Electoral Governance Matters

This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative political studies 2008-01, Vol.41 (1), p.73-98
Hauptverfasser: Hartlyn, Jonathan, McCoy, Jennifer, Mustillo, Thomas M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 98
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
container_title Comparative political studies
container_volume 41
creator Hartlyn, Jonathan
McCoy, Jennifer
Mustillo, Thomas M
description This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures of election administration, one focused on the degree of partisanship or professional independence and another on formal-legal institutional independence, as well as on other key factors, to test partial proportional odds-ordered logit models predicting the probability of an acceptable, flawed, or failed electoral process. The results show an important positive role for professional, independent electoral commissions on electoral outcomes in Latin America, controlling for other socioeconomic and political factors; formal-legal independence matters when the rules of the game are likely to be respected. In addition, low-quality elections are found disproportionately where incumbents seek reelection and where victory margins are extremely wide rather than narrow. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2008.]
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0010414007301701
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59807259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59807259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-70746eda37232da6d50684e2b5185ec888876486b88dc32e239d371adacf9ab83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjL9PAkEQRrfARER7Cwoqu9PZnzNbGoJogrGhJ3O7QyJZ7vT28O8Xol_z8l7xKXWv4VFrxCcADU47ALSgEfRETS-pubRrdVPr4azGG5qq-apIGvuBy2Ld_8jQcZdk8c7jKEO9VVd7LlXu_jlT25fVdvnabD7Wb8vnTZOQYoOALkhmi8aazCF7COTEtF6Tl0TnYXAUWqKcrBFjY7aoOXPaR27JztTD3-3X0H-fpI6742dNUgp30p_qzkcCND7aX74cPJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>59807259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electoral Governance Matters</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Hartlyn, Jonathan ; McCoy, Jennifer ; Mustillo, Thomas M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartlyn, Jonathan ; McCoy, Jennifer ; Mustillo, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><description>This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures of election administration, one focused on the degree of partisanship or professional independence and another on formal-legal institutional independence, as well as on other key factors, to test partial proportional odds-ordered logit models predicting the probability of an acceptable, flawed, or failed electoral process. The results show an important positive role for professional, independent electoral commissions on electoral outcomes in Latin America, controlling for other socioeconomic and political factors; formal-legal independence matters when the rules of the game are likely to be respected. In addition, low-quality elections are found disproportionately where incumbents seek reelection and where victory margins are extremely wide rather than narrow. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2008.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0010414007301701</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Elections ; Institutions ; Latin America ; Legal System</subject><ispartof>Comparative political studies, 2008-01, Vol.41 (1), p.73-98</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-70746eda37232da6d50684e2b5185ec888876486b88dc32e239d371adacf9ab83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartlyn, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustillo, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><title>Electoral Governance Matters</title><title>Comparative political studies</title><description>This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures of election administration, one focused on the degree of partisanship or professional independence and another on formal-legal institutional independence, as well as on other key factors, to test partial proportional odds-ordered logit models predicting the probability of an acceptable, flawed, or failed electoral process. The results show an important positive role for professional, independent electoral commissions on electoral outcomes in Latin America, controlling for other socioeconomic and political factors; formal-legal independence matters when the rules of the game are likely to be respected. In addition, low-quality elections are found disproportionately where incumbents seek reelection and where victory margins are extremely wide rather than narrow. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2008.]</description><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>Legal System</subject><issn>0010-4140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNotjL9PAkEQRrfARER7Cwoqu9PZnzNbGoJogrGhJ3O7QyJZ7vT28O8Xol_z8l7xKXWv4VFrxCcADU47ALSgEfRETS-pubRrdVPr4azGG5qq-apIGvuBy2Ld_8jQcZdk8c7jKEO9VVd7LlXu_jlT25fVdvnabD7Wb8vnTZOQYoOALkhmi8aazCF7COTEtF6Tl0TnYXAUWqKcrBFjY7aoOXPaR27JztTD3-3X0H-fpI6742dNUgp30p_qzkcCND7aX74cPJI</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Hartlyn, Jonathan</creator><creator>McCoy, Jennifer</creator><creator>Mustillo, Thomas M</creator><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Electoral Governance Matters</title><author>Hartlyn, Jonathan ; McCoy, Jennifer ; Mustillo, Thomas M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-70746eda37232da6d50684e2b5185ec888876486b88dc32e239d371adacf9ab83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>Legal System</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartlyn, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustillo, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartlyn, Jonathan</au><au>McCoy, Jennifer</au><au>Mustillo, Thomas M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electoral Governance Matters</atitle><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>73-98</pages><issn>0010-4140</issn><abstract>This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures of election administration, one focused on the degree of partisanship or professional independence and another on formal-legal institutional independence, as well as on other key factors, to test partial proportional odds-ordered logit models predicting the probability of an acceptable, flawed, or failed electoral process. The results show an important positive role for professional, independent electoral commissions on electoral outcomes in Latin America, controlling for other socioeconomic and political factors; formal-legal independence matters when the rules of the game are likely to be respected. In addition, low-quality elections are found disproportionately where incumbents seek reelection and where victory margins are extremely wide rather than narrow. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2008.]</abstract><doi>10.1177/0010414007301701</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4140
ispartof Comparative political studies, 2008-01, Vol.41 (1), p.73-98
issn 0010-4140
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59807259
source Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Elections
Institutions
Latin America
Legal System
title Electoral Governance Matters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T15%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electoral%20Governance%20Matters&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20political%20studies&rft.au=Hartlyn,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=73-98&rft.issn=0010-4140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0010414007301701&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E59807259%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=59807259&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true