In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India
Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative political studies 2007-06, Vol.40 (6), p.638-664 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 664 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 638 |
container_title | Comparative political studies |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Teitelbaum, Emmanuel |
description | Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affected urban workers in India. Agrarian mobilization led to two changes in development policy that undermined the bargaining strength of organized labor. First, remunerative pricing for agricultural products biased the terms of trade in favor of agriculture, resulting in a rise in the product wage. Second, incentives for rural and small-scale industries led to increased product market competition in the manufacturing sector, generating unemployment among urban workers. Under these circumstances, unions could not frequently strike, and, when they did strike, they fought longer to win their demands. The author supports these arguments with a statistical analysis of strike frequency and duration in India from 1976 to 1997. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0010414006297657 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59769323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0010414006297657</sage_id><sourcerecordid>36664352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-856d75c5e0aff9fe180b8902b348ac6709b43a11e89650cab0331765bb1ecac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtLAzEQAOAgCq7VuwcPi4K31Zm8c5Sia6HgRc8hG7O6pd2tyfbgvzelHqRQPE2G-WbIDCGXCHeISt0DIHDkAJIaJYU6IgUKQSumqTkmxbZcbeun5CylRU6poLogV7O-HD9DWcduXQ5t6fIrhL6sO9eP5-SkdcsULn7jhLw9Pb5On6v5Sz2bPswrzwSOlRbyXQkvAri2NW1ADY02QBvGtfNSgWk4c4hBGynAuwYYw_zHpsHgM2ATcrubu47D1yak0a665MNy6fowbJIVeSPDKPsXMiklZ4JmeL0HF8Mm9nkJSyEjhYJndHMIoaFaSW60yAp2yschpRhau47dysVvi2C3p7f7p88t1a4luY_wZ-gh_wMm0X2a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928764985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>HeinOnline</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><description>Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affected urban workers in India. Agrarian mobilization led to two changes in development policy that undermined the bargaining strength of organized labor. First, remunerative pricing for agricultural products biased the terms of trade in favor of agriculture, resulting in a rise in the product wage. Second, incentives for rural and small-scale industries led to increased product market competition in the manufacturing sector, generating unemployment among urban workers. Under these circumstances, unions could not frequently strike, and, when they did strike, they fought longer to win their demands. The author supports these arguments with a statistical analysis of strike frequency and duration in India from 1976 to 1997.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0010414006297657</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPLSBZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; Agricultural Policy ; Agricultural products ; Bargaining ; Bias ; Comparative politics ; Competition ; Constituents ; Development policy ; Economic models ; Incentives ; India ; Labor Movements ; Labor relations ; Labor unions ; Labour history ; Manufacturing ; Mobilization ; Organization ; Policy analysis ; Policy making ; Political Action ; Political behavior ; Quantitative analysis ; Rural Areas ; Rural communities ; Rural-urban relations ; Social scientists ; Statistical analysis ; Strikes ; Trade ; Trade unions ; Unemployment ; Unionism ; Urban Population ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Comparative political studies, 2007-06, Vol.40 (6), p.638-664</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-856d75c5e0aff9fe180b8902b348ac6709b43a11e89650cab0331765bb1ecac63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0010414006297657$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414006297657$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><title>In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India</title><title>Comparative political studies</title><description>Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affected urban workers in India. Agrarian mobilization led to two changes in development policy that undermined the bargaining strength of organized labor. First, remunerative pricing for agricultural products biased the terms of trade in favor of agriculture, resulting in a rise in the product wage. Second, incentives for rural and small-scale industries led to increased product market competition in the manufacturing sector, generating unemployment among urban workers. Under these circumstances, unions could not frequently strike, and, when they did strike, they fought longer to win their demands. The author supports these arguments with a statistical analysis of strike frequency and duration in India from 1976 to 1997.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural Policy</subject><subject>Agricultural products</subject><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Labor Movements</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Labour history</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Mobilization</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political Action</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural-urban relations</subject><subject>Social scientists</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Strikes</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Trade unions</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Unionism</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0010-4140</issn><issn>1552-3829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EtLAzEQAOAgCq7VuwcPi4K31Zm8c5Sia6HgRc8hG7O6pd2tyfbgvzelHqRQPE2G-WbIDCGXCHeISt0DIHDkAJIaJYU6IgUKQSumqTkmxbZcbeun5CylRU6poLogV7O-HD9DWcduXQ5t6fIrhL6sO9eP5-SkdcsULn7jhLw9Pb5On6v5Sz2bPswrzwSOlRbyXQkvAri2NW1ADY02QBvGtfNSgWk4c4hBGynAuwYYw_zHpsHgM2ATcrubu47D1yak0a665MNy6fowbJIVeSPDKPsXMiklZ4JmeL0HF8Mm9nkJSyEjhYJndHMIoaFaSW60yAp2yschpRhau47dysVvi2C3p7f7p88t1a4luY_wZ-gh_wMm0X2a</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>In the Grip of a Green Giant</title><author>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-856d75c5e0aff9fe180b8902b348ac6709b43a11e89650cab0331765bb1ecac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural Policy</topic><topic>Agricultural products</topic><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Labor Movements</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Labour history</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Mobilization</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political Action</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural-urban relations</topic><topic>Social scientists</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Strikes</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Trade unions</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Unionism</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India</atitle><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>638</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>638-664</pages><issn>0010-4140</issn><eissn>1552-3829</eissn><coden>CPLSBZ</coden><abstract>Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affected urban workers in India. Agrarian mobilization led to two changes in development policy that undermined the bargaining strength of organized labor. First, remunerative pricing for agricultural products biased the terms of trade in favor of agriculture, resulting in a rise in the product wage. Second, incentives for rural and small-scale industries led to increased product market competition in the manufacturing sector, generating unemployment among urban workers. Under these circumstances, unions could not frequently strike, and, when they did strike, they fought longer to win their demands. The author supports these arguments with a statistical analysis of strike frequency and duration in India from 1976 to 1997.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0010414006297657</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4140 |
ispartof | Comparative political studies, 2007-06, Vol.40 (6), p.638-664 |
issn | 0010-4140 1552-3829 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59769323 |
source | SAGE Publications; HeinOnline; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Agribusiness Agricultural Policy Agricultural products Bargaining Bias Comparative politics Competition Constituents Development policy Economic models Incentives India Labor Movements Labor relations Labor unions Labour history Manufacturing Mobilization Organization Policy analysis Policy making Political Action Political behavior Quantitative analysis Rural Areas Rural communities Rural-urban relations Social scientists Statistical analysis Strikes Trade Trade unions Unemployment Unionism Urban Population Workers |
title | In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A08%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20the%20Grip%20of%20a%20Green%20Giant:%20How%20the%20Rural%20Sector%20Tamed%20Organized%20Labor%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20political%20studies&rft.au=Teitelbaum,%20Emmanuel&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=638&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=638-664&rft.issn=0010-4140&rft.eissn=1552-3829&rft.coden=CPLSBZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0010414006297657&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36664352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928764985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0010414006297657&rfr_iscdi=true |