The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution
In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Publius 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.213-240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 213 |
container_title | Publius |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Behnke, Nathalie Benz, Arthur |
description | In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendment and numerous veto players. We propose an analytical distinction of reform and evolution as two modes of constitutional change that can complement and in part substitute for each other. Comparative research shows that those two modes can effectively account for different patterns of constitutional change and that a two-track mode of constitutional change making use of a flexible interplay of both reform and evolution can best secure federal stability over the long run. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/publius/pjn039 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59868704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A196964341</galeid><jstor_id>40272207</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/publius/pjn039</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A196964341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-23336788df0e26970d8c0b6749a1f7c7927ef2bbdfaf6c1ede157b2eb426ceda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEEkvhyg0p4oDEIa0_Ejs-lqhQVpUKqKCKi-U4k10v3ji1nUL_e5ymWiEuPYxnJP_mjZ5elr3G6BgjQU_GqbVmCifjbkBUPMlWmJe84Bjxp9kKobIuKlGh59mLEHYIJaTmq-zD1RbyL86aaHTIXZ83bgjRxCkaNyibN1s1bCBvIf4GGPJv0Du_z9XQ5We3zt5TL7NnvbIBXj30o-z7x7Or5ry4uPz0uTm9KDSjNBaEUsp4XXc9AsIER12tUct4KRTuueaCcOhJ23a96pnG0AGueEugLQnT0Cl6lL1bdEfvbiYIUe5N0GCtGsBNQVaiZjVH5aMg5aSi6B58-x-4c5NPtoMkmCe9CvEEFQu0URakGbQbIvyJ2lkLG5DJYnMpT7FggpW0xIk_XnjtXQgeejl6s1f-TmIk56DkQ1ByCSotrJcFDyPoA-2mcQYTdyupoiI9d6kIQvNo5jHVOHdMJSmR3MZ9Enu_iKX1xw-_WdhdiM4f6BIRTsi_zk1Ijg__yv-SjFNeyfPrn3L9Q5DqmnyVa_oX0zPISQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217598507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Behnke, Nathalie ; Benz, Arthur</creator><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Nathalie ; Benz, Arthur</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendment and numerous veto players. We propose an analytical distinction of reform and evolution as two modes of constitutional change that can complement and in part substitute for each other. Comparative research shows that those two modes can effectively account for different patterns of constitutional change and that a two-track mode of constitutional change making use of a flexible interplay of both reform and evolution can best secure federal stability over the long run.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjn039</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBLSAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Amendments ; Change ; Comparative Analysis ; Constitutional amendments ; Constitutional change ; Constitutional reform ; Constitutions ; Evolution ; Federalism ; Government ; Government reform ; Intergovernmental relations ; Intergovernmentalism ; Parliamentary system ; Parliaments ; Policy Reform ; Political conflict ; Political reform ; Political stability ; Politics ; Power relations ; Social evolution ; Society ; Stability ; Studies ; Veto</subject><ispartof>Publius, 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.213-240</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 CSF Associates: Publius, Inc.</rights><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CSF Associates: Publius, Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org. 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Spring 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-23336788df0e26970d8c0b6749a1f7c7927ef2bbdfaf6c1ede157b2eb426ceda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-23336788df0e26970d8c0b6749a1f7c7927ef2bbdfaf6c1ede157b2eb426ceda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40272207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40272207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1579,3994,27847,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/ouppublus/v_3a39_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a213-240.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benz, Arthur</creatorcontrib><title>The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution</title><title>Publius</title><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><description>In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendment and numerous veto players. We propose an analytical distinction of reform and evolution as two modes of constitutional change that can complement and in part substitute for each other. Comparative research shows that those two modes can effectively account for different patterns of constitutional change and that a two-track mode of constitutional change making use of a flexible interplay of both reform and evolution can best secure federal stability over the long run.</description><subject>Amendments</subject><subject>Change</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Constitutional amendments</subject><subject>Constitutional change</subject><subject>Constitutional reform</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government reform</subject><subject>Intergovernmental relations</subject><subject>Intergovernmentalism</subject><subject>Parliamentary system</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Policy Reform</subject><subject>Political conflict</subject><subject>Political reform</subject><subject>Political stability</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power relations</subject><subject>Social evolution</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Veto</subject><issn>0048-5950</issn><issn>1747-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEEkvhyg0p4oDEIa0_Ejs-lqhQVpUKqKCKi-U4k10v3ji1nUL_e5ymWiEuPYxnJP_mjZ5elr3G6BgjQU_GqbVmCifjbkBUPMlWmJe84Bjxp9kKobIuKlGh59mLEHYIJaTmq-zD1RbyL86aaHTIXZ83bgjRxCkaNyibN1s1bCBvIf4GGPJv0Du_z9XQ5We3zt5TL7NnvbIBXj30o-z7x7Or5ry4uPz0uTm9KDSjNBaEUsp4XXc9AsIER12tUct4KRTuueaCcOhJ23a96pnG0AGueEugLQnT0Cl6lL1bdEfvbiYIUe5N0GCtGsBNQVaiZjVH5aMg5aSi6B58-x-4c5NPtoMkmCe9CvEEFQu0URakGbQbIvyJ2lkLG5DJYnMpT7FggpW0xIk_XnjtXQgeejl6s1f-TmIk56DkQ1ByCSotrJcFDyPoA-2mcQYTdyupoiI9d6kIQvNo5jHVOHdMJSmR3MZ9Enu_iKX1xw-_WdhdiM4f6BIRTsi_zk1Ijg__yv-SjFNeyfPrn3L9Q5DqmnyVa_oX0zPISQ</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Behnke, Nathalie</creator><creator>Benz, Arthur</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution</title><author>Behnke, Nathalie ; Benz, Arthur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-23336788df0e26970d8c0b6749a1f7c7927ef2bbdfaf6c1ede157b2eb426ceda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Amendments</topic><topic>Change</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Constitutional amendments</topic><topic>Constitutional change</topic><topic>Constitutional reform</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government reform</topic><topic>Intergovernmental relations</topic><topic>Intergovernmentalism</topic><topic>Parliamentary system</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Policy Reform</topic><topic>Political conflict</topic><topic>Political reform</topic><topic>Political stability</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power relations</topic><topic>Social evolution</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Veto</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benz, Arthur</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Publius</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behnke, Nathalie</au><au>Benz, Arthur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution</atitle><jtitle>Publius</jtitle><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>213-240</pages><issn>0048-5950</issn><eissn>1747-7107</eissn><coden>PBLSAB</coden><abstract>In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendment and numerous veto players. We propose an analytical distinction of reform and evolution as two modes of constitutional change that can complement and in part substitute for each other. Comparative research shows that those two modes can effectively account for different patterns of constitutional change and that a two-track mode of constitutional change making use of a flexible interplay of both reform and evolution can best secure federal stability over the long run.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/publius/pjn039</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-5950 |
ispartof | Publius, 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.213-240 |
issn | 0048-5950 1747-7107 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59868704 |
source | RePEc; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Political Science Complete |
subjects | Amendments Change Comparative Analysis Constitutional amendments Constitutional change Constitutional reform Constitutions Evolution Federalism Government Government reform Intergovernmental relations Intergovernmentalism Parliamentary system Parliaments Policy Reform Political conflict Political reform Political stability Politics Power relations Social evolution Society Stability Studies Veto |
title | The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A18%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Politics%20of%20Constitutional%20Change%20between%20Reform%20and%20Evolution&rft.jtitle=Publius&rft.au=Behnke,%20Nathalie&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=213-240&rft.issn=0048-5950&rft.eissn=1747-7107&rft.coden=PBLSAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/publius/pjn039&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA196964341%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217598507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A196964341&rft_jstor_id=40272207&rft_oup_id=10.1093/publius/pjn039&rfr_iscdi=true |