The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana
On January 8, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, a case related to the discriminatory effects of voter-identification laws in the state of Indiana. Indiana has one of the most stringent voting requirements in the nation, as voters are r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2009-01, Vol.42 (1), p.111-116 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 116 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 111 |
| container_title | PS, political science & politics |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Barreto, Matt A. Nuño, Stephen A. Sanchez, Gabriel R. |
| description | On January 8, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, a case related to the discriminatory effects of voter-identification laws in the state of Indiana. Indiana has one of the most stringent voting requirements in the nation, as voters are required to present an up-to-date photo identification issued by the federal or state government in order to cast a ballot. Plaintiffs argued that the Indiana requirements prevent significant and unequal obstacles to the right to vote. The state argued that Indiana had the right to enforce strict requirements to prevent fraud and uphold confidence in the electoral process. Similar laws have also been proposed in many other states, typically related to charges of vote fraud, and often times tied into the divisive debate regarding undocumented immigrants or African American felons. Therefore the recent decision of the Court has tremendous implications to the future of photo-identification laws across the United States. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1049096509090283 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59891649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1049096509090283</cupid><jstor_id>20452383</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20452383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-88cd434bef008c55efde6b6d99e85e020ddd0d2991f621fd700736a8fbde1c333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1uFDEQhVuISISEA7BAsliwa7DbP20vUWYSRomCgMCCjeW2y-Bhuj2xPfzscoickJPEw0RBAiG8sC2975VeVTXNY4KfE0z6F-8IZgorwXG9cSfpvWafcNq3XFF-v_6r3G71B83DnJe4HsnxfjNcfAY0C3md4jqmEuJkCqDFuDa2oOjRh1ggtYsZeguXm5BghKlkFCdUqm--Altiqo6fV9fn8A3NvwYHkwXkUxzRYnLBTOaw2fNmleHR7XvQvD-eXxy9as9enyyOXp61lklRWimtY5QN4Gs0yzl4B2IQTimQHHCHnXPYdUoRLzriXY9xT4WRfnBALKX0oHm2q1t7udxALnoM2cJqZSaIm6y5kooIpv4PSol7Qrbg0z_AZdykqTahu46pntXRV4jsIJtizgm8XqcwmvRDE6y3u9F_7aZ6nuw8y1znd2foMOMd_aW3Oz3kAt_vdJO-aNHTnmtx8kafSjGT8iPT55WntxnMOKTgPsHvpP9OcQMNKqnn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224974101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Barreto, Matt A. ; Nuño, Stephen A. ; Sanchez, Gabriel R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Matt A. ; Nuño, Stephen A. ; Sanchez, Gabriel R.</creatorcontrib><description>On January 8, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, a case related to the discriminatory effects of voter-identification laws in the state of Indiana. Indiana has one of the most stringent voting requirements in the nation, as voters are required to present an up-to-date photo identification issued by the federal or state government in order to cast a ballot. Plaintiffs argued that the Indiana requirements prevent significant and unequal obstacles to the right to vote. The state argued that Indiana had the right to enforce strict requirements to prevent fraud and uphold confidence in the electoral process. Similar laws have also been proposed in many other states, typically related to charges of vote fraud, and often times tied into the divisive debate regarding undocumented immigrants or African American felons. Therefore the recent decision of the Court has tremendous implications to the future of photo-identification laws across the United States.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049096509090283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Demographics ; Documents ; Drivers licenses ; Educational Attainment ; Election law ; Election laws ; Elections ; Electorate ; Fraud ; Identification cards, certificates, etc ; Identity ; Indiana ; Law ; Legislation ; Minorities ; Minority voters ; Names ; Older adults ; Politics ; Research Projects ; Social networks ; Studies ; Symposium: Voter-ID Issues in Politics and Political Science ; Telephone Surveys ; Voter behavior ; Voter fraud ; Voter registration ; Voters ; Voting ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>PS, political science & politics, 2009-01, Vol.42 (1), p.111-116</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 American Political Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Political Science Association Jan 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-88cd434bef008c55efde6b6d99e85e020ddd0d2991f621fd700736a8fbde1c333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-88cd434bef008c55efde6b6d99e85e020ddd0d2991f621fd700736a8fbde1c333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20452383$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1049096509090283/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,12826,27844,27903,27904,55606,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Matt A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuño, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Gabriel R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana</title><title>PS, political science & politics</title><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><description>On January 8, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, a case related to the discriminatory effects of voter-identification laws in the state of Indiana. Indiana has one of the most stringent voting requirements in the nation, as voters are required to present an up-to-date photo identification issued by the federal or state government in order to cast a ballot. Plaintiffs argued that the Indiana requirements prevent significant and unequal obstacles to the right to vote. The state argued that Indiana had the right to enforce strict requirements to prevent fraud and uphold confidence in the electoral process. Similar laws have also been proposed in many other states, typically related to charges of vote fraud, and often times tied into the divisive debate regarding undocumented immigrants or African American felons. Therefore the recent decision of the Court has tremendous implications to the future of photo-identification laws across the United States.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Drivers licenses</subject><subject>Educational Attainment</subject><subject>Election law</subject><subject>Election laws</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electorate</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Identification cards, certificates, etc</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Minorities</subject><subject>Minority voters</subject><subject>Names</subject><subject>Older adults</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Research Projects</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Symposium: Voter-ID Issues in Politics and Political Science</subject><subject>Telephone Surveys</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voter fraud</subject><subject>Voter registration</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1uFDEQhVuISISEA7BAsliwa7DbP20vUWYSRomCgMCCjeW2y-Bhuj2xPfzscoickJPEw0RBAiG8sC2975VeVTXNY4KfE0z6F-8IZgorwXG9cSfpvWafcNq3XFF-v_6r3G71B83DnJe4HsnxfjNcfAY0C3md4jqmEuJkCqDFuDa2oOjRh1ggtYsZeguXm5BghKlkFCdUqm--Altiqo6fV9fn8A3NvwYHkwXkUxzRYnLBTOaw2fNmleHR7XvQvD-eXxy9as9enyyOXp61lklRWimtY5QN4Gs0yzl4B2IQTimQHHCHnXPYdUoRLzriXY9xT4WRfnBALKX0oHm2q1t7udxALnoM2cJqZSaIm6y5kooIpv4PSol7Qrbg0z_AZdykqTahu46pntXRV4jsIJtizgm8XqcwmvRDE6y3u9F_7aZ6nuw8y1znd2foMOMd_aW3Oz3kAt_vdJO-aNHTnmtx8kafSjGT8iPT55WntxnMOKTgPsHvpP9OcQMNKqnn</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Barreto, Matt A.</creator><creator>Nuño, Stephen A.</creator><creator>Sanchez, Gabriel R.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana</title><author>Barreto, Matt A. ; Nuño, Stephen A. ; Sanchez, Gabriel R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-88cd434bef008c55efde6b6d99e85e020ddd0d2991f621fd700736a8fbde1c333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Drivers licenses</topic><topic>Educational Attainment</topic><topic>Election law</topic><topic>Election laws</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electorate</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Identification cards, certificates, etc</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Minorities</topic><topic>Minority voters</topic><topic>Names</topic><topic>Older adults</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Research Projects</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Symposium: Voter-ID Issues in Politics and Political Science</topic><topic>Telephone Surveys</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voter fraud</topic><topic>Voter registration</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Matt A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuño, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Gabriel R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barreto, Matt A.</au><au>Nuño, Stephen A.</au><au>Sanchez, Gabriel R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>111-116</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract>On January 8, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, a case related to the discriminatory effects of voter-identification laws in the state of Indiana. Indiana has one of the most stringent voting requirements in the nation, as voters are required to present an up-to-date photo identification issued by the federal or state government in order to cast a ballot. Plaintiffs argued that the Indiana requirements prevent significant and unequal obstacles to the right to vote. The state argued that Indiana had the right to enforce strict requirements to prevent fraud and uphold confidence in the electoral process. Similar laws have also been proposed in many other states, typically related to charges of vote fraud, and often times tied into the divisive debate regarding undocumented immigrants or African American felons. Therefore the recent decision of the Court has tremendous implications to the future of photo-identification laws across the United States.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049096509090283</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1049-0965 |
| ispartof | PS, political science & politics, 2009-01, Vol.42 (1), p.111-116 |
| issn | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59891649 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | African Americans Demographics Documents Drivers licenses Educational Attainment Election law Election laws Elections Electorate Fraud Identification cards, certificates, etc Identity Indiana Law Legislation Minorities Minority voters Names Older adults Politics Research Projects Social networks Studies Symposium: Voter-ID Issues in Politics and Political Science Telephone Surveys Voter behavior Voter fraud Voter registration Voters Voting Voting rights |
| title | The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A57%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Disproportionate%20Impact%20of%20Voter-ID%20Requirements%20on%20the%20Electorate%E2%80%94New%20Evidence%20from%20Indiana&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Barreto,%20Matt%20A.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=111-116&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049096509090283&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20452383%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224974101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1049096509090283&rft_jstor_id=20452383&rfr_iscdi=true |