Studying Issue (Non)-Adoption in Transnational Advocacy Networks
Why do some issues but not others galvanize transnational advocacy networks? To gain insight into this question, I studied how advocates in the human rights sector think and talk about an issue that has received little advocacy attention to date: stigma against children born of wartime rape. Focus g...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International organization 2007-07, Vol.61 (3), p.643-667 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 667 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 643 |
| container_title | International organization |
| container_volume | 61 |
| creator | Carpenter, R. Charli |
| description | Why do some issues but not others galvanize transnational advocacy
networks? To gain insight into this question, I studied how advocates in
the human rights sector think and talk about an issue that has received
little advocacy attention to date: stigma against children born of wartime
rape. Focus groups with humanitarian practitioners were coded and analyzed
for evidence of a variety of explanations for issue adoption drawn from
the literature on advocacy networks. The analysis suggests that the
conditions for issue adoption are constituted by dynamics across, rather
than primarily within, issue networks.This
project was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. SES 0432488
and by a Hewlett Research Grant from University of Pittsburgh's
University Center for International Studies. I am deeply indebted to
Stuart Shulman and University of Pittsburgh's Qualitative Data
Analysis Program for assistance with Atlas.ti software, and to
Laurel Person, Abbie Zahler, Betcy Jose-Thota, Vanja Lundell, Rachel
Helwig, and Justin Reed for assistance in coding and data analysis. Vera
Achvarina, Lisa Alfredson, David Bearce, Clifford Bob, Daniel Chong, Jack
Donnelly, Michael Goodhart, John Mendeloff, Joel Oestreich, Simon Reich,
Stephen Rothman, Ben Rubin, Nita Rudra, Laura Sjoberg, Dan Thomas, and
participants in Yale University's Genocide Studies Seminar Series
provided helpful feedback on earlier drafts. I am solely responsible for
any remaining errors. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S002081830707021X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59886166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S002081830707021X</cupid><jstor_id>4498160</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4498160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-9abe44f670b4297ac01de97643c0ddffa86699273f2c531073730e57f2a7d25b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWC8_QPBhQRB9WJ1cNpc3S_EGRVEr-BbS3WzZXjY12VX7702pVFBE8jCE852ZM4PQAYYzDFicPwEQkFhSEPER_LKBOjijOM1Ayk3UWcrpUt9GOyGMAQAzrDro4qlpi0VVj5LbEFqbnNy5-jTtFm7eVK5OqjoZeFOH2iy_Zpp0izeXm3yR3Nnm3flJ2ENbpZkGu_9Vd9Hz1eWgd5P2769ve91-mmdMNqkyQ8tYyQUMGVHC5IALqwRnNIeiKEsjOVeKCFqSPMYGQQUFm4mSGFGQbEh30fGq79y719aGRs-qkNvp1NTWtUFnSkqOOf8XpHGQUIRF8OgHOHatj0sGTQjFSjLFRaTwisq9C8HbUs99NTN-oTHo5en1r9NHz-HKMw6N82sDY0piDlFOV3IVGvuxlo2f6DhQZJpfP-gH3sMZGzD9GHn6FcHMhr4qRvY76d8hPgGpHJu8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2231984967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Studying Issue (Non)-Adoption in Transnational Advocacy Networks</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Carpenter, R. Charli</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, R. Charli</creatorcontrib><description>Why do some issues but not others galvanize transnational advocacy
networks? To gain insight into this question, I studied how advocates in
the human rights sector think and talk about an issue that has received
little advocacy attention to date: stigma against children born of wartime
rape. Focus groups with humanitarian practitioners were coded and analyzed
for evidence of a variety of explanations for issue adoption drawn from
the literature on advocacy networks. The analysis suggests that the
conditions for issue adoption are constituted by dynamics across, rather
than primarily within, issue networks.This
project was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. SES 0432488
and by a Hewlett Research Grant from University of Pittsburgh's
University Center for International Studies. I am deeply indebted to
Stuart Shulman and University of Pittsburgh's Qualitative Data
Analysis Program for assistance with Atlas.ti software, and to
Laurel Person, Abbie Zahler, Betcy Jose-Thota, Vanja Lundell, Rachel
Helwig, and Justin Reed for assistance in coding and data analysis. Vera
Achvarina, Lisa Alfredson, David Bearce, Clifford Bob, Daniel Chong, Jack
Donnelly, Michael Goodhart, John Mendeloff, Joel Oestreich, Simon Reich,
Stephen Rothman, Ben Rubin, Nita Rudra, Laura Sjoberg, Dan Thomas, and
participants in Yale University's Genocide Studies Seminar Series
provided helpful feedback on earlier drafts. I am solely responsible for
any remaining errors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S002081830707021X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOCMFZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Armed conflict ; Child abuse ; Child adoption ; Child molestation ; Child soldiers ; Childrens rights ; Colleges & universities ; Data analysis ; Drafts ; Errors ; Focus groups ; Genocide ; Government agencies ; Group research ; Human rights ; Human Rights Movements ; Infanticide ; Infants ; International organizations ; International studies ; Mobilization ; Network analysis ; Networks ; Non-governmental organizations ; Rape ; RESEARCH NOTE ; Social Networks ; Socioeconomic status ; Software ; Stigma ; Transnationalism ; Wartime sexual violence</subject><ispartof>International organization, 2007-07, Vol.61 (3), p.643-667</ispartof><rights>2007 The IO Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright 2007 The IO Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-9abe44f670b4297ac01de97643c0ddffa86699273f2c531073730e57f2a7d25b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-9abe44f670b4297ac01de97643c0ddffa86699273f2c531073730e57f2a7d25b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4498160$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002081830707021X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, R. Charli</creatorcontrib><title>Studying Issue (Non)-Adoption in Transnational Advocacy Networks</title><title>International organization</title><addtitle>Int Org</addtitle><description>Why do some issues but not others galvanize transnational advocacy
networks? To gain insight into this question, I studied how advocates in
the human rights sector think and talk about an issue that has received
little advocacy attention to date: stigma against children born of wartime
rape. Focus groups with humanitarian practitioners were coded and analyzed
for evidence of a variety of explanations for issue adoption drawn from
the literature on advocacy networks. The analysis suggests that the
conditions for issue adoption are constituted by dynamics across, rather
than primarily within, issue networks.This
project was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. SES 0432488
and by a Hewlett Research Grant from University of Pittsburgh's
University Center for International Studies. I am deeply indebted to
Stuart Shulman and University of Pittsburgh's Qualitative Data
Analysis Program for assistance with Atlas.ti software, and to
Laurel Person, Abbie Zahler, Betcy Jose-Thota, Vanja Lundell, Rachel
Helwig, and Justin Reed for assistance in coding and data analysis. Vera
Achvarina, Lisa Alfredson, David Bearce, Clifford Bob, Daniel Chong, Jack
Donnelly, Michael Goodhart, John Mendeloff, Joel Oestreich, Simon Reich,
Stephen Rothman, Ben Rubin, Nita Rudra, Laura Sjoberg, Dan Thomas, and
participants in Yale University's Genocide Studies Seminar Series
provided helpful feedback on earlier drafts. I am solely responsible for
any remaining errors.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Armed conflict</subject><subject>Child abuse</subject><subject>Child adoption</subject><subject>Child molestation</subject><subject>Child soldiers</subject><subject>Childrens rights</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Drafts</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Group research</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Human Rights Movements</subject><subject>Infanticide</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>International studies</subject><subject>Mobilization</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Non-governmental organizations</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>RESEARCH NOTE</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><subject>Wartime sexual violence</subject><issn>0020-8183</issn><issn>1531-5088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWC8_QPBhQRB9WJ1cNpc3S_EGRVEr-BbS3WzZXjY12VX7702pVFBE8jCE852ZM4PQAYYzDFicPwEQkFhSEPER_LKBOjijOM1Ayk3UWcrpUt9GOyGMAQAzrDro4qlpi0VVj5LbEFqbnNy5-jTtFm7eVK5OqjoZeFOH2iy_Zpp0izeXm3yR3Nnm3flJ2ENbpZkGu_9Vd9Hz1eWgd5P2769ve91-mmdMNqkyQ8tYyQUMGVHC5IALqwRnNIeiKEsjOVeKCFqSPMYGQQUFm4mSGFGQbEh30fGq79y719aGRs-qkNvp1NTWtUFnSkqOOf8XpHGQUIRF8OgHOHatj0sGTQjFSjLFRaTwisq9C8HbUs99NTN-oTHo5en1r9NHz-HKMw6N82sDY0piDlFOV3IVGvuxlo2f6DhQZJpfP-gH3sMZGzD9GHn6FcHMhr4qRvY76d8hPgGpHJu8</recordid><startdate>200707</startdate><enddate>200707</enddate><creator>Carpenter, R. Charli</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200707</creationdate><title>Studying Issue (Non)-Adoption in Transnational Advocacy Networks</title><author>Carpenter, R. Charli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-9abe44f670b4297ac01de97643c0ddffa86699273f2c531073730e57f2a7d25b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Armed conflict</topic><topic>Child abuse</topic><topic>Child adoption</topic><topic>Child molestation</topic><topic>Child soldiers</topic><topic>Childrens rights</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Drafts</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Group research</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Human Rights Movements</topic><topic>Infanticide</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>International studies</topic><topic>Mobilization</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Non-governmental organizations</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>RESEARCH NOTE</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><topic>Wartime sexual violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, R. Charli</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpenter, R. Charli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Studying Issue (Non)-Adoption in Transnational Advocacy Networks</atitle><jtitle>International organization</jtitle><addtitle>Int Org</addtitle><date>2007-07</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>643</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>643-667</pages><issn>0020-8183</issn><eissn>1531-5088</eissn><coden>IOCMFZ</coden><abstract>Why do some issues but not others galvanize transnational advocacy
networks? To gain insight into this question, I studied how advocates in
the human rights sector think and talk about an issue that has received
little advocacy attention to date: stigma against children born of wartime
rape. Focus groups with humanitarian practitioners were coded and analyzed
for evidence of a variety of explanations for issue adoption drawn from
the literature on advocacy networks. The analysis suggests that the
conditions for issue adoption are constituted by dynamics across, rather
than primarily within, issue networks.This
project was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. SES 0432488
and by a Hewlett Research Grant from University of Pittsburgh's
University Center for International Studies. I am deeply indebted to
Stuart Shulman and University of Pittsburgh's Qualitative Data
Analysis Program for assistance with Atlas.ti software, and to
Laurel Person, Abbie Zahler, Betcy Jose-Thota, Vanja Lundell, Rachel
Helwig, and Justin Reed for assistance in coding and data analysis. Vera
Achvarina, Lisa Alfredson, David Bearce, Clifford Bob, Daniel Chong, Jack
Donnelly, Michael Goodhart, John Mendeloff, Joel Oestreich, Simon Reich,
Stephen Rothman, Ben Rubin, Nita Rudra, Laura Sjoberg, Dan Thomas, and
participants in Yale University's Genocide Studies Seminar Series
provided helpful feedback on earlier drafts. I am solely responsible for
any remaining errors.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S002081830707021X</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-8183 |
| ispartof | International organization, 2007-07, Vol.61 (3), p.643-667 |
| issn | 0020-8183 1531-5088 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59886166 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Advocacy Armed conflict Child abuse Child adoption Child molestation Child soldiers Childrens rights Colleges & universities Data analysis Drafts Errors Focus groups Genocide Government agencies Group research Human rights Human Rights Movements Infanticide Infants International organizations International studies Mobilization Network analysis Networks Non-governmental organizations Rape RESEARCH NOTE Social Networks Socioeconomic status Software Stigma Transnationalism Wartime sexual violence |
| title | Studying Issue (Non)-Adoption in Transnational Advocacy Networks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A45%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Studying%20Issue%20(Non)-Adoption%20in%20Transnational%20Advocacy%20Networks&rft.jtitle=International%20organization&rft.au=Carpenter,%20R.%20Charli&rft.date=2007-07&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=643&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=643-667&rft.issn=0020-8183&rft.eissn=1531-5088&rft.coden=IOCMFZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S002081830707021X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4498160%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2231984967&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S002081830707021X&rft_jstor_id=4498160&rfr_iscdi=true |