The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution

In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Publius 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.213-240
Hauptverfasser: Behnke, Nathalie, Benz, Arthur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 240
container_issue 2
container_start_page 213
container_title Publius
container_volume 39
creator Behnke, Nathalie
Benz, Arthur
description In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendment and numerous veto players. We propose an analytical distinction of reform and evolution as two modes of constitutional change that can complement and in part substitute for each other. Comparative research shows that those two modes can effectively account for different patterns of constitutional change and that a two-track mode of constitutional change making use of a flexible interplay of both reform and evolution can best secure federal stability over the long run.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/publius/pjn039
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59868704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A196964341</galeid><jstor_id>40272207</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/publius/pjn039</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A196964341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-23336788df0e26970d8c0b6749a1f7c7927ef2bbdfaf6c1ede157b2eb426ceda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEEkvhyg0p4oDEIa0_Ejs-lqhQVpUKqKCKi-U4k10v3ji1nUL_e5ymWiEuPYxnJP_mjZ5elr3G6BgjQU_GqbVmCifjbkBUPMlWmJe84Bjxp9kKobIuKlGh59mLEHYIJaTmq-zD1RbyL86aaHTIXZ83bgjRxCkaNyibN1s1bCBvIf4GGPJv0Du_z9XQ5We3zt5TL7NnvbIBXj30o-z7x7Or5ry4uPz0uTm9KDSjNBaEUsp4XXc9AsIER12tUct4KRTuueaCcOhJ23a96pnG0AGueEugLQnT0Cl6lL1bdEfvbiYIUe5N0GCtGsBNQVaiZjVH5aMg5aSi6B58-x-4c5NPtoMkmCe9CvEEFQu0URakGbQbIvyJ2lkLG5DJYnMpT7FggpW0xIk_XnjtXQgeejl6s1f-TmIk56DkQ1ByCSotrJcFDyPoA-2mcQYTdyupoiI9d6kIQvNo5jHVOHdMJSmR3MZ9Enu_iKX1xw-_WdhdiM4f6BIRTsi_zk1Ijg__yv-SjFNeyfPrn3L9Q5DqmnyVa_oX0zPISQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217598507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Behnke, Nathalie ; Benz, Arthur</creator><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Nathalie ; Benz, Arthur</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendment and numerous veto players. We propose an analytical distinction of reform and evolution as two modes of constitutional change that can complement and in part substitute for each other. Comparative research shows that those two modes can effectively account for different patterns of constitutional change and that a two-track mode of constitutional change making use of a flexible interplay of both reform and evolution can best secure federal stability over the long run.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjn039</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBLSAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Amendments ; Change ; Comparative Analysis ; Constitutional amendments ; Constitutional change ; Constitutional reform ; Constitutions ; Evolution ; Federalism ; Government ; Government reform ; Intergovernmental relations ; Intergovernmentalism ; Parliamentary system ; Parliaments ; Policy Reform ; Political conflict ; Political reform ; Political stability ; Politics ; Power relations ; Social evolution ; Society ; Stability ; Studies ; Veto</subject><ispartof>Publius, 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.213-240</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 CSF Associates: Publius, Inc.</rights><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CSF Associates: Publius, Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org. 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Spring 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-23336788df0e26970d8c0b6749a1f7c7927ef2bbdfaf6c1ede157b2eb426ceda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-23336788df0e26970d8c0b6749a1f7c7927ef2bbdfaf6c1ede157b2eb426ceda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40272207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40272207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1579,3994,27847,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/ouppublus/v_3a39_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a213-240.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benz, Arthur</creatorcontrib><title>The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution</title><title>Publius</title><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><description>In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendment and numerous veto players. We propose an analytical distinction of reform and evolution as two modes of constitutional change that can complement and in part substitute for each other. Comparative research shows that those two modes can effectively account for different patterns of constitutional change and that a two-track mode of constitutional change making use of a flexible interplay of both reform and evolution can best secure federal stability over the long run.</description><subject>Amendments</subject><subject>Change</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Constitutional amendments</subject><subject>Constitutional change</subject><subject>Constitutional reform</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government reform</subject><subject>Intergovernmental relations</subject><subject>Intergovernmentalism</subject><subject>Parliamentary system</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Policy Reform</subject><subject>Political conflict</subject><subject>Political reform</subject><subject>Political stability</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power relations</subject><subject>Social evolution</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Veto</subject><issn>0048-5950</issn><issn>1747-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxSMEEkvhyg0p4oDEIa0_Ejs-lqhQVpUKqKCKi-U4k10v3ji1nUL_e5ymWiEuPYxnJP_mjZ5elr3G6BgjQU_GqbVmCifjbkBUPMlWmJe84Bjxp9kKobIuKlGh59mLEHYIJaTmq-zD1RbyL86aaHTIXZ83bgjRxCkaNyibN1s1bCBvIf4GGPJv0Du_z9XQ5We3zt5TL7NnvbIBXj30o-z7x7Or5ry4uPz0uTm9KDSjNBaEUsp4XXc9AsIER12tUct4KRTuueaCcOhJ23a96pnG0AGueEugLQnT0Cl6lL1bdEfvbiYIUe5N0GCtGsBNQVaiZjVH5aMg5aSi6B58-x-4c5NPtoMkmCe9CvEEFQu0URakGbQbIvyJ2lkLG5DJYnMpT7FggpW0xIk_XnjtXQgeejl6s1f-TmIk56DkQ1ByCSotrJcFDyPoA-2mcQYTdyupoiI9d6kIQvNo5jHVOHdMJSmR3MZ9Enu_iKX1xw-_WdhdiM4f6BIRTsi_zk1Ijg__yv-SjFNeyfPrn3L9Q5DqmnyVa_oX0zPISQ</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Behnke, Nathalie</creator><creator>Benz, Arthur</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution</title><author>Behnke, Nathalie ; Benz, Arthur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-23336788df0e26970d8c0b6749a1f7c7927ef2bbdfaf6c1ede157b2eb426ceda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Amendments</topic><topic>Change</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Constitutional amendments</topic><topic>Constitutional change</topic><topic>Constitutional reform</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government reform</topic><topic>Intergovernmental relations</topic><topic>Intergovernmentalism</topic><topic>Parliamentary system</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Policy Reform</topic><topic>Political conflict</topic><topic>Political reform</topic><topic>Political stability</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power relations</topic><topic>Social evolution</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Veto</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behnke, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benz, Arthur</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Publius</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behnke, Nathalie</au><au>Benz, Arthur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution</atitle><jtitle>Publius</jtitle><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>213-240</pages><issn>0048-5950</issn><eissn>1747-7107</eissn><coden>PBLSAB</coden><abstract>In this article, we investigate the dynamics of constitutional policy. Starting from the observation that federal systems are confronted with a two-sided dilemma of stability and flexibility, the question is how necessary constitutional change can be accomplished in spite of special rules of amendment and numerous veto players. We propose an analytical distinction of reform and evolution as two modes of constitutional change that can complement and in part substitute for each other. Comparative research shows that those two modes can effectively account for different patterns of constitutional change and that a two-track mode of constitutional change making use of a flexible interplay of both reform and evolution can best secure federal stability over the long run.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/publius/pjn039</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5950
ispartof Publius, 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.213-240
issn 0048-5950
1747-7107
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59868704
source RePEc; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Political Science Complete
subjects Amendments
Change
Comparative Analysis
Constitutional amendments
Constitutional change
Constitutional reform
Constitutions
Evolution
Federalism
Government
Government reform
Intergovernmental relations
Intergovernmentalism
Parliamentary system
Parliaments
Policy Reform
Political conflict
Political reform
Political stability
Politics
Power relations
Social evolution
Society
Stability
Studies
Veto
title The Politics of Constitutional Change between Reform and Evolution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A18%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Politics%20of%20Constitutional%20Change%20between%20Reform%20and%20Evolution&rft.jtitle=Publius&rft.au=Behnke,%20Nathalie&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=213-240&rft.issn=0048-5950&rft.eissn=1747-7107&rft.coden=PBLSAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/publius/pjn039&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA196964341%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217598507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A196964341&rft_jstor_id=40272207&rft_oup_id=10.1093/publius/pjn039&rfr_iscdi=true