The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)
Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | African affairs (London) 2008-01, Vol.107 (426), p.89-110 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 110 |
---|---|
container_issue | 426 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | African affairs (London) |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Eaton, Dave |
description | Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to a familiar array of factors such as resource scarcity, small arms proliferation, and generational conflict. While each issue is obviously of some relevance, such explanations are too cumbersome to really enhance our knowledge of cattle raiding. This article proposes a new approach to the problem by utilizing popular conceptions of ethnicity and criminal responsibility for raids. Given that most major raids originally stem from seemingly insignificant thefts, the process of retaliation is seen as crucial to understanding why violence escalates in certain situations and defuses in others. The failure of NGOs engaged in peace work to address this important issue in a meaningful way is the reason they have failed to achieve much success along the Kenya–Uganda border. This is in turn responsible for the widespread cynicism and corruption that has crept into their work, and is the subject of the second part of this article. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/afraf/adm085 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59801963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A176204384</galeid><jstor_id>27667000</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/afraf/adm085</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A176204384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10b7470b2905012c0bae357f9dc7ac558cce8e5d013a9adbf735a348b4e0cb5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9v0zAUB_AIgUQZ3LgiWRz4IRH2HMexvVtXsXZi0irYYOJivThOSZfGxU4kdtv_wH-4v2QuQT1w2cn288fWs79J8pLCRwqKHWLtsT7EagOSP0omNC9kmhUZfZxMAICmSoF6mjwLYR2XjCk5Sb5d_LTkeAhNZ0MgriZLi8YekS_YVE23IthVY4l8d_6aTFsXi30889l2N3h3--dyFQmSY-cr68m7JfqenL5_njypsQ32xb_xILk8-XQxW6Rn5_PT2fQsNTyDPqVQilxAmSngQDMDJVrGRa0qI9BwLo2x0vIKKEOFVVkLxpHlsswtmDJOD5I3471b734NNvR60wRj2xY764aguZJAVcEehKyQ8T8kj_D1f3DtBt_FR-iM5hJyrnYoHdEKW6ubzriut79749rWrqyOT5yd6ykVRQY5k3n0H0ZvvAvB21pvfbNBf6Mp6F10-m90eowu8rcjd8P2IflqlOvQO7-3mSgKsct432gTYoP7ffTXuhBMcL24-qHn4moOXxdLrdg9g4yxLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214804595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Eaton, Dave</creator><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Dave</creatorcontrib><description>Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to a familiar array of factors such as resource scarcity, small arms proliferation, and generational conflict. While each issue is obviously of some relevance, such explanations are too cumbersome to really enhance our knowledge of cattle raiding. This article proposes a new approach to the problem by utilizing popular conceptions of ethnicity and criminal responsibility for raids. Given that most major raids originally stem from seemingly insignificant thefts, the process of retaliation is seen as crucial to understanding why violence escalates in certain situations and defuses in others. The failure of NGOs engaged in peace work to address this important issue in a meaningful way is the reason they have failed to achieve much success along the Kenya–Uganda border. This is in turn responsible for the widespread cynicism and corruption that has crept into their work, and is the subject of the second part of this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-9909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/afraf/adm085</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFAFAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Africa ; African studies ; Agriculture ; Area studies ; Borders ; Cattle ; Cattle raiding ; Cattle rustling ; Cattle stealing ; Company business management ; Company financing ; Ethnicity ; Finance ; Government regulation ; Guns ; Kenya ; Larceny ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Management ; Meetings ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Non-governmental organizations ; Nongovernmental Organizations ; Peace ; Peace keeping ; Peace making ; Peace movements ; Peace negotiations ; Peacetime ; Political anthropology ; Political violence ; Retaliation ; Small arms ; Theft ; Uganda ; Violence ; Weapons ; Workers</subject><ispartof>African affairs (London), 2008-01, Vol.107 (426), p.89-110</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Royal African Society</rights><rights>Oxford University Press © The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved. 2008</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jan 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10b7470b2905012c0bae357f9dc7ac558cce8e5d013a9adbf735a348b4e0cb5a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27667000$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27667000$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,1581,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Dave</creatorcontrib><title>The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)</title><title>African affairs (London)</title><addtitle>African Affairs</addtitle><description>Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to a familiar array of factors such as resource scarcity, small arms proliferation, and generational conflict. While each issue is obviously of some relevance, such explanations are too cumbersome to really enhance our knowledge of cattle raiding. This article proposes a new approach to the problem by utilizing popular conceptions of ethnicity and criminal responsibility for raids. Given that most major raids originally stem from seemingly insignificant thefts, the process of retaliation is seen as crucial to understanding why violence escalates in certain situations and defuses in others. The failure of NGOs engaged in peace work to address this important issue in a meaningful way is the reason they have failed to achieve much success along the Kenya–Uganda border. This is in turn responsible for the widespread cynicism and corruption that has crept into their work, and is the subject of the second part of this article.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>African studies</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Area studies</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle raiding</subject><subject>Cattle rustling</subject><subject>Cattle stealing</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Company financing</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Guns</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Larceny</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Non-governmental organizations</subject><subject>Nongovernmental Organizations</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Peace keeping</subject><subject>Peace making</subject><subject>Peace movements</subject><subject>Peace negotiations</subject><subject>Peacetime</subject><subject>Political anthropology</subject><subject>Political violence</subject><subject>Retaliation</subject><subject>Small arms</subject><subject>Theft</subject><subject>Uganda</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0001-9909</issn><issn>1468-2621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9v0zAUB_AIgUQZ3LgiWRz4IRH2HMexvVtXsXZi0irYYOJivThOSZfGxU4kdtv_wH-4v2QuQT1w2cn288fWs79J8pLCRwqKHWLtsT7EagOSP0omNC9kmhUZfZxMAICmSoF6mjwLYR2XjCk5Sb5d_LTkeAhNZ0MgriZLi8YekS_YVE23IthVY4l8d_6aTFsXi30889l2N3h3--dyFQmSY-cr68m7JfqenL5_njypsQ32xb_xILk8-XQxW6Rn5_PT2fQsNTyDPqVQilxAmSngQDMDJVrGRa0qI9BwLo2x0vIKKEOFVVkLxpHlsswtmDJOD5I3471b734NNvR60wRj2xY764aguZJAVcEehKyQ8T8kj_D1f3DtBt_FR-iM5hJyrnYoHdEKW6ubzriut79749rWrqyOT5yd6ykVRQY5k3n0H0ZvvAvB21pvfbNBf6Mp6F10-m90eowu8rcjd8P2IflqlOvQO7-3mSgKsct432gTYoP7ffTXuhBMcL24-qHn4moOXxdLrdg9g4yxLQ</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Eaton, Dave</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)</title><author>Eaton, Dave</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10b7470b2905012c0bae357f9dc7ac558cce8e5d013a9adbf735a348b4e0cb5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>African studies</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Area studies</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle raiding</topic><topic>Cattle rustling</topic><topic>Cattle stealing</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Company financing</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Guns</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Larceny</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Non-governmental organizations</topic><topic>Nongovernmental Organizations</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Peace keeping</topic><topic>Peace making</topic><topic>Peace movements</topic><topic>Peace negotiations</topic><topic>Peacetime</topic><topic>Political anthropology</topic><topic>Political violence</topic><topic>Retaliation</topic><topic>Small arms</topic><topic>Theft</topic><topic>Uganda</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Dave</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>African affairs (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eaton, Dave</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)</atitle><jtitle>African affairs (London)</jtitle><addtitle>African Affairs</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>426</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>89-110</pages><issn>0001-9909</issn><eissn>1468-2621</eissn><coden>AFAFAI</coden><abstract>Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to a familiar array of factors such as resource scarcity, small arms proliferation, and generational conflict. While each issue is obviously of some relevance, such explanations are too cumbersome to really enhance our knowledge of cattle raiding. This article proposes a new approach to the problem by utilizing popular conceptions of ethnicity and criminal responsibility for raids. Given that most major raids originally stem from seemingly insignificant thefts, the process of retaliation is seen as crucial to understanding why violence escalates in certain situations and defuses in others. The failure of NGOs engaged in peace work to address this important issue in a meaningful way is the reason they have failed to achieve much success along the Kenya–Uganda border. This is in turn responsible for the widespread cynicism and corruption that has crept into their work, and is the subject of the second part of this article.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/afraf/adm085</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-9909 |
ispartof | African affairs (London), 2008-01, Vol.107 (426), p.89-110 |
issn | 0001-9909 1468-2621 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59801963 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Africa African studies Agriculture Area studies Borders Cattle Cattle raiding Cattle rustling Cattle stealing Company business management Company financing Ethnicity Finance Government regulation Guns Kenya Larceny Laws, regulations and rules Management Meetings Minority & ethnic groups Non-governmental organizations Nongovernmental Organizations Peace Peace keeping Peace making Peace movements Peace negotiations Peacetime Political anthropology Political violence Retaliation Small arms Theft Uganda Violence Weapons Workers |
title | The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A18%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Business%20of%20Peace:%20Raiding%20and%20Peace%20Work%20Along%20the%20Kenya%E2%80%93Uganda%20Border%20(Part%20I)&rft.jtitle=African%20affairs%20(London)&rft.au=Eaton,%20Dave&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=426&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=89-110&rft.issn=0001-9909&rft.eissn=1468-2621&rft.coden=AFAFAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/afraf/adm085&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA176204384%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214804595&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A176204384&rft_jstor_id=27667000&rft_oup_id=10.1093/afraf/adm085&rfr_iscdi=true |