A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism
The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Review of radical political economics 2006-10, Vol.38 (4), p.499-518 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 518 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 499 |
container_title | The Review of radical political economics |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Mavroudeas, Stavros D. |
description | The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups and especially social classes. Contrarily, neoclassical orthodoxy understands the history of economic theory as mere history of economic thought, a succession of personal contributions with limited relation to socioeconomic conditions. The relation between economy and economic theory is theorized through an asocial perspective, because social classes and politics are excluded and methodological individualism reigns. Recent postmodernist interpretations advance a historicist, relativist, politicist view. The reasons for creating an autonomous science of economic relations are to be found not in socioeconomic relations but mainly in the field of the political. This article criticizes postmodernist interpretations from a Marxist perspective, rejecting them as historically unfounded and analytically infertile. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0486613406293217 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59740572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0486613406293217</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1170132981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-4b5afd41e92867caaf0e98114ed274e53c4b471a168f402e07aa3b3db15e8a093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHoMHb9Gd_ZrNwUMprRUKetBz2Gw2kpJk62566H_vlgpCQTwNM-_3Hswj5BboAwDiIxVaKeCCKlZwBnhGJiAly7Wk7JxMDnJ-0C_JVYwbSgEBxYQ8zbJVG0cf9plvsrkfRtdvfTBpf_NdO7bWdNnC-sH3-8wMdbrGsfe1C0Mb-2ty0ZguupufOSUfy8X7fJWvX59f5rN1brnAMReVNE0twBVMK7TGNNQVGkC4mqFwkltRCQQDSjeCMkfRGF7xugLptKEFn5L7Y-42-K-di2PZt9G6rjOD87tYygIFlcj-BbmSCExhAu9OwI3fhSE9UTKaytKK6wTRI2SDjzG4ptyGtk_dlEDLQ-vlaevJkh8t0Xy638w_-W9ILX_8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200488638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creatorcontrib><description>The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups and especially social classes. Contrarily, neoclassical orthodoxy understands the history of economic theory as mere history of economic thought, a succession of personal contributions with limited relation to socioeconomic conditions. The relation between economy and economic theory is theorized through an asocial perspective, because social classes and politics are excluded and methodological individualism reigns. Recent postmodernist interpretations advance a historicist, relativist, politicist view. The reasons for creating an autonomous science of economic relations are to be found not in socioeconomic relations but mainly in the field of the political. This article criticizes postmodernist interpretations from a Marxist perspective, rejecting them as historically unfounded and analytically infertile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0486-6134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0486613406293217</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RRPEEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Class ; Economic analysis ; Economic history ; Economic relations ; Economic Theories ; Economic theory ; Historicism ; History ; Interaction ; Marx, Karl ; Marxism ; Methodological Individualism ; Political Economy ; Postmodernism ; Social Class ; Social classes ; Social Groups ; Socioeconomic factors ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Review of radical political economics, 2006-10, Vol.38 (4), p.499-518</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-4b5afd41e92867caaf0e98114ed274e53c4b471a168f402e07aa3b3db15e8a093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-4b5afd41e92867caaf0e98114ed274e53c4b471a168f402e07aa3b3db15e8a093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0486613406293217$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613406293217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creatorcontrib><title>A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism</title><title>The Review of radical political economics</title><description>The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups and especially social classes. Contrarily, neoclassical orthodoxy understands the history of economic theory as mere history of economic thought, a succession of personal contributions with limited relation to socioeconomic conditions. The relation between economy and economic theory is theorized through an asocial perspective, because social classes and politics are excluded and methodological individualism reigns. Recent postmodernist interpretations advance a historicist, relativist, politicist view. The reasons for creating an autonomous science of economic relations are to be found not in socioeconomic relations but mainly in the field of the political. This article criticizes postmodernist interpretations from a Marxist perspective, rejecting them as historically unfounded and analytically infertile.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Class</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>Economic relations</subject><subject>Economic Theories</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Historicism</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Marx, Karl</subject><subject>Marxism</subject><subject>Methodological Individualism</subject><subject>Political Economy</subject><subject>Postmodernism</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social Groups</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0486-6134</issn><issn>1552-8502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHoMHb9Gd_ZrNwUMprRUKetBz2Gw2kpJk62566H_vlgpCQTwNM-_3Hswj5BboAwDiIxVaKeCCKlZwBnhGJiAly7Wk7JxMDnJ-0C_JVYwbSgEBxYQ8zbJVG0cf9plvsrkfRtdvfTBpf_NdO7bWdNnC-sH3-8wMdbrGsfe1C0Mb-2ty0ZguupufOSUfy8X7fJWvX59f5rN1brnAMReVNE0twBVMK7TGNNQVGkC4mqFwkltRCQQDSjeCMkfRGF7xugLptKEFn5L7Y-42-K-di2PZt9G6rjOD87tYygIFlcj-BbmSCExhAu9OwI3fhSE9UTKaytKK6wTRI2SDjzG4ptyGtk_dlEDLQ-vlaevJkh8t0Xy638w_-W9ILX_8</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism</title><author>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-4b5afd41e92867caaf0e98114ed274e53c4b471a168f402e07aa3b3db15e8a093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Class</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>Economic relations</topic><topic>Economic Theories</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Historicism</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Marx, Karl</topic><topic>Marxism</topic><topic>Methodological Individualism</topic><topic>Political Economy</topic><topic>Postmodernism</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social Groups</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of radical political economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism</atitle><jtitle>The Review of radical political economics</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>499-518</pages><issn>0486-6134</issn><eissn>1552-8502</eissn><coden>RRPEEP</coden><abstract>The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups and especially social classes. Contrarily, neoclassical orthodoxy understands the history of economic theory as mere history of economic thought, a succession of personal contributions with limited relation to socioeconomic conditions. The relation between economy and economic theory is theorized through an asocial perspective, because social classes and politics are excluded and methodological individualism reigns. Recent postmodernist interpretations advance a historicist, relativist, politicist view. The reasons for creating an autonomous science of economic relations are to be found not in socioeconomic relations but mainly in the field of the political. This article criticizes postmodernist interpretations from a Marxist perspective, rejecting them as historically unfounded and analytically infertile.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0486613406293217</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0486-6134 |
ispartof | The Review of radical political economics, 2006-10, Vol.38 (4), p.499-518 |
issn | 0486-6134 1552-8502 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59740572 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Capitalism Class Economic analysis Economic history Economic relations Economic Theories Economic theory Historicism History Interaction Marx, Karl Marxism Methodological Individualism Political Economy Postmodernism Social Class Social classes Social Groups Socioeconomic factors Studies |
title | A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A43%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20History%20of%20Contemporary%20Political%20Economy%20and%20Postmodernism&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20radical%20political%20economics&rft.au=Mavroudeas,%20Stavros%20D.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=499-518&rft.issn=0486-6134&rft.eissn=1552-8502&rft.coden=RRPEEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0486613406293217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1170132981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200488638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0486613406293217&rfr_iscdi=true |