The Well-Aged Arbitration Case

The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial & labor relations review 1958-01, Vol.11 (2), p.262-271
1. Verfasser: Ross, Arthur M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue 2
container_start_page 262
container_title Industrial & labor relations review
container_volume 11
creator Ross, Arthur M.
description The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past decade the time span between the first and last steps of the arbitration process has tended to lengthen significantly. The author explores the reasons for this development and its implications for grievance handling. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)
doi_str_mv 10.1177/001979395801100207
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58988039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2519813</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_001979395801100207</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2519813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2877-4cb3b2dc5f5a63849dec569815b6ff2ba4ef556dc65e3453a7c2472e1f3995663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKd_wAsZKN7V5U2ar8sx_GTgzUTvQpqmW0e31qQT9u9NrchQMPDmzcVzTg4HoXPANwBCjDEGJRRVTGIAjAkWB2hAgJOECHg7RIMOSDriGJ2EsMLxpAIG6GK-dKNXV1XJZOHy0cRnZetNW9ab0dQEd4qOClMFd_a9h-jl7nY-fUhmz_eP08kssUQKkaQ2oxnJLSuY4VSmKneWcSWBZbwoSGZSVzDGc8uZoymjRliSCuKgoEoxzukQXfe-ja_fty60el0GG2OZjau3QTOppMRURfDyF7iqt34Ts2kgiqeSqy-K9JT1dQjeFbrx5dr4nQasu8L038Ki6KkXedc4-6MoK298W9pKf2hqAOK16x5RGlcZh8Rpus2JjnXrZbuOZuPeLJiF28v43_dXvWIV2trvByYUC00YxD4p_QS8hovp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296486939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Well-Aged Arbitration Case</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ross, Arthur M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ross, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><description>The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past decade the time span between the first and last steps of the arbitration process has tended to lengthen significantly. The author explores the reasons for this development and its implications for grievance handling. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-7939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-271X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001979395801100207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University</publisher><subject>Arbitration ; Arbitration law ; Arbitration, Industrial ; Arithmetic mean ; Attorneys ; Employee benefits ; Employment ; Labor grievances ; Labor management relations ; Legal briefs ; Wage rate</subject><ispartof>Industrial &amp; labor relations review, 1958-01, Vol.11 (2), p.262-271</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1958 Cornell University</rights><rights>1958 Cornell University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2877-4cb3b2dc5f5a63849dec569815b6ff2ba4ef556dc65e3453a7c2472e1f3995663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2519813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2519813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3994,4010,27842,27846,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/ilrarticl/v_3a11_3ay_3a1958_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a262-271.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ross, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Well-Aged Arbitration Case</title><title>Industrial &amp; labor relations review</title><description>The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past decade the time span between the first and last steps of the arbitration process has tended to lengthen significantly. The author explores the reasons for this development and its implications for grievance handling. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)</description><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Arbitration law</subject><subject>Arbitration, Industrial</subject><subject>Arithmetic mean</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Employee benefits</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Labor grievances</subject><subject>Labor management relations</subject><subject>Legal briefs</subject><subject>Wage rate</subject><issn>0019-7939</issn><issn>2162-271X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1958</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKd_wAsZKN7V5U2ar8sx_GTgzUTvQpqmW0e31qQT9u9NrchQMPDmzcVzTg4HoXPANwBCjDEGJRRVTGIAjAkWB2hAgJOECHg7RIMOSDriGJ2EsMLxpAIG6GK-dKNXV1XJZOHy0cRnZetNW9ab0dQEd4qOClMFd_a9h-jl7nY-fUhmz_eP08kssUQKkaQ2oxnJLSuY4VSmKneWcSWBZbwoSGZSVzDGc8uZoymjRliSCuKgoEoxzukQXfe-ja_fty60el0GG2OZjau3QTOppMRURfDyF7iqt34Ts2kgiqeSqy-K9JT1dQjeFbrx5dr4nQasu8L038Ki6KkXedc4-6MoK298W9pKf2hqAOK16x5RGlcZh8Rpus2JjnXrZbuOZuPeLJiF28v43_dXvWIV2trvByYUC00YxD4p_QS8hovp</recordid><startdate>19580101</startdate><enddate>19580101</enddate><creator>Ross, Arthur M.</creator><general>New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School</general><general>Cornell University, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>7TP</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19580101</creationdate><title>The Well-Aged Arbitration Case</title><author>Ross, Arthur M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2877-4cb3b2dc5f5a63849dec569815b6ff2ba4ef556dc65e3453a7c2472e1f3995663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1958</creationdate><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Arbitration law</topic><topic>Arbitration, Industrial</topic><topic>Arithmetic mean</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Employee benefits</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Labor grievances</topic><topic>Labor management relations</topic><topic>Legal briefs</topic><topic>Wage rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ross, Arthur M.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><jtitle>Industrial &amp; labor relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ross, Arthur M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Well-Aged Arbitration Case</atitle><jtitle>Industrial &amp; labor relations review</jtitle><date>1958-01-01</date><risdate>1958</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>262-271</pages><issn>0019-7939</issn><eissn>2162-271X</eissn><abstract>The proponents of labor arbitration have always claimed as one of its chief merits that this process settles unresolved grievances more quickly than alternative methods such as court action. While this generalization still holds true, the evidence presented in this article reveals that over the past decade the time span between the first and last steps of the arbitration process has tended to lengthen significantly. The author explores the reasons for this development and its implications for grievance handling. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University</pub><doi>10.1177/001979395801100207</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-7939
ispartof Industrial & labor relations review, 1958-01, Vol.11 (2), p.262-271
issn 0019-7939
2162-271X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58988039
source Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Arbitration
Arbitration law
Arbitration, Industrial
Arithmetic mean
Attorneys
Employee benefits
Employment
Labor grievances
Labor management relations
Legal briefs
Wage rate
title The Well-Aged Arbitration Case
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A06%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Well-Aged%20Arbitration%20Case&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20labor%20relations%20review&rft.au=Ross,%20Arthur%20M.&rft.date=1958-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=262-271&rft.issn=0019-7939&rft.eissn=2162-271X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001979395801100207&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2519813%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296486939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2519813&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001979395801100207&rfr_iscdi=true