T6NapVMGWN9fl2RCd_xbKUx-dGctl-OHSuHZhLI90HJR9Uex1qk_u5cO-X9ycffhy8rG6_Hy-PDm6rAxyEBVBsNYKU9da204ZbZ2gIIxB2zDeCd0ialdrSpkD0IJbpmtNOqOsdo2wdL94N3vv4nC_yW-Qa5-M63sV3LBJEkUrsCXwKEhbjgxJm8H3_wWziyNiwyfn67_Q22ETQ_6vJAIpsJqJDL35JzTN40A4y9ThTJk4pBRdJ--iX6u4zfPkVKacqpNTdfJPmTnx9sGrklF9F1UwPu1iNZAaGM0Ym7Gfvnfbx6zy-GJ5NdurOeZz7b92MRW_S97QBuXXT-fyGFermjUryehvnIe6bg</recordid><startdate>199812</startdate><enddate>199812</enddate><creator>Cooke, William N.</creator><creator>Noble, Deborah S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>London School of Economics</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199812</creationdate><title>Industrial Relations Systems and US Foreign Direct Investment Abroad</title><author>Cooke, William N. ; Noble, Deborah S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5609-150ddd9c22bbdfacbde9309cc5d746f9b855be2b334e00b96d4b2b1fcadbe79d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>American</topic><topic>Collective bargaining</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Foreign direct investment</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>Foreign investments</topic><topic>Industrial relations</topic><topic>International business enterprises</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labor aspects</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>Labour relations</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Professional relations. Trade unions</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of work</topic><topic>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trade unions</topic><topic>Wage rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooke, William N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Deborah S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>British journal of industrial relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooke, William N.</au><au>Noble, Deborah S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Industrial Relations Systems and US Foreign Direct Investment Abroad</atitle><jtitle>British journal of industrial relations</jtitle><date>1998-12</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>581-609</pages><issn>0007-1080</issn><eissn>1467-8543</eissn><coden>BJIRAV</coden><abstract>Five readily distinguishable industrial relations systems are identified based on differences in education levels, hourly compensation costs and various government and collective bargaining constraints placed on management’s freedom to set the terms and conditions of employment. A model of foreign direct investment (FDI) that incorporates these key industrial relations variables is then specified and tested against US FDI across a sample of nine industries and 33 industrialized and developing countries. The industrial relations system variables significantly influence US FDI abroad. In particular, education is negatively related to FDI across low skill–low wage countries but is positively related to FDI across high skill–high wage countries. Higher hourly compensation costs (apparently capturing higher productivity) are associated with greater FDI. Whereas government restrictions on layoffs, union penetration and centralized negotiation structures are negatively related to US FDI, the ratification of ILO standards and works council policies are positively related to US FDI. Based on these findings, the FDI attractiveness of industrial relations systems are compared and policy implications discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8543.00109</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1080 |
ispartof | British journal of industrial relations, 1998-12, Vol.36 (4), p.581-609 |
issn | 0007-1080 1467-8543 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59895810 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | American Collective bargaining Education Foreign direct investment Foreign investment Foreign investments Industrial relations International business enterprises Investments Labor Labor aspects Labor economics Labor relations Labour relations Management decisions Policy analysis Professional relations. Trade unions Sociology Sociology of work Sociology of work and sociology of organizations Studies Trade unions Wage rates |
title | Industrial Relations Systems and US Foreign Direct Investment Abroad |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T05%3A15%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Industrial%20Relations%20Systems%20and%20US%20Foreign%20Direct%20Investment%20Abroad&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20industrial%20relations&rft.au=Cooke,%20William%20N.&rft.date=1998-12&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=581-609&rft.issn=0007-1080&rft.eissn=1467-8543&rft.coden=BJIRAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8543.00109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38654518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1518360164&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |