The Paradox of Voter Participation? A Laboratory Study

It is widely believed that rational choice theory is grossly inconsistent with empirical observations about voter turnout. We report the results of an experiment designed to test the voter turnout predictions of the rational choice Palfrey–Rosenthal model of participation with asymmetric information...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The American political science review 2007-02, Vol.101 (1), p.143-158
Hauptverfasser:	LEVINE, DAVID K., PALFREY, THOMAS R.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Case studies Competition Cost allocation Costs Economic models Economic theory Elections Electorate Equilibrium Experiments Game theory Laboratories Laboratory Experiments Landslides Mathematical methods Nash equilibrium Paradoxes Political candidates Political participation Political science Prediction Public choice Quantitative Methods Rational Choice Rational choice theory Studies Voter behavior Voter turnout Voters Voting Voting Behavior Voting behaviour
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!