The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)

Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:African affairs (London) 2008-01, Vol.107 (426), p.89-110
1. Verfasser: Eaton, Dave
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110
container_issue 426
container_start_page 89
container_title African affairs (London)
container_volume 107
creator Eaton, Dave
description Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to a familiar array of factors such as resource scarcity, small arms proliferation, and generational conflict. While each issue is obviously of some relevance, such explanations are too cumbersome to really enhance our knowledge of cattle raiding. This article proposes a new approach to the problem by utilizing popular conceptions of ethnicity and criminal responsibility for raids. Given that most major raids originally stem from seemingly insignificant thefts, the process of retaliation is seen as crucial to understanding why violence escalates in certain situations and defuses in others. The failure of NGOs engaged in peace work to address this important issue in a meaningful way is the reason they have failed to achieve much success along the Kenya–Uganda border. This is in turn responsible for the widespread cynicism and corruption that has crept into their work, and is the subject of the second part of this article.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/afraf/adm085
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59801963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A176204384</galeid><jstor_id>27667000</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/afraf/adm085</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A176204384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10b7470b2905012c0bae357f9dc7ac558cce8e5d013a9adbf735a348b4e0cb5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9v0zAUB_AIgUQZ3LgiWRz4IRH2HMexvVtXsXZi0irYYOJivThOSZfGxU4kdtv_wH-4v2QuQT1w2cn288fWs79J8pLCRwqKHWLtsT7EagOSP0omNC9kmhUZfZxMAICmSoF6mjwLYR2XjCk5Sb5d_LTkeAhNZ0MgriZLi8YekS_YVE23IthVY4l8d_6aTFsXi30889l2N3h3--dyFQmSY-cr68m7JfqenL5_njypsQ32xb_xILk8-XQxW6Rn5_PT2fQsNTyDPqVQilxAmSngQDMDJVrGRa0qI9BwLo2x0vIKKEOFVVkLxpHlsswtmDJOD5I3471b734NNvR60wRj2xY764aguZJAVcEehKyQ8T8kj_D1f3DtBt_FR-iM5hJyrnYoHdEKW6ubzriut79749rWrqyOT5yd6ykVRQY5k3n0H0ZvvAvB21pvfbNBf6Mp6F10-m90eowu8rcjd8P2IflqlOvQO7-3mSgKsct432gTYoP7ffTXuhBMcL24-qHn4moOXxdLrdg9g4yxLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214804595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Eaton, Dave</creator><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Dave</creatorcontrib><description>Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to a familiar array of factors such as resource scarcity, small arms proliferation, and generational conflict. While each issue is obviously of some relevance, such explanations are too cumbersome to really enhance our knowledge of cattle raiding. This article proposes a new approach to the problem by utilizing popular conceptions of ethnicity and criminal responsibility for raids. Given that most major raids originally stem from seemingly insignificant thefts, the process of retaliation is seen as crucial to understanding why violence escalates in certain situations and defuses in others. The failure of NGOs engaged in peace work to address this important issue in a meaningful way is the reason they have failed to achieve much success along the Kenya–Uganda border. This is in turn responsible for the widespread cynicism and corruption that has crept into their work, and is the subject of the second part of this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-9909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/afraf/adm085</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFAFAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Africa ; African studies ; Agriculture ; Area studies ; Borders ; Cattle ; Cattle raiding ; Cattle rustling ; Cattle stealing ; Company business management ; Company financing ; Ethnicity ; Finance ; Government regulation ; Guns ; Kenya ; Larceny ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Management ; Meetings ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Non-governmental organizations ; Nongovernmental Organizations ; Peace ; Peace keeping ; Peace making ; Peace movements ; Peace negotiations ; Peacetime ; Political anthropology ; Political violence ; Retaliation ; Small arms ; Theft ; Uganda ; Violence ; Weapons ; Workers</subject><ispartof>African affairs (London), 2008-01, Vol.107 (426), p.89-110</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Royal African Society</rights><rights>Oxford University Press © The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved. 2008</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jan 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10b7470b2905012c0bae357f9dc7ac558cce8e5d013a9adbf735a348b4e0cb5a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27667000$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27667000$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,1581,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Dave</creatorcontrib><title>The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)</title><title>African affairs (London)</title><addtitle>African Affairs</addtitle><description>Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to a familiar array of factors such as resource scarcity, small arms proliferation, and generational conflict. While each issue is obviously of some relevance, such explanations are too cumbersome to really enhance our knowledge of cattle raiding. This article proposes a new approach to the problem by utilizing popular conceptions of ethnicity and criminal responsibility for raids. Given that most major raids originally stem from seemingly insignificant thefts, the process of retaliation is seen as crucial to understanding why violence escalates in certain situations and defuses in others. The failure of NGOs engaged in peace work to address this important issue in a meaningful way is the reason they have failed to achieve much success along the Kenya–Uganda border. This is in turn responsible for the widespread cynicism and corruption that has crept into their work, and is the subject of the second part of this article.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>African studies</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Area studies</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle raiding</subject><subject>Cattle rustling</subject><subject>Cattle stealing</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Company financing</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Guns</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Larceny</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Non-governmental organizations</subject><subject>Nongovernmental Organizations</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Peace keeping</subject><subject>Peace making</subject><subject>Peace movements</subject><subject>Peace negotiations</subject><subject>Peacetime</subject><subject>Political anthropology</subject><subject>Political violence</subject><subject>Retaliation</subject><subject>Small arms</subject><subject>Theft</subject><subject>Uganda</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0001-9909</issn><issn>1468-2621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9v0zAUB_AIgUQZ3LgiWRz4IRH2HMexvVtXsXZi0irYYOJivThOSZfGxU4kdtv_wH-4v2QuQT1w2cn288fWs79J8pLCRwqKHWLtsT7EagOSP0omNC9kmhUZfZxMAICmSoF6mjwLYR2XjCk5Sb5d_LTkeAhNZ0MgriZLi8YekS_YVE23IthVY4l8d_6aTFsXi30889l2N3h3--dyFQmSY-cr68m7JfqenL5_njypsQ32xb_xILk8-XQxW6Rn5_PT2fQsNTyDPqVQilxAmSngQDMDJVrGRa0qI9BwLo2x0vIKKEOFVVkLxpHlsswtmDJOD5I3471b734NNvR60wRj2xY764aguZJAVcEehKyQ8T8kj_D1f3DtBt_FR-iM5hJyrnYoHdEKW6ubzriut79749rWrqyOT5yd6ykVRQY5k3n0H0ZvvAvB21pvfbNBf6Mp6F10-m90eowu8rcjd8P2IflqlOvQO7-3mSgKsct432gTYoP7ffTXuhBMcL24-qHn4moOXxdLrdg9g4yxLQ</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Eaton, Dave</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)</title><author>Eaton, Dave</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10b7470b2905012c0bae357f9dc7ac558cce8e5d013a9adbf735a348b4e0cb5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>African studies</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Area studies</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle raiding</topic><topic>Cattle rustling</topic><topic>Cattle stealing</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Company financing</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Guns</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Larceny</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Non-governmental organizations</topic><topic>Nongovernmental Organizations</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Peace keeping</topic><topic>Peace making</topic><topic>Peace movements</topic><topic>Peace negotiations</topic><topic>Peacetime</topic><topic>Political anthropology</topic><topic>Political violence</topic><topic>Retaliation</topic><topic>Small arms</topic><topic>Theft</topic><topic>Uganda</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Dave</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>African affairs (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eaton, Dave</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)</atitle><jtitle>African affairs (London)</jtitle><addtitle>African Affairs</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>426</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>89-110</pages><issn>0001-9909</issn><eissn>1468-2621</eissn><coden>AFAFAI</coden><abstract>Peace-building NGOs are frequently at work along the Kenya–Uganda border. But in this desolate region, results have been extremely sparse. This article contends that this is due to the inadequacies of contemporary understandings of cattle raiding. Most NGOs and many academics ascribe cattle raids to a familiar array of factors such as resource scarcity, small arms proliferation, and generational conflict. While each issue is obviously of some relevance, such explanations are too cumbersome to really enhance our knowledge of cattle raiding. This article proposes a new approach to the problem by utilizing popular conceptions of ethnicity and criminal responsibility for raids. Given that most major raids originally stem from seemingly insignificant thefts, the process of retaliation is seen as crucial to understanding why violence escalates in certain situations and defuses in others. The failure of NGOs engaged in peace work to address this important issue in a meaningful way is the reason they have failed to achieve much success along the Kenya–Uganda border. This is in turn responsible for the widespread cynicism and corruption that has crept into their work, and is the subject of the second part of this article.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/afraf/adm085</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-9909
ispartof African affairs (London), 2008-01, Vol.107 (426), p.89-110
issn 0001-9909
1468-2621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59801963
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Africa
African studies
Agriculture
Area studies
Borders
Cattle
Cattle raiding
Cattle rustling
Cattle stealing
Company business management
Company financing
Ethnicity
Finance
Government regulation
Guns
Kenya
Larceny
Laws, regulations and rules
Management
Meetings
Minority & ethnic groups
Non-governmental organizations
Nongovernmental Organizations
Peace
Peace keeping
Peace making
Peace movements
Peace negotiations
Peacetime
Political anthropology
Political violence
Retaliation
Small arms
Theft
Uganda
Violence
Weapons
Workers
title The Business of Peace: Raiding and Peace Work Along the Kenya–Uganda Border (Part I)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A18%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Business%20of%20Peace:%20Raiding%20and%20Peace%20Work%20Along%20the%20Kenya%E2%80%93Uganda%20Border%20(Part%20I)&rft.jtitle=African%20affairs%20(London)&rft.au=Eaton,%20Dave&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=426&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=89-110&rft.issn=0001-9909&rft.eissn=1468-2621&rft.coden=AFAFAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/afraf/adm085&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA176204384%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214804595&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A176204384&rft_jstor_id=27667000&rft_oup_id=10.1093/afraf/adm085&rfr_iscdi=true