New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain
Social and economic policy decisions are increasingly being taken in a global public domain in which national/transnational boundaries are blurred, and the `public' domain includes non-state actors. We argue that a new rights advocacy, advancing economic and social human rights as well as civil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of international relations 2007-06, Vol.13 (2), p.187-216 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 216 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 187 |
container_title | European journal of international relations |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Nelson, Paul Dorsey, Ellen |
description | Social and economic policy decisions are increasingly being taken in a global public
domain in which national/transnational boundaries are blurred, and the `public'
domain includes non-state actors. We argue that a new rights advocacy, advancing
economic and social human rights as well as civil and political, is essential to
understanding rule-making in the global public domain. New rights advocacy involves
traditional human rights and development NGOs, social movement organizations and new
`hybrid' organizations, in using human rights standards and methods to influence
states, international organizations, and corporations. The new patterns of NGO
engagement are studied through case studies of advocacy on HIV/AIDS and on the right
to water. New rights advocacy constitutes a direct challenge to development
orthodoxy, suggests a new interpretation of the social movements protesting
globalization, and manifests a complex relationship between NGOs and poor country
governments, in which NGOs often advocate on behalf of these governments' sovereign
rights to set economic and social policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1354066107076953 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59766682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1354066107076953</sage_id><sourcerecordid>59766682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-58d8bedc367295e15bc4c0b9aa741dfd9cf4efde34892f2de97ae707982b93603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3j8GDt2iy-T6WqlUoKqLnkE2ydct2Uzddpf-9KSsIBfE0A_N7jzcPgHOCrwiR8ppQzrAQBEssheb0AIwIExhRSehh3vMZ7e7H4CSlJcZYEaJHAD2GL_hSL943CU78Z3TWbWHdQgtnTSxtA5_7sqkdvIkrW7en4KiyTQpnP3MM3u5uX6f3aP40e5hO5sgxTDaIK6_K4B0VstA8EF465nCprZWM-MprV7FQ-UCZ0kVV-KClDTm3VkWpqcB0DC4H33UXP_qQNmZVJxeaxrYh9slwLYUQqvgXzAkoEYpl8GIPXMa-a_MTpshFaEkxzxAeINfFlLpQmXVXr2y3NQSbXctmv-UsQYMk2UX49fyT_wauV3lO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211997305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Nelson, Paul ; Dorsey, Ellen</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Paul ; Dorsey, Ellen</creatorcontrib><description>Social and economic policy decisions are increasingly being taken in a global public
domain in which national/transnational boundaries are blurred, and the `public'
domain includes non-state actors. We argue that a new rights advocacy, advancing
economic and social human rights as well as civil and political, is essential to
understanding rule-making in the global public domain. New rights advocacy involves
traditional human rights and development NGOs, social movement organizations and new
`hybrid' organizations, in using human rights standards and methods to influence
states, international organizations, and corporations. The new patterns of NGO
engagement are studied through case studies of advocacy on HIV/AIDS and on the right
to water. New rights advocacy constitutes a direct challenge to development
orthodoxy, suggests a new interpretation of the social movements protesting
globalization, and manifests a complex relationship between NGOs and poor country
governments, in which NGOs often advocate on behalf of these governments' sovereign
rights to set economic and social policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-0661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1354066107076953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ; Advocacy ; Boundaries ; Case studies ; Civil society ; Decision making ; Economic Policy ; Globalization ; Human Rights ; International ; International organizations ; Neoliberalism ; NGOs ; Non-governmental organizations ; Nongovernmental Organizations ; Policy making ; Political activism ; Public domain ; Social activism ; Social Movements ; Social Policy ; Social responsibility ; Studies ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>European journal of international relations, 2007-06, Vol.13 (2), p.187-216</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-58d8bedc367295e15bc4c0b9aa741dfd9cf4efde34892f2de97ae707982b93603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-58d8bedc367295e15bc4c0b9aa741dfd9cf4efde34892f2de97ae707982b93603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066107076953$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354066107076953$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorsey, Ellen</creatorcontrib><title>New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain</title><title>European journal of international relations</title><description>Social and economic policy decisions are increasingly being taken in a global public
domain in which national/transnational boundaries are blurred, and the `public'
domain includes non-state actors. We argue that a new rights advocacy, advancing
economic and social human rights as well as civil and political, is essential to
understanding rule-making in the global public domain. New rights advocacy involves
traditional human rights and development NGOs, social movement organizations and new
`hybrid' organizations, in using human rights standards and methods to influence
states, international organizations, and corporations. The new patterns of NGO
engagement are studied through case studies of advocacy on HIV/AIDS and on the right
to water. New rights advocacy constitutes a direct challenge to development
orthodoxy, suggests a new interpretation of the social movements protesting
globalization, and manifests a complex relationship between NGOs and poor country
governments, in which NGOs often advocate on behalf of these governments' sovereign
rights to set economic and social policy.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome</subject><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Human Rights</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Non-governmental organizations</subject><subject>Nongovernmental Organizations</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Public domain</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social Movements</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>1354-0661</issn><issn>1460-3713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3j8GDt2iy-T6WqlUoKqLnkE2ydct2Uzddpf-9KSsIBfE0A_N7jzcPgHOCrwiR8ppQzrAQBEssheb0AIwIExhRSehh3vMZ7e7H4CSlJcZYEaJHAD2GL_hSL943CU78Z3TWbWHdQgtnTSxtA5_7sqkdvIkrW7en4KiyTQpnP3MM3u5uX6f3aP40e5hO5sgxTDaIK6_K4B0VstA8EF465nCprZWM-MprV7FQ-UCZ0kVV-KClDTm3VkWpqcB0DC4H33UXP_qQNmZVJxeaxrYh9slwLYUQqvgXzAkoEYpl8GIPXMa-a_MTpshFaEkxzxAeINfFlLpQmXVXr2y3NQSbXctmv-UsQYMk2UX49fyT_wauV3lO</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Nelson, Paul</creator><creator>Dorsey, Ellen</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain</title><author>Nelson, Paul ; Dorsey, Ellen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-58d8bedc367295e15bc4c0b9aa741dfd9cf4efde34892f2de97ae707982b93603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome</topic><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Human Rights</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Non-governmental organizations</topic><topic>Nongovernmental Organizations</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Public domain</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social Movements</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorsey, Ellen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of international relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Paul</au><au>Dorsey, Ellen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain</atitle><jtitle>European journal of international relations</jtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>187-216</pages><issn>1354-0661</issn><eissn>1460-3713</eissn><abstract>Social and economic policy decisions are increasingly being taken in a global public
domain in which national/transnational boundaries are blurred, and the `public'
domain includes non-state actors. We argue that a new rights advocacy, advancing
economic and social human rights as well as civil and political, is essential to
understanding rule-making in the global public domain. New rights advocacy involves
traditional human rights and development NGOs, social movement organizations and new
`hybrid' organizations, in using human rights standards and methods to influence
states, international organizations, and corporations. The new patterns of NGO
engagement are studied through case studies of advocacy on HIV/AIDS and on the right
to water. New rights advocacy constitutes a direct challenge to development
orthodoxy, suggests a new interpretation of the social movements protesting
globalization, and manifests a complex relationship between NGOs and poor country
governments, in which NGOs often advocate on behalf of these governments' sovereign
rights to set economic and social policy.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1354066107076953</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-0661 |
ispartof | European journal of international relations, 2007-06, Vol.13 (2), p.187-216 |
issn | 1354-0661 1460-3713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59766682 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Accountability Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Advocacy Boundaries Case studies Civil society Decision making Economic Policy Globalization Human Rights International International organizations Neoliberalism NGOs Non-governmental organizations Nongovernmental Organizations Policy making Political activism Public domain Social activism Social Movements Social Policy Social responsibility Studies Transnationalism |
title | New Rights Advocacy in a Global Public Domain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T22%3A49%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Rights%20Advocacy%20in%20a%20Global%20Public%20Domain&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20international%20relations&rft.au=Nelson,%20Paul&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=187-216&rft.issn=1354-0661&rft.eissn=1460-3713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1354066107076953&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E59766682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211997305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1354066107076953&rfr_iscdi=true |