Libya and the United States: A Faustian Pact?
In congressional testimony in July 1999, Ambassador Ronald E. Neumann, deputy assistant secretary for Near East and South Asian Affairs, emphasized that the United States expected Libya to fulfill all of its UN security Council requirements, including an end to support for terrorist activities, ackn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Middle East policy 2008-03, Vol.15 (1), p.133-148 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 148 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | Middle East policy |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | St John, Ronald Bruce |
description | In congressional testimony in July 1999, Ambassador Ronald E. Neumann, deputy assistant secretary for Near East and South Asian Affairs, emphasized that the United States expected Libya to fulfill all of its UN security Council requirements, including an end to support for terrorist activities, acknowledgment of its responsibility for the actions of Libyan officials, cooperation with the [Lockerbie] trial, and payment of appropriate compensation. Over time, Ambassador Neumann and other American officials added weapons of mass destruction and Libyan regional policies to the list of U.S. concerns, but there was no indication throughout this period that the United States placed any priority on issues like democratic reform and the promotion of human rights, later assigned importance.\n40 PERMANENT INTERESTS Throughout the Bush administration, ambivalence more that anything else has characterized American policy toward Libya, with good faith often in short supply on both sides. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1475-4967.2008.00343.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59809183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A177816576</galeid><sourcerecordid>A177816576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g5223-32ac9667dcd9821e160d1c876662ad9690df771fdfadd8fb0f80815006bcb5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNklFv0zAQxyMEEmPwHSIekHhIONuJ7SAhVKqtq1bWTh2Ct5MbO8ElTUbsivbbz12nTUV9mP3gk_37353tfxTFBFISxqdlSjKRJ1nBRUoBZArAMpZuXkQnjwcvQwycJKSg2evojXNLACAgs5MomdjFVsWq1bH_beIfrfVGx3OvvHGf40F8rtbOW9XGM1X6r2-jV5VqnHn3sJ5GN-dnN8OLZDIdjYeDSVLnlLKEUVUWnAtd6kJSYggHTUopOOdU6YIXoCshSKUrpbWsFlBJkCQH4ItykWt2Gn3Yp73tu79r4zyurCtN06jWdGuHeSGhIJIF8P1_4LJb921oDSmw0IHM8wAle6hWjUHbVp3vVVmb1vSq6VpT2bA9IEJIwnPBA58e4cPUZmXLo4KPB4LAeLPxdXg6h5ez8bPZ8fzq2awcTQ7Z5Bhbdk1jaoPhd4bTQ_7Lnv8XLrPF296uVL9FArhzFS5xZx7cmQd3rsJ7V-EGv5_NpiF6qmddqPOoV_0f5IIF6c-rEV7PCb3-Nf-Ggt0BZpLKPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203667855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Libya and the United States: A Faustian Pact?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>St John, Ronald Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>St John, Ronald Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>In congressional testimony in July 1999, Ambassador Ronald E. Neumann, deputy assistant secretary for Near East and South Asian Affairs, emphasized that the United States expected Libya to fulfill all of its UN security Council requirements, including an end to support for terrorist activities, acknowledgment of its responsibility for the actions of Libyan officials, cooperation with the [Lockerbie] trial, and payment of appropriate compensation. Over time, Ambassador Neumann and other American officials added weapons of mass destruction and Libyan regional policies to the list of U.S. concerns, but there was no indication throughout this period that the United States placed any priority on issues like democratic reform and the promotion of human rights, later assigned importance.\n40 PERMANENT INTERESTS Throughout the Bush administration, ambivalence more that anything else has characterized American policy toward Libya, with good faith often in short supply on both sides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-1924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4967.2008.00343.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambassadors ; Biological & chemical weapons ; Compensation ; Contract agreement ; Cooperation ; Councils ; Democratization ; Diplomacy ; Diplomatic & consular services ; Foreign Policy ; Intelligence gathering ; Intelligence services ; International Relations ; International relations-US ; Political activity ; Political aspects ; Presidential elections ; Prime ministers ; Sanctions ; Scandals ; Terrorism ; Testimony ; Trials ; United States of America ; Weapons of mass destruction</subject><ispartof>Middle East policy, 2008-03, Vol.15 (1), p.133-148</ispartof><rights>2008, The Author</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Middle East Policy Council Spring 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1475-4967.2008.00343.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1475-4967.2008.00343.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,12824,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>St John, Ronald Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>Libya and the United States: A Faustian Pact?</title><title>Middle East policy</title><addtitle>Middle East Policy</addtitle><description>In congressional testimony in July 1999, Ambassador Ronald E. Neumann, deputy assistant secretary for Near East and South Asian Affairs, emphasized that the United States expected Libya to fulfill all of its UN security Council requirements, including an end to support for terrorist activities, acknowledgment of its responsibility for the actions of Libyan officials, cooperation with the [Lockerbie] trial, and payment of appropriate compensation. Over time, Ambassador Neumann and other American officials added weapons of mass destruction and Libyan regional policies to the list of U.S. concerns, but there was no indication throughout this period that the United States placed any priority on issues like democratic reform and the promotion of human rights, later assigned importance.\n40 PERMANENT INTERESTS Throughout the Bush administration, ambivalence more that anything else has characterized American policy toward Libya, with good faith often in short supply on both sides.</description><subject>Ambassadors</subject><subject>Biological & chemical weapons</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Contract agreement</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>Diplomatic & consular services</subject><subject>Foreign Policy</subject><subject>Intelligence gathering</subject><subject>Intelligence services</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Political activity</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Prime ministers</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Weapons of mass destruction</subject><issn>1061-1924</issn><issn>1475-4967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNqNklFv0zAQxyMEEmPwHSIekHhIONuJ7SAhVKqtq1bWTh2Ct5MbO8ElTUbsivbbz12nTUV9mP3gk_37353tfxTFBFISxqdlSjKRJ1nBRUoBZArAMpZuXkQnjwcvQwycJKSg2evojXNLACAgs5MomdjFVsWq1bH_beIfrfVGx3OvvHGf40F8rtbOW9XGM1X6r2-jV5VqnHn3sJ5GN-dnN8OLZDIdjYeDSVLnlLKEUVUWnAtd6kJSYggHTUopOOdU6YIXoCshSKUrpbWsFlBJkCQH4ItykWt2Gn3Yp73tu79r4zyurCtN06jWdGuHeSGhIJIF8P1_4LJb921oDSmw0IHM8wAle6hWjUHbVp3vVVmb1vSq6VpT2bA9IEJIwnPBA58e4cPUZmXLo4KPB4LAeLPxdXg6h5ez8bPZ8fzq2awcTQ7Z5Bhbdk1jaoPhd4bTQ_7Lnv8XLrPF296uVL9FArhzFS5xZx7cmQd3rsJ7V-EGv5_NpiF6qmddqPOoV_0f5IIF6c-rEV7PCb3-Nf-Ggt0BZpLKPQ</recordid><startdate>20080322</startdate><enddate>20080322</enddate><creator>St John, Ronald Bruce</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Middle East Policy Council</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080322</creationdate><title>Libya and the United States: A Faustian Pact?</title><author>St John, Ronald Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g5223-32ac9667dcd9821e160d1c876662ad9690df771fdfadd8fb0f80815006bcb5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Ambassadors</topic><topic>Biological & chemical weapons</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Contract agreement</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>Diplomatic & consular services</topic><topic>Foreign Policy</topic><topic>Intelligence gathering</topic><topic>Intelligence services</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Political activity</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Prime ministers</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Weapons of mass destruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>St John, Ronald Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Middle East policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>St John, Ronald Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Libya and the United States: A Faustian Pact?</atitle><jtitle>Middle East policy</jtitle><addtitle>Middle East Policy</addtitle><date>2008-03-22</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>133-148</pages><issn>1061-1924</issn><eissn>1475-4967</eissn><abstract>In congressional testimony in July 1999, Ambassador Ronald E. Neumann, deputy assistant secretary for Near East and South Asian Affairs, emphasized that the United States expected Libya to fulfill all of its UN security Council requirements, including an end to support for terrorist activities, acknowledgment of its responsibility for the actions of Libyan officials, cooperation with the [Lockerbie] trial, and payment of appropriate compensation. Over time, Ambassador Neumann and other American officials added weapons of mass destruction and Libyan regional policies to the list of U.S. concerns, but there was no indication throughout this period that the United States placed any priority on issues like democratic reform and the promotion of human rights, later assigned importance.\n40 PERMANENT INTERESTS Throughout the Bush administration, ambivalence more that anything else has characterized American policy toward Libya, with good faith often in short supply on both sides.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1475-4967.2008.00343.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-1924 |
ispartof | Middle East policy, 2008-03, Vol.15 (1), p.133-148 |
issn | 1061-1924 1475-4967 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59809183 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete (EBSCOhost) |
subjects | Ambassadors Biological & chemical weapons Compensation Contract agreement Cooperation Councils Democratization Diplomacy Diplomatic & consular services Foreign Policy Intelligence gathering Intelligence services International Relations International relations-US Political activity Political aspects Presidential elections Prime ministers Sanctions Scandals Terrorism Testimony Trials United States of America Weapons of mass destruction |
title | Libya and the United States: A Faustian Pact? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A40%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Libya%20and%20the%20United%20States:%20A%20Faustian%20Pact?&rft.jtitle=Middle%20East%20policy&rft.au=St%20John,%20Ronald%20Bruce&rft.date=2008-03-22&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=133-148&rft.issn=1061-1924&rft.eissn=1475-4967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2008.00343.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA177816576%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203667855&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A177816576&rfr_iscdi=true |