How Closed is Japan's Market? Additional Evidence
Although conventional wisdom attributes the trade imblance between the US and Japan to macroeconomic factors, many in the US maintain that it is due partly to unfair trade practices by Japanese competitors. Based on the results of a survey of 62 firms in Australia, the purchasing behavior of Japanes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World economy 1988-12, Vol.11 (4), p.529-542 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 542 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 529 |
container_title | World economy |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Kreinin, Mordechai E. |
description | Although conventional wisdom attributes the trade imblance between the US and Japan to macroeconomic factors, many in the US maintain that it is due partly to unfair trade practices by Japanese competitors. Based on the results of a survey of 62 firms in Australia, the purchasing behavior of Japanese-owned subsidiaries is definitely different from that of the US-owned and European-owned firms. They are tightly controlled by the parent firm, procure their equipment mainly in Japan, and own and operate mainly Japanese machinery. By contrast, western firms have a great deal of autonomy to make purchase, sourcing, and other decisions, procure capital equipment by competitive bids, and own machinery made in 3 continents. Japan is an outlier in that it imports fewer manufactures than it would if its markets were as open as those of other developed countries, and its industrial structure and buyers' preferences play an important part in bringing about this outcome. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-9701.1988.tb00147.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59501581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59501581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6159-575fd7ccd52e9cf86d1615d9da4154298a20f122c533afd1da0a8ae64aef30d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkUFPwjAYhhujiYj-h4WDetns165r64XggqBBPYjh2NS1S4aD4ToE_r1dMBw8mNhLk_Z5ny99i1APcAR-3cwjiBMeSo4hAilE1LxjDDGPtkeoc7g6Rh1MuQiZJPgUnTk391ASE9xBMK42QVpWzpqgcMGjXunllQuedP1hm34wMKZoimqpy2D4VRi7zOw5Osl16ezFz95Fb_fDaToOJy-jh3QwCbMEmAwZZ7nhWWYYsTLLRWLAnxtpdAwsJlJognMgJGOU6tyA0VgLbZNY25xiw2kXXe69q7r6XFvXqEXhMluWemmrtVNMMgxMgAev_wQBU8YFI0A82vuFzqt17V_nFKEUJI1ZO_h2D2V15Vxtc7Wqi4Wud96k2tbVXLXVqrZa1bauflpXWx_u78OborS7fyTVdDZMGZHeEO4NhWvs9mDwH6ISTjlTs-eRIoRN-evdTAn6DdtNloI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233193457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Closed is Japan's Market? Additional Evidence</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kreinin, Mordechai E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kreinin, Mordechai E.</creatorcontrib><description>Although conventional wisdom attributes the trade imblance between the US and Japan to macroeconomic factors, many in the US maintain that it is due partly to unfair trade practices by Japanese competitors. Based on the results of a survey of 62 firms in Australia, the purchasing behavior of Japanese-owned subsidiaries is definitely different from that of the US-owned and European-owned firms. They are tightly controlled by the parent firm, procure their equipment mainly in Japan, and own and operate mainly Japanese machinery. By contrast, western firms have a great deal of autonomy to make purchase, sourcing, and other decisions, procure capital equipment by competitive bids, and own machinery made in 3 continents. Japan is an outlier in that it imports fewer manufactures than it would if its markets were as open as those of other developed countries, and its industrial structure and buyers' preferences play an important part in bringing about this outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.1988.tb00147.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>American ; Australia ; Comparative analysis ; Corporations ; Equipment purchasing ; European ; Foreign investments ; Free trade and protection ; International trade ; Japanese ; Purchasing, Industrial ; Subsidiaries ; Trade barriers</subject><ispartof>World economy, 1988-12, Vol.11 (4), p.529-542</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Dec 1988</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6159-575fd7ccd52e9cf86d1615d9da4154298a20f122c533afd1da0a8ae64aef30d73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9701.1988.tb00147.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9701.1988.tb00147.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27865,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kreinin, Mordechai E.</creatorcontrib><title>How Closed is Japan's Market? Additional Evidence</title><title>World economy</title><description>Although conventional wisdom attributes the trade imblance between the US and Japan to macroeconomic factors, many in the US maintain that it is due partly to unfair trade practices by Japanese competitors. Based on the results of a survey of 62 firms in Australia, the purchasing behavior of Japanese-owned subsidiaries is definitely different from that of the US-owned and European-owned firms. They are tightly controlled by the parent firm, procure their equipment mainly in Japan, and own and operate mainly Japanese machinery. By contrast, western firms have a great deal of autonomy to make purchase, sourcing, and other decisions, procure capital equipment by competitive bids, and own machinery made in 3 continents. Japan is an outlier in that it imports fewer manufactures than it would if its markets were as open as those of other developed countries, and its industrial structure and buyers' preferences play an important part in bringing about this outcome.</description><subject>American</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Equipment purchasing</subject><subject>European</subject><subject>Foreign investments</subject><subject>Free trade and protection</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Japanese</subject><subject>Purchasing, Industrial</subject><subject>Subsidiaries</subject><subject>Trade barriers</subject><issn>0378-5920</issn><issn>1467-9701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkUFPwjAYhhujiYj-h4WDetns165r64XggqBBPYjh2NS1S4aD4ToE_r1dMBw8mNhLk_Z5ny99i1APcAR-3cwjiBMeSo4hAilE1LxjDDGPtkeoc7g6Rh1MuQiZJPgUnTk391ASE9xBMK42QVpWzpqgcMGjXunllQuedP1hm34wMKZoimqpy2D4VRi7zOw5Osl16ezFz95Fb_fDaToOJy-jh3QwCbMEmAwZZ7nhWWYYsTLLRWLAnxtpdAwsJlJognMgJGOU6tyA0VgLbZNY25xiw2kXXe69q7r6XFvXqEXhMluWemmrtVNMMgxMgAev_wQBU8YFI0A82vuFzqt17V_nFKEUJI1ZO_h2D2V15Vxtc7Wqi4Wud96k2tbVXLXVqrZa1bauflpXWx_u78OborS7fyTVdDZMGZHeEO4NhWvs9mDwH6ISTjlTs-eRIoRN-evdTAn6DdtNloI</recordid><startdate>198812</startdate><enddate>198812</enddate><creator>Kreinin, Mordechai E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198812</creationdate><title>How Closed is Japan's Market? Additional Evidence</title><author>Kreinin, Mordechai E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6159-575fd7ccd52e9cf86d1615d9da4154298a20f122c533afd1da0a8ae64aef30d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>American</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Equipment purchasing</topic><topic>European</topic><topic>Foreign investments</topic><topic>Free trade and protection</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Japanese</topic><topic>Purchasing, Industrial</topic><topic>Subsidiaries</topic><topic>Trade barriers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kreinin, Mordechai E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>World economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kreinin, Mordechai E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Closed is Japan's Market? Additional Evidence</atitle><jtitle>World economy</jtitle><date>1988-12</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>529-542</pages><issn>0378-5920</issn><eissn>1467-9701</eissn><abstract>Although conventional wisdom attributes the trade imblance between the US and Japan to macroeconomic factors, many in the US maintain that it is due partly to unfair trade practices by Japanese competitors. Based on the results of a survey of 62 firms in Australia, the purchasing behavior of Japanese-owned subsidiaries is definitely different from that of the US-owned and European-owned firms. They are tightly controlled by the parent firm, procure their equipment mainly in Japan, and own and operate mainly Japanese machinery. By contrast, western firms have a great deal of autonomy to make purchase, sourcing, and other decisions, procure capital equipment by competitive bids, and own machinery made in 3 continents. Japan is an outlier in that it imports fewer manufactures than it would if its markets were as open as those of other developed countries, and its industrial structure and buyers' preferences play an important part in bringing about this outcome.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9701.1988.tb00147.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-5920 |
ispartof | World economy, 1988-12, Vol.11 (4), p.529-542 |
issn | 0378-5920 1467-9701 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59501581 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | American Australia Comparative analysis Corporations Equipment purchasing European Foreign investments Free trade and protection International trade Japanese Purchasing, Industrial Subsidiaries Trade barriers |
title | How Closed is Japan's Market? Additional Evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A57%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Closed%20is%20Japan's%20Market?%20Additional%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=World%20economy&rft.au=Kreinin,%20Mordechai%20E.&rft.date=1988-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=529-542&rft.issn=0378-5920&rft.eissn=1467-9701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9701.1988.tb00147.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E59501581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233193457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |