The Well-Aged Arbitration Case
The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial & labor relations review 1958-01, Vol.11 (2), p.262-271 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 271 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 262 |
container_title | Industrial & labor relations review |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Ross, Arthur M. |
description | The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past decade the time span between the first and last steps of the arbitration process has tended to lengthen significantly. The author explores the reasons for this development and its implications for grievance handling. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/001979395801100207 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58988039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2519813</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_001979395801100207</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2519813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2877-4cb3b2dc5f5a63849dec569815b6ff2ba4ef556dc65e3453a7c2472e1f3995663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKd_wAsZKN7V5U2ar8sx_GTgzUTvQpqmW0e31qQT9u9NrchQMPDmzcVzTg4HoXPANwBCjDEGJRRVTGIAjAkWB2hAgJOECHg7RIMOSDriGJ2EsMLxpAIG6GK-dKNXV1XJZOHy0cRnZetNW9ab0dQEd4qOClMFd_a9h-jl7nY-fUhmz_eP08kssUQKkaQ2oxnJLSuY4VSmKneWcSWBZbwoSGZSVzDGc8uZoymjRliSCuKgoEoxzukQXfe-ja_fty60el0GG2OZjau3QTOppMRURfDyF7iqt34Ts2kgiqeSqy-K9JT1dQjeFbrx5dr4nQasu8L038Ki6KkXedc4-6MoK298W9pKf2hqAOK16x5RGlcZh8Rpus2JjnXrZbuOZuPeLJiF28v43_dXvWIV2trvByYUC00YxD4p_QS8hovp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296486939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Well-Aged Arbitration Case</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ross, Arthur M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ross, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><description>The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past decade the time span between the first and last steps of the arbitration process has tended to lengthen significantly. The author explores the reasons for this development and its implications for grievance handling. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-7939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-271X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001979395801100207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University</publisher><subject>Arbitration ; Arbitration law ; Arbitration, Industrial ; Arithmetic mean ; Attorneys ; Employee benefits ; Employment ; Labor grievances ; Labor management relations ; Legal briefs ; Wage rate</subject><ispartof>Industrial & labor relations review, 1958-01, Vol.11 (2), p.262-271</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1958 Cornell University</rights><rights>1958 Cornell University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2877-4cb3b2dc5f5a63849dec569815b6ff2ba4ef556dc65e3453a7c2472e1f3995663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2519813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2519813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3994,4010,27842,27846,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/ilrarticl/v_3a11_3ay_3a1958_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a262-271.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ross, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Well-Aged Arbitration Case</title><title>Industrial & labor relations review</title><description>The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past decade the time span between the first and last steps of the arbitration process has tended to lengthen significantly. The author explores the reasons for this development and its implications for grievance handling. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)</description><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Arbitration law</subject><subject>Arbitration, Industrial</subject><subject>Arithmetic mean</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Employee benefits</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Labor grievances</subject><subject>Labor management relations</subject><subject>Legal briefs</subject><subject>Wage rate</subject><issn>0019-7939</issn><issn>2162-271X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1958</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKd_wAsZKN7V5U2ar8sx_GTgzUTvQpqmW0e31qQT9u9NrchQMPDmzcVzTg4HoXPANwBCjDEGJRRVTGIAjAkWB2hAgJOECHg7RIMOSDriGJ2EsMLxpAIG6GK-dKNXV1XJZOHy0cRnZetNW9ab0dQEd4qOClMFd_a9h-jl7nY-fUhmz_eP08kssUQKkaQ2oxnJLSuY4VSmKneWcSWBZbwoSGZSVzDGc8uZoymjRliSCuKgoEoxzukQXfe-ja_fty60el0GG2OZjau3QTOppMRURfDyF7iqt34Ts2kgiqeSqy-K9JT1dQjeFbrx5dr4nQasu8L038Ki6KkXedc4-6MoK298W9pKf2hqAOK16x5RGlcZh8Rpus2JjnXrZbuOZuPeLJiF28v43_dXvWIV2trvByYUC00YxD4p_QS8hovp</recordid><startdate>19580101</startdate><enddate>19580101</enddate><creator>Ross, Arthur M.</creator><general>New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School</general><general>Cornell University, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>7TP</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19580101</creationdate><title>The Well-Aged Arbitration Case</title><author>Ross, Arthur M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2877-4cb3b2dc5f5a63849dec569815b6ff2ba4ef556dc65e3453a7c2472e1f3995663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1958</creationdate><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Arbitration law</topic><topic>Arbitration, Industrial</topic><topic>Arithmetic mean</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Employee benefits</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Labor grievances</topic><topic>Labor management relations</topic><topic>Legal briefs</topic><topic>Wage rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ross, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><jtitle>Industrial & labor relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ross, Arthur M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Well-Aged Arbitration Case</atitle><jtitle>Industrial & labor relations review</jtitle><date>1958-01-01</date><risdate>1958</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>262-271</pages><issn>0019-7939</issn><eissn>2162-271X</eissn><abstract>The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past decade the time span between the first and last steps of the arbitration process has tended to lengthen significantly. The author explores the reasons for this development and its implications for grievance handling. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University</pub><doi>10.1177/001979395801100207</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0019-7939 |
ispartof | Industrial & labor relations review, 1958-01, Vol.11 (2), p.262-271 |
issn | 0019-7939 2162-271X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58988039 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Arbitration Arbitration law Arbitration, Industrial Arithmetic mean Attorneys Employee benefits Employment Labor grievances Labor management relations Legal briefs Wage rate |
title | The Well-Aged Arbitration Case |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A06%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Well-Aged%20Arbitration%20Case&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20labor%20relations%20review&rft.au=Ross,%20Arthur%20M.&rft.date=1958-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=262-271&rft.issn=0019-7939&rft.eissn=2162-271X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001979395801100207&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2519813%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296486939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2519813&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001979395801100207&rfr_iscdi=true |