Employee participation programs and the national labor relations act? Quo vadis?
Six years ago, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision that casts doubt on the future of employee involvement programs in nonunionized organizations. This article summarizes the NLRB ruling, discusses the meaning of this ruling for nonunionized organization that have implemented...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Business forum (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 1998-04, Vol.23 (1/2), p.28-30 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 30 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1/2 |
| container_start_page | 28 |
| container_title | Business forum (Los Angeles, Calif.) |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Terpstra, David E Gillenwater, Edward L Robinson, Robert K |
| description | Six years ago, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision that casts doubt on the future of employee involvement programs in nonunionized organizations. This article summarizes the NLRB ruling, discusses the meaning of this ruling for nonunionized organization that have implemented or are considering implementing employee involvement programs, and offers some recommendations to deal with this ruling. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59804317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59804317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p587-bed5766daacfee827f5d83375180654098bfda21df8d671a570f3ea7944780e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj81KxDAYRbNQcBx9h-DCXSG_TboaZBh_YEBF9-Vr80U7pE1NWsG3t4yzcnXhcLjce0ZWzEhZCMXsBbnM-cAY00qUK_Ky68cQfxDpCGnq2m6EqYsDHVP8SNBnCoOj0yfS4cgh0ABNTDRhOIJFaKcNfZ0j_QbX5c0VOfcQMl6fck3e7nfv28di__zwtL3bF6O2pmjQaVOWDqD1iFYYr52V0mhuWakVq2zjHQjuvHWl4aAN8xLBVEoZy1Cuye1f67Lza8Y81X2XWwwBBoxzrnVlmZLcLOLNP_EQ57T8yLXgTFglLJe_3PRW_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210284281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Employee participation programs and the national labor relations act? Quo vadis?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Terpstra, David E ; Gillenwater, Edward L ; Robinson, Robert K</creator><creatorcontrib>Terpstra, David E ; Gillenwater, Edward L ; Robinson, Robert K</creatorcontrib><description>Six years ago, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision that casts doubt on the future of employee involvement programs in nonunionized organizations. This article summarizes the NLRB ruling, discusses the meaning of this ruling for nonunionized organization that have implemented or are considering implementing employee involvement programs, and offers some recommendations to deal with this ruling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles: California State University, Los Angeles, School of Business and Economics</publisher><subject>Administrative law ; Bills ; Decision making ; Decisions ; Efficiency ; Employee involvement ; Employees' representation in management ; Employers ; Employment ; Empowerment ; Industrial relations ; Labor disputes ; Labor policy ; Labor relations ; National labor relations board ; Participation ; Product quality ; Productivity ; Quality circles ; United States ; Wagner Act 1935-US ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Business forum (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1998-04, Vol.23 (1/2), p.28-30</ispartof><rights>Copyright California State University, Los Angeles, School of Business and Economics Winter 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terpstra, David E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillenwater, Edward L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Robert K</creatorcontrib><title>Employee participation programs and the national labor relations act? Quo vadis?</title><title>Business forum (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>Six years ago, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision that casts doubt on the future of employee involvement programs in nonunionized organizations. This article summarizes the NLRB ruling, discusses the meaning of this ruling for nonunionized organization that have implemented or are considering implementing employee involvement programs, and offers some recommendations to deal with this ruling.</description><subject>Administrative law</subject><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Employee involvement</subject><subject>Employees' representation in management</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Industrial relations</subject><subject>Labor disputes</subject><subject>Labor policy</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>National labor relations board</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Product quality</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Quality circles</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Wagner Act 1935-US</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0733-2408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj81KxDAYRbNQcBx9h-DCXSG_TboaZBh_YEBF9-Vr80U7pE1NWsG3t4yzcnXhcLjce0ZWzEhZCMXsBbnM-cAY00qUK_Ky68cQfxDpCGnq2m6EqYsDHVP8SNBnCoOj0yfS4cgh0ABNTDRhOIJFaKcNfZ0j_QbX5c0VOfcQMl6fck3e7nfv28di__zwtL3bF6O2pmjQaVOWDqD1iFYYr52V0mhuWakVq2zjHQjuvHWl4aAN8xLBVEoZy1Cuye1f67Lza8Y81X2XWwwBBoxzrnVlmZLcLOLNP_EQ57T8yLXgTFglLJe_3PRW_Q</recordid><startdate>19980401</startdate><enddate>19980401</enddate><creator>Terpstra, David E</creator><creator>Gillenwater, Edward L</creator><creator>Robinson, Robert K</creator><general>California State University, Los Angeles, School of Business and Economics</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980401</creationdate><title>Employee participation programs and the national labor relations act? Quo vadis?</title><author>Terpstra, David E ; Gillenwater, Edward L ; Robinson, Robert K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p587-bed5766daacfee827f5d83375180654098bfda21df8d671a570f3ea7944780e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Administrative law</topic><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Employee involvement</topic><topic>Employees' representation in management</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Industrial relations</topic><topic>Labor disputes</topic><topic>Labor policy</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>National labor relations board</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Product quality</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Quality circles</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Wagner Act 1935-US</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terpstra, David E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillenwater, Edward L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Robert K</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Business forum (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terpstra, David E</au><au>Gillenwater, Edward L</au><au>Robinson, Robert K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Employee participation programs and the national labor relations act? Quo vadis?</atitle><jtitle>Business forum (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1998-04-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>28-30</pages><issn>0733-2408</issn><abstract>Six years ago, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision that casts doubt on the future of employee involvement programs in nonunionized organizations. This article summarizes the NLRB ruling, discusses the meaning of this ruling for nonunionized organization that have implemented or are considering implementing employee involvement programs, and offers some recommendations to deal with this ruling.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles</cop><pub>California State University, Los Angeles, School of Business and Economics</pub><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0733-2408 |
| ispartof | Business forum (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1998-04, Vol.23 (1/2), p.28-30 |
| issn | 0733-2408 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59804317 |
| source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Administrative law Bills Decision making Decisions Efficiency Employee involvement Employees' representation in management Employers Employment Empowerment Industrial relations Labor disputes Labor policy Labor relations National labor relations board Participation Product quality Productivity Quality circles United States Wagner Act 1935-US Workers |
| title | Employee participation programs and the national labor relations act? Quo vadis? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A49%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Employee%20participation%20programs%20and%20the%20national%20labor%20relations%20act?%20Quo%20vadis?&rft.jtitle=Business%20forum%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Terpstra,%20David%20E&rft.date=1998-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=28-30&rft.issn=0733-2408&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E59804317%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210284281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |