Who Governs Academic Freedom in International Studies?
Replies to charges against members of the International Studies Association (ISA) in David Horowitz' book The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America (2006) to question who has the right & responsibility to determine the content of international studies. The author reflects...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International studies perspectives 2007-11, Vol.8 (4), p.358-368 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 368 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 358 |
| container_title | International studies perspectives |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Mittelman, James H. |
| description | Replies to charges against members of the International Studies Association (ISA) in David Horowitz' book The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America (2006) to question who has the right & responsibility to determine the content of international studies. The author reflects on encroachments on his own academic freedom in Uganda & the US. Analysis of Horowitz's charges indicates the conflation of circumstances, methodological dependence on declaratory arguments, & profiling. Governance of academic freedom is related to international studies during the McCarthy period. It is concluded that, although courts of law may help protect the constitutional right to free speech, universities are accountable to themselves through regional accrediting agencies & internal evaluation. References. E. Sanchez |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00302.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59798133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44218513</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44218513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-42c215f53d03623a4e7bad805f50e6738a7ce2075e410674510b84f1ec3484e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LwzAYx4soOKcfQSgevLXmtclOMoabgzkPUwZeQtY-xda2mUkr89ubOunBXBKe_wtPfkEQYhRjf-7KGHMiI8oljwlCIkaIIhIfToLRIJwObyHOgwvnSoRQIgQZBcn23YQL8wW2ceE01RnURRrOLUBm6rBowmXTek23hWl0FW7aLivA3V8GZ7muHFz93ePgdf7wMnuMVs-L5Wy6ilIyIW3ESEowzznNEE0I1QzETmcS-RGCRFCpRQoECQ4M-4UYx2gnWY4hpUwymNBxcHvs3Vvz2YFrVV24FKpKN2A6p_hETCSm1Btv_hlL0_m9K6cIwZJhKXqTPJpSa5yzkKu9LWptvxVGqqepStWDUj001dNUvzTVwUevj9HStcYOOcZ8Ocd9dXTUC9fCYdC1_VD-n4Kr7XqhxNMGr7dvQq3pD8C-fvM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221841873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who Governs Academic Freedom in International Studies?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Mittelman, James H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mittelman, James H.</creatorcontrib><description>Replies to charges against members of the International Studies Association (ISA) in David Horowitz' book The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America (2006) to question who has the right & responsibility to determine the content of international studies. The author reflects on encroachments on his own academic freedom in Uganda & the US. Analysis of Horowitz's charges indicates the conflation of circumstances, methodological dependence on declaratory arguments, & profiling. Governance of academic freedom is related to international studies during the McCarthy period. It is concluded that, although courts of law may help protect the constitutional right to free speech, universities are accountable to themselves through regional accrediting agencies & internal evaluation. References. E. Sanchez</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-3577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-3585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00302.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic Freedom ; Chancellors ; College faculty ; Courts ; Freedom of Speech ; Governance ; International Studies ; ISP Forum: Academic Freedom in International Studies ; Law ; McCarthyism ; School campuses ; State universities ; Terrorism ; United States of America ; Universities ; University administration</subject><ispartof>International studies perspectives, 2007-11, Vol.8 (4), p.358-368</ispartof><rights>2007 International Studies Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-42c215f53d03623a4e7bad805f50e6738a7ce2075e410674510b84f1ec3484e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-42c215f53d03623a4e7bad805f50e6738a7ce2075e410674510b84f1ec3484e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44218513$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44218513$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mittelman, James H.</creatorcontrib><title>Who Governs Academic Freedom in International Studies?</title><title>International studies perspectives</title><description>Replies to charges against members of the International Studies Association (ISA) in David Horowitz' book The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America (2006) to question who has the right & responsibility to determine the content of international studies. The author reflects on encroachments on his own academic freedom in Uganda & the US. Analysis of Horowitz's charges indicates the conflation of circumstances, methodological dependence on declaratory arguments, & profiling. Governance of academic freedom is related to international studies during the McCarthy period. It is concluded that, although courts of law may help protect the constitutional right to free speech, universities are accountable to themselves through regional accrediting agencies & internal evaluation. References. E. Sanchez</description><subject>Academic Freedom</subject><subject>Chancellors</subject><subject>College faculty</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Freedom of Speech</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>International Studies</subject><subject>ISP Forum: Academic Freedom in International Studies</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>McCarthyism</subject><subject>School campuses</subject><subject>State universities</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>University administration</subject><issn>1528-3577</issn><issn>1528-3585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LwzAYx4soOKcfQSgevLXmtclOMoabgzkPUwZeQtY-xda2mUkr89ubOunBXBKe_wtPfkEQYhRjf-7KGHMiI8oljwlCIkaIIhIfToLRIJwObyHOgwvnSoRQIgQZBcn23YQL8wW2ceE01RnURRrOLUBm6rBowmXTek23hWl0FW7aLivA3V8GZ7muHFz93ePgdf7wMnuMVs-L5Wy6ilIyIW3ESEowzznNEE0I1QzETmcS-RGCRFCpRQoECQ4M-4UYx2gnWY4hpUwymNBxcHvs3Vvz2YFrVV24FKpKN2A6p_hETCSm1Btv_hlL0_m9K6cIwZJhKXqTPJpSa5yzkKu9LWptvxVGqqepStWDUj001dNUvzTVwUevj9HStcYOOcZ8Ocd9dXTUC9fCYdC1_VD-n4Kr7XqhxNMGr7dvQq3pD8C-fvM</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>Mittelman, James H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Who Governs Academic Freedom in International Studies?</title><author>Mittelman, James H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-42c215f53d03623a4e7bad805f50e6738a7ce2075e410674510b84f1ec3484e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Academic Freedom</topic><topic>Chancellors</topic><topic>College faculty</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Freedom of Speech</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>International Studies</topic><topic>ISP Forum: Academic Freedom in International Studies</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>McCarthyism</topic><topic>School campuses</topic><topic>State universities</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>University administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mittelman, James H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International studies perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mittelman, James H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who Governs Academic Freedom in International Studies?</atitle><jtitle>International studies perspectives</jtitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>358</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>358-368</pages><issn>1528-3577</issn><eissn>1528-3585</eissn><abstract>Replies to charges against members of the International Studies Association (ISA) in David Horowitz' book The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America (2006) to question who has the right & responsibility to determine the content of international studies. The author reflects on encroachments on his own academic freedom in Uganda & the US. Analysis of Horowitz's charges indicates the conflation of circumstances, methodological dependence on declaratory arguments, & profiling. Governance of academic freedom is related to international studies during the McCarthy period. It is concluded that, although courts of law may help protect the constitutional right to free speech, universities are accountable to themselves through regional accrediting agencies & internal evaluation. References. E. Sanchez</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00302.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1528-3577 |
| ispartof | International studies perspectives, 2007-11, Vol.8 (4), p.358-368 |
| issn | 1528-3577 1528-3585 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59798133 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| subjects | Academic Freedom Chancellors College faculty Courts Freedom of Speech Governance International Studies ISP Forum: Academic Freedom in International Studies Law McCarthyism School campuses State universities Terrorism United States of America Universities University administration |
| title | Who Governs Academic Freedom in International Studies? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A23%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20Governs%20Academic%20Freedom%20in%20International%20Studies?&rft.jtitle=International%20studies%20perspectives&rft.au=Mittelman,%20James%20H.&rft.date=2007-11&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=358&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=358-368&rft.issn=1528-3577&rft.eissn=1528-3585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00302.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44218513%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221841873&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44218513&rfr_iscdi=true |