Expanded deterrence: broadening the threat of retaliation

Accelerating advances in computing, biotechnology, nanotechnology have democratized destructive power - up to the point at which a single individual may have the power to do enormous damage.2 Today we see this peril most plainly in the justified fears about the use of the first and greatest absolute...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Policy review (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2008-06 (149), p.43
1. Verfasser: Colby, Elbridge A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 149
container_start_page 43
container_title Policy review (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume
creator Colby, Elbridge A
description Accelerating advances in computing, biotechnology, nanotechnology have democratized destructive power - up to the point at which a single individual may have the power to do enormous damage.2 Today we see this peril most plainly in the justified fears about the use of the first and greatest absolute weapon - the nuclear bomb. In effect, we would simply be bringing to bear the real correlation of factors, matching accountability with responsibility and capability.\n Instead, such a policy would require a capabilities mix that would allow the fullest range of responses compatible with budgetary considerations and international obligations - including, necessarily, the capabilities to meet our treaty obligations not to target civilians who are in no way complicit in a terrorist attack.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59891868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A181232310</galeid><sourcerecordid>A181232310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g469t-8b3925b7bf8bdf4fa2363a6f88390a9c40db064262e18ad1a493ec5e32d453743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtLAzEQAOBFFKzV_7AnxcPK5rFp4q0WrYViDz6uy-xmsq7EpGZT6M83UA8KRTrDEAjfzGHmKBtRIlQhZEmPs1FJuCgqxavT7GwYPsoUXNBRpu63a3Aada4xYgjoWrzNm-BBo-tdl8d3TBUQYu5NHjCC7SH23p1nJwbsgBc_7zh7fbh_mT0Wy9V8MZsui44LFQvZMEWrZtIY2WjDDVAmGAgjJVMlqJaXuikFp4IikaAJcMWwrZBRzSs24WycXe7mroP_2uAQ689-aNFacOg3Q10pqYgUMsGrf2FaB2dcCJVksZMdWKx7Z3wM0HboMID1Dk2fvqdEEsooI2XyN3t8So2ffbu34fpPQzIRt7GDzTDUi-enw-3q7XB7Nz_Yyvnyry322dZbix3W6Z6z1W__DdGmtzE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216434669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expanded deterrence: broadening the threat of retaliation</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Colby, Elbridge A</creator><creatorcontrib>Colby, Elbridge A</creatorcontrib><description>Accelerating advances in computing, biotechnology, nanotechnology have democratized destructive power - up to the point at which a single individual may have the power to do enormous damage.2 Today we see this peril most plainly in the justified fears about the use of the first and greatest absolute weapon - the nuclear bomb. In effect, we would simply be bringing to bear the real correlation of factors, matching accountability with responsibility and capability.\n Instead, such a policy would require a capabilities mix that would allow the fullest range of responses compatible with budgetary considerations and international obligations - including, necessarily, the capabilities to meet our treaty obligations not to target civilians who are in no way complicit in a terrorist attack.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-5945</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-6802</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POREDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Hoover Institution Press</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Business growth ; Calculus ; Company business management ; Company business planning ; Control ; Counterterrorism ; Defense ; Defense Policy ; Deterrence ; Deterrence (Strategy) ; Fear ; Fear &amp; phobias ; Life sciences ; Management ; Military policy ; Morality ; Nanotechnology ; National security ; Negligence ; Planning ; Prevention ; Society ; Technology ; Terrorism ; Threats ; Traffic accidents &amp; safety ; United States of America ; Weapons ; Weapons of Mass Destruction</subject><ispartof>Policy review (Washington, D.C.), 2008-06 (149), p.43</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Hoover Institution Press</rights><rights>Copyright Hoover Institute Jun/Jul 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,14637</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colby, Elbridge A</creatorcontrib><title>Expanded deterrence: broadening the threat of retaliation</title><title>Policy review (Washington, D.C.)</title><addtitle>Policy Review</addtitle><description>Accelerating advances in computing, biotechnology, nanotechnology have democratized destructive power - up to the point at which a single individual may have the power to do enormous damage.2 Today we see this peril most plainly in the justified fears about the use of the first and greatest absolute weapon - the nuclear bomb. In effect, we would simply be bringing to bear the real correlation of factors, matching accountability with responsibility and capability.\n Instead, such a policy would require a capabilities mix that would allow the fullest range of responses compatible with budgetary considerations and international obligations - including, necessarily, the capabilities to meet our treaty obligations not to target civilians who are in no way complicit in a terrorist attack.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Business growth</subject><subject>Calculus</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Company business planning</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Counterterrorism</subject><subject>Defense</subject><subject>Defense Policy</subject><subject>Deterrence</subject><subject>Deterrence (Strategy)</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Fear &amp; phobias</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Negligence</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Traffic accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><subject>Weapons of Mass Destruction</subject><issn>0146-5945</issn><issn>2169-6802</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UtLAzEQAOBFFKzV_7AnxcPK5rFp4q0WrYViDz6uy-xmsq7EpGZT6M83UA8KRTrDEAjfzGHmKBtRIlQhZEmPs1FJuCgqxavT7GwYPsoUXNBRpu63a3Aada4xYgjoWrzNm-BBo-tdl8d3TBUQYu5NHjCC7SH23p1nJwbsgBc_7zh7fbh_mT0Wy9V8MZsui44LFQvZMEWrZtIY2WjDDVAmGAgjJVMlqJaXuikFp4IikaAJcMWwrZBRzSs24WycXe7mroP_2uAQ689-aNFacOg3Q10pqYgUMsGrf2FaB2dcCJVksZMdWKx7Z3wM0HboMID1Dk2fvqdEEsooI2XyN3t8So2ffbu34fpPQzIRt7GDzTDUi-enw-3q7XB7Nz_Yyvnyry322dZbix3W6Z6z1W__DdGmtzE</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Colby, Elbridge A</creator><general>Hoover Institution Press</general><general>Hoover Institute</general><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>884</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Expanded deterrence: broadening the threat of retaliation</title><author>Colby, Elbridge A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g469t-8b3925b7bf8bdf4fa2363a6f88390a9c40db064262e18ad1a493ec5e32d453743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Business growth</topic><topic>Calculus</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Company business planning</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Counterterrorism</topic><topic>Defense</topic><topic>Defense Policy</topic><topic>Deterrence</topic><topic>Deterrence (Strategy)</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Fear &amp; phobias</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Negligence</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Traffic accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><topic>Weapons of Mass Destruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colby, Elbridge A</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Policy review (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colby, Elbridge A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expanded deterrence: broadening the threat of retaliation</atitle><jtitle>Policy review (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><addtitle>Policy Review</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><issue>149</issue><spage>43</spage><pages>43-</pages><issn>0146-5945</issn><eissn>2169-6802</eissn><coden>POREDP</coden><abstract>Accelerating advances in computing, biotechnology, nanotechnology have democratized destructive power - up to the point at which a single individual may have the power to do enormous damage.2 Today we see this peril most plainly in the justified fears about the use of the first and greatest absolute weapon - the nuclear bomb. In effect, we would simply be bringing to bear the real correlation of factors, matching accountability with responsibility and capability.\n Instead, such a policy would require a capabilities mix that would allow the fullest range of responses compatible with budgetary considerations and international obligations - including, necessarily, the capabilities to meet our treaty obligations not to target civilians who are in no way complicit in a terrorist attack.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Hoover Institution Press</pub><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-5945
ispartof Policy review (Washington, D.C.), 2008-06 (149), p.43
issn 0146-5945
2169-6802
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59891868
source Education Source; Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accountability
Business growth
Calculus
Company business management
Company business planning
Control
Counterterrorism
Defense
Defense Policy
Deterrence
Deterrence (Strategy)
Fear
Fear & phobias
Life sciences
Management
Military policy
Morality
Nanotechnology
National security
Negligence
Planning
Prevention
Society
Technology
Terrorism
Threats
Traffic accidents & safety
United States of America
Weapons
Weapons of Mass Destruction
title Expanded deterrence: broadening the threat of retaliation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A59%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expanded%20deterrence:%20broadening%20the%20threat%20of%20retaliation&rft.jtitle=Policy%20review%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Colby,%20Elbridge%20A&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.issue=149&rft.spage=43&rft.pages=43-&rft.issn=0146-5945&rft.eissn=2169-6802&rft.coden=POREDP&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA181232310%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216434669&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A181232310&rfr_iscdi=true