Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Additive and Interactive Effects
The additive and interactive effects of Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) and Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) were examined using 16 independent samples of New Zealand European participants (N = 2,164). Consistent with Duckitt's (2001) Dual Process Model, SDO and RWA displayed strong additiv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political psychology 2006-10, Vol.27 (5), p.755-768 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 768 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 755 |
container_title | Political psychology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Sibley, Chris G. Robertson, Andrew Wilson, Marc S. |
description | The additive and interactive effects of Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) and Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) were examined using 16 independent samples of New Zealand European participants (N = 2,164). Consistent with Duckitt's (2001) Dual Process Model, SDO and RWA displayed strong additive effects across various domains of intergroup-related attitude, including measures of racism, sexism, homosexual prejudice, and ethnic and religious ingroup identification. In each of these five domains, meta-analysis indicated that the statistical interaction of SDO and RWA accounted for an average of less than .001% variance in addition to their linear combination. It is concluded that the association between SDO and various discriminatory attitudes and beliefs is only extremely weakly dependent on RWA, and vice-versa, suggesting that these two ideological attitudes are primarily additive, rather than interactive, in nature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00531.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59755230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3792537</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3792537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-c4a413637484e3bec8949591e6d6882592e380ca096643a4ad63e2eef2c1c7673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURiMEEkPhH7CIWLBL8PuBxGLUlmlFxVQUNBULLOPctA4zTrE9dPrvSSZoFmzAsmRb95wr-X5FUWJU42G96WrMhKw0IbgmCIkaIU5xvXtUzA6Fx8UMYUEqpfn10-JZSh1CSA57Vny76p236_Kk3_hgg4NyGT2EbLPvQ2lDU37yN7e5WvlwU863-baPPtvobfBp87acN43P_hfsyfOQIVq3f5-2LbicnhdPWrtO8OLPeVR8eX_6-fisulguzo_nF5XjROLKMcswFVQyxYB-B6c001xjEI1QinBNgCrkLNJCMGqZbQQFAtASh50Ukh4Vr6e-d7H_uYWUzcYnB-u1DdBvk-Fack4o-idIBddMajWAr_4Cu34bw_AJQzBmSiNGB0hNkIt9ShFacxf9xsYHg5EZ4zGdGVMwYwpmjMfs4zG7QX03qfd-DQ__7ZnL5eXVcBv8l5PfpdzHg0-lJpyOA6mmsk8ZdoeyjT_MMC7Jzerjwgj1dfHhekWMpL8BNHutng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211489043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Additive and Interactive Effects</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Sibley, Chris G. ; Robertson, Andrew ; Wilson, Marc S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Chris G. ; Robertson, Andrew ; Wilson, Marc S.</creatorcontrib><description>The additive and interactive effects of Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) and Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) were examined using 16 independent samples of New Zealand European participants (N = 2,164). Consistent with Duckitt's (2001) Dual Process Model, SDO and RWA displayed strong additive effects across various domains of intergroup-related attitude, including measures of racism, sexism, homosexual prejudice, and ethnic and religious ingroup identification. In each of these five domains, meta-analysis indicated that the statistical interaction of SDO and RWA accounted for an average of less than .001% variance in addition to their linear combination. It is concluded that the association between SDO and various discriminatory attitudes and beliefs is only extremely weakly dependent on RWA, and vice-versa, suggesting that these two ideological attitudes are primarily additive, rather than interactive, in nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-895X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9221</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00531.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Authoritarianism ; Conservatism ; Discrimination ; Europe ; Female homosexuality ; Homophobia ; Ideologies ; Male homosexuality ; New Zealand ; Political opinions ; Political psychology ; Political theory ; Prejudice ; Prejudices ; Psychological attitudes ; Psychology ; Racism ; Religion ; Religious Beliefs ; Religious Identification ; Right-Wing Authoritarianism ; Right-wing parties ; Sexism ; Social Dominance Orientation ; Social interaction ; Social psychology ; Systematic review ; We they distinction</subject><ispartof>Political psychology, 2006-10, Vol.27 (5), p.755-768</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 International Society of Political Psychology</rights><rights>2006 International Society of Political Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-c4a413637484e3bec8949591e6d6882592e380ca096643a4ad63e2eef2c1c7673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-c4a413637484e3bec8949591e6d6882592e380ca096643a4ad63e2eef2c1c7673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3792537$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3792537$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Chris G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Marc S.</creatorcontrib><title>Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Additive and Interactive Effects</title><title>Political psychology</title><description>The additive and interactive effects of Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) and Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) were examined using 16 independent samples of New Zealand European participants (N = 2,164). Consistent with Duckitt's (2001) Dual Process Model, SDO and RWA displayed strong additive effects across various domains of intergroup-related attitude, including measures of racism, sexism, homosexual prejudice, and ethnic and religious ingroup identification. In each of these five domains, meta-analysis indicated that the statistical interaction of SDO and RWA accounted for an average of less than .001% variance in addition to their linear combination. It is concluded that the association between SDO and various discriminatory attitudes and beliefs is only extremely weakly dependent on RWA, and vice-versa, suggesting that these two ideological attitudes are primarily additive, rather than interactive, in nature.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female homosexuality</subject><subject>Homophobia</subject><subject>Ideologies</subject><subject>Male homosexuality</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Political opinions</subject><subject>Political psychology</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Prejudices</subject><subject>Psychological attitudes</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious Beliefs</subject><subject>Religious Identification</subject><subject>Right-Wing Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Right-wing parties</subject><subject>Sexism</subject><subject>Social Dominance Orientation</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>We they distinction</subject><issn>0162-895X</issn><issn>1467-9221</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURiMEEkPhH7CIWLBL8PuBxGLUlmlFxVQUNBULLOPctA4zTrE9dPrvSSZoFmzAsmRb95wr-X5FUWJU42G96WrMhKw0IbgmCIkaIU5xvXtUzA6Fx8UMYUEqpfn10-JZSh1CSA57Vny76p236_Kk3_hgg4NyGT2EbLPvQ2lDU37yN7e5WvlwU863-baPPtvobfBp87acN43P_hfsyfOQIVq3f5-2LbicnhdPWrtO8OLPeVR8eX_6-fisulguzo_nF5XjROLKMcswFVQyxYB-B6c001xjEI1QinBNgCrkLNJCMGqZbQQFAtASh50Ukh4Vr6e-d7H_uYWUzcYnB-u1DdBvk-Fack4o-idIBddMajWAr_4Cu34bw_AJQzBmSiNGB0hNkIt9ShFacxf9xsYHg5EZ4zGdGVMwYwpmjMfs4zG7QX03qfd-DQ__7ZnL5eXVcBv8l5PfpdzHg0-lJpyOA6mmsk8ZdoeyjT_MMC7Jzerjwgj1dfHhekWMpL8BNHutng</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Sibley, Chris G.</creator><creator>Robertson, Andrew</creator><creator>Wilson, Marc S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Additive and Interactive Effects</title><author>Sibley, Chris G. ; Robertson, Andrew ; Wilson, Marc S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-c4a413637484e3bec8949591e6d6882592e380ca096643a4ad63e2eef2c1c7673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female homosexuality</topic><topic>Homophobia</topic><topic>Ideologies</topic><topic>Male homosexuality</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Political opinions</topic><topic>Political psychology</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Prejudices</topic><topic>Psychological attitudes</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious Beliefs</topic><topic>Religious Identification</topic><topic>Right-Wing Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Right-wing parties</topic><topic>Sexism</topic><topic>Social Dominance Orientation</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>We they distinction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Chris G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Marc S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sibley, Chris G.</au><au>Robertson, Andrew</au><au>Wilson, Marc S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Additive and Interactive Effects</atitle><jtitle>Political psychology</jtitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>755</spage><epage>768</epage><pages>755-768</pages><issn>0162-895X</issn><eissn>1467-9221</eissn><abstract>The additive and interactive effects of Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) and Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) were examined using 16 independent samples of New Zealand European participants (N = 2,164). Consistent with Duckitt's (2001) Dual Process Model, SDO and RWA displayed strong additive effects across various domains of intergroup-related attitude, including measures of racism, sexism, homosexual prejudice, and ethnic and religious ingroup identification. In each of these five domains, meta-analysis indicated that the statistical interaction of SDO and RWA accounted for an average of less than .001% variance in addition to their linear combination. It is concluded that the association between SDO and various discriminatory attitudes and beliefs is only extremely weakly dependent on RWA, and vice-versa, suggesting that these two ideological attitudes are primarily additive, rather than interactive, in nature.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00531.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0162-895X |
ispartof | Political psychology, 2006-10, Vol.27 (5), p.755-768 |
issn | 0162-895X 1467-9221 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59755230 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Attitudes Authoritarianism Conservatism Discrimination Europe Female homosexuality Homophobia Ideologies Male homosexuality New Zealand Political opinions Political psychology Political theory Prejudice Prejudices Psychological attitudes Psychology Racism Religion Religious Beliefs Religious Identification Right-Wing Authoritarianism Right-wing parties Sexism Social Dominance Orientation Social interaction Social psychology Systematic review We they distinction |
title | Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism: Additive and Interactive Effects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Dominance%20Orientation%20and%20Right-Wing%20Authoritarianism:%20Additive%20and%20Interactive%20Effects&rft.jtitle=Political%20psychology&rft.au=Sibley,%20Chris%20G.&rft.date=2006-10&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=755&rft.epage=768&rft.pages=755-768&rft.issn=0162-895X&rft.eissn=1467-9221&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00531.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3792537%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211489043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3792537&rfr_iscdi=true |