Diplomacy's Possible Futures

In an attempt to think beyond the immediate horizon for diplomacy, five possible futures are envisioned. 'Disintermediation' suggests that diplomats, in competition with a dynamic private sector, may need to adopt business methods and use the internet - or be bypassed. 'Europeanizatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Hague journal of diplomacy 2006, Vol.1 (1), p.3-27
1. Verfasser: Henrikson, Alan K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title The Hague journal of diplomacy
container_volume 1
creator Henrikson, Alan K
description In an attempt to think beyond the immediate horizon for diplomacy, five possible futures are envisioned. 'Disintermediation' suggests that diplomats, in competition with a dynamic private sector, may need to adopt business methods and use the internet - or be bypassed. 'Europeanization' could largely subordinate bilateral diplomacy within the regional European Union framework, although space might be left for 'public diplomatic' functions. International 'democratization' would accord a larger role to states hitherto excluded from decision-making within multilateral institutions, and also to civil society. 'Thematization' would require a higher degree of flexibility from diplomats as they engage in crusade-like efforts against terrorism, disease and other such threats. 'Americanization' implies the adjustment by diplomats to a world in which 'international relations' are conducted along the lines of US domestic politics, with lobbying and advocacy becoming major activities. The need to win greater public support, if not necessarily to involve the people directly in diplomacy, is evident in all of these 'projective visions'. Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/187119006X101870
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59825957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59825957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b281t-4821d4b2ff53e1c38c7b4566e993c5e373411c9cd45f4c185e544843d3be63f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHjz0pKfUnez3Uaut1oIiFXpbku0EUrdN3U3A_vemRHoQPM1j-L35eIRcAh0CSHYLWgEYSuUCaKvpEentWwkYWBwfNIVTchbjilKupaE9cvVQbn21ztzuJg7eqhjL3ONg3NRNwHhOTorMR7z4rX3yMX6cj56S2evkeXQ3S_JUQ51wncKS52lRCIbgmHYq50JKNIY5gUwxDuCMW3JRcAdaoOBcc7ZkOUpWpKxPrru521B9NRhruy6jQ--zDVZNtMLoVBihWpB2oAvtqQELuw3lOgs7C9TuY7B_Y2gtSWcpY43fBz4Ln1YqpoSdvszt5D2VU3qv7H7FsOPzUHpvV1UTNu3v_y_4ATPDacA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>59825957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diplomacy's Possible Futures</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Henrikson, Alan K</creator><creatorcontrib>Henrikson, Alan K</creatorcontrib><description>In an attempt to think beyond the immediate horizon for diplomacy, five possible futures are envisioned. 'Disintermediation' suggests that diplomats, in competition with a dynamic private sector, may need to adopt business methods and use the internet - or be bypassed. 'Europeanization' could largely subordinate bilateral diplomacy within the regional European Union framework, although space might be left for 'public diplomatic' functions. International 'democratization' would accord a larger role to states hitherto excluded from decision-making within multilateral institutions, and also to civil society. 'Thematization' would require a higher degree of flexibility from diplomats as they engage in crusade-like efforts against terrorism, disease and other such threats. 'Americanization' implies the adjustment by diplomats to a world in which 'international relations' are conducted along the lines of US domestic politics, with lobbying and advocacy becoming major activities. The need to win greater public support, if not necessarily to involve the people directly in diplomacy, is evident in all of these 'projective visions'. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1871-1901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1871-191X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1871-1901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/187119006X101870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Crisis Intervention ; CRISIS MANAGEMENT ; Democracy ; DEMOCRATIZATION OF DIPLOMACY ; Diplomacy ; DISINTERMEDIATION ; European Union ; FUTURE PROJECTIONS FOR DIPLOMACY ; GAIATSU DIPLOMACY ; INTEGRATED DIPLOMATIC SERVICES ; THEMATIC DIPLOMACY</subject><ispartof>The Hague journal of diplomacy, 2006, Vol.1 (1), p.3-27</ispartof><rights>2006 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b281t-4821d4b2ff53e1c38c7b4566e993c5e373411c9cd45f4c185e544843d3be63f23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henrikson, Alan K</creatorcontrib><title>Diplomacy's Possible Futures</title><title>The Hague journal of diplomacy</title><addtitle>HJD</addtitle><description>In an attempt to think beyond the immediate horizon for diplomacy, five possible futures are envisioned. 'Disintermediation' suggests that diplomats, in competition with a dynamic private sector, may need to adopt business methods and use the internet - or be bypassed. 