Does the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission make a difference? An assessment of its first decade
When the US Congress created the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in 1971, it was intended to: 1. conduct research on potential product hazards, 2. work with industry to develop voluntary safety standards, 3. set mandatory standards when the need arose, and 4. recall hazardous products from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of consumer policy 1986-03, Vol.9 (1), p.25-40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | Journal of consumer policy |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Zick, C.D Mayer, R.N Snow, L.A |
description | When the US Congress created the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in 1971, it was intended to: 1. conduct research on potential product hazards, 2. work with industry to develop voluntary safety standards, 3. set mandatory standards when the need arose, and 4. recall hazardous products from the marketplace. Pooled cross-sectional time-series data from 1961 to 1982 on states' accidental home death rates were utilized to examine the effectiveness of the CPSC. The results indicated that, between 1973 and 1982, the CPSC prevented an estimated 17,941 accidental home deaths. Although the findings supported the Consumer Federation of America's contention that the CPSC saves lives, the estimate of lives saved was much lower than that of the Consumer Federation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00380308 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59396225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1187798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-906c02489ecb9371bb0567706790bb34ecf9e47b79fd10bc482b9023842a8f773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0Etr3DAUBWBRGuiQZJM_UNFFFwVPrh62pFVIJ80DAglMZi1k-ap1MrZSXXuRf1-HKRS6unD5OBwOY2cC1gLAnH-_BlAWFNgPbCVqoyowAB_ZCpSWVW21-sROiZ4BQDTWOW1WDK8yEp9-Id-tt2u-ySPNAxb-WHI3x4lvQ8LpbfkPQ0_U55EP4QV54F2fEhYcI17wy5EHIiQacJx4TryfiKe-0MQ7jKHDE3aUwp7w9O89ZrvrH0-b2-r-4eZuc3lfRVm7qXLQRJDaOoytU0a0LdSNMdAYB22rNMbkUJvWuNQJaKO2snUgldUy2GSMOmZfD7mvJf-ekSa_tI6434cR80y-dso1UtYL_PIffM5zGZduXjirG6ndO_p2QLFkooLJv5Z-COXNC_Dvi_t_iy_48wGnkH34WXryu60EoUCCUtoo9QeT1Hmb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198462495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission make a difference? An assessment of its first decade</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zick, C.D ; Mayer, R.N ; Snow, L.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Zick, C.D ; Mayer, R.N ; Snow, L.A</creatorcontrib><description>When the US Congress created the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in 1971, it was intended to: 1. conduct research on potential product hazards, 2. work with industry to develop voluntary safety standards, 3. set mandatory standards when the need arose, and 4. recall hazardous products from the marketplace. Pooled cross-sectional time-series data from 1961 to 1982 on states' accidental home death rates were utilized to examine the effectiveness of the CPSC. The results indicated that, between 1973 and 1982, the CPSC prevented an estimated 17,941 accidental home deaths. Although the findings supported the Consumer Federation of America's contention that the CPSC saves lives, the estimate of lives saved was much lower than that of the Consumer Federation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-5843</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0168-7034</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00380308</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPODV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>accidents ; Accidents, Home ; consumer product safety act ; Consumer product safety commission ; Consumer protection ; data analysis ; Effectiveness ; Evaluation ; Government agencies ; human health and safety ; laws and regulations ; Mathematical analysis ; Product safety ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Time series ; time series analysis ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of consumer policy, 1986-03, Vol.9 (1), p.25-40</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers Mar 1986</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-906c02489ecb9371bb0567706790bb34ecf9e47b79fd10bc482b9023842a8f773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-906c02489ecb9371bb0567706790bb34ecf9e47b79fd10bc482b9023842a8f773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27842,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zick, C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, R.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, L.A</creatorcontrib><title>Does the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission make a difference? An assessment of its first decade</title><title>Journal of consumer policy</title><description>When the US Congress created the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in 1971, it was intended to: 1. conduct research on potential product hazards, 2. work with industry to develop voluntary safety standards, 3. set mandatory standards when the need arose, and 4. recall hazardous products from the marketplace. Pooled cross-sectional time-series data from 1961 to 1982 on states' accidental home death rates were utilized to examine the effectiveness of the CPSC. The results indicated that, between 1973 and 1982, the CPSC prevented an estimated 17,941 accidental home deaths. Although the findings supported the Consumer Federation of America's contention that the CPSC saves lives, the estimate of lives saved was much lower than that of the Consumer Federation.</description><subject>accidents</subject><subject>Accidents, Home</subject><subject>consumer product safety act</subject><subject>Consumer product safety commission</subject><subject>Consumer protection</subject><subject>data analysis</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>human health and safety</subject><subject>laws and regulations</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Product safety</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>time series analysis</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0342-5843</issn><issn>0168-7034</issn><issn>1573-0700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0Etr3DAUBWBRGuiQZJM_UNFFFwVPrh62pFVIJ80DAglMZi1k-ap1MrZSXXuRf1-HKRS6unD5OBwOY2cC1gLAnH-_BlAWFNgPbCVqoyowAB_ZCpSWVW21-sROiZ4BQDTWOW1WDK8yEp9-Id-tt2u-ySPNAxb-WHI3x4lvQ8LpbfkPQ0_U55EP4QV54F2fEhYcI17wy5EHIiQacJx4TryfiKe-0MQ7jKHDE3aUwp7w9O89ZrvrH0-b2-r-4eZuc3lfRVm7qXLQRJDaOoytU0a0LdSNMdAYB22rNMbkUJvWuNQJaKO2snUgldUy2GSMOmZfD7mvJf-ekSa_tI6434cR80y-dso1UtYL_PIffM5zGZduXjirG6ndO_p2QLFkooLJv5Z-COXNC_Dvi_t_iy_48wGnkH34WXryu60EoUCCUtoo9QeT1Hmb</recordid><startdate>198603</startdate><enddate>198603</enddate><creator>Zick, C.D</creator><creator>Mayer, R.N</creator><creator>Snow, L.A</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198603</creationdate><title>Does the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission make a difference? An assessment of its first decade</title><author>Zick, C.D ; Mayer, R.N ; Snow, L.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-906c02489ecb9371bb0567706790bb34ecf9e47b79fd10bc482b9023842a8f773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>accidents</topic><topic>Accidents, Home</topic><topic>consumer product safety act</topic><topic>Consumer product safety commission</topic><topic>Consumer protection</topic><topic>data analysis</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>human health and safety</topic><topic>laws and regulations</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Product safety</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>time series analysis</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zick, C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, R.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, L.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of consumer policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zick, C.D</au><au>Mayer, R.N</au><au>Snow, L.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission make a difference? An assessment of its first decade</atitle><jtitle>Journal of consumer policy</jtitle><date>1986-03</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>25-40</pages><issn>0342-5843</issn><issn>0168-7034</issn><eissn>1573-0700</eissn><coden>JCPODV</coden><abstract>When the US Congress created the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in 1971, it was intended to: 1. conduct research on potential product hazards, 2. work with industry to develop voluntary safety standards, 3. set mandatory standards when the need arose, and 4. recall hazardous products from the marketplace. Pooled cross-sectional time-series data from 1961 to 1982 on states' accidental home death rates were utilized to examine the effectiveness of the CPSC. The results indicated that, between 1973 and 1982, the CPSC prevented an estimated 17,941 accidental home deaths. Although the findings supported the Consumer Federation of America's contention that the CPSC saves lives, the estimate of lives saved was much lower than that of the Consumer Federation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00380308</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0342-5843 |
ispartof | Journal of consumer policy, 1986-03, Vol.9 (1), p.25-40 |
issn | 0342-5843 0168-7034 1573-0700 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59396225 |
source | PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | accidents Accidents, Home consumer product safety act Consumer product safety commission Consumer protection data analysis Effectiveness Evaluation Government agencies human health and safety laws and regulations Mathematical analysis Product safety Statistical analysis Studies Time series time series analysis United States |
title | Does the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission make a difference? An assessment of its first decade |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A36%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20U.S.%20Consumer%20Product%20Safety%20Commission%20make%20a%20difference?%20An%20assessment%20of%20its%20first%20decade&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20consumer%20policy&rft.au=Zick,%20C.D&rft.date=1986-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=25-40&rft.issn=0342-5843&rft.eissn=1573-0700&rft.coden=JCPODV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00380308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1187798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198462495&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |