Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China

This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative political studies 2006-04, Vol.39 (3), p.301-324
1. Verfasser: Manion, Melanie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 324
container_issue 3
container_start_page 301
container_title Comparative political studies
container_volume 39
creator Manion, Melanie
description This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996, merged with a set of separately collected data detailing features of elections in these villages during the same period of time. The analyses take advantage of uneven progress in grassroots democratization and ask how variation in democratic electoral quality across villages is associated with variation in changed views about the probity (or venality) of local leaders. Results strongly suggest that formal institutions of electoral democracy matter: Designs that feature contestation and encourage voter participation do better at promoting beliefs that leaders are trustworthy. At the same time, results point to the importance of informal community institutions of lineage relationships.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0010414005280852
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59711624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0010414005280852</sage_id><sourcerecordid>37705606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-501baaa3c0b1aef6df8bdce86bab37c57d43bb62f3d128c836da8499a8cf8ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvghfx4MnqJGk-epT1Exa89B4maSpdtts1aQ_735tSQVgQTzPD-70H8wi5pHBPqVIPABQKWgAIpkELdkQyKgTLuWblMckmOZ_0U3IW4zqdLIEZuXryXe8Cuv3d9bLvunHbDmmtwhiHc3LS4Cb6i5-5INXLc7V8y1cfr-_Lx1XuOONDLoBaROQOLEXfyLrRtnZeS4uWKydUXXBrJWt4TZl2mssadVGWqF2j0fEFuZ1jd6H_Gn0cTNdG5zcb3Pp-jEaUilLJin9BrhQICTKBNwfguh_DNv1gGEippNQiQTBDLvQxBt-YXWg7DHtDwUyVmsNKkyWfLRE__W_mn_w3vTxzqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206676685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Manion, Melanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Manion, Melanie</creatorcontrib><description>This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996, merged with a set of separately collected data detailing features of elections in these villages during the same period of time. The analyses take advantage of uneven progress in grassroots democratization and ask how variation in democratic electoral quality across villages is associated with variation in changed views about the probity (or venality) of local leaders. Results strongly suggest that formal institutions of electoral democracy matter: Designs that feature contestation and encourage voter participation do better at promoting beliefs that leaders are trustworthy. At the same time, results point to the importance of informal community institutions of lineage relationships.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0010414005280852</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPLSBZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>China ; Clans ; Comparative politics ; Corruption ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Elections ; Electoral behaviour ; Peoples Republic of China ; Political Attitudes ; Political leaders ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Rural areas ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Comparative political studies, 2006-04, Vol.39 (3), p.301-324</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-501baaa3c0b1aef6df8bdce86bab37c57d43bb62f3d128c836da8499a8cf8ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0010414005280852$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414005280852$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manion, Melanie</creatorcontrib><title>Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China</title><title>Comparative political studies</title><description>This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996, merged with a set of separately collected data detailing features of elections in these villages during the same period of time. The analyses take advantage of uneven progress in grassroots democratization and ask how variation in democratic electoral quality across villages is associated with variation in changed views about the probity (or venality) of local leaders. Results strongly suggest that formal institutions of electoral democracy matter: Designs that feature contestation and encourage voter participation do better at promoting beliefs that leaders are trustworthy. At the same time, results point to the importance of informal community institutions of lineage relationships.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Clans</subject><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral behaviour</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Political Attitudes</subject><subject>Political leaders</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0010-4140</issn><issn>1552-3829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvghfx4MnqJGk-epT1Exa89B4maSpdtts1aQ_735tSQVgQTzPD-70H8wi5pHBPqVIPABQKWgAIpkELdkQyKgTLuWblMckmOZ_0U3IW4zqdLIEZuXryXe8Cuv3d9bLvunHbDmmtwhiHc3LS4Cb6i5-5INXLc7V8y1cfr-_Lx1XuOONDLoBaROQOLEXfyLrRtnZeS4uWKydUXXBrJWt4TZl2mssadVGWqF2j0fEFuZ1jd6H_Gn0cTNdG5zcb3Pp-jEaUilLJin9BrhQICTKBNwfguh_DNv1gGEippNQiQTBDLvQxBt-YXWg7DHtDwUyVmsNKkyWfLRE__W_mn_w3vTxzqw</recordid><startdate>200604</startdate><enddate>200604</enddate><creator>Manion, Melanie</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200604</creationdate><title>Democracy, Community, Trust</title><author>Manion, Melanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-501baaa3c0b1aef6df8bdce86bab37c57d43bb62f3d128c836da8499a8cf8ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Clans</topic><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral behaviour</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Political Attitudes</topic><topic>Political leaders</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manion, Melanie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manion, Melanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China</atitle><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle><date>2006-04</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>301-324</pages><issn>0010-4140</issn><eissn>1552-3829</eissn><coden>CPLSBZ</coden><abstract>This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996, merged with a set of separately collected data detailing features of elections in these villages during the same period of time. The analyses take advantage of uneven progress in grassroots democratization and ask how variation in democratic electoral quality across villages is associated with variation in changed views about the probity (or venality) of local leaders. Results strongly suggest that formal institutions of electoral democracy matter: Designs that feature contestation and encourage voter participation do better at promoting beliefs that leaders are trustworthy. At the same time, results point to the importance of informal community institutions of lineage relationships.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0010414005280852</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4140
ispartof Comparative political studies, 2006-04, Vol.39 (3), p.301-324
issn 0010-4140
1552-3829
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59711624
source Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects China
Clans
Comparative politics
Corruption
Democracy
Democratization
Elections
Electoral behaviour
Peoples Republic of China
Political Attitudes
Political leaders
Polls & surveys
Rural areas
Trust
title Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T18%3A24%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Democracy,%20Community,%20Trust:%20The%20Impact%20of%20Elections%20in%20Rural%20China&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20political%20studies&rft.au=Manion,%20Melanie&rft.date=2006-04&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=301-324&rft.issn=0010-4140&rft.eissn=1552-3829&rft.coden=CPLSBZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0010414005280852&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37705606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206676685&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0010414005280852&rfr_iscdi=true