'Europeanization' could largely subordinate bilateral diplomacy within the regional European Union framework, although space might be left for 'public diplomatic' functions. International 'democratization' would accord a larger role to states hitherto excluded from decision-making within multilateral institutions, and also to civil society. 'Thematization' would require a higher degree of flexibility from diplomats as they engage in crusade-like efforts against terrorism, disease and other such threats. 'Americanization' implies the adjustment by diplomats to a world in which 'international relations' are conducted along the lines of US domestic politics, with lobbying and advocacy becoming major activities. The need to win greater public support, if not necessarily to involve the people directly in diplomacy, is evident in all of these 'projective visions'. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Crisis Intervention</subject><subject>CRISIS MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>DEMOCRATIZATION OF DIPLOMACY</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>DISINTERMEDIATION</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>FUTURE PROJECTIONS FOR DIPLOMACY</subject><subject>GAIATSU DIPLOMACY</subject><subject>INTEGRATED DIPLOMATIC SERVICES</subject><subject>THEMATIC DIPLOMACY</subject><issn>1871-1901</issn><issn>1871-191X</issn><issn>1871-1901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHjz0pKfUnez3Uaut1oIiFXpbku0EUrdN3U3A_vemRHoQPM1j-L35eIRcAh0CSHYLWgEYSuUCaKvpEentWwkYWBwfNIVTchbjilKupaE9cvVQbn21ztzuJg7eqhjL3ONg3NRNwHhOTorMR7z4rX3yMX6cj56S2evkeXQ3S_JUQ51wncKS52lRCIbgmHYq50JKNIY5gUwxDuCMW3JRcAdaoOBcc7ZkOUpWpKxPrru521B9NRhruy6jQ--zDVZNtMLoVBihWpB2oAvtqQELuw3lOgs7C9TuY7B_Y2gtSWcpY43fBz4Ln1YqpoSdvszt5D2VU3qv7H7FsOPzUHpvV1UTNu3v_y_4ATPDacA</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Henrikson, Alan K</creator><general>BRILL</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Diplomacy's Possible Futures</title><author>Henrikson, Alan K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b281t-4821d4b2ff53e1c38c7b4566e993c5e373411c9cd45f4c185e544843d3be63f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Crisis Intervention</topic><topic>CRISIS MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>DEMOCRATIZATION OF DIPLOMACY</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>DISINTERMEDIATION</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>FUTURE PROJECTIONS FOR DIPLOMACY</topic><topic>GAIATSU DIPLOMACY</topic><topic>INTEGRATED DIPLOMATIC SERVICES</topic><topic>THEMATIC DIPLOMACY</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henrikson, Alan K</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Hague journal of diplomacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henrikson, Alan K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diplomacy's Possible Futures</atitle><jtitle>The Hague journal of diplomacy</jtitle><addtitle>HJD</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>3-27</pages><issn>1871-1901</issn><eissn>1871-191X</eissn><eissn>1871-1901</eissn><abstract>In an attempt to think beyond the immediate horizon for diplomacy, five possible futures are envisioned. 'Disintermediation' suggests that diplomats, in competition with a dynamic private sector, may need to adopt business methods and use the internet - or be bypassed. 'Europeanization' could largely subordinate bilateral diplomacy within the regional European Union framework, although space might be left for 'public diplomatic' functions. International 'democratization' would accord a larger role to states hitherto excluded from decision-making within multilateral institutions, and also to civil society. 'Thematization' would require a higher degree of flexibility from diplomats as they engage in crusade-like efforts against terrorism, disease and other such threats. 'Americanization' implies the adjustment by diplomats to a world in which 'international relations' are conducted along the lines of US domestic politics, with lobbying and advocacy becoming major activities. The need to win greater public support, if not necessarily to involve the people directly in diplomacy, is evident in all of these 'projective visions'. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/187119006X101870</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1871-1901
ispartof The Hague journal of diplomacy, 2006, Vol.1 (1), p.3-27
issn 1871-1901
1871-191X
1871-1901
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59825957
source Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Crisis Intervention
CRISIS MANAGEMENT
Democracy
DEMOCRATIZATION OF DIPLOMACY
Diplomacy
DISINTERMEDIATION
European Union
FUTURE PROJECTIONS FOR DIPLOMACY
GAIATSU DIPLOMACY
INTEGRATED DIPLOMATIC SERVICES
THEMATIC DIPLOMACY
title Diplomacy's Possible Futures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A04%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diplomacy's%20Possible%20Futures&rft.jtitle=The%20Hague%20journal%20of%20diplomacy&rft.au=Henrikson,%20Alan%20K&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=3-27&rft.issn=1871-1901&rft.eissn=1871-191X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/187119006X101870&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E59825957%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=59825957&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true