A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism

The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Review of radical political economics 2006-10, Vol.38 (4), p.499-518
1. Verfasser: Mavroudeas, Stavros D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 518
container_issue 4
container_start_page 499
container_title The Review of radical political economics
container_volume 38
creator Mavroudeas, Stavros D.
description The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups and especially social classes. Contrarily, neoclassical orthodoxy understands the history of economic theory as mere history of economic thought, a succession of personal contributions with limited relation to socioeconomic conditions. The relation between economy and economic theory is theorized through an asocial perspective, because social classes and politics are excluded and methodological individualism reigns. Recent postmodernist interpretations advance a historicist, relativist, politicist view. The reasons for creating an autonomous science of economic relations are to be found not in socioeconomic relations but mainly in the field of the political. This article criticizes postmodernist interpretations from a Marxist perspective, rejecting them as historically unfounded and analytically infertile.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0486613406293217
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59740572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0486613406293217</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1170132981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-4b5afd41e92867caaf0e98114ed274e53c4b471a168f402e07aa3b3db15e8a093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHoMHb9Gd_ZrNwUMprRUKetBz2Gw2kpJk62566H_vlgpCQTwNM-_3Hswj5BboAwDiIxVaKeCCKlZwBnhGJiAly7Wk7JxMDnJ-0C_JVYwbSgEBxYQ8zbJVG0cf9plvsrkfRtdvfTBpf_NdO7bWdNnC-sH3-8wMdbrGsfe1C0Mb-2ty0ZguupufOSUfy8X7fJWvX59f5rN1brnAMReVNE0twBVMK7TGNNQVGkC4mqFwkltRCQQDSjeCMkfRGF7xugLptKEFn5L7Y-42-K-di2PZt9G6rjOD87tYygIFlcj-BbmSCExhAu9OwI3fhSE9UTKaytKK6wTRI2SDjzG4ptyGtk_dlEDLQ-vlaevJkh8t0Xy638w_-W9ILX_8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200488638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creatorcontrib><description>The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups and especially social classes. Contrarily, neoclassical orthodoxy understands the history of economic theory as mere history of economic thought, a succession of personal contributions with limited relation to socioeconomic conditions. The relation between economy and economic theory is theorized through an asocial perspective, because social classes and politics are excluded and methodological individualism reigns. Recent postmodernist interpretations advance a historicist, relativist, politicist view. The reasons for creating an autonomous science of economic relations are to be found not in socioeconomic relations but mainly in the field of the political. This article criticizes postmodernist interpretations from a Marxist perspective, rejecting them as historically unfounded and analytically infertile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0486-6134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0486613406293217</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RRPEEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Class ; Economic analysis ; Economic history ; Economic relations ; Economic Theories ; Economic theory ; Historicism ; History ; Interaction ; Marx, Karl ; Marxism ; Methodological Individualism ; Political Economy ; Postmodernism ; Social Class ; Social classes ; Social Groups ; Socioeconomic factors ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Review of radical political economics, 2006-10, Vol.38 (4), p.499-518</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-4b5afd41e92867caaf0e98114ed274e53c4b471a168f402e07aa3b3db15e8a093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-4b5afd41e92867caaf0e98114ed274e53c4b471a168f402e07aa3b3db15e8a093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0486613406293217$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613406293217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creatorcontrib><title>A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism</title><title>The Review of radical political economics</title><description>The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups and especially social classes. Contrarily, neoclassical orthodoxy understands the history of economic theory as mere history of economic thought, a succession of personal contributions with limited relation to socioeconomic conditions. The relation between economy and economic theory is theorized through an asocial perspective, because social classes and politics are excluded and methodological individualism reigns. Recent postmodernist interpretations advance a historicist, relativist, politicist view. The reasons for creating an autonomous science of economic relations are to be found not in socioeconomic relations but mainly in the field of the political. This article criticizes postmodernist interpretations from a Marxist perspective, rejecting them as historically unfounded and analytically infertile.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Class</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>Economic relations</subject><subject>Economic Theories</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Historicism</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Marx, Karl</subject><subject>Marxism</subject><subject>Methodological Individualism</subject><subject>Political Economy</subject><subject>Postmodernism</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social Groups</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0486-6134</issn><issn>1552-8502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHoMHb9Gd_ZrNwUMprRUKetBz2Gw2kpJk62566H_vlgpCQTwNM-_3Hswj5BboAwDiIxVaKeCCKlZwBnhGJiAly7Wk7JxMDnJ-0C_JVYwbSgEBxYQ8zbJVG0cf9plvsrkfRtdvfTBpf_NdO7bWdNnC-sH3-8wMdbrGsfe1C0Mb-2ty0ZguupufOSUfy8X7fJWvX59f5rN1brnAMReVNE0twBVMK7TGNNQVGkC4mqFwkltRCQQDSjeCMkfRGF7xugLptKEFn5L7Y-42-K-di2PZt9G6rjOD87tYygIFlcj-BbmSCExhAu9OwI3fhSE9UTKaytKK6wTRI2SDjzG4ptyGtk_dlEDLQ-vlaevJkh8t0Xy638w_-W9ILX_8</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism</title><author>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-4b5afd41e92867caaf0e98114ed274e53c4b471a168f402e07aa3b3db15e8a093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Class</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>Economic relations</topic><topic>Economic Theories</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Historicism</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Marx, Karl</topic><topic>Marxism</topic><topic>Methodological Individualism</topic><topic>Political Economy</topic><topic>Postmodernism</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social Groups</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of radical political economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mavroudeas, Stavros D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism</atitle><jtitle>The Review of radical political economics</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>499-518</pages><issn>0486-6134</issn><eissn>1552-8502</eissn><coden>RRPEEP</coden><abstract>The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups and especially social classes. Contrarily, neoclassical orthodoxy understands the history of economic theory as mere history of economic thought, a succession of personal contributions with limited relation to socioeconomic conditions. The relation between economy and economic theory is theorized through an asocial perspective, because social classes and politics are excluded and methodological individualism reigns. Recent postmodernist interpretations advance a historicist, relativist, politicist view. The reasons for creating an autonomous science of economic relations are to be found not in socioeconomic relations but mainly in the field of the political. This article criticizes postmodernist interpretations from a Marxist perspective, rejecting them as historically unfounded and analytically infertile.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0486613406293217</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0486-6134
ispartof The Review of radical political economics, 2006-10, Vol.38 (4), p.499-518
issn 0486-6134
1552-8502
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59740572
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Capitalism
Class
Economic analysis
Economic history
Economic relations
Economic Theories
Economic theory
Historicism
History
Interaction
Marx, Karl
Marxism
Methodological Individualism
Political Economy
Postmodernism
Social Class
Social classes
Social Groups
Socioeconomic factors
Studies
title A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A43%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20History%20of%20Contemporary%20Political%20Economy%20and%20Postmodernism&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20radical%20political%20economics&rft.au=Mavroudeas,%20Stavros%20D.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=499-518&rft.issn=0486-6134&rft.eissn=1552-8502&rft.coden=RRPEEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0486613406293217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1170132981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200488638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0486613406293217&rfr_iscdi=true