Electoral Governance Matters
This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative political studies 2008-01, Vol.41 (1), p.73-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 98 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 73 |
container_title | Comparative political studies |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Hartlyn, Jonathan McCoy, Jennifer Mustillo, Thomas M |
description | This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures of election administration, one focused on the degree of partisanship or professional independence and another on formal-legal institutional independence, as well as on other key factors, to test partial proportional odds-ordered logit models predicting the probability of an acceptable, flawed, or failed electoral process. The results show an important positive role for professional, independent electoral commissions on electoral outcomes in Latin America, controlling for other socioeconomic and political factors; formal-legal independence matters when the rules of the game are likely to be respected. In addition, low-quality elections are found disproportionately where incumbents seek reelection and where victory margins are extremely wide rather than narrow. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2008.] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0010414007301701 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59807259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59807259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-70746eda37232da6d50684e2b5185ec888876486b88dc32e239d371adacf9ab83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjL9PAkEQRrfARER7Cwoqu9PZnzNbGoJogrGhJ3O7QyJZ7vT28O8Xol_z8l7xKXWv4VFrxCcADU47ALSgEfRETS-pubRrdVPr4azGG5qq-apIGvuBy2Ld_8jQcZdk8c7jKEO9VVd7LlXu_jlT25fVdvnabD7Wb8vnTZOQYoOALkhmi8aazCF7COTEtF6Tl0TnYXAUWqKcrBFjY7aoOXPaR27JztTD3-3X0H-fpI6742dNUgp30p_qzkcCND7aX74cPJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>59807259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electoral Governance Matters</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Hartlyn, Jonathan ; McCoy, Jennifer ; Mustillo, Thomas M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartlyn, Jonathan ; McCoy, Jennifer ; Mustillo, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><description>This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures of election administration, one focused on the degree of partisanship or professional independence and another on formal-legal institutional independence, as well as on other key factors, to test partial proportional odds-ordered logit models predicting the probability of an acceptable, flawed, or failed electoral process. The results show an important positive role for professional, independent electoral commissions on electoral outcomes in Latin America, controlling for other socioeconomic and political factors; formal-legal independence matters when the rules of the game are likely to be respected. In addition, low-quality elections are found disproportionately where incumbents seek reelection and where victory margins are extremely wide rather than narrow. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2008.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0010414007301701</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Elections ; Institutions ; Latin America ; Legal System</subject><ispartof>Comparative political studies, 2008-01, Vol.41 (1), p.73-98</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-70746eda37232da6d50684e2b5185ec888876486b88dc32e239d371adacf9ab83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartlyn, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustillo, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><title>Electoral Governance Matters</title><title>Comparative political studies</title><description>This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures of election administration, one focused on the degree of partisanship or professional independence and another on formal-legal institutional independence, as well as on other key factors, to test partial proportional odds-ordered logit models predicting the probability of an acceptable, flawed, or failed electoral process. The results show an important positive role for professional, independent electoral commissions on electoral outcomes in Latin America, controlling for other socioeconomic and political factors; formal-legal independence matters when the rules of the game are likely to be respected. In addition, low-quality elections are found disproportionately where incumbents seek reelection and where victory margins are extremely wide rather than narrow. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2008.]</description><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>Legal System</subject><issn>0010-4140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNotjL9PAkEQRrfARER7Cwoqu9PZnzNbGoJogrGhJ3O7QyJZ7vT28O8Xol_z8l7xKXWv4VFrxCcADU47ALSgEfRETS-pubRrdVPr4azGG5qq-apIGvuBy2Ld_8jQcZdk8c7jKEO9VVd7LlXu_jlT25fVdvnabD7Wb8vnTZOQYoOALkhmi8aazCF7COTEtF6Tl0TnYXAUWqKcrBFjY7aoOXPaR27JztTD3-3X0H-fpI6742dNUgp30p_qzkcCND7aX74cPJI</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Hartlyn, Jonathan</creator><creator>McCoy, Jennifer</creator><creator>Mustillo, Thomas M</creator><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Electoral Governance Matters</title><author>Hartlyn, Jonathan ; McCoy, Jennifer ; Mustillo, Thomas M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-70746eda37232da6d50684e2b5185ec888876486b88dc32e239d371adacf9ab83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>Legal System</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartlyn, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustillo, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartlyn, Jonathan</au><au>McCoy, Jennifer</au><au>Mustillo, Thomas M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electoral Governance Matters</atitle><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>73-98</pages><issn>0010-4140</issn><abstract>This article provides a systematic cross-national analysis of the role of electoral administration in explaining acceptable democratic presidential elections in 19 countries in Latin America since the year 1980 or the first pivotal, transitional election. The authors provide two alternative measures of election administration, one focused on the degree of partisanship or professional independence and another on formal-legal institutional independence, as well as on other key factors, to test partial proportional odds-ordered logit models predicting the probability of an acceptable, flawed, or failed electoral process. The results show an important positive role for professional, independent electoral commissions on electoral outcomes in Latin America, controlling for other socioeconomic and political factors; formal-legal independence matters when the rules of the game are likely to be respected. In addition, low-quality elections are found disproportionately where incumbents seek reelection and where victory margins are extremely wide rather than narrow. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2008.]</abstract><doi>10.1177/0010414007301701</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4140 |
ispartof | Comparative political studies, 2008-01, Vol.41 (1), p.73-98 |
issn | 0010-4140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59807259 |
source | Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Elections Institutions Latin America Legal System |
title | Electoral Governance Matters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T15%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electoral%20Governance%20Matters&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20political%20studies&rft.au=Hartlyn,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=73-98&rft.issn=0010-4140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0010414007301701&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E59807259%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=59807259&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |