The Two Kingdoms Doctrine and the Relationship of Church and State in the Early Reformed Tradition
Among its important features are a much greater recognition of the scholastic theologians' immersion in biblical studies,5 of scholasticism as more a development of method than a change in theological substance,6 of the international character of Reformed orthodoxy,7 and of the complex and vari...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | A journal of church and state 2007-09, Vol.49 (4), p.743-763 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 743 |
container_title | A journal of church and state |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | VANDRUNEN, DAVID |
description | Among its important features are a much greater recognition of the scholastic theologians' immersion in biblical studies,5 of scholasticism as more a development of method than a change in theological substance,6 of the international character of Reformed orthodoxy,7 and of the complex and variegated character of Reformed theology within a single tradition,8 which includes the conviction that Calvin, for all his importance, should never be taken as the sole standard for assessing later Reformed thought.9 While the present essay does not seek to contribute directly to this scholarly debate, the conclusions certainly add supporting evidence to the case for continuity between Reformation and post-Reformation Reformed theology and for early Reformed theology as a variegated yet single tradition. A number of influential schools of thought among contemporary Christian theologians take a decidedly negative view of the concept of the "secular," identifying it with an Enlightenment quest for autonomy, moral fragmentation, and the exclusion of religious discourse from the public square. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jcs/49.4.743 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59808318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A174750034</galeid><jstor_id>23922304</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A174750034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-955aace0e3bfe7438ea4e7827c57b532b179c524b923842938a237fd3d04113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s2LEzEUAPBBFKyrN6_CoCAITjefzeS41HV3tbji9FC8hDTzpk2dmdQkg-5_b7pdFitFJYdA3u_lJS_JsucYjTGS9HRjwimTYzYWjD7IRgQxVLByIh5mI4QILuRELh5nT0LYIIRxCoyy5XwN-fyHyz_aflW7LuTvnIne9pDrvs5jin6BVkfr-rC229w1-XQ9eLO-DVdRR8htf-vOtW9vkm6c76DO517Xdpf3NHvU6DbAs7v5JKven8-nl8Xs-uJqejYrDJc8FpJzrQ0goMsG0gVK0AxESYThYskpWWIhDSdsKQktGZG01ISKpqY1YhjTk-z1ftetd98HCFF1NhhoW92DG4LiskQlxeU_IRWpV4SjBF_-ATdu8H26giI0NVBQwhJ6tUcr3YKyfeOi12a3ozrDggmOEN2p4ohaQQ9et66HxqblAz8-4tOoobPmaMKbg4RkIvyMKz2EoK6qT_9ty4vZ3w5-Z41rW1iBSu83vT70b_feeBeCh0Ztve20v1EYqd0fVemPKiYVU-mJE3-x55sQnb-3hEqSWvxbeRtS2fu49t_URFDB1eXiq_qA-KKq5GfF6C8IYOvS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230017324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Two Kingdoms Doctrine and the Relationship of Church and State in the Early Reformed Tradition</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>VANDRUNEN, DAVID</creator><creatorcontrib>VANDRUNEN, DAVID</creatorcontrib><description>Among its important features are a much greater recognition of the scholastic theologians' immersion in biblical studies,5 of scholasticism as more a development of method than a change in theological substance,6 of the international character of Reformed orthodoxy,7 and of the complex and variegated character of Reformed theology within a single tradition,8 which includes the conviction that Calvin, for all his importance, should never be taken as the sole standard for assessing later Reformed thought.9 While the present essay does not seek to contribute directly to this scholarly debate, the conclusions certainly add supporting evidence to the case for continuity between Reformation and post-Reformation Reformed theology and for early Reformed theology as a variegated yet single tradition. A number of influential schools of thought among contemporary Christian theologians take a decidedly negative view of the concept of the "secular," identifying it with an Enlightenment quest for autonomy, moral fragmentation, and the exclusion of religious discourse from the public square.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-969X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-4867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jcs/49.4.743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Calvin, John (1509-64) ; Calvinism ; Christianity ; Church & state ; Church and state ; Church renewal ; Churches ; Civic education ; Divine right ; English Reformation, ca. 1534-1590 ; Government regulation ; Historiography ; Judges & magistrates ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Magistrates ; Natural law ; Orthodox Church ; Orthodoxy ; Political philosophy ; Political theory ; Reformation ; Religion ; Religion and politics ; Religion Politics Relationship ; Religiosity ; Religious beliefs ; Religious reform ; Religious studies ; Social theory ; Swords ; Theology ; Two-kingdom theology</subject><ispartof>A journal of church and state, 2007-09, Vol.49 (4), p.743-763</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 J. M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies Autumn 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-955aace0e3bfe7438ea4e7827c57b532b179c524b923842938a237fd3d04113</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23922304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23922304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12836,27915,27916,58008,58241</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>VANDRUNEN, DAVID</creatorcontrib><title>The Two Kingdoms Doctrine and the Relationship of Church and State in the Early Reformed Tradition</title><title>A journal of church and state</title><addtitle>Journal of Church and State</addtitle><description>Among its important features are a much greater recognition of the scholastic theologians' immersion in biblical studies,5 of scholasticism as more a development of method than a change in theological substance,6 of the international character of Reformed orthodoxy,7 and of the complex and variegated character of Reformed theology within a single tradition,8 which includes the conviction that Calvin, for all his importance, should never be taken as the sole standard for assessing later Reformed thought.9 While the present essay does not seek to contribute directly to this scholarly debate, the conclusions certainly add supporting evidence to the case for continuity between Reformation and post-Reformation Reformed theology and for early Reformed theology as a variegated yet single tradition. A number of influential schools of thought among contemporary Christian theologians take a decidedly negative view of the concept of the "secular," identifying it with an Enlightenment quest for autonomy, moral fragmentation, and the exclusion of religious discourse from the public square.</description><subject>Calvin, John (1509-64)</subject><subject>Calvinism</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Church & state</subject><subject>Church and state</subject><subject>Church renewal</subject><subject>Churches</subject><subject>Civic education</subject><subject>Divine right</subject><subject>English Reformation, ca. 1534-1590</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Magistrates</subject><subject>Natural law</subject><subject>Orthodox Church</subject><subject>Orthodoxy</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Reformation</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion and politics</subject><subject>Religion Politics Relationship</subject><subject>Religiosity</subject><subject>Religious beliefs</subject><subject>Religious reform</subject><subject>Religious studies</subject><subject>Social theory</subject><subject>Swords</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Two-kingdom theology</subject><issn>0021-969X</issn><issn>2040-4867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0s2LEzEUAPBBFKyrN6_CoCAITjefzeS41HV3tbji9FC8hDTzpk2dmdQkg-5_b7pdFitFJYdA3u_lJS_JsucYjTGS9HRjwimTYzYWjD7IRgQxVLByIh5mI4QILuRELh5nT0LYIIRxCoyy5XwN-fyHyz_aflW7LuTvnIne9pDrvs5jin6BVkfr-rC229w1-XQ9eLO-DVdRR8htf-vOtW9vkm6c76DO517Xdpf3NHvU6DbAs7v5JKven8-nl8Xs-uJqejYrDJc8FpJzrQ0goMsG0gVK0AxESYThYskpWWIhDSdsKQktGZG01ISKpqY1YhjTk-z1ftetd98HCFF1NhhoW92DG4LiskQlxeU_IRWpV4SjBF_-ATdu8H26giI0NVBQwhJ6tUcr3YKyfeOi12a3ozrDggmOEN2p4ohaQQ9et66HxqblAz8-4tOoobPmaMKbg4RkIvyMKz2EoK6qT_9ty4vZ3w5-Z41rW1iBSu83vT70b_feeBeCh0Ztve20v1EYqd0fVemPKiYVU-mJE3-x55sQnb-3hEqSWvxbeRtS2fu49t_URFDB1eXiq_qA-KKq5GfF6C8IYOvS</recordid><startdate>20070922</startdate><enddate>20070922</enddate><creator>VANDRUNEN, DAVID</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>J. M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies of Baylor University</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070922</creationdate><title>The Two Kingdoms Doctrine and the Relationship of Church and State in the Early Reformed Tradition</title><author>VANDRUNEN, DAVID</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-955aace0e3bfe7438ea4e7827c57b532b179c524b923842938a237fd3d04113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Calvin, John (1509-64)</topic><topic>Calvinism</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Church & state</topic><topic>Church and state</topic><topic>Church renewal</topic><topic>Churches</topic><topic>Civic education</topic><topic>Divine right</topic><topic>English Reformation, ca. 1534-1590</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Magistrates</topic><topic>Natural law</topic><topic>Orthodox Church</topic><topic>Orthodoxy</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Reformation</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion and politics</topic><topic>Religion Politics Relationship</topic><topic>Religiosity</topic><topic>Religious beliefs</topic><topic>Religious reform</topic><topic>Religious studies</topic><topic>Social theory</topic><topic>Swords</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Two-kingdom theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VANDRUNEN, DAVID</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>A journal of church and state</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VANDRUNEN, DAVID</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Two Kingdoms Doctrine and the Relationship of Church and State in the Early Reformed Tradition</atitle><jtitle>A journal of church and state</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Church and State</addtitle><date>2007-09-22</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>743</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>743-763</pages><issn>0021-969X</issn><eissn>2040-4867</eissn><abstract>Among its important features are a much greater recognition of the scholastic theologians' immersion in biblical studies,5 of scholasticism as more a development of method than a change in theological substance,6 of the international character of Reformed orthodoxy,7 and of the complex and variegated character of Reformed theology within a single tradition,8 which includes the conviction that Calvin, for all his importance, should never be taken as the sole standard for assessing later Reformed thought.9 While the present essay does not seek to contribute directly to this scholarly debate, the conclusions certainly add supporting evidence to the case for continuity between Reformation and post-Reformation Reformed theology and for early Reformed theology as a variegated yet single tradition. A number of influential schools of thought among contemporary Christian theologians take a decidedly negative view of the concept of the "secular," identifying it with an Enlightenment quest for autonomy, moral fragmentation, and the exclusion of religious discourse from the public square.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jcs/49.4.743</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-969X |
ispartof | A journal of church and state, 2007-09, Vol.49 (4), p.743-763 |
issn | 0021-969X 2040-4867 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59808318 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Calvin, John (1509-64) Calvinism Christianity Church & state Church and state Church renewal Churches Civic education Divine right English Reformation, ca. 1534-1590 Government regulation Historiography Judges & magistrates Laws, regulations and rules Magistrates Natural law Orthodox Church Orthodoxy Political philosophy Political theory Reformation Religion Religion and politics Religion Politics Relationship Religiosity Religious beliefs Religious reform Religious studies Social theory Swords Theology Two-kingdom theology |
title | The Two Kingdoms Doctrine and the Relationship of Church and State in the Early Reformed Tradition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A57%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Two%20Kingdoms%20Doctrine%20and%20the%20Relationship%20of%20Church%20and%20State%20in%20the%20Early%20Reformed%20Tradition&rft.jtitle=A%20journal%20of%20church%20and%20state&rft.au=VANDRUNEN,%20DAVID&rft.date=2007-09-22&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=743&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=743-763&rft.issn=0021-969X&rft.eissn=2040-4867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jcs/49.4.743&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA174750034%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230017324&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A174750034&rft_jstor_id=23922304&rfr_iscdi=true |