Anti-Immigrant Sentiment, Policy Preferences and Populist Party Voting in Australia

Immigration has become a highly salient political issue in many of the world's affluent democracies. Yet, the electoral dynamics of anti-immigrant sentiment remain barely understood. We distinguish two dimensions of concern about immigrants: material threat and cultural threat, and hold that th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of political science 2006-04, Vol.36 (2), p.341-358
Hauptverfasser: MUGHAN, ANTHONY, PAXTON, PAMELA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 358
container_issue 2
container_start_page 341
container_title British journal of political science
container_volume 36
creator MUGHAN, ANTHONY
PAXTON, PAMELA
description Immigration has become a highly salient political issue in many of the world's affluent democracies. Yet, the electoral dynamics of anti-immigrant sentiment remain barely understood. We distinguish two dimensions of concern about immigrants: material threat and cultural threat, and hold that the influence of both on the right-wing populist party vote is critically mediated by policy preferences to restrict immigration and to isolate Australia from foreign influence. The result is a path model of voting that allows material and cultural threat to influence policy preferences about how to deal with the ‘immigrant problem’, and allows both threat and policy preferences to affect voting for the far-right One Nation party in Australia. Our results confirm that popular concern about immigrants is multi-dimensional and that its two dimensions have different sources. We also demonstrate that anti-immigrant sentiment works indirectly through policy orientations to influence vote choice. Feelings about immigrants, in other words, have an electoral effect only when there is a good fit between the policy stances of voters and the policies promoted by the parties on offer.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0007123406000184
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59710286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007123406000184</cupid><jstor_id>4092233</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4092233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-8752c44d5a16b8430fb3db57293608a344d6fdee2269dc0090f5fd9795c7ad7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctqGzEUFSWFOm4_oNDFkEVWnVbvx9KExDEEatdutkLWaIzceTiSBuK_rwaHEBJCN5KuzoNz7wXgK4I_EETi5xpCKBAmFPL8QpJ-ABNEuSoxQvgMTEa4HPFP4DzGfS4lkWgC1rMu-XLRtn4XTJeKtct1m4_vxbJvvD0Wy-BqF1xnXSxMV-Xvw9D4mIqlCelY3PfJd7vCd8VsiCmYxpvP4GNtmui-PN1T8OfmenN1W979mi-uZnelpZKlUgqGLaUVM4hvJSWw3pJqywRWhENpSIZ4XTmHMVeVhVDBmtWVEopZYSphyRRcnnwPoX8YXEy69dG6pjGd64eomRIIYsn_SyRCIIWUyMSLV8R9P4QuN6GRYgQTQkc3dCLZ0MeYp6MPwbcmHDWCelyGfrOMrPl20uxj6sOzgEKFs2mGyxOc5-oen2ET_mouiGCaz1d6xdfq_jeTepP55CmCabfBVzv3Iui7If4BMs6igQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195323346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anti-Immigrant Sentiment, Policy Preferences and Populist Party Voting in Australia</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>MUGHAN, ANTHONY ; PAXTON, PAMELA</creator><creatorcontrib>MUGHAN, ANTHONY ; PAXTON, PAMELA</creatorcontrib><description>Immigration has become a highly salient political issue in many of the world's affluent democracies. Yet, the electoral dynamics of anti-immigrant sentiment remain barely understood. We distinguish two dimensions of concern about immigrants: material threat and cultural threat, and hold that the influence of both on the right-wing populist party vote is critically mediated by policy preferences to restrict immigration and to isolate Australia from foreign influence. The result is a path model of voting that allows material and cultural threat to influence policy preferences about how to deal with the ‘immigrant problem’, and allows both threat and policy preferences to affect voting for the far-right One Nation party in Australia. Our results confirm that popular concern about immigrants is multi-dimensional and that its two dimensions have different sources. We also demonstrate that anti-immigrant sentiment works indirectly through policy orientations to influence vote choice. Feelings about immigrants, in other words, have an electoral effect only when there is a good fit between the policy stances of voters and the policies promoted by the parties on offer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007123406000184</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BPLSBO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Australia ; Case studies ; Congressional hearings ; Countries ; Cultural assimilation ; Democracy ; Economic migration ; Economics ; Extremism ; Immigrants ; Immigration ; Immigration policy ; Isolationism ; Multiculturalism ; Nationalism ; Noncitizens ; Perceptions ; Policy making ; Political parties ; Political science ; Political theory ; Politics ; Populism ; Populist parties ; Preferences ; Prejudices ; Public Opinion ; Voters ; Voting ; Voting Behavior ; Voting behaviour ; Xenophobia</subject><ispartof>British journal of political science, 2006-04, Vol.36 (2), p.341-358</ispartof><rights>2006 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-8752c44d5a16b8430fb3db57293608a344d6fdee2269dc0090f5fd9795c7ad7c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4092233$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123406000184/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12845,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MUGHAN, ANTHONY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAXTON, PAMELA</creatorcontrib><title>Anti-Immigrant Sentiment, Policy Preferences and Populist Party Voting in Australia</title><title>British journal of political science</title><addtitle>Brit. J. Polit. Sci</addtitle><description>Immigration has become a highly salient political issue in many of the world's affluent democracies. Yet, the electoral dynamics of anti-immigrant sentiment remain barely understood. We distinguish two dimensions of concern about immigrants: material threat and cultural threat, and hold that the influence of both on the right-wing populist party vote is critically mediated by policy preferences to restrict immigration and to isolate Australia from foreign influence. The result is a path model of voting that allows material and cultural threat to influence policy preferences about how to deal with the ‘immigrant problem’, and allows both threat and policy preferences to affect voting for the far-right One Nation party in Australia. Our results confirm that popular concern about immigrants is multi-dimensional and that its two dimensions have different sources. We also demonstrate that anti-immigrant sentiment works indirectly through policy orientations to influence vote choice. Feelings about immigrants, in other words, have an electoral effect only when there is a good fit between the policy stances of voters and the policies promoted by the parties on offer.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Congressional hearings</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Cultural assimilation</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Economic migration</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Extremism</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Immigration policy</subject><subject>Isolationism</subject><subject>Multiculturalism</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Populist parties</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prejudices</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><subject>Voting behaviour</subject><subject>Xenophobia</subject><issn>0007-1234</issn><issn>1469-2112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUctqGzEUFSWFOm4_oNDFkEVWnVbvx9KExDEEatdutkLWaIzceTiSBuK_rwaHEBJCN5KuzoNz7wXgK4I_EETi5xpCKBAmFPL8QpJ-ABNEuSoxQvgMTEa4HPFP4DzGfS4lkWgC1rMu-XLRtn4XTJeKtct1m4_vxbJvvD0Wy-BqF1xnXSxMV-Xvw9D4mIqlCelY3PfJd7vCd8VsiCmYxpvP4GNtmui-PN1T8OfmenN1W979mi-uZnelpZKlUgqGLaUVM4hvJSWw3pJqywRWhENpSIZ4XTmHMVeVhVDBmtWVEopZYSphyRRcnnwPoX8YXEy69dG6pjGd64eomRIIYsn_SyRCIIWUyMSLV8R9P4QuN6GRYgQTQkc3dCLZ0MeYp6MPwbcmHDWCelyGfrOMrPl20uxj6sOzgEKFs2mGyxOc5-oen2ET_mouiGCaz1d6xdfq_jeTepP55CmCabfBVzv3Iui7If4BMs6igQ</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>MUGHAN, ANTHONY</creator><creator>PAXTON, PAMELA</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Anti-Immigrant Sentiment, Policy Preferences and Populist Party Voting in Australia</title><author>MUGHAN, ANTHONY ; PAXTON, PAMELA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-8752c44d5a16b8430fb3db57293608a344d6fdee2269dc0090f5fd9795c7ad7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Congressional hearings</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Cultural assimilation</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Economic migration</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Extremism</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Immigration policy</topic><topic>Isolationism</topic><topic>Multiculturalism</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Populist parties</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prejudices</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><topic>Voting behaviour</topic><topic>Xenophobia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MUGHAN, ANTHONY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAXTON, PAMELA</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MUGHAN, ANTHONY</au><au>PAXTON, PAMELA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anti-Immigrant Sentiment, Policy Preferences and Populist Party Voting in Australia</atitle><jtitle>British journal of political science</jtitle><addtitle>Brit. J. Polit. Sci</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>341-358</pages><issn>0007-1234</issn><eissn>1469-2112</eissn><coden>BPLSBO</coden><abstract>Immigration has become a highly salient political issue in many of the world's affluent democracies. Yet, the electoral dynamics of anti-immigrant sentiment remain barely understood. We distinguish two dimensions of concern about immigrants: material threat and cultural threat, and hold that the influence of both on the right-wing populist party vote is critically mediated by policy preferences to restrict immigration and to isolate Australia from foreign influence. The result is a path model of voting that allows material and cultural threat to influence policy preferences about how to deal with the ‘immigrant problem’, and allows both threat and policy preferences to affect voting for the far-right One Nation party in Australia. Our results confirm that popular concern about immigrants is multi-dimensional and that its two dimensions have different sources. We also demonstrate that anti-immigrant sentiment works indirectly through policy orientations to influence vote choice. Feelings about immigrants, in other words, have an electoral effect only when there is a good fit between the policy stances of voters and the policies promoted by the parties on offer.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0007123406000184</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1234
ispartof British journal of political science, 2006-04, Vol.36 (2), p.341-358
issn 0007-1234
1469-2112
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59710286
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Australia
Case studies
Congressional hearings
Countries
Cultural assimilation
Democracy
Economic migration
Economics
Extremism
Immigrants
Immigration
Immigration policy
Isolationism
Multiculturalism
Nationalism
Noncitizens
Perceptions
Policy making
Political parties
Political science
Political theory
Politics
Populism
Populist parties
Preferences
Prejudices
Public Opinion
Voters
Voting
Voting Behavior
Voting behaviour
Xenophobia
title Anti-Immigrant Sentiment, Policy Preferences and Populist Party Voting in Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A15%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anti-Immigrant%20Sentiment,%20Policy%20Preferences%20and%20Populist%20Party%20Voting%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=MUGHAN,%20ANTHONY&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=341-358&rft.issn=0007-1234&rft.eissn=1469-2112&rft.coden=BPLSBO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007123406000184&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4092233%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195323346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007123406000184&rft_jstor_id=4092233&rfr_iscdi=true