In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India

Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative political studies 2007-06, Vol.40 (6), p.638-664
1. Verfasser: Teitelbaum, Emmanuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 664
container_issue 6
container_start_page 638
container_title Comparative political studies
container_volume 40
creator Teitelbaum, Emmanuel
description Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affected urban workers in India. Agrarian mobilization led to two changes in development policy that undermined the bargaining strength of organized labor. First, remunerative pricing for agricultural products biased the terms of trade in favor of agriculture, resulting in a rise in the product wage. Second, incentives for rural and small-scale industries led to increased product market competition in the manufacturing sector, generating unemployment among urban workers. Under these circumstances, unions could not frequently strike, and, when they did strike, they fought longer to win their demands. The author supports these arguments with a statistical analysis of strike frequency and duration in India from 1976 to 1997.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0010414006297657
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59769323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0010414006297657</sage_id><sourcerecordid>36664352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-856d75c5e0aff9fe180b8902b348ac6709b43a11e89650cab0331765bb1ecac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtLAzEQAOAgCq7VuwcPi4K31Zm8c5Sia6HgRc8hG7O6pd2tyfbgvzelHqRQPE2G-WbIDCGXCHeISt0DIHDkAJIaJYU6IgUKQSumqTkmxbZcbeun5CylRU6poLogV7O-HD9DWcduXQ5t6fIrhL6sO9eP5-SkdcsULn7jhLw9Pb5On6v5Sz2bPswrzwSOlRbyXQkvAri2NW1ADY02QBvGtfNSgWk4c4hBGynAuwYYw_zHpsHgM2ATcrubu47D1yak0a665MNy6fowbJIVeSPDKPsXMiklZ4JmeL0HF8Mm9nkJSyEjhYJndHMIoaFaSW60yAp2yschpRhau47dysVvi2C3p7f7p88t1a4luY_wZ-gh_wMm0X2a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928764985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>HeinOnline</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><description>Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affected urban workers in India. Agrarian mobilization led to two changes in development policy that undermined the bargaining strength of organized labor. First, remunerative pricing for agricultural products biased the terms of trade in favor of agriculture, resulting in a rise in the product wage. Second, incentives for rural and small-scale industries led to increased product market competition in the manufacturing sector, generating unemployment among urban workers. Under these circumstances, unions could not frequently strike, and, when they did strike, they fought longer to win their demands. The author supports these arguments with a statistical analysis of strike frequency and duration in India from 1976 to 1997.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0010414006297657</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPLSBZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; Agricultural Policy ; Agricultural products ; Bargaining ; Bias ; Comparative politics ; Competition ; Constituents ; Development policy ; Economic models ; Incentives ; India ; Labor Movements ; Labor relations ; Labor unions ; Labour history ; Manufacturing ; Mobilization ; Organization ; Policy analysis ; Policy making ; Political Action ; Political behavior ; Quantitative analysis ; Rural Areas ; Rural communities ; Rural-urban relations ; Social scientists ; Statistical analysis ; Strikes ; Trade ; Trade unions ; Unemployment ; Unionism ; Urban Population ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Comparative political studies, 2007-06, Vol.40 (6), p.638-664</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-856d75c5e0aff9fe180b8902b348ac6709b43a11e89650cab0331765bb1ecac63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0010414006297657$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414006297657$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><title>In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India</title><title>Comparative political studies</title><description>Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affected urban workers in India. Agrarian mobilization led to two changes in development policy that undermined the bargaining strength of organized labor. First, remunerative pricing for agricultural products biased the terms of trade in favor of agriculture, resulting in a rise in the product wage. Second, incentives for rural and small-scale industries led to increased product market competition in the manufacturing sector, generating unemployment among urban workers. Under these circumstances, unions could not frequently strike, and, when they did strike, they fought longer to win their demands. The author supports these arguments with a statistical analysis of strike frequency and duration in India from 1976 to 1997.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural Policy</subject><subject>Agricultural products</subject><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Labor Movements</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Labour history</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Mobilization</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political Action</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural-urban relations</subject><subject>Social scientists</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Strikes</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Trade unions</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Unionism</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0010-4140</issn><issn>1552-3829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EtLAzEQAOAgCq7VuwcPi4K31Zm8c5Sia6HgRc8hG7O6pd2tyfbgvzelHqRQPE2G-WbIDCGXCHeISt0DIHDkAJIaJYU6IgUKQSumqTkmxbZcbeun5CylRU6poLogV7O-HD9DWcduXQ5t6fIrhL6sO9eP5-SkdcsULn7jhLw9Pb5On6v5Sz2bPswrzwSOlRbyXQkvAri2NW1ADY02QBvGtfNSgWk4c4hBGynAuwYYw_zHpsHgM2ATcrubu47D1yak0a665MNy6fowbJIVeSPDKPsXMiklZ4JmeL0HF8Mm9nkJSyEjhYJndHMIoaFaSW60yAp2yschpRhau47dysVvi2C3p7f7p88t1a4luY_wZ-gh_wMm0X2a</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>In the Grip of a Green Giant</title><author>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-856d75c5e0aff9fe180b8902b348ac6709b43a11e89650cab0331765bb1ecac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural Policy</topic><topic>Agricultural products</topic><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Labor Movements</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Labour history</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Mobilization</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political Action</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural-urban relations</topic><topic>Social scientists</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Strikes</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Trade unions</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Unionism</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teitelbaum, Emmanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India</atitle><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>638</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>638-664</pages><issn>0010-4140</issn><eissn>1552-3829</eissn><coden>CPLSBZ</coden><abstract>Social scientists studying rural—urban struggles have primarily focused on the issue of urban bias. The issue of rural bias and its potential effects on urban dwellers has received much less attention. This article demonstrates how agrarian political mobilization of rural constituents adversely affected urban workers in India. Agrarian mobilization led to two changes in development policy that undermined the bargaining strength of organized labor. First, remunerative pricing for agricultural products biased the terms of trade in favor of agriculture, resulting in a rise in the product wage. Second, incentives for rural and small-scale industries led to increased product market competition in the manufacturing sector, generating unemployment among urban workers. Under these circumstances, unions could not frequently strike, and, when they did strike, they fought longer to win their demands. The author supports these arguments with a statistical analysis of strike frequency and duration in India from 1976 to 1997.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0010414006297657</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4140
ispartof Comparative political studies, 2007-06, Vol.40 (6), p.638-664
issn 0010-4140
1552-3829
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59769323
source SAGE Publications; HeinOnline; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Agribusiness
Agricultural Policy
Agricultural products
Bargaining
Bias
Comparative politics
Competition
Constituents
Development policy
Economic models
Incentives
India
Labor Movements
Labor relations
Labor unions
Labour history
Manufacturing
Mobilization
Organization
Policy analysis
Policy making
Political Action
Political behavior
Quantitative analysis
Rural Areas
Rural communities
Rural-urban relations
Social scientists
Statistical analysis
Strikes
Trade
Trade unions
Unemployment
Unionism
Urban Population
Workers
title In the Grip of a Green Giant: How the Rural Sector Tamed Organized Labor in India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A08%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20the%20Grip%20of%20a%20Green%20Giant:%20How%20the%20Rural%20Sector%20Tamed%20Organized%20Labor%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20political%20studies&rft.au=Teitelbaum,%20Emmanuel&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=638&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=638-664&rft.issn=0010-4140&rft.eissn=1552-3829&rft.coden=CPLSBZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0010414006297657&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36664352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928764985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0010414006297657&rfr_iscdi=true