Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan
Political parties have recently rediscovered grassroots tactics for voter mobilization. The only solid evidence for the effectiveness of such get-out-the-vote (GOTV) tactics is based upon non-partisan field experiments that may not accurately capture the effectiveness of partisan campaign outreach....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Political research quarterly 2006-03, Vol.59 (1), p.85-97 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 97 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 85 |
| container_title | Political research quarterly |
| container_volume | 59 |
| creator | Nickerson, David W. Ryan D. Friedrichs King, David C. |
| description | Political parties have recently rediscovered grassroots tactics for voter mobilization. The only solid evidence for the effectiveness of such get-out-the-vote (GOTV) tactics is based upon non-partisan field experiments that may not accurately capture the effectiveness of partisan campaign outreach. In order to address this lacuna, during the 2002 Michigan gubernatorial election, a large field experiment across 14 state house districts evaluated the cost effectiveness of three mobilization technologies utilized by the Michigan Democratic Party's Youth Coordinated Campaign: door hangers, volunteer phone calls, and face-to-face visits. Contrary to past non-partisan experiments, our results indicate that all three GOTV strategies possess similar cost-effectiveness. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/106591290605900108 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59715914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4148077</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_106591290605900108</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4148077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-11984271c5800d29ea535e3b73c62e0ee4ee541f491ec933ac94e6a64f0be2223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkclKBDEQhhtRcH0B8RA8eGtNZel0vMkwLqAoLuCtyfRUjxl6OmOSxuXpzTCioKCnqsP3VVF_Zdku0EMApY6AFlID07SgUlMKtFzJNkDzMmdKPK6mPgH5gljPNkOYJoSBkBsZ3hgfbTAduXIj29p3E63ryMDM5sZOukBsR-ITklOL7fiY3GLo2xhI492MGHIXTcQXO0Zy3_vO9ZEMX-fo7Qy7uDCvbP1kJ6bbztYa0wbc-axb2cPp8H5wnl9en10MTi7zmmsVcwBdCqagliWlY6bRSC6RjxSvC4YUUSBKAY3QgLXm3NRaYGEK0dARMsb4VnawnDv37rnHEKuZDTW2renQ9aGSWkHKSfwL8kJRLVmRwP0f4NSlU9MRFQPJuUhpJ4gtodq7EDw21TxlYPxbBbRa_Kf6_Z8kHS2lYCb4PfVPY29pTEN0_muHAFFSpfgHrwOYlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215334900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nickerson, David W. ; Ryan D. Friedrichs ; King, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nickerson, David W. ; Ryan D. Friedrichs ; King, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Political parties have recently rediscovered grassroots tactics for voter mobilization. The only solid evidence for the effectiveness of such get-out-the-vote (GOTV) tactics is based upon non-partisan field experiments that may not accurately capture the effectiveness of partisan campaign outreach. In order to address this lacuna, during the 2002 Michigan gubernatorial election, a large field experiment across 14 state house districts evaluated the cost effectiveness of three mobilization technologies utilized by the Michigan Democratic Party's Youth Coordinated Campaign: door hangers, volunteer phone calls, and face-to-face visits. Contrary to past non-partisan experiments, our results indicate that all three GOTV strategies possess similar cost-effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-274X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/106591290605900108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: University of Utah</publisher><subject>Canvassing ; Control groups ; Cost-effectiveness ; Elections ; Electoral campaigning ; Experiments ; Field study ; Governors ; Human experimentation ; Michigan ; Mobilization ; Partisanship ; Political campaigns ; Political mobilization ; Political participation ; Political Parties ; Political partisanship ; Standard error ; State elections ; Strategic planning ; U.S.A ; Voter behavior ; Voter registration ; Voter turnout ; Voting ; Voting Behavior ; Voting turnout</subject><ispartof>Political research quarterly, 2006-03, Vol.59 (1), p.85-97</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 University of Utah</rights><rights>Copyright University of Utah, Political Science Dept. Mar 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-11984271c5800d29ea535e3b73c62e0ee4ee541f491ec933ac94e6a64f0be2223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-11984271c5800d29ea535e3b73c62e0ee4ee541f491ec933ac94e6a64f0be2223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4148077$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4148077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12843,21817,27864,27922,27923,43619,43620,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nickerson, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan D. Friedrichs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan</title><title>Political research quarterly</title><description>Political parties have recently rediscovered grassroots tactics for voter mobilization. The only solid evidence for the effectiveness of such get-out-the-vote (GOTV) tactics is based upon non-partisan field experiments that may not accurately capture the effectiveness of partisan campaign outreach. In order to address this lacuna, during the 2002 Michigan gubernatorial election, a large field experiment across 14 state house districts evaluated the cost effectiveness of three mobilization technologies utilized by the Michigan Democratic Party's Youth Coordinated Campaign: door hangers, volunteer phone calls, and face-to-face visits. Contrary to past non-partisan experiments, our results indicate that all three GOTV strategies possess similar cost-effectiveness.</description><subject>Canvassing</subject><subject>Control groups</subject><subject>Cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral campaigning</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Human experimentation</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Mobilization</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political mobilization</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Standard error</subject><subject>State elections</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voter registration</subject><subject>Voter turnout</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><subject>Voting turnout</subject><issn>1065-9129</issn><issn>1938-274X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkclKBDEQhhtRcH0B8RA8eGtNZel0vMkwLqAoLuCtyfRUjxl6OmOSxuXpzTCioKCnqsP3VVF_Zdku0EMApY6AFlID07SgUlMKtFzJNkDzMmdKPK6mPgH5gljPNkOYJoSBkBsZ3hgfbTAduXIj29p3E63ryMDM5sZOukBsR-ITklOL7fiY3GLo2xhI492MGHIXTcQXO0Zy3_vO9ZEMX-fo7Qy7uDCvbP1kJ6bbztYa0wbc-axb2cPp8H5wnl9en10MTi7zmmsVcwBdCqagliWlY6bRSC6RjxSvC4YUUSBKAY3QgLXm3NRaYGEK0dARMsb4VnawnDv37rnHEKuZDTW2renQ9aGSWkHKSfwL8kJRLVmRwP0f4NSlU9MRFQPJuUhpJ4gtodq7EDw21TxlYPxbBbRa_Kf6_Z8kHS2lYCb4PfVPY29pTEN0_muHAFFSpfgHrwOYlQ</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Nickerson, David W.</creator><creator>Ryan D. Friedrichs</creator><creator>King, David C.</creator><general>University of Utah</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan</title><author>Nickerson, David W. ; Ryan D. Friedrichs ; King, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-11984271c5800d29ea535e3b73c62e0ee4ee541f491ec933ac94e6a64f0be2223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Canvassing</topic><topic>Control groups</topic><topic>Cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral campaigning</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Human experimentation</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Mobilization</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political mobilization</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Standard error</topic><topic>State elections</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voter registration</topic><topic>Voter turnout</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><topic>Voting turnout</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nickerson, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan D. Friedrichs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nickerson, David W.</au><au>Ryan D. Friedrichs</au><au>King, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan</atitle><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>85-97</pages><issn>1065-9129</issn><eissn>1938-274X</eissn><abstract>Political parties have recently rediscovered grassroots tactics for voter mobilization. The only solid evidence for the effectiveness of such get-out-the-vote (GOTV) tactics is based upon non-partisan field experiments that may not accurately capture the effectiveness of partisan campaign outreach. In order to address this lacuna, during the 2002 Michigan gubernatorial election, a large field experiment across 14 state house districts evaluated the cost effectiveness of three mobilization technologies utilized by the Michigan Democratic Party's Youth Coordinated Campaign: door hangers, volunteer phone calls, and face-to-face visits. Contrary to past non-partisan experiments, our results indicate that all three GOTV strategies possess similar cost-effectiveness.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>University of Utah</pub><doi>10.1177/106591290605900108</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1065-9129 |
| ispartof | Political research quarterly, 2006-03, Vol.59 (1), p.85-97 |
| issn | 1065-9129 1938-274X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59715914 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Political Science Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Canvassing Control groups Cost-effectiveness Elections Electoral campaigning Experiments Field study Governors Human experimentation Michigan Mobilization Partisanship Political campaigns Political mobilization Political participation Political Parties Political partisanship Standard error State elections Strategic planning U.S.A Voter behavior Voter registration Voter turnout Voting Voting Behavior Voting turnout |
| title | Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A17%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partisan%20Mobilization%20Campaigns%20in%20the%20Field:%20Results%20from%20a%20Statewide%20Turnout%20Experiment%20in%20Michigan&rft.jtitle=Political%20research%20quarterly&rft.au=Nickerson,%20David%20W.&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=85-97&rft.issn=1065-9129&rft.eissn=1938-274X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/106591290605900108&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4148077%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215334900&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4148077&rft_sage_id=10.1177_106591290605900108&rfr_iscdi=true |