Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism
I offer an explanation for the widespread diffusion of neoliberal tax policies in the developed democracies. After accounting for the policy influences of commonly experienced domestic and international forces, I consider several plausible paths of diffusion of neoliberal tax structure. My central a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International organization 2006-10, Vol.60 (4), p.847-882 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 882 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 847 |
container_title | International organization |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Swank, Duane |
description | I offer an explanation for the widespread diffusion of neoliberal tax policies in the developed democracies. After accounting for the policy influences of commonly experienced domestic and international forces, I consider several plausible paths of diffusion of neoliberal tax structure. My central argument is that the highly visible 1980s market-conforming tax reform in the United States should be especially important in shaping subsequent tax policies in other polities. There are substantial reasons to believe, however, that domestic political and institutional forces will shape policy-maker assessment of the benefits and costs of neoliberal reforms: the strength of right parties and the degree to which the median voter has moved right should condition adoption of neoliberal tax policy; the institutions of national and sector-coordinated capitalism should also slow the enactment of neoliberal tax reforms. I assess these arguments with empirical models of 1981-98 tax rates on capital in sixteen nations. I find that changes in U.S. tax policy influence subsequent reforms in other polities; in the long term, all nations move toward the U.S. neoliberal tax structure. Analysis also shows, however, that the short-term responsiveness to U.S. tax reforms is notably greater where uncoordinated market institutions are dominant. Theory and extensive qualitative and quantitative evidence indicate that pressures to compete for mobile assets, as balanced against the economic and political costs of adoption, anchor the process of diffusion of neoliberal tax policy. There is little evidence for the view that systematic policy learning or social emulation drove tax policy diffusion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0020818306060280 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59752215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3877849</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3877849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d59ce0ca3a067d3786fd481273e46c64db08795a107470286097e16ba9d6905d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPAQELytTjabL29Sai0UbWn1GtLdVFO3uzXZQuuvN7XSgx5kDhl4nncgMwidE7gmQMTNGCAFSSQFHiuVcIBahFGSMJDyELW2ONnyY3QSwhwASEZUC00mZo2HdenyDXYVNhXueoPrGe5XjfWVaVxdmdJ9fje3uLtelsZVrnrFzZvF46W3ptjqjzbOmFof3bA4RUczUwZ79vO20fN9d9J5SAZPvX7nbpDkmciapGAqt5AbaoCLggrJZ0UmSSqozXjOs2IKUihmCIhMxD9xUMISPjWq4ApYQdvoajd36euPlQ2NXriQ27I0la1XQTMlWJrGNfwnUs6oJJRE8fKXOK9XcQ1l0Gmacsa4VDxaZGflvg7B25leercwfqMJ6O059J9zxMzFLjMPTe33ASqFkJmKONlhFxq73mPj3zUXVDDNeyOtRkPyQulYM_oFZBySyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2226556896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Swank, Duane</creator><creatorcontrib>Swank, Duane</creatorcontrib><description>I offer an explanation for the widespread diffusion of neoliberal tax policies in the developed democracies. After accounting for the policy influences of commonly experienced domestic and international forces, I consider several plausible paths of diffusion of neoliberal tax structure. My central argument is that the highly visible 1980s market-conforming tax reform in the United States should be especially important in shaping subsequent tax policies in other polities. There are substantial reasons to believe, however, that domestic political and institutional forces will shape policy-maker assessment of the benefits and costs of neoliberal reforms: the strength of right parties and the degree to which the median voter has moved right should condition adoption of neoliberal tax policy; the institutions of national and sector-coordinated capitalism should also slow the enactment of neoliberal tax reforms. I assess these arguments with empirical models of 1981-98 tax rates on capital in sixteen nations. I find that changes in U.S. tax policy influence subsequent reforms in other polities; in the long term, all nations move toward the U.S. neoliberal tax structure. Analysis also shows, however, that the short-term responsiveness to U.S. tax reforms is notably greater where uncoordinated market institutions are dominant. Theory and extensive qualitative and quantitative evidence indicate that pressures to compete for mobile assets, as balanced against the economic and political costs of adoption, anchor the process of diffusion of neoliberal tax policy. There is little evidence for the view that systematic policy learning or social emulation drove tax policy diffusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0020818306060280</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOCMFZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Capital investments ; Capitalism ; Colleges & universities ; Corporate taxes ; Costs ; Countries ; Democracy ; Economic liberalism ; Economic reform ; Economic theory ; Empirical research ; Enactment ; European studies ; Fiscal Policy ; Globalization ; Income taxes ; International organizations ; International studies ; Internationalization ; Investment tax credits ; Learning ; Median voter ; Neoliberalism ; Policy making ; Political Parties ; Political science ; Political Systems ; Public policy ; Quantitative analysis ; Reform ; Responsiveness ; Symposium: Diffusion of Liberalism ; Tax policy ; Tax rates ; Tax reform ; Taxation ; U.S.A ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>International organization, 2006-10, Vol.60 (4), p.847-882</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 The IO Foundation</rights><rights>2006 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d59ce0ca3a067d3786fd481273e46c64db08795a107470286097e16ba9d6905d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d59ce0ca3a067d3786fd481273e46c64db08795a107470286097e16ba9d6905d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3877849$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3877849$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27843,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swank, Duane</creatorcontrib><title>Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism</title><title>International organization</title><description>I offer an explanation for the widespread diffusion of neoliberal tax policies in the developed democracies. After accounting for the policy influences of commonly experienced domestic and international forces, I consider several plausible paths of diffusion of neoliberal tax structure. My central argument is that the highly visible 1980s market-conforming tax reform in the United States should be especially important in shaping subsequent tax policies in other polities. There are substantial reasons to believe, however, that domestic political and institutional forces will shape policy-maker assessment of the benefits and costs of neoliberal reforms: the strength of right parties and the degree to which the median voter has moved right should condition adoption of neoliberal tax policy; the institutions of national and sector-coordinated capitalism should also slow the enactment of neoliberal tax reforms. I assess these arguments with empirical models of 1981-98 tax rates on capital in sixteen nations. I find that changes in U.S. tax policy influence subsequent reforms in other polities; in the long term, all nations move toward the U.S. neoliberal tax structure. Analysis also shows, however, that the short-term responsiveness to U.S. tax reforms is notably greater where uncoordinated market institutions are dominant. Theory and extensive qualitative and quantitative evidence indicate that pressures to compete for mobile assets, as balanced against the economic and political costs of adoption, anchor the process of diffusion of neoliberal tax policy. There is little evidence for the view that systematic policy learning or social emulation drove tax policy diffusion.</description><subject>Capital investments</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Corporate taxes</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Economic liberalism</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Enactment</subject><subject>European studies</subject><subject>Fiscal Policy</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>International studies</subject><subject>Internationalization</subject><subject>Investment tax credits</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Median voter</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political Systems</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Responsiveness</subject><subject>Symposium: Diffusion of Liberalism</subject><subject>Tax policy</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0020-8183</issn><issn>1531-5088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPAQELytTjabL29Sai0UbWn1GtLdVFO3uzXZQuuvN7XSgx5kDhl4nncgMwidE7gmQMTNGCAFSSQFHiuVcIBahFGSMJDyELW2ONnyY3QSwhwASEZUC00mZo2HdenyDXYVNhXueoPrGe5XjfWVaVxdmdJ9fje3uLtelsZVrnrFzZvF46W3ptjqjzbOmFof3bA4RUczUwZ79vO20fN9d9J5SAZPvX7nbpDkmciapGAqt5AbaoCLggrJZ0UmSSqozXjOs2IKUihmCIhMxD9xUMISPjWq4ApYQdvoajd36euPlQ2NXriQ27I0la1XQTMlWJrGNfwnUs6oJJRE8fKXOK9XcQ1l0Gmacsa4VDxaZGflvg7B25leercwfqMJ6O059J9zxMzFLjMPTe33ASqFkJmKONlhFxq73mPj3zUXVDDNeyOtRkPyQulYM_oFZBySyw</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Swank, Duane</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism</title><author>Swank, Duane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-d59ce0ca3a067d3786fd481273e46c64db08795a107470286097e16ba9d6905d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Capital investments</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Corporate taxes</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Economic liberalism</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Enactment</topic><topic>European studies</topic><topic>Fiscal Policy</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>International studies</topic><topic>Internationalization</topic><topic>Investment tax credits</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Median voter</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political Systems</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Responsiveness</topic><topic>Symposium: Diffusion of Liberalism</topic><topic>Tax policy</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swank, Duane</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swank, Duane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism</atitle><jtitle>International organization</jtitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>882</epage><pages>847-882</pages><issn>0020-8183</issn><eissn>1531-5088</eissn><coden>IOCMFZ</coden><abstract>I offer an explanation for the widespread diffusion of neoliberal tax policies in the developed democracies. After accounting for the policy influences of commonly experienced domestic and international forces, I consider several plausible paths of diffusion of neoliberal tax structure. My central argument is that the highly visible 1980s market-conforming tax reform in the United States should be especially important in shaping subsequent tax policies in other polities. There are substantial reasons to believe, however, that domestic political and institutional forces will shape policy-maker assessment of the benefits and costs of neoliberal reforms: the strength of right parties and the degree to which the median voter has moved right should condition adoption of neoliberal tax policy; the institutions of national and sector-coordinated capitalism should also slow the enactment of neoliberal tax reforms. I assess these arguments with empirical models of 1981-98 tax rates on capital in sixteen nations. I find that changes in U.S. tax policy influence subsequent reforms in other polities; in the long term, all nations move toward the U.S. neoliberal tax structure. Analysis also shows, however, that the short-term responsiveness to U.S. tax reforms is notably greater where uncoordinated market institutions are dominant. Theory and extensive qualitative and quantitative evidence indicate that pressures to compete for mobile assets, as balanced against the economic and political costs of adoption, anchor the process of diffusion of neoliberal tax policy. There is little evidence for the view that systematic policy learning or social emulation drove tax policy diffusion.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0020818306060280</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-8183 |
ispartof | International organization, 2006-10, Vol.60 (4), p.847-882 |
issn | 0020-8183 1531-5088 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59752215 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Capital investments Capitalism Colleges & universities Corporate taxes Costs Countries Democracy Economic liberalism Economic reform Economic theory Empirical research Enactment European studies Fiscal Policy Globalization Income taxes International organizations International studies Internationalization Investment tax credits Learning Median voter Neoliberalism Policy making Political Parties Political science Political Systems Public policy Quantitative analysis Reform Responsiveness Symposium: Diffusion of Liberalism Tax policy Tax rates Tax reform Taxation U.S.A United States of America |
title | Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tax%20Policy%20in%20an%20Era%20of%20Internationalization:%20Explaining%20the%20Spread%20of%20Neoliberalism&rft.jtitle=International%20organization&rft.au=Swank,%20Duane&rft.date=2006-10&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=882&rft.pages=847-882&rft.issn=0020-8183&rft.eissn=1531-5088&rft.coden=IOCMFZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0020818306060280&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3877849%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2226556896&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3877849&rfr_iscdi=true |