Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China
This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative political studies 2006-04, Vol.39 (3), p.301-324 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 324 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 301 |
container_title | Comparative political studies |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Manion, Melanie |
description | This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996, merged with a set of separately collected data detailing features of elections in these villages during the same period of time. The analyses take advantage of uneven progress in grassroots democratization and ask how variation in democratic electoral quality across villages is associated with variation in changed views about the probity (or venality) of local leaders. Results strongly suggest that formal institutions of electoral democracy matter: Designs that feature contestation and encourage voter participation do better at promoting beliefs that leaders are trustworthy. At the same time, results point to the importance of informal community institutions of lineage relationships. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0010414005280852 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59711624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0010414005280852</sage_id><sourcerecordid>37705606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-501baaa3c0b1aef6df8bdce86bab37c57d43bb62f3d128c836da8499a8cf8ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvghfx4MnqJGk-epT1Exa89B4maSpdtts1aQ_735tSQVgQTzPD-70H8wi5pHBPqVIPABQKWgAIpkELdkQyKgTLuWblMckmOZ_0U3IW4zqdLIEZuXryXe8Cuv3d9bLvunHbDmmtwhiHc3LS4Cb6i5-5INXLc7V8y1cfr-_Lx1XuOONDLoBaROQOLEXfyLrRtnZeS4uWKydUXXBrJWt4TZl2mssadVGWqF2j0fEFuZ1jd6H_Gn0cTNdG5zcb3Pp-jEaUilLJin9BrhQICTKBNwfguh_DNv1gGEippNQiQTBDLvQxBt-YXWg7DHtDwUyVmsNKkyWfLRE__W_mn_w3vTxzqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206676685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Manion, Melanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Manion, Melanie</creatorcontrib><description>This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996, merged with a set of separately collected data detailing features of elections in these villages during the same period of time. The analyses take advantage of uneven progress in grassroots democratization and ask how variation in democratic electoral quality across villages is associated with variation in changed views about the probity (or venality) of local leaders. Results strongly suggest that formal institutions of electoral democracy matter: Designs that feature contestation and encourage voter participation do better at promoting beliefs that leaders are trustworthy. At the same time, results point to the importance of informal community institutions of lineage relationships.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0010414005280852</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPLSBZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>China ; Clans ; Comparative politics ; Corruption ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Elections ; Electoral behaviour ; Peoples Republic of China ; Political Attitudes ; Political leaders ; Polls & surveys ; Rural areas ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Comparative political studies, 2006-04, Vol.39 (3), p.301-324</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-501baaa3c0b1aef6df8bdce86bab37c57d43bb62f3d128c836da8499a8cf8ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0010414005280852$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414005280852$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manion, Melanie</creatorcontrib><title>Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China</title><title>Comparative political studies</title><description>This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996, merged with a set of separately collected data detailing features of elections in these villages during the same period of time. The analyses take advantage of uneven progress in grassroots democratization and ask how variation in democratic electoral quality across villages is associated with variation in changed views about the probity (or venality) of local leaders. Results strongly suggest that formal institutions of electoral democracy matter: Designs that feature contestation and encourage voter participation do better at promoting beliefs that leaders are trustworthy. At the same time, results point to the importance of informal community institutions of lineage relationships.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Clans</subject><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral behaviour</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Political Attitudes</subject><subject>Political leaders</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0010-4140</issn><issn>1552-3829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvghfx4MnqJGk-epT1Exa89B4maSpdtts1aQ_735tSQVgQTzPD-70H8wi5pHBPqVIPABQKWgAIpkELdkQyKgTLuWblMckmOZ_0U3IW4zqdLIEZuXryXe8Cuv3d9bLvunHbDmmtwhiHc3LS4Cb6i5-5INXLc7V8y1cfr-_Lx1XuOONDLoBaROQOLEXfyLrRtnZeS4uWKydUXXBrJWt4TZl2mssadVGWqF2j0fEFuZ1jd6H_Gn0cTNdG5zcb3Pp-jEaUilLJin9BrhQICTKBNwfguh_DNv1gGEippNQiQTBDLvQxBt-YXWg7DHtDwUyVmsNKkyWfLRE__W_mn_w3vTxzqw</recordid><startdate>200604</startdate><enddate>200604</enddate><creator>Manion, Melanie</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200604</creationdate><title>Democracy, Community, Trust</title><author>Manion, Melanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-501baaa3c0b1aef6df8bdce86bab37c57d43bb62f3d128c836da8499a8cf8ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Clans</topic><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral behaviour</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Political Attitudes</topic><topic>Political leaders</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manion, Melanie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manion, Melanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China</atitle><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle><date>2006-04</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>301-324</pages><issn>0010-4140</issn><eissn>1552-3829</eissn><coden>CPLSBZ</coden><abstract>This article systematically investigates the impact of elections in rural China on a basic element of the elite-mass relationship: beliefs of ordinary citizens that their leaders are trustworthy. It analyzes data from two surveys of randomly sampled villagers in the same 57 villages in 1990 and 1996, merged with a set of separately collected data detailing features of elections in these villages during the same period of time. The analyses take advantage of uneven progress in grassroots democratization and ask how variation in democratic electoral quality across villages is associated with variation in changed views about the probity (or venality) of local leaders. Results strongly suggest that formal institutions of electoral democracy matter: Designs that feature contestation and encourage voter participation do better at promoting beliefs that leaders are trustworthy. At the same time, results point to the importance of informal community institutions of lineage relationships.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0010414005280852</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4140 |
ispartof | Comparative political studies, 2006-04, Vol.39 (3), p.301-324 |
issn | 0010-4140 1552-3829 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59711624 |
source | Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | China Clans Comparative politics Corruption Democracy Democratization Elections Electoral behaviour Peoples Republic of China Political Attitudes Political leaders Polls & surveys Rural areas Trust |
title | Democracy, Community, Trust: The Impact of Elections in Rural China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T18%3A24%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Democracy,%20Community,%20Trust:%20The%20Impact%20of%20Elections%20in%20Rural%20China&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20political%20studies&rft.au=Manion,%20Melanie&rft.date=2006-04&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=301-324&rft.issn=0010-4140&rft.eissn=1552-3829&rft.coden=CPLSBZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0010414005280852&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37705606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206676685&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0010414005280852&rfr_iscdi=true |