The Russian-Libyan Rapprochement: What Has Moscow Gained?
Soviet-Libyan trade volume during the 1970s and 1980s was approximately $100 million per year.1 During this period, Moscow also supplied $4.6 billion in weaponry to Libya, providing about 90 percent of that country's arms inventory.2 According to Kommersant, Libya was one of the Soviet Union�...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Middle East policy 2008-09, Vol.15 (3), p.122-128 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 128 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 122 |
| container_title | Middle East policy |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Katz, Mark N. |
| description | Soviet-Libyan trade volume during the 1970s and 1980s was approximately $100 million per year.1 During this period, Moscow also supplied $4.6 billion in weaponry to Libya, providing about 90 percent of that country's arms inventory.2 According to Kommersant, Libya was one of the Soviet Union's few partners that paid in full for the military equipment it purchased from the USSR. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1475-4967.2008.00363.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59886781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A185487272</galeid><sourcerecordid>A185487272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g5223-890d232755e4d455fc045599f523ba03f408ecb5313dd15f176ed5b3d7cf6c913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YoF23_2B2MdiFXX1YljwYowutE5o0pe2Wy4MiHzvOHDuzHJr8-8rN6MjIRSWQDtLz6hxJr-f5lITUtfNlSCMpgiiJZcgIUSEhPObh9o13-rLx1sUkpgFNWHTivbd2SQihREWnXvKwQP9uY22p62Bczne69u_0et02ZoErrLuv_myhO3-orT9prGke_VSXNWbfP3jvcl1Z_Ph3PvN-Xl0-DIbBeJqOBhfjoBCM8UAlJGOcSSEwyiIhckPcmCS5YHyuCc8jotDMBac8y6jIqYwxE3OeSZPHJqH8zPu8P9fV9GeDtoNVaQ1Wla6x2VgQiVKxVD346T9w2Wza2tUGzL2JjJUUDgr2UKErhLLOm67VpsAaW101NealW76gSkRKMskcHx7hXc9wVZqjgi8HAsd0uO0K7d4Yrm9Hr2ZH9zevZlU6PmSDY6xpqgoLBPc9g-kh_23PP7rL7GDdlivd7oAS6C0GS-idBL2ToLcYPFsMtjC5vJ266F--0ro8L3rd_oZYcied3aRAhmQy-_UjhSv-BJGKzss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203676875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Russian-Libyan Rapprochement: What Has Moscow Gained?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Katz, Mark N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Katz, Mark N.</creatorcontrib><description>Soviet-Libyan trade volume during the 1970s and 1980s was approximately $100 million per year.1 During this period, Moscow also supplied $4.6 billion in weaponry to Libya, providing about 90 percent of that country's arms inventory.2 According to Kommersant, Libya was one of the Soviet Union's few partners that paid in full for the military equipment it purchased from the USSR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-1924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4967.2008.00363.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Alliances ; Armored vehicles ; Contracts ; Cooperation ; Debts ; Diplomacy ; Europe ; Exports ; Gas industry ; International relations-US ; International trade ; Libya ; Memoranda ; Military sales ; Petroleum ; Petroleum industry ; Political parties ; Putin, Vladimir ; Qaddafi, Muammar al ; Railroads ; Rapprochement ; Russia ; Sanctions ; United Nations</subject><ispartof>Middle East policy, 2008-09, Vol.15 (3), p.122-128</ispartof><rights>2008, The Authors</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Middle East Policy Council Fall 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1475-4967.2008.00363.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1475-4967.2008.00363.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,12845,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Katz, Mark N.</creatorcontrib><title>The Russian-Libyan Rapprochement: What Has Moscow Gained?</title><title>Middle East policy</title><addtitle>Middle East Policy</addtitle><description>Soviet-Libyan trade volume during the 1970s and 1980s was approximately $100 million per year.1 During this period, Moscow also supplied $4.6 billion in weaponry to Libya, providing about 90 percent of that country's arms inventory.2 According to Kommersant, Libya was one of the Soviet Union's few partners that paid in full for the military equipment it purchased from the USSR.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Armored vehicles</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Debts</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Gas industry</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Libya</subject><subject>Memoranda</subject><subject>Military sales</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Petroleum industry</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Putin, Vladimir</subject><subject>Qaddafi, Muammar al</subject><subject>Railroads</subject><subject>Rapprochement</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>United Nations</subject><issn>1061-1924</issn><issn>1475-4967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YoF23_2B2MdiFXX1YljwYowutE5o0pe2Wy4MiHzvOHDuzHJr8-8rN6MjIRSWQDtLz6hxJr-f5lITUtfNlSCMpgiiJZcgIUSEhPObh9o13-rLx1sUkpgFNWHTivbd2SQihREWnXvKwQP9uY22p62Bczne69u_0et02ZoErrLuv_myhO3-orT9prGke_VSXNWbfP3jvcl1Z_Ph3PvN-Xl0-DIbBeJqOBhfjoBCM8UAlJGOcSSEwyiIhckPcmCS5YHyuCc8jotDMBac8y6jIqYwxE3OeSZPHJqH8zPu8P9fV9GeDtoNVaQ1Wla6x2VgQiVKxVD346T9w2Wza2tUGzL2JjJUUDgr2UKErhLLOm67VpsAaW101NealW76gSkRKMskcHx7hXc9wVZqjgi8HAsd0uO0K7d4Yrm9Hr2ZH9zevZlU6PmSDY6xpqgoLBPc9g-kh_23PP7rL7GDdlivd7oAS6C0GS-idBL2ToLcYPFsMtjC5vJ266F--0ro8L3rd_oZYcied3aRAhmQy-_UjhSv-BJGKzss</recordid><startdate>20080922</startdate><enddate>20080922</enddate><creator>Katz, Mark N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Middle East Policy Council</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080922</creationdate><title>The Russian-Libyan Rapprochement: What Has Moscow Gained?</title><author>Katz, Mark N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g5223-890d232755e4d455fc045599f523ba03f408ecb5313dd15f176ed5b3d7cf6c913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Armored vehicles</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Debts</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Gas industry</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Libya</topic><topic>Memoranda</topic><topic>Military sales</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Petroleum industry</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Putin, Vladimir</topic><topic>Qaddafi, Muammar al</topic><topic>Railroads</topic><topic>Rapprochement</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>United Nations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katz, Mark N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Middle East policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katz, Mark N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Russian-Libyan Rapprochement: What Has Moscow Gained?</atitle><jtitle>Middle East policy</jtitle><addtitle>Middle East Policy</addtitle><date>2008-09-22</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>122-128</pages><issn>1061-1924</issn><eissn>1475-4967</eissn><abstract>Soviet-Libyan trade volume during the 1970s and 1980s was approximately $100 million per year.1 During this period, Moscow also supplied $4.6 billion in weaponry to Libya, providing about 90 percent of that country's arms inventory.2 According to Kommersant, Libya was one of the Soviet Union's few partners that paid in full for the military equipment it purchased from the USSR.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1475-4967.2008.00363.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1061-1924 |
| ispartof | Middle East policy, 2008-09, Vol.15 (3), p.122-128 |
| issn | 1061-1924 1475-4967 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59886781 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Agreements Alliances Armored vehicles Contracts Cooperation Debts Diplomacy Europe Exports Gas industry International relations-US International trade Libya Memoranda Military sales Petroleum Petroleum industry Political parties Putin, Vladimir Qaddafi, Muammar al Railroads Rapprochement Russia Sanctions United Nations |
| title | The Russian-Libyan Rapprochement: What Has Moscow Gained? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A49%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Russian-Libyan%20Rapprochement:%20What%20Has%20Moscow%20Gained?&rft.jtitle=Middle%20East%20policy&rft.au=Katz,%20Mark%20N.&rft.date=2008-09-22&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=122-128&rft.issn=1061-1924&rft.eissn=1475-4967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2008.00363.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA185487272%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203676875&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A185487272&rfr_iscdi=true